Modification of deglycerolization procedure improves processing and post-thaw quality of cryopreserved sickle trait red cell concentrates.

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a critical therapy for those with sickle cell disease (SCD). Alloimmunization is frequent for those with SCD and may limit the availability of matched RBC. Cryopreserved RBCs, from family members or donors with a similar RBC antigen profile could provide a viable alternative to avoid further alloimmunization and prevent hemolytic transfusion-related events. However, cryopreserved SCD and Sickle Cell trait (S-trait) donor RBC units suffer from reduced recovery following deglycerolization. This study proposes and tests a modified deglycerolization protocol using an automated cell processor to mitigate RBC loss. Six red cell concentrates (RCC) from donors with S-trait and six control RCCs were glycerolized, frozen (<-65 °C) and deglycerolized on the ACP 215 using modified parameters (decreased hypertonic solution flow rate (100 mL/min) and hypertonic equilibration delay (120 s), and increased NaCl dilution volumes (500 mL). Quality testing included: hematocrit (HCT), hemolysis, indices, extracellular potassium, morphology, osmotic fragility, osmotic gradient ektacytometry, hemoglobin (HGB), and recovery. Canadian standards (CS) indicate that acceptable deglycerolized units for transfusion require a HCT ≤0.80 L/L, HGB ≥35 g/unit, and hemolysis <0.8 % in 90 % of units tested. No significant differences in HGB or RBC recovery were observed between study groups. Significant differences between study groups were identified in osmotic fragility and osmotic gradient ektacytometry parameters. Of the 6 S-trait RCCs, 3/6 units were within the HCT, HGB and hemolysis thresholds set by the CS. The modified deglycerolization protocol provides a path for the routine cryopreservation of S-trait RBCs.

Isohemagglutinin titration in pooled and apheresis platelets.

BACKGROUND: Platelet inventory constraints necessitate ABO-incompatible platelet transfusion. Many minimize the hemolytic impact by confirming low titre (LT) donor isohemagglutinins. This process is costly. Pathogen-reduced platelets (PRP) in platelet additive solutions (PAS) will dilute plasma and decrease high-titre isohemagglutinins (HT). We determined the proportion of HT platelets and incompatible transfusions for units suspended in plasma to reassess the need for titres following introduction of PRP/PAS. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Our titre method is manual tube (1:50) dilution of platelet supernatant from apheresis or whole blood derived buffy coat pools suspended in plasma, tested with A1/B red cells. Testing included 49,058 pooled and 11,738 apheresis platelets over 4 years. The HT proportion, rate of out-of-group transfusions, and hemolytic reactions were determined. The impact of PAS dilution was estimated. RESULTS: Totally 60,796 platelet units were tested. Group O pooled and group B apheresis platelets had HT in 6.6% and 5.7%, respectively. Group A pooled and apheresis platelets included 2% with HT. Approximately 25% of platelets transfused were ABO-incompatible and no hemolytic reactions were reported. Based on the proportions of PAS-E and plasma for PRP platelets, plasma from each donor comprises 11 mL (6% of total volume) vs 20-257 mL in untreated pools. PAS-E will replace and dilute residual plasma by at least 50%. DISCUSSION: Rare platelet pools may demonstrate HT. PRP platelets with PAS will reduce titres and may abrogate the need for titration. A strategy of group specific transfusion or transfusion of group A PRP platelet transfusions may be a safe alternative.

Guideline No. 448: Prevention of Rh D Alloimmunization.

OBJECTIVE: This guideline provides recommendations for the prevention of Rh D alloimmunization (isoimmunization) in pregnancy, including parental testing, routine postpartum and antepartum prophylaxis, and other clinical indications for prophylaxis. Prevention of red cell alloimmunization in pregnancy with atypical antigens (other than the D antigen), for which immunoprophylaxis is not currently available, is not addressed in this guideline. TARGET POPULATION: All Rh D-negative pregnant individuals at risk for Rh D alloimmunization due to potential exposure to a paternally derived fetal Rh D antigen. OUTCOMES: Routine postpartum and antepartum Rh D immunoprophylaxis reduces the risk of Rh D alloimmunization at 6 months postpartum and in a subsequent pregnancy. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This guideline details the population of pregnant individuals who may benefit from Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIG) immunoprophylaxis. Thus, those for whom the intervention is not required may avoid adverse effects, while those who are at risk of alloimmunization may mitigate this risk for themselves and/or their fetus. EVIDENCE: For recommendations regarding use of RhIG, Medline and Medline in Process via Ovid and Embase Classic + Embase via Ovid were searched using both the trials and observational studies search strategies with study design filters. For trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects via Ovid were also searched. All databases were searched from January 2000 to November 26, 2019. Studies published before 2000 were captured from the grey literature of national obstetrics and gynaecology specialty societies, luminary specialty journals, and bibliographic searching. A formal process for the systematic review was undertaken for this update, as described in the systematic review manuscript published separately. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the SOGC's modified GRADE approach. See Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: The intended users of this guideline include prenatal care providers such as obstetricians, midwives, family physicians, emergency room physicians, and residents, as well as registered nurses and nurse practitioners. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: An updated Canadian guideline for prevention of Rh D alloimmunization addresses D variants, cffDNA for fetal Rh type, and updates recommendations on timing of RhIG administration. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Reconsidering Routine Repeat Group and Screens During Pregnancy-Personalizing Pregnancy Care.

The group and screen (G&S) are performed in early pregnancy to identify clinically significant antibodies (CSA) that may necessitate fetal monitoring for hemolysis/anemia or affect RhIg eligibility. Guidelines vary, including differences between RhD-positive and negative patients, but typically, the G&S is repeated at 28 weeks, and sometimes pre-delivery. We reviewed data showing a low risk (0.01%-0.43%) of detecting a new CSA in late gestation (late alloimmunization) and the risk of late alloimmunization causing severe hemolysis/anemia is even lower at <0.01%. Routinely repeating a G&S at 28 weeks and delivery may not be necessary for healthy, low-risk pregnancies.

The selection and preparation of red cell components for intrauterine transfusion: A national survey.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The practice regarding the selection and preparation of red blood cells (RBCs) for intrauterine transfusion (IUT) is variable reflecting historical practice and expert opinion rather than evidence-based recommendations. The aim of this survey was to assess Canadian hospital blood bank practice with respect to red cell IUT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was sent to nine hospital laboratories known to perform red cell IUT. Questions regarding component selection, processing, foetal pre-transfusion testing, transfusion administration, documentation and traceability were assessed. RESULTS: The median annual number of IUTs performed in Canada was 109 (interquartile range, 103-118). RBC selection criteria included allogeneic, Cytomegalovirus seronegative, irradiated, fresh units with most sites preferentially providing HbS negative, group O, RhD negative, Kell negative and units lacking the corresponding maternal antibody without extended matching to the maternal phenotype. Red cell processing varied with respect to target haematocrit, use of saline reconstitution (n = 4), use of an automated procedure for red cell concentration (n = 1) and incorporation of a wash step (n = 2). Foetal pre-transfusion testing uniformly included haemoglobin measurement, but additional serologic testing varied. A variety of strategies were used to link the IUT event to the neonate post-delivery, including the creation of a unique foetal blood bank identifier at three sites. CONCLUSION: This survey reviews current practice and highlights the need for standardized national guidelines regarding the selection and preparation of RBCs for IUT. This study has prompted a re-examination of priorities for RBC selection for IUT and highlighted strategies for transfusion traceability in this unique setting.

Comparison of automated solid phase versus manual saline indirect antiglobulin test methodology for non-ABO antibody titration: Implications for perinatal antibody monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Accurate antibody titration is crucial in prenatal evaluations to identify patients who need clinical monitoring for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) causing fetal anemia. This study compares the established gold standard method of manual tube saline indirect antiglobulin testing (SIAT) with the newer automated solid phase (ASP) method of antibody titration and aims to establish the critical titer threshold for ASP that corresponds to the previously established SIAT critical threshold of ≥16 used in our laboratory. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-seven prenatal and donor plasma samples with known antibodies were tested using both SIAT and ASP methodologies and results were compared. RESULTS: The study found that ASP titers were, on average, 1.33 dilutions higher than SIAT titers. The critical titer cutoff for ASP was determined to be ≥32, which is one tube higher than the SIAT cutoff of ≥16. DISCUSSION: The ASP method for antibody titration offers greater reproducibility and efficiency compared with manual SIAT titration. This study suggests that a titer cutoff of ≥32 is appropriate for most clinically significant antibodies using ASP. However, further research is needed to determine the comparability of ASP with SIAT in samples with multiple antibodies, anti-M antibodies, and other less common antibodies. Validation of the ASP titer cutoff against HDFN clinical outcomes is required before implementing this test for routine use in perinatal antibody titration.

Use of selective phenotyping and genotyping to identify rare blood donors in Canada.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The distribution of rare and specific red cell phenotypes varies between races and ethnicities. Therefore, the most compatible red cell units for patients with haemoglobinopathies and other rare blood requirements are most likely to be found in donors from similar genetic backgrounds. Our blood service introduced a voluntary question asking donors to provide their racial background/ethnicity. Results triggered additional phenotyping and/or genotyping. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed the results of additional testing performed between January 2021 and June 2022, and rare donors were added to the Rare Blood Donor database. We determined the incidence of various rare phenotypes and blood group alleles based on donor race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Over 95% of donors answered the voluntary question; 715 samples were tested, and 25 donors were added to the Rare Blood Donor database, including five k-, four U-, two Jk(a-b-) and two D- - phenotypes. CONCLUSION: Asking donors about their race/ethnicity was well received by donors, and the resulting selective testing enabled us to identify individuals with a higher likelihood of being rare blood donors, support patients with rare blood requirements and better understand the incidence of common and rare alleles and red blood cell phenotypes in the Canadian donor population.

Severe fetal anemia caused by anti-Jra : Burst forming unit-erythroid colony formation inhibition assay suggesting possible erythroid suppression mechanism.

BACKGROUND: The Jr blood group system includes a single, high-prevalence antigen, Jra , encoded by the ABCG2 gene. The impact of anti-Jra in pregnancy is variable, ranging from no clinical effect to severe anemia including some fetal deaths. Case reports have postulated that anti-Jra mediated fetal anemia is poorly hemolytic, suggesting other mechanisms of anemia may be involved. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We describe the case of severe anti-Jra mediated fetal anemia. At Canadian Blood Services laboratories, maternal anti-Jra was tested for phagocytic activity via a monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) and erythroid suppression via inhibition of burst forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) colony formation assays. The New York Blood Center sequenced exons 4 and 7 of the ABCG2 gene. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Sequencing of exons 4 and 7 of the ABCG2 gene revealed maternal compound heterozygosity for two nonsense mutations at exon 7 (c.706 C > T and c.784G > T). Fetal sequencing revealed the c.706C > T polymorphism. The MMA showed a borderline phagocytic index (around the cutoff of five for both donor segments tested [5 ± 1 and 7 ± 3]). The BFU-E colony formation inhibition assay suggested a dose-dependent inhibition of BFU-E colony formation with inhibition percentages of 4%, 11%, and 43% at maternal serum concentrations of 2%, 5%, and 10%, respectively. Our findings support the hypothesis that anti-Jra may impair erythropoiesis leading to clinically significant fetal/neonatal anemia. A referral to maternal fetal medicine is recommended if anti-Jra is detected in pregnancy, regardless of the titer.

Serologic reactivity of unidentified specificity in antenatal testing and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: The BEST collaborative study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of serologic reactivity of unidentified specificity (SRUS) in pregnancy is not clear based on available literature. The aim of this study is to determine if SRUS is associated with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from eight institutions over an 11-year study period (2010-2020), when available (5/8 sites). The outcome of the pregnancies with SRUS-no, mild, moderate, or severe HDFN-was determined. RESULTS: SRUS was demonstrated in 589 pregnancies. After excluding those with incomplete data, a total of 284 pregnancies were included in the primary HDFN outcome analysis. SRUS was detected in 124 (44%) pregnancies in isolation, and none were affected by HDFN. Of 41 pregnancies with SRUS and ABO incompatibility, 37 (90%) were unaffected, and 4 (10%) were associated with mild HDFN. Of 98 pregnancies with SRUS and concurrent identifiable antibody reactivity(s), 80 (81%) were unaffected, and 19 (19%) were associated with mild to severe HDFN. There was 1 case of mild HDFN and 1 case of severe HDFN in the 21 pregnancies with SRUS, ABO incompatibility, and concurrent identifiable antibody reactivity(s), and 19 (90%) were unaffected by HDFN. Among all patients with repeat testing, newly identified alloantibodies or other antibodies were identified in 63 of 212 (30%) patients. Although most were not clinically significant, on occasion SRUS preceded clinically significant antibody(s) associated with HDFN (3%, 5/188). CONCLUSION: The antenatal serologic finding of SRUS in isolation is not associated with HDFN but may precede clinically significant antibodies.

Validation of a flow-cytometry-based red blood cell antigen phenotyping method.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Current manual and automated phenotyping methods are based on visual detection of the antigen-antibody interaction. This approach has several limitations including the use of large volumes of patient and reagent red blood cells (RBCs) and antisera to produce a visually detectable reaction. We sought to determine whether the flow cytometry could be developed and validated to perform RBC phenotyping to enable a high-throughput method of phenotyping using comparatively miniscule reagent volumes via fluorescence-based detection of antibody binding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RBC phenotyping by flow cytometry was performed using monoclonal direct typing antisera (human IgM): anti-C, -E, -c, -e, -K, -Jka , -Jkb and indirect typing antisera (human IgG): anti-k, -Fya , -Fyb , -S, -s that are commercially available and currently utilized in our blood transfusion services (BTS) for agglutination-based phenotyping assays. RESULTS: Seventy samples were tested using both flow-cytometry-based-phenotyping and a manual tube standard agglutination assay. For all the antigens tested, 100% concordance was achieved. The flow-cytometry-based method used minimal reagent volume (0.5-1 µl per antigen) compared with the volumes required for manual tube standard agglutination (50 µl per antigen) CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the successful validation of flow-cytometry-based RBC phenotyping. Flow cytometry offers many benefits compared to common conventional RBC phenotyping methods including high degrees of automation, quantitative assessment with automated interpretation of results and extremely low volumes of reagents. This method could be used for high-throughput, low-cost phenotyping for both blood suppliers and hospital BTS.

KEL1 negative red cell transfusions for females of current or future child-bearing potential: A clinical impact and feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Anti-K is an alloantibody stimulated in response to the KEL1 antigen and may cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Provision of KEL1 negative blood to females of child-bearing potential was not our practice. We assessed the impact of our policy and assessed feasibility of a KEL1 negative transfusion policy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a cohort study spanning Jan 1, 2007-Jun 30, 2017 in Hamilton, Canada. Data were obtained via our institution's transfusion database. Chart reviews of females age ≤45 with anti-K were performed; data on RBC KEL1 phenotype were obtained from the blood supplier when needed to ascertain the cause of alloimmunization. Descriptive analysis of hospital KEL1 negative inventory demand and supply was performed. RESULTS: From Jan 2007-Jun 2017, 8.6% of all RBC units transfused were provided to females age ≤45. There were 111 females with detectable anti-K. Median age at time of antibody detection was 34 years (interquartile range 27-40) and 28 of 111 (25.2%) patients may have been alloimmunized by transfusion. Of 49 pregnancies, seven had complications due to anti-K. We estimated that our existing RBC inventory (with 16% units known to be KEL1 negative in 2017) is sufficient to meet demand and support a KEL1 negative transfusion policy for females age ≤45. CONCLUSION: Transfusion was responsible for alloimmunization in 25% of females with anti-K over 10 years. Analysis of supply and demand can be used to inform feasibility of a KEL1 negative transfusion policy.

How do I provide rare red cells to patients?

BACKGROUND: The demand for rare blood is expected to increase in Canada as its population continues to expand through immigration from diverse regions of the world. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This paper outlines a national approach to providing rare red cells for patients through the Rare Blood Program of Canadian Blood Services (CBS). Data detailing the rare red cell requests and inventory managed by CBS' Rare Blood Program is provided. RESULTS: The provision of rare red cells involves multiple considerations such as multidisciplinary communication, serologic/molecular confirmation, donor recruitment, inventory optimization and logistical factors. CONCLUSION: The description of CBS' Rare Blood Program will inform others that seek to create, optimize, or expand programs that facilitate the provision of rare blood. New technologies such as next-generation sequencing may also affect how rare donors are identified and recruited in the future.

Preparing small-dose red cell concentrates (RCCs) for neonatal and pediatric transfusions: Impact of RCC volume, storage, and irradiation.

BACKGROUND: Preparing small-dose red cell concentrates (RCCs) is a common practice for pediatric and neonatal transfusions. However, there is a lack of quality monitoring data to indicate that both the preparation and storage of small-dose RCCs does not alter in vitro red cell quality. The present study seeks to provide data to support this practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To evaluate quality of stored small aliquots, six ABO/Rh matched leukoreduced citrate phosphate-dextrose/saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol (LR CPD/SAGM) RCCs were pooled and split into 30 ml aliquots, 80 ml aliquots, and a standard 290 ml unit, with testing performed for up to 43 days post-collection. To evaluate the impact of irradiation on small-dose RCC preparation, a total of 48 independent LR CPD/SAGM RCCs were used (non-irradiated: n = 24; irradiated: n = 24). Aliquoting with/without irradiation was performed within 7 days of collection and baseline testing was performed within 24 h of aliquot production. RESULTS: Limited variability in hemolysis, mean cell volume, and extracellular potassium concentrations were seen between the different aliquot sizes throughout the 43-day storage period. Aliquot production did not accentuate damage based on any of these tested parameters in both the non-irradiated and irradiated subsets. A significant increase was seen in the potassium concentrations in the irradiated parent and aliquot samples relative to their non-irradiated counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Non-irradiated small-aliquot dose RCCs meet in vitro quality criteria required for safe transfusion throughout the 42-day storage period. The same can be said for aliquots derived from irradiated units and tested within 24 h of aliquot production.

Immunohematology testing using umbilical cord blood: review of the literature, survey of practice and guidance development.

BACKGROUND: Following delivery, blood tests are performed on umbilical cord blood (CB) to avoid neonatal venipuncture. Despite widespread and longstanding CB testing, no guidelines exist to suggest which immunohematology tests should be performed on CB. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a scoping review, surveyed national practice, and developed guidance statements concerning CB testing. Database searches identified relevant articles. A survey was sent to all Canadian hospitals and transfusion laboratories that perform perinatal testing. A national panel of experts was convened to develop guidance statements. RESULTS: A total of 116 articles met the inclusion criteria and were summarized. Literature on CB testing is limited; few studies have investigated laboratory testing methodologies or validated CB test results with peripheral samples. The survey was completed by 580/597 institutions (97%); 85% were community hospitals and 16% had a neonatal intensive care unit. There is diversity in the types of CB tests performed and variability in practice. While most centers order appropriately, some laboratories routinely perform CB tests that are not clinically indicated (e.g., direct antiglobulin testing for all neonates) and other do not perform CB tests when results would be beneficial (e.g., phenotype on CB when mother has a clinically significant antibody). Fifteen guidance statements were developed. DISCUSSION: This study highlights variability in CB testing, likely reflecting evidence gaps, methodology differences between studies, and lack of guidelines. CB tests should only be performed when indicated and validated on this sample type. The presented guidance statements aim to standardize practice and encourage judicious CB sampling.

Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive fetal RhD blood group genotyping in nonalloimmunized and alloimmunized pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of noninvasive fetal RhD blood group genotyping in nonalloimmunized and alloimmunized pregnancies in Canada. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We developed two probabilistic state-transition (Markov) microsimulation models to compare fetal genotyping followed by targeted management versus usual care (i.e., universal Rh immunoglobulin [RhIG] prophylaxis in nonalloimmunized RhD-negative pregnancies, or universal intensive monitoring in alloimmunized pregnancies). The reference case considered a healthcare payer perspective and a 10-year time horizon. Sensitivity analysis examined assumptions related to test cost, paternal screening, subsequent pregnancies, other alloantibodies (e.g., K, Rh c/C/E), societal perspective, and lifetime horizon. RESULTS: Fetal genotyping in nonalloimmunized pregnancies (at per-sample test cost of C$247/US$311) was associated with a slightly higher probability of maternal alloimmunization (22 vs. 21 per 10,000) and a reduced number of RhIG injections (1.427 vs. 1.795) than usual care. It was more expensive (C$154/US$194, 95% Credible Interval [CrI]: C$139/US$175-C$169/US$213) and had little impact on QALYs (0.0007, 95%CrI: -0.01-0.01). These results were sensitive to the test cost (threshold achieved at C$88/US$111), and inclusion of paternal screening. Fetal genotyping in alloimmunized pregnancies (at test cost of C$328/US$413) was less expensive (-C$6280/US$7903, 95% CrI: -C$6325/US$7959 to -C$6229/US$7838) and more effective (0.19 QALYs, 95% CrI 0.17-0.20) than usual care. These cost savings remained robust in sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: Noninvasive fetal RhD genotyping saves resources and represents good value for the management of alloimmunized pregnancies. If the cost of genotyping is substantially decreased, the targeted intervention can become a viable option for nonalloimmunized pregnancies.