Effects of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate exposure on 1,2-dimethyhydrazine-induced colon tumor promotion in rats.

Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) may cause carcinogenicity in the liver; however, few have detailed on the potential effects of DEHP exposure on colorectal cancer. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received i.p. injections of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH) once-a-week for the first 4 weeks, and rats in each group were treated with DEHP through oral gavage daily for either 7, 10 or 15 weeks; after which, all rats were euthanized and their colons were assessed (a) morphologically for aberrant crypt foci (ACF) or tumors, (b) cytologically for mitotic index (MI), and (c) immunohistochemically for the expression of ß-catenin, cyclooygenase (COX)-2, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), cyclin D1, and c-myc. Our results indicated that the mean total ACF, tumor incidence, and MI were significantly higher in the DEHP-treated DMH compared to control and the DEHP-alone groups. The level of ß-catenin and cyclin D1 was increased in DEHP-exposed rats. Expression of ß-catenin, COX-2, VEGF, and cyclin D1 was significantly higher in the combined DMH and DEHP-treated rats by comparison to that of the DMH group. In conclusion, this study indicates that exposure to DEHP may exacerbate DMH-induced colon tumorigenesis and provides impetus to evaluate the effect of DEHP in conjunction with other carcinogens.

SB203580 increases G-CSF production via a stem-loop destabilizing element in the 3' untranslated region in macrophages independently of its effect on p38 MAPK activity.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a major regulator of the production and survival of neutrophils. Regulation of G-CSF expression is complex and occurs at both transcription and post-transcription levels. Two distinct types of cis-acting elements in the 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) of G-CSF mRNA have been identified as destabilizing elements; these consist of adenylate uridylate-rich elements (AUREs) and a stem-loop destabilizing element (SLDE). Regulation of the stability of mRNA by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) has been indicated to be linked to AUREs in the 3'UTR. However, whether p38 MAPK is involved in the regulation of the stability of G-CSF mRNA has not been elucidated. This study investigated the effect of SB203580, an inhibitor of p38 MAPK, on the lipopolysaccharide-induced G-CSF expression in macrophages at the post-transcription level. RESULTS: Our study showed surprising results that SB203580 augmented the lipopolysaccharide-induced increase in the G-CSF mRNA levels in RAW264.7 mouse macrophages, mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages and in THP-1 human macrophages. This effect was also seen in p38α MAPK knockdown RAW264.7 cells, showing that it was not due to inhibition of p38 MAPK activity. In the presence of actinomycin D, the decay of G-CSF mRNA was slower in SB203580-treated cells than in control cells, showing that SB203580 increased the stability of G-CSF mRNA. Reporter genes containing luciferase with or without the 3'UTR of G-CSF were constructed and transfected into RAW264.7 cells and the results showed that the presence of the 3'UTR reduced the luciferase mRNA levels and luciferase activity. Furthermore, SB203580 increased the luciferase mRNA levels and activity in RAW264.7 cells transfected with the luciferase reporter containing the 3'UTR, but not in cells transfected with the luciferase reporter without the 3'UTR. Mutations of the highly conserved SLDE in the 3'UTR abolished these effects, showing that the SLDE was essential for the SB203580-induced increase in the stability of mRNA. CONCLUSIONS: SB203580 increases G-CSF expression in macrophages by increasing the stability of G-CSF mRNA via its 3'UTR, and the effect was not due to its inhibition of p38 MAPK activity. The results of this study also highlight a potential target for boosting endogenous production of G-CSF during neutropenia.

LPS-Induced G-CSF Expression in Macrophages Is Mediated by ERK2, but Not ERK1.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) selectively stimulates proliferation and differentiation of neutrophil progenitors which play important roles in host defense against infectious agents. However, persistent G-CSF production often leads to neutrophilia and excessive inflammatory reactions. There is therefore a need to understand the mechanism regulating G-CSF expression. In this study, we showed that U0126, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, decreases lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated G-CSF promoter activity, mRNA expression and protein secretion. Using short hairpin RNA knockdown, we demonstrated that ERK2, and not ERK1, involves in LPS-induced G-CSF expression, but not LPS-regulated expression of TNF-α. Reporter assays showed that ERK2 and C/EBPß synergistically activate G-CSF promoter activity. Further chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays revealed that U0126 inhibits LPS-induced binding of NF-κB (p50/p65) and C/EBPß to the G-CSF promoter, but not their nuclear protein levels. Knockdown of ERK2 inhibits LPS-induced accessibility of the G-CSF promoter region to DNase I, suggesting that chromatin remodeling may occur. These findings clarify that ERK2, rather than ERK1, mediates LPS-induced G-CSF expression in macrophages by remodeling chromatin, and stimulates C/EBPß-dependent activation of the G-CSF promoter. This study provides a potential target for regulating G-CSF expression.

Inhibition by rapamycin of the lipoteichoic acid-induced granulocyte-colony stimulating factor expression in mouse macrophages.

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a cytokine which involves in anti-inflammation and inflammation as well. Rapamycin is an inhibitor of mTOR which also plays a role in innate immunity. This study investigated the effect of rapamycin on the lipoteichoic acid (LTA)-induced expression of G-CSF in macrophages and its underlying mechanism. Our data show that LTA induced G-CSF expression in RAW264.7 and bone marrow-derived macrophages and that this effect was inhibited by rapamycin. Analysis of the G-CSF 5' flanking sequence revealed that the -283 to +35 fragment, which contains CSF and octamer elements, was required for maximal promoter activity in response to LTA stimulation. Western blot analyses of proteins that bind to the CSF and octamer element show that LTA increased protein levels of NF-κB, C/EBPß and Oct-2, and that rapamycin inhibited the LTA-induced increase in Oct-2 protein levels, but not the others. Knockdown of Oct-2 by RNA interference resulted in a decrease in LTA-induced G-CSF mRNA levels. Moreover, forced expression of Oct-2 by transfection with the pCG-Oct-2 plasmid overcame the inhibitory effect of rapamycin on the LTA-induced increase in G-CSF mRNA levels and promoter activity. This study demonstrates that rapamycin reduces G-CSF expression in LTA-treated macrophages by inhibiting Oct-2 expression.

Rapamycin inhibits lipopolysaccharide induction of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in macrophages by reducing the levels of octamer-binding factor-2.

This article reports an inhibitory effect of rapamycin on the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced expression of both inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in macrophages and its underlying mechanism. The study arose from an observation that rapamycin inhibited the LPS-induced increase in octamer-binding factor-2 (Oct-2) protein levels through a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent pathway in mouse RAW264.7 macrophages. As both iNOS and G-CSF are potential Oct-2 target genes, we tested the effect of rapamycin on their expression and found that it reduced the LPS-induced increase in iNOS and G-CSF mRNA levels and iNOS and G-CSF protein levels. Blocking of mTOR-signaling using a dominant-negative mTOR expression plasmid resulted in inhibition of the LPS-induced increase in iNOS and G-CSF protein levels, supporting the essential role of mTOR. Forced expression of Oct-2 using the pCG-Oct-2 plasmid overcame the inhibitory effect of rapamycin on the LPS-induced increase in iNOS and G-CSF mRNA levels. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that LPS enhanced the binding of Oct-2 to the iNOS and G-CSF promoters and that this effect was inhibited by pretreatment with rapamycin. Moreover, RNA interference knockdown of Oct-2 reduced iNOS and G-CSF expression in LPS-treated cells. The inhibitory effect of rapamycin on the LPS-induced increase in Oct-2 protein levels and on the iNOS and G-CSF mRNA levels was also detected in human THP-1 monocyte-derived macrophages. This study demonstrates that rapamycin reduces iNOS and G-CSF expression at the transcription level in LPS-treated macrophages by inhibiting Oct-2 expression.

A novel role for Oct-2 in the lipopolysaccharide-mediated induction of resistin gene expression in RAW264.7 cells.

Although resistin was first suggested as a possible link between obesity and diabetes, we have demonstrated previously that expression of resistin is induced by LPS (lipopolysaccharide). In the present study, we showed that LPS increased levels of resistin mRNA and promoter activity in murine RAW264.7 macrophages. Investigation of cis-regulatory elements in the mouse resistin promoter required for LPS-mediated induction showed that an Octamer (ATTTGCAT) element, located at -914 to -907, was required for maximal promoter activity in response to LPS stimulation. Co-transfection of RAW264.7 cells with a resistin promoter-luciferase construct and an Oct-1 or Oct-2 expression plasmid (pCG-Oct-1 or pCG-Oct-2) showed that Oct-2, but not Oct-1, activated the resistin promoter upon LPS treatment. Binding of Oct-2 to the Octamer element was demonstrated by supershift DNA-affinity precipitation and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot results showed that levels of Oct-2 mRNA and protein were both up-regulated by LPS in RAW264.7 cells. The LPS-induced increase in Oct-2 protein was inhibited by LY294002 (a phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor) post-transcriptionally, and the inhibition also resulted in a lower response of both resistin mRNA and promoter activity to LPS treatment. Moreover, specific knockdown of Oct-2 by RNA interference impaired the LPS-induced increase in resistin mRNA and promoter activity. Together, these results indicate that Oct-2 is involved in the LPS-mediated induction of resistin gene expression in macrophages and suggest that activation of Oct-2 is a part of LPS signalling pathways in macrophages.