Proactive Detection (PROTECT) and Safety Planning to Shorten Emergency Department Stays for Psychiatric Patients.

OBJECTIVE: A literature gap exists for interventions to decrease average length of stay (ALOS) for patients with psychiatric presentations at the emergency department (ED). Long ALOSs are often related to sequential assessments of patients with high suicide risk or patients awaiting an inpatient bed. Safety planning may provide opportunities for diverting patients to the community and for reducing ED ALOS. This study reports on the impact of a safety-planning approach based on the PROTECT (proactive detection) framework for suicide prevention. METHODS: A complex intervention (comprising leadership, governance, and innovation) was instrumental in embedding a new clinical culture of proactive detection and positive risk management through safety planning at Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Practice as usual continued at a comparator nonintervention site (NIS). In total, 24,515 psychiatric presentations over 24 months were grouped into monthly averages for key outcomes, providing a sample size of 24 at each site. A difference-in-differences analysis across sites, preintervention (January-November 2019) and postimplementation (December 2019-December 2020), was used to estimate the intervention's impact. RESULTS: ED ALOS for psychiatric presentations, patients with an ALOS >12 hours, patients with an ALOS >24 hours, and inpatient psychiatric admissions decreased significantly compared with NIS (p<0.01) pre- and postimplementation of the safety-planning intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Embedding a recovery-oriented culture of safety significantly reduced ED ALOS for psychiatric evaluations. Leadership, governance, and innovative practices that shift the focus of assessment and care from a mindset of risk prediction to one of prevention through collaborative safety planning as outlined in the PROTECT framework may have far-reaching benefits for patient care.

The documentation of pain intensity and its influences on care in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Assessment and reassessment of self reported pain intensity scores form the basis of acute pain care in the emergency deprtment (ED), however are frequently undocumented. The effects of not documenting pain assessments on time to first analgesic medication (TTA) and ED length of stay (EDLOS) are unknown. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study to investigate the association between documented evidence of pain intensity scores, TTA and EDLOS in the ED. It also examined the factors associated with the documentation of pain intensity scores. Univariate and multivariable modelling was used on a random sample of presentations. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant associations between the documented evidence of pain intensity scores and TTA or EDLOS. Modelling suggests that patients were less likely to have documented evidence of pain intensity scores if they were male, were streamed to the fast-track treatment area, had a lower burden of co-morbidities, or when the general departmental workload was increased. CONCLUSIONS: The documentation of pain intensity scores was not associated with TTA or EDLOS. Some demographic, illness and workload factors are associated with the lack of pain intensity score documentation, however, the effect on patients outcomes needs further investigation.

Face, content, construct validity and training effect of touch surgery™ as a surgical decision-making trainer for novices in open appendicectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has become the gold standard for many operations with significant benefits in morbidity and hospital recovery time. One such procedure is appendicectomy, which is overwhelmingly performed using the laparoscopic approach in the modern era. This has also meant that the number of cases involving traditional open appendicectomy has declined despite surgeons being expected to be able to convert to the open technique if required. One method to rehearse for theatre is the use of software applications. This paper investigates the validity of Touch Surgery™ as an education tool for surgical decision-making for novices, as well as its training effect in open appendicectomy. METHOD: 70 participants will be recruited, consisting of 60 medical students (novices) and 10 surgical consultants (experts). For face, content, and construct validity, first attempt scores on the Touch Surgery™ Open Appendicectomy Test Module will be compared between novices and experts. For the training effect and knowledge decline elements of the study, novices will be further randomised into either the low intervention (control) group who will complete the simulation once, or to the high intervention group who will complete the simulation six times, with both novice groups asked to repeat the test one week later. All participants will also be requested to complete questionnaires regarding the stimulation.

The relationship between time to analgesic administration and emergency department length of stay: A retrospective review.

AIM: To determine the association between time to first analgesic medication and emergency department length of stay (ED LOS). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHOD: We conducted this study in a large, inner-city emergency department and included adult patients who presented with pain as a symptom and received analgesic medication(s). Study participants were identified from a random selection of 2,000 adult patients who presented between August-October 2018. The relationship between ED LOS and time to first analgesic medication was described using bivariate and multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Of the 2,000 randomly selected patients presenting between August and October 2018, 727 (36.35%) had pain as a symptom on arrival, 423 (21.15%) had analgesic medication administered. The median time to first analgesic medication was in 62 (interquartile range: 36-105) minutes and median ED LOS was 218 (interquartile range: 160-317.5) minutes. After adjusting for the effects of sex, urgency of the presentation, emergency department location first seen by clinician, departure destination and workload metrics (average daily time to be seen and daily access block). Time to first analgesic medication was independently associated with ED LOS, contributing to 6.96% of the variance in the multivariate model. CONCLUSION: Providing analgesic medication faster to patients presenting in pain, in addition to previously demonstrated positive patient outcomes, may decrease their ED LOS. IMPACT: Reducing ED LOS through faster pain care, benefits the patient through faster pain relief and can benefit the department by reducing the total amount of care delivered in the emergency department. Reducing total care delivery frees up resources to improve the care to all emergency department patients.