Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 40
1.
Transl Lung Cancer Res ; 13(1): 46-59, 2024 Jan 31.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38404998

Background: Although various studies have demonstrated that the clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improves the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), studies on the financial aspects based on large population-based data are needed. This study aimed to analyze the differences in medical expenses and the effect of ICIs on the prognosis of patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Patients newly diagnosed with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who received palliative chemotherapy between 2013 and 2020 were selected from the nationwide database of the population covered by the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Interrupted time-series analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of subsequent ICI use after platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy (CC) on overall mortality. Progression-free survival and medical expenditure were also assessed. Results: In the final study population, 2,485 and 4,812 patients were included in the ICI and non-ICI groups, respectively. ICI treatment significantly lowered the risk of death [adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.84]. And the ICI-treated patients were less likely to experience disease progression (adjusted odds ratios, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.85-0.99). Furthermore, after the introduction of ICIs, both total and cancer-related medical expenses per capita showed an increasing trend [ß: $4.56K, standard error (SE): $0.27K, P<0.0001 and ß: $4.54K, SE: $0.27K, P<0.0001, respectively]. Conclusions: Subsequent ICI use after platinum-based CC improved the overall survival rate of patients with advanced NSCLC. With the increasing burden of individual medical expenses, further research is required to identify patients for whom ICI treatment may be effective.

2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 838, 2024 01 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191642

The long-term outcome of first-line moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy for secondary prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy remains elusive. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe combination therapy with high-intensity statin monotherapy. We conducted a nationwide, population-based, retrospective, cohort study of patients with ACS from 2013 to 2019. The patients using combination therapy were matched (1:1) to those using monotherapy. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke and all-cause mortality. We estimated the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Cox proportional hazards regression. After propensity score matching, 10,723 pairs were selected. Men accounted for 70% of the patients and 37% aged > 70 years. The primary endpoint occurred in 1297 patients (12.1%) in the combination group and in 1426 patients (13.3%) in the monotherapy group, and decreased risk (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.92, P < 0.001) in the combination group. Among the patients with ACS, moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy was associated with decreased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy in a nationwide population-based study representing routine clinical practice.


Acute Coronary Syndrome , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Male , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Ezetimibe/therapeutic use
3.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 39(1): 74-80, 2024 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37855299

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Colorectal cancer (CRC) was the fourth most common cancer in Republic of Korea in 2019. It has a gradually increasing mortality rate, indicating the importance of screening for CRC. Among the various CRC screening test, fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a simple yet most commonly used. Neverthelss, there have been only few long-term studies on subjects with FIT-positive. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the risk factors for CRC in FIT-positive patients using the National Health Insurance Service Bigdata database. METHODS: Among 1 737 633 individuals with a FIT screening result for CRC in 2009, 101 143 (5.82%) were confirmed to be FIT positive. The CRC incidence over 10 years (up to 2018) of these participants was investigated using the National Cancer Registry. RESULTS: Out of the 101 143 FIT-positive participants, 4395 (4.35%) were diagnosed with CRC. The FIT-positive patients who underwent a second round of screening showed a 5-year cumulative CRC incidence of approximately 1.25%, whereas those who did not showed an incidence of approximately 3.75%. Among the FIT-positive patients, the CRC incidence in the non-compliance group for the second round of screening was 2.8 times higher than that in the compliance group. CONCLUSIONS: In FIT-positive participants, non-compliance with the second round of screening was identified as a major risk factor for CRC development. It is necessary to establish appropriate strategies for managing risk factors for CRC in FIT-positive patients to increase the rate of compliance with the second round of CRC screening.


Colorectal Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Factors , National Health Programs , Mass Screening , Feces , Occult Blood
4.
BMC Geriatr ; 23(1): 840, 2023 12 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38087197

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify and select age-related diseases (ARDs) in Korea, which is about to have a super-aged society, and to elucidate patterns in their incidence rates. METHODS: The National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort, comprising 1 million health insurance and medical benefit beneficiaries in Korea from 2002 to 2019, was utilized. We selected 14 diseases with high disease burden and prevalence among Koreans from the 92 diseases defined in the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study as ARDs. The annual incidence rate represented the number of patients newly diagnosed with an ARD each year from 2006 to 2019, excluding those with a history of ARD diagnosis from 2002 to 2005. The incidence rate by age was categorized into 10-year units based on age as of 2019. The number of patients with ARDs in each age group was used as the numerator, and the incidence rate for each age group was calculated with the age group as the denominator. RESULTS: Regarding the annual incidence rates of ARDs from 2006 to 2019, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and ischemic heart disease decreased annually, whereas dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, cataracts, hearing loss, and Parkinson's disease showed a significant increase. Hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and age-related macular degeneration initially displayed a gradual decrease in incidence but exhibited a tendency to increase after 2015. Concerning age-specific incidence rates of ARDs, two types of curves emerged. The first type, characterized by an exponential increase with age, was exemplified by congestive heart failure. The second type, marked by an exponential increase peaking between ages 60 and 80, followed by stability or decrease, was observed in 13 ARDs, excluding congestive heart failure. However, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hearing loss in men belonged to the first type. CONCLUSIONS: From an epidemiological perspective, there are similar characteristics in age-specific ARDs that increase with age, reaching a peak followed by a plateau or decrease in Koreans.


Cerebrovascular Disorders , Hearing Loss , Heart Failure , Hypertension , Myocardial Ischemia , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Male , Humans , Aged , Incidence , Aging , Cerebrovascular Disorders/diagnosis , Cerebrovascular Disorders/epidemiology , National Health Programs , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
5.
Lung Cancer ; 186: 107412, 2023 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37856923

BACKGROUND: South Korea introduced the National Lung Cancer Screening Program (NLCSP) in 2019. This study investigated the effect of the NLCSP on one-year mortality in individuals with a history of lung cancer. METHODS: This study used the 2018-2020 National Health Insurance Service claims data. The difference-in-differences approach was used to investigate the effect of participating in the NLCSP between the case and control groups before and after the intervention period. The case group included individuals aged between 54 and 74 years with a smoking history of ≥ 30 pack-years and the control group those aged between 54 and 74 years with a history of smoking of <30 pack-years and non-smokers. The pre-intervention period was from January 2018 to June 2019 and the post-intervention period from July 2019 to December 2020. RESULTS: The introduction of the NLCSP was related to an overall decrease in one-year mortality (-3.21 % points, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) -4.84 to -1.58). Specifically, this reduction was significant for lung cancer related mortality (lung cancer: -2.69 % points, 95 % CI -4.24 to -1.13). Furthermore, stronger associations were found in individuals of older age, residing in non-metropolitan areas, and who visited healthcare institutions in non-metropolitan areas. CONCLUSION: The findings confirm a relationship between implementation of the NLCSP and one-year mortality in eligible individuals with a history of lung cancer, which is noteworthy considering that Korea is one of the first countries to include lung cancer into the national cancer screening program.


Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer , Lung , Smoking , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Mass Screening
6.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 35(2)2023 May 18.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37098223

The National Cancer Screening Program of South Korea for cervical cancer was expanded from women aged ≥30 years to women aged ≥20 years in 2016. This study investigated the effect of this policy on occurrence rates of cervical dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, and cervical cancer in women in their twenties. The National Health Information Database for the years 2012-19 was used. The outcome measures were monthly occurrence rates of cervical dysplasia, cervical carcinoma in situ, and cervical cancer. An interrupted time series analysis was performed to investigate whether the number of occurrences changed after policy implementation. For cervical dysplasia, a pre-intervention decreasing trend of 0.3243 per month (P-value < .0001) was found. The post-intervention trend did not differ significantly, although the slope increased at a rate of 0.4622 per month (P-value < .0001). For carcinoma in situ, a trend of increase at 0.0128 per month (P-value = .0099) was seen before policy implementation. The post-intervention trend did not escalate, but the slope showed an increasing trend of 0.0217 per month (P-value < .0001). For cervical cancer, no significant trend was present before intervention. Occurrences of cervical cancer escalated at a rate of 0.0406 per month (P-value < .0001) after policy implementation, and the slope also showed an increasing trend at a rate of 0.0394 per month (P-value < .0001). Expanding the target population for cervical cancer screening increased detection rates for cervical cancer in women aged between 20 and 29 years.


Carcinoma in Situ , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnosis , Carcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Mass Screening
7.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 5131, 2023 03 29.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36991140

This study aimed to examine the association between familial aggregation of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and risk of CKD development and its progression. This nationwide family study comprised 881,453 cases with newly diagnosed CKD between 2004 and 2017 and 881,453 controls without CKD matched by age and sex, using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service with linkage to the family tree database. The risks of CKD development and disease progression, defined as an incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD), were evaluated. The presence of any affected family member with CKD was associated with a significantly higher risk of CKD with adjusted ORs (95% CI) of 1.42 (1.38-1.45), 1.50 (1.46-1.55), 1.70 (1.64-1.77), and 1.30 (1.27-1.33) for individuals with affected parents, offspring, siblings, and spouses, respectively. In Cox models conducted on patients with predialysis CKD, risk of incident ESRD was significantly higher in those with affected family members with ESRD. The corresponding HRs (95% CI) were 1.10 (1.05-1.15), 1.38 (1.32-1.46), 1.57 (1.49-1.65), and 1.14 (1.08-1.19) for individuals listed above, respectively. Familial aggregation of CKD was strongly associated with a higher risk of CKD development and disease progression to ESRD.


Kidney Failure, Chronic , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Incidence , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/genetics , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/genetics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Disease Progression , Risk Factors
8.
Gynecol Oncol ; 170: 19-24, 2023 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36608383

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) for stage III-IV ovarian cancer from a randomized controlled phase III trial. METHODS: A comparative cost-effective analysis was performed using a Markov health-state transition model derived from the current trial cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01091636). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated by dividing the incremental costs by incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with a time horizon of 10 years. Costs were calculated from the perspective of Korean healthcare, and health utility values were extracted from published sources. RESULTS: Based on data from the trial, the mean QALY in the ICS group was 7.16 compared to 10.8 in ICS followed by the HIPEC group. With an incremental QALY of 3.64, the ICS followed by HIPEC, was estimated to obtain an ICER of KRW 954,598 (USD 708.3) per QALY. CONCLUSION: The findings of the study suggest that ICS followed by HIPEC, is cost-effective with a significant gain in QALYs. These results may support the current reimbursement of HIPEC from Korean insurance services and the management of long-term conditions.


Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Republic of Korea
9.
J Korean Med Sci ; 37(32): e248, 2022 Aug 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35971762

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported an association between pneumonia risk and the use of certain drugs. We investigated the relationship between antihypertensive drugs and pneumonia in the general population. METHODS: This case-crossover study utilized the nationwide data of South Korea. We included participants who were hospitalized for pneumonia. A single case period was defined as 30 days before pneumonia onset, and two control periods were established (90-120 and 150-180 days before pneumonia onset). Further, we performed sensitivity and subgroup analyses (according to the presence of diabetes, documented disability, and whether participants were aged ≥ 70 years). We used conditional logistic regression models adjusted for covariates, such as angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), other antihypertensives, statins, antipsychotics, benzodiazepine, and the number of outpatient visits. RESULTS: In total, 15,463 subjects were included in this study. ACE inhibitors (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.660; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.558-0.781), ARBs (aOR, 0.702; 95% CI, 0.640-0.770), and other antihypertensive drugs (aOR, 0.737; 95% CI, 0.665-0.816) were significantly associated with reduced pneumonia risk. Subgroup analyses according to the presence of diabetes mellitus, documented disability, and whether participants were aged ≥ 70 years consistently showed the association of antihypertensives with a reduced risk of hospitalization for pneumonia. CONCLUSION: All antihypertensive drug types were related to a lower risk of hospitalization for pneumonia in the general population. Our results implied that frequent medical service usage and protective immunity were primarily related to a reduced risk of pneumonia in the general population of South Korea.


Antihypertensive Agents , Hospitalization , Hypertension , Pneumonia , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , National Health Programs , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
10.
J Korean Med Sci ; 37(31): e243, 2022 Aug 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35942556

BACKGROUND: A chronic disease management program was implemented in April 2012 to lower out-of-pocket costs for repeat visits to the same clinic. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between participating in this program and the onset of complications among patients with hypertension using whole-nation claims data. METHODS: We used National Health Insurance Service data (2011-2018) and patients with newly detected hypertension from 2012 to 2014 were selected. Chronic disease management program reduces the out-of-pocket expenses of consultation fee from 30% to 20% when patients enroll in this program by agreeing to visit the same clinic for the treatment of hypertension or diabetes. As the dependent variable, acute myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and heart failure (HF) were selected. For analysis, cox proportional hazards model was used. RESULTS: Total participants were 827,577, among which 102,831(12.6%) subjects participated in the chronic disease management. Participants of the chronic disease management program were more likely to show lower hazard ratios (HRs) than those of non-participants in terms of all complications (MI: HR, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.82; stroke: HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.72-0.78; CKD: HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96; HF: HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.52-0.61). CONCLUSION: The results showed that participants of the chronic disease management program were less likely to have hypertension complications compared to non-participants. Enhancing the participation rate may be related to better outcomes and reducing medical expenses among patients with chronic diseases.


Heart Failure , Hypertension , Myocardial Infarction , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Stroke , Disease Management , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Proportional Hazards Models , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Risk Factors
11.
J Korean Med Sci ; 37(19): e153, 2022 May 16.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35578585

BACKGROUND: F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-18 FDG PET), which can cover the body from the skull base to the thigh in one scan, is beneficial for evaluating distant metastasis. F-18 FDG PET has interested policymakers because of its relatively high cost. This study investigated the effect of the F-18 FDG PET reimbursement criteria amendment on healthcare behavior in breast cancer using an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the inpatient and outpatient data from Korea's Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2018. ITS analysis was performed for the number of each medical imaging modality and the total medical imaging cost of the breast cancer patients. RESULTS: The annual number of breast cancer patients has been increasing steadily since 2013. The trend of F-18 FDG PET increased before the reimbursement criteria was amended, but intensely decreased immediately thereafter. The chest and abdomen computed tomography scans showed a statistically significant increase immediately after the amendment and kept steadily increasing. A change in the total medical imaging cost for the breast cancer patient claimed every month showed an increasing trend before the amendment (ß = 5,475, standard error [SE] = 1,992, P = 0.008) and rapid change immediately after (ß = -103,317, SE = 16,152, P < 0.001). However, there was no significant change in the total medical imaging cost at the long-term follow-up (ß = -912, SE = 1,981, P = 0.647). CONCLUSION: Restriction of health insurance coverage for cancer may affect healthcare behaviors. To compensate for it, the policymakers must consider this and anticipate the impact following implementation.


Breast Neoplasms , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Humans , Insurance Coverage , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Positron-Emission Tomography , Radiopharmaceuticals , Republic of Korea , Retrospective Studies
12.
J Korean Med Sci ; 37(15): e112, 2022 Apr 18.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35437963

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the association between antihypertensive use and the incidence of hospitalized pneumonia in patients with a history of stroke. METHODS: In this case-crossover study, we obtained data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database. We included the data of patients with history of stroke who were admitted with a disease code of pneumonia. We analyzed the patients' exposure to antihypertensives in the 30 (single case period), 90-120, and 150-180 days (2 control periods) before the onset of pneumonia using conditional logistic regression analysis. Additionally, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis according to diabetes status, age, and documented disability were performed. RESULTS: Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) use was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalized pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval; 95% CI]: 0.718 [0.576-0.894]). However, the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and other antihypertensives were not associated with a change in hospitalized pneumonia incidence (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.902, [0.603-1.350] and 0.788 [0609-1.018], respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed that ARB use was associated with a reduced incidence of hospitalized pneumonia in patients with a history of stroke who were older than 65 years, but not in younger (≤ 65 years) group (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.687 [0.536-0.880]). CONCLUSION: ARB use is associated with a reduced incidence of hospitalized pneumonia in patients with a history of stroke, especially in older adults.


Hypertension , Pneumonia , Stroke , Aged , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Pneumonia/complications , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/complications , Stroke/epidemiology
13.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(8): e28917, 2022 Feb 25.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35212298

ABSTRACT: We aimed to examine trends and characteristics of substance use (opioid, cocaine, marijuana, and heroin) among hospitalized homeless patients in comparison with other hospitalized patients in 3 states.This was a cross-sectional study, based on the 2007 to 2015 State Inpatient Data of Arizona, Florida, and Washington (n = 32,162,939). Use of opioid, cocaine, marijuana, heroin, respectively, was identified by the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision. Multi-level multivariable regressions were performed to estimate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Dependent variables were the use of substances (opioid, cocaine, marijuana, and heroin), respectively. The main independent variable was homeless status. The subgroup analysis by age group was also conducted.Homeless patients were associated with more use of opioid (RR [CI]), 1.23 [1.20-1.26], cocaine 2.55 [2.50-2.60], marijuana 1.43 [1.40-1.46], and heroin 1.57 [1.29-1.91] compared to other hospitalized patients. All hospitalized patients including those who were homeless increased substance use except the use of cocaine (RR [CI]), 0.57 [0.55-0.58] for other patients and 0.60 [0.50-0.74] for homeless patients. In all age subgroups, homeless patients 60 years old or older were more likely to be hospitalized with all 4 types of substance use, especially, cocaine (RR [CI]), 6.33 [5.81-6.90] and heroin 5.86 [2.08-16.52] in comparison with other hospitalized patients.Homeless status is associated with high risks of substance use among hospitalized patients. Homeless elderly are particularly vulnerable to use of hard drugs including cocaine and heroin during the opioid epidemics.


Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Ill-Housed Persons/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Arizona/epidemiology , Cannabis , Cocaine , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Heroin , Ill-Housed Persons/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
14.
J Affect Disord ; 290: 164-168, 2021 07 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34000569

BACKGROUND: Suicide and violence exposure are important health related issues in adolescents. This study aimed to investigate suicide attempt and violence victimization in Korean adolescents with migrant parents. METHODS: Data from the 2016 to 2018 Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey (KYRBS) were used. The migration status of the participating students' parents was defined based on parental birthplace, classified into the 'both native Korean parents,' 'mother born abroad,' 'father born abroad,' and 'both parents born abroad' groups. Suicide attempt and violence victimization included events that occurred in the past 12 months. The general characteristics of the population were investigated using chi-square test. The association between dependent and independent variables was examined using multiple logistic regression analysis, expressed as Odds Ratio (OR) and their 95 percent confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: Of the 170,575 study participants, 4,012 (2.4%) attempted suicide and 3,038 (1.8%) experienced violence victimization. Highest proportions of suicide attempt and violence victimization were found in adolescents with both migrated parents born abroad. Compared to adolescents with both native Korean parents, individuals with both migrated parents were more likely to attempt suicide (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.37-3.81) and experience violence victimization (OR 5.63, 95% CI 3.73-8.48). LIMITATIONS: This study was cross-sectional in design. Information was unavailable on which immigrant generation the study participants belonged to. CONCLUSION: Adolescents with both migrated parents were more likely to attempt suicide and experience violence victimization. The findings have important implications in the management of suicide and violence victimization in adolescents.


Crime Victims , Transients and Migrants , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Parents , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Suicide, Attempted , Violence
15.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 33(2)2021 Apr 30.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33856029

BACKGROUND: The Chronic Disease Management Program (CDMP) of Korea has been introduced to improve care continuity in patients with hypertension and diabetes. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of the CDMP in patients with hypertension from the perspective of the healthcare payer. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed based on a Markov simulation model. The cost and effect of the CDMP versus usual care was compared in individuals aged 40 years or above. The two strategies were presumed to result in a difference in the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, and chronic kidney disease. The model was analyzed over the lifetime of the cohort. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated by dividing the difference in lifetime costs by the difference in lifetime effects (quality adjusted life years, QALYs) between the two strategies. Costs were expressed in Korean Won (KRW). RESULTS: The ICER value of the CDMP participation strategy was -5 761 088 KRW/QALY compared to usual care. Similar tendencies were found when limiting the population to only clinic users (-3 843 355 KRW/QALY) and national health examination participants (-5 595 185 KRW/QALY). CONCLUSION: The CDMP was highly cost-effective in patients with hypertension aged 40 years or above. Implementing efficient policies that enhance care coordination and improve outcomes in patients with hypertension is important.


Hypertension , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disease Management , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/therapy , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
16.
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) ; 35(4): 901-908, 2020 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33297603

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive patients with type 2 diabetes compared to those without diabetes in Korea. METHODS: We extracted claims data for patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from the National Health Insurance Service database in Korea from January 20, 2020 to March 31, 2020. We followed up this cohort until death from COVID-19 or discharge from hospital. RESULTS: A total of 5,473 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were analyzed, including 495 with type 2 diabetes and 4,978 without diabetes. Patients with type 2 diabetes were more likely to be treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) (P<0.0001). The incidence of inhospital mortality was higher in patients with type 2 diabetes (P<0.0001). After adjustment for age, sex, insurance status, and comorbidities, odds of ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 2.49; P=0.0416) and in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.21; P=0.0161) among patients with COVID-19 infection were significantly higher in those with type 2 diabetes. However, there was no significant difference between patients with and without type 2 diabetes in ventilator, oxygen therapy, antibiotics, antiviral drugs, antipyretics, and the incidence of pneumonia after adjustment. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 positive patients with type 2 diabetes had poorer clinical outcomes with higher risk of ICU admission and in-hospital mortality than those without diabetes. Therefore, medical providers need to consider this more serious clinical course when planning and delivering care to type 2 diabetes patients with COVID-19 infection.


COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Incidence , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prognosis , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Young Adult
17.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(22): e20033, 2020 May 29.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32481373

Though overall death from opioid overdose are increasing in the United States, the death rate in some states and population groups is stabilizing or even decreasing. Several states have enacted a Naloxone Accessibility Laws to increase naloxone availability as an opioid antidote. The extent to which these laws permit layperson distribution and possession varies. The aim of this study is to investigate differences in provisions of Naloxone Accessibility Laws by states mainly in the Northeast and West regions, and the impact of naloxone availability on the rates of drug overdose deaths.This cross-sectional study was based on the National Vital Statistics System multiple cause-of-death mortality files. The average changes in drug overdose death rates between 2013 and 2017 in relevant states of the Northeast and West regions were compared according to availability of naloxone to laypersons.Seven states in the Northeast region and 10 states in the Western region allowed layperson distribution of naloxone. Layperson possession of naloxone was allowed in 3 states each in the Northeast and the Western regions. The average drug overdose death rates increased in many states in the both regions regardless of legalization of layperson naloxone distribution. The average death rates of 3 states that legalized layperson possession in the West region decreased (-0.33 per 100,000 person); however, in states in the West region that did not allow layperson possession and states in the Northeast region regardless of layperson possession increased between 2013 and 2017.The provision to legalize layperson possession of naloxone was associated with decreased average opioid overdose death rates in 3 states of the West region.


Analgesics, Opioid/poisoning , Drug Overdose/mortality , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Naloxone/supply & distribution , Narcotic Antagonists/supply & distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Overdose/drug therapy , Health Services Accessibility/trends , Humans , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , State Government , United States
18.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(25): e20723, 2020 Jun 19.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32569209

This study aimed to analyze the trends of opioid use disorders, cannabis use disorders, and palliative care among hospitalized patients with gastrointestinal cancer and to identify their associated factors.We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample data from 2005 to 2014 and included hospitalized patients with gastrointestinal cancers. The trends of hospital palliative care and opioid or cannabis use disorders were analyzed using the compound annual growth rates (CAGR) with Rao-Scott correction for χ tests. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the associated factors.From 2005 to 2014, among 4,364,416 hospitalizations of patients with gastrointestinal cancer, the average annual rates of opioid and cannabis use disorders were 0.4% (n = 19,520), and 0.3% (n = 13,009), respectively. The utilization rate of hospital palliative care was 6.2% (n = 268,742). They all sharply increased for 10 years (CAGR = 9.61%, 22.2%, and 21.51%, respectively). The patients with a cannabis use disorder were over 4 times more likely to have an opioid use disorder (Odds ratios, OR = 4.029; P < .001). Hospital palliative care was associated with higher opioid use disorder rates, higher in-hospital mortality, shorter length of hospital stay, and lower hospital charges. (OR = 1.527, 9.980, B = -0.054 and -0.386; each of P < .001)The temporal trends of opioid use disorders and hospital palliative care use among patients with gastrointestinal cancer increased from 2005 to 2014, which is mostly attributed to patients with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality. Cannabis use disorders were associated with opioid use disorders. Palliative care was associated with both reduced lengths of stay and hospital charge.


Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hospitalization/trends , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Palliative Care/trends , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospital Charges/trends , Humans , Length of Stay/trends , Male , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology
19.
Diabetes Metab J ; 44(6): 897-907, 2020 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33389959

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the infection risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with diabetes (according to treatment method). METHODS: Claimed subjects to the Korean National Health Insurance claims database diagnosed with COVID-19 were included. Ten thousand sixty-nine patients with COVID-19 between January 28 and April 5, 2020, were included. Stratified random sampling of 1:5 was used to select the control group of COVID-19 patients. In total 50,587 subjects were selected as the control group. After deleting the missing values, 60,656 subjects were included. RESULTS: Adjusted odds ratio (OR) indicated that diabetic insulin users had a higher risk of COVID-19 than subjects without diabetes (OR, 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.53; P=0.0278). In the subgroup analysis, infection risk was higher among diabetes male insulin users (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.89), those between 40 and 59 years (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.44). The infection risk was higher in diabetic insulin users with 2 to 4 years of morbidity (OR, 1.744; 95% CI, 1.003 to 3.044). CONCLUSION: Some diabetic patients with certain conditions would be associated with a higher risk of acquiring COVID-19, highlighting their need for special attention. Efforts are warranted to ensure that diabetic patients have minimal exposure to the virus. It is important to establish proactive care and screening tests for diabetic patients suspected with COVID-19 for timely disease diagnosis and management.


COVID-19/economics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Social Class , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/diagnosis , Databases, Factual/trends , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , National Health Programs/trends , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Young Adult
20.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 45(2): 124-133, 2020 Jan 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31851144

STUDY DESIGN: Serial cross-sectional study utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2005 to 2014. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the trends of opioid-use disorders among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment and to identify its contributing factors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The opioid is widely used in chronic spinal conditions, and misuse of prescriptions is the main culprit of the opioid crisis. Cannabis, the most commonly utilized illicit drug, has recently been substituted for opioid despite increasing cannabis-use emergency room visits. There is limited information on opioid-use disorders, the association with cannabis, and other contributing factors. METHODS: We analyzed the 2005 to 2014 NIS data that identified opioid-use disorders among hospitalized patients with cervical and lumbar spinal conditions and treatment using the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification codes for opioid abuse, dependence, poisoning, and cervical and lumbar spinal diseases and procedures. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was used to quantify trends of opioid-use disorders among hospitalized patients. Multilevel and multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine their contributing factors. RESULTS: The number of hospitalizations with spinal conditions and treatment increased from 2005 to 2011, then decreased between 2011 and 2014 with an overall decrease in length of stay, resulting in the CAGR of -1.60% (P < .001). Almost 3% (2.93%, n = 557,423) of hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment were diagnosed as opioid-use disorders and its CAGR was 6.47% (P < .0001). Opioid-use disorders were associated with cannabis-use disorders (odds ratio 1.714), substance use, mental health condition, younger age, white race, male sex, higher household income, and public insurance or uninsured. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that opioid-use disorders are increasing among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment and associated with several demographic, and socioeconomic factors, including cannabis-use disorders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Spinal Diseases/therapy , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cervical Vertebrae , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Female , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Income , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Lumbar Vertebrae , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data
...