Clinical Outcomes of Elderly Patients with Non ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of the elderly patients with Non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) compared to non-elderly patients. Patients with NSTEMI and undergoing CABG (n=451) who were registered in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry between December 2003 and August 2012 were divided into two groups.; the non-elderly group (<75 years, n=327) and the elderly group (≥75 years, n=124). In-hospital mortality was higher in the elderly group (4.9% vs. 11.3%, p=0.015), but cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, percutaneous revascularization, and redo-CABG after a one-year follow up were not different between the two groups. Predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI undergoing CABG were left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤40%) [hazard ratio (HR): 2.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-6.57, p=0.022] and age (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.10, p=0.047). So elderly NSTEMI patients should be considered for CABG if appropriate, but careful consideration for surgery is required, especially if the patients have severe LV systolic dysfunction.

Effects of age on arterial stiffness and blood pressure variables in patients with newly diagnosed untreated hypertension.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of age on arterial stiffness and blood pressure (BP) variables in newly diagnosed untreated hypertension (HT). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 144 patients with newly diagnosed untreated HT were divided into two groups: young group (age ≤50 years, n=71), and old group (age >50 years, n=73). BP variables were measured on office or 24 hours ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Parameters of arterial stiffness were measured on pulse wave velocity (PWV). Pulse wave analysis (PWA) was compared. RESULTS: Although office BP and pulse pressure (PP) were significantly (p<0.05) higher in the young group than in the old group, BP and PP on ABPM were not significantly different. Central systolic BP and PP, augmentation pressure, augmentation index on PWA, and PWV were significantly higher or faster in the old group compared to that in the young group. Age showed significant positive correlation with both PWV and PWA variables in the young group with HT. However, age only showed significant positive correlation with PWV in the old group with HT. In the young group with HT, PWA variable showed better correlation with age than PWV. CONCLUSION: Considering BP levels on ABPM, office BP is prone to be overestimated in young patients with HT. Parameters of arterial stiffness measured by PWV and PWA were more affected by age rather than by BP level in patients with HT. Therefore, PWA variable might be a more sensitive marker of arterial stiffness in young patients with HT. However, PWV might be a better marker for old patients with HT.

Effect of myocardial protection of intracoronary adenosine and nicorandil injection in patients undergoing non-urgent percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated that adenosine and nicorandil protect the myocardium against angioplasty-related myocardial injury. We conducted a prospective study to investigate the myocardial protective effects of combination therapy with intracoronary adenosine and nicorandil. METHODS: We enrolled 213 consecutive patients with stable or unstable angina who were scheduled for non-urgent PCI for de-novo coronary lesions. Patients were randomized into group I (control saline, n=55), group II (adenosine 50 µg, n=54), group III (nicorandil 4 mg, n=54), or group IV (adenosine-nicorandil combination, n=50). Serial assessments of CK-MB were used to assess myocardial necrosis before and after PCI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of myocardial necrosis (elevation of CK-MB), and the secondary endpoints were the changes in serum CK-MB and cTnI levels and the incidence of post-procedural myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: No significant differences were observed among the four groups with regard to baseline or angiographic characteristics. No major adverse events related to adenosine and nicorandil were observed. There were no significant differences in the incidence of post-procedural myocardial necrosis among the four groups (10.9, 14.8, 14.8, and 14.0%, respectively, p=0.9). There were no significant differences in the incidence of post-procedural MI among groups (p=0.6). In multivariate regression analysis, multivessel stenting, median stent length, and the presence of a compromised side branch were independent predictors of myonecrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with intracoronary adenosine, nicorandil, or the combination of the two drugs did not reduce the incidences of myocardial necrosis or MI after non-urgent PCI in patients with low-risk angina pectoris.