What Do Child Abuse and Neglect Medical Evaluation Consultation Notes Tell Researchers and Clinicians?

Child abuse and neglect (CAN) medical experts provide specialized multidisciplinary care to children when there is concern for maltreatment. Their clinical notes contain valuable information on child- and family-level factors, clinical concerns, and service placements that may inform the needed supports for the family. We created and implemented a coding system for data abstraction from these notes. Participants were 1,397 children ages 0-17 years referred for a consultation with a CAN medical provider at an urban teaching and research hospital between March 2013 and December 2017. Coding themes were developed using an interdisciplinary team-based approach to qualitative analysis, and descriptive results are presented using a developmental-contextual framework. This study demonstrates the potential value of developing a coding system to assess characteristics and patterns from CAN medical provider notes, which could be helpful in improving quality of care and prevention and detection of child abuse.

Catalyzing Cross-Sector Collaboration: Lessons from a Virtual Pediatric Complex Care Coalition.

BACKGROUND: Children with complex health needs (CCHN) have intersecting medical, behavioral health, and social needs. Unfortunately, fragmentation across health and social services sectors often results in uncoordinated care for CCHN and their families. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to describe the creation of a statewide cross-sector partnership, the Children's Complex Care Coalition of North Carolina, to identify and act on opportunities for system-level improvements in the care of CCHN. METHODS: We applied a virtual community engagement approach to form an advisory committee of cross-sector collaborators; systematically identify priorities most important and urgent to collaborators for improving systems of care; and host a series of virtual convenings involving more than 90 attendees from across the state to operationalize collaborator-identified priorities into actionable next steps. LESSONS LEARNED: Key facilitators of success for the Children's Complex Care Coalition of North Carolina partnership were investing time in building trusting relationships, particularly with families of CCHN, and aligning goals and priorities with existing local and regional efforts. Challenges included incorporating traditionally under-represented perspectives, right-sizing virtual convening attendance and number of topics covered, and navigating technological difficulties in a virtual environment. CONCLUSIONS: Health systems can catalyze the formation of cross-sector coalitions and community partnerships to advance complex care. Virtual convenings with interactive activities and participatory structures can be an efficient medium to connect coalition members and elicit actionable recommendations for system-level improvements that address the needs of community members.

Identifying Priorities to Improve the System of Care for Children With Complex Health Needs in North Carolina: Process and Outcomes of Systematic Stakeholder Engagement.

OBJECTIVE: Children with complex health needs (CCHN) have both medical (eg, chronic conditions) and health-related social needs (eg, potentially adverse social determinants of health) that require ongoing health care and support from multiple community service providers. National standards developed for populations defined by health needs (CYSHCN) provide a framework for stakeholders to plan system-level improvements in care delivery for CCHN, but improvement efforts should reflect the priorities of their families and providers. This article describes a process of prioritizing system-level efforts to improve the health and well-being of CCHN and families in North Carolina (NC), using systematic stakeholder engagement and modified Delphi expert ratings. METHODS: We surveyed stakeholders with experience caring for CCHN using an open-ended, 3-item instrument to identify opportunities to improve systems of care. Using directed qualitative content analysis, we synthesized responses into a master list of potential improvement topics. Using a modified Delphi approach, a 16-member advisory committee rated all topics for importance and urgency, on 9-point Likert scales over 2 rounds; then ratings for each topic were ranked (low, medium, high) to establish relative priority. RESULTS: Forty seven individuals from 31 counties around NC provided survey responses, yielding 59 improvement topics in 10 domains. Through the modified Delphi method process, 21 topics (36%) received the highest rankings, largely representing access to community- and home-based services, equity, and enhancement of the pediatric workforce. CONCLUSIONS: Priorities identified by stakeholders will inform advocacy, policy, and improvement efforts. Next steps for the coalition include developing improvement projects to implement stakeholder-recommended actions for the highest-priority topics.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infections Among Children in the Biospecimens from Respiratory Virus-Exposed Kids (BRAVE Kids) Study.

BACKGROUND: Child with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection typically have mild symptoms that do not require medical attention, leaving a gap in our understanding of the spectrum of SARS-CoV-2-related illnesses that the viruses causes in children. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of children and adolescents (aged <21 years) with a SARS-CoV-2-infected close contact. We collected nasopharyngeal or nasal swabs at enrollment and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. RESULTS: Of 382 children, 293 (77%) were SARS-CoV-2-infected. SARS-CoV-2-infected children were more likely to be Hispanic (P < .0001), less likely to have asthma (P = .005), and more likely to have an infected sibling contact (P = .001) than uninfected children. Children aged 6-13 years were frequently asymptomatic (39%) and had respiratory symptoms less often than younger children (29% vs 48%; P = .01) or adolescents (29% vs 60%; P < .001). Compared with children aged 6-13 years, adolescents more frequently reported influenza-like (61% vs 39%; P < .001) , and gastrointestinal (27% vs 9%; P = .002), and sensory symptoms (42% vs 9%; P < .0001) and had more prolonged illnesses (median [interquartile range] duration: 7 [4-12] vs 4 [3-8] days; P = 0.01). Despite the age-related variability in symptoms, wWe found no difference in nasopharyngeal viral load by age or between symptomatic and asymptomatic children. CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic ethnicity and an infected sibling close contact are associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among children, while asthma is associated with decreased risk. Age-related differences in clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection must be considered when evaluating children for coronavirus disease 2019 and in developing screening strategies for schools and childcare settings.

SARS-CoV-2 Infections Among Children in the Biospecimens from Respiratory Virus-Exposed Kids (BRAVE Kids) Study.

BACKGROUND: Children with SARS-CoV-2 infection typically have mild symptoms that do not require medical attention, leaving a gap in our understanding of the spectrum of illnesses that the virus causes in children. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of children and adolescents (<21 years of age) with a SARS-CoV-2-infected close contact. We collected nasopharyngeal or nasal swabs at enrollment and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using a real-time PCR assay. RESULTS: Of 382 children, 289 (76%) were SARS-CoV-2-infected. SARS-CoV-2-infected children were more likely to be Hispanic (p<0.0001), less likely to have a history of asthma (p=0.009), and more likely to have an infected sibling contact (p=0.0007) than uninfected children. Children ages 6-13 years were frequently asymptomatic (38%) and had respiratory symptoms less often than younger children (30% vs. 49%; p=0.008) or adolescents (30% vs. 59%; p<0.0001). Compared to children ages 6-13 years, adolescents more frequently reported influenza-like (61% vs. 39%; p=0.002), gastrointestinal (26% vs. 9%; p=0.003), and sensory symptoms (43% vs. 9%; p<0.0001), and had more prolonged illnesses [median (IQR) duration: 7 (4, 12) vs. 4 (3, 8) days; p=0.004]. Despite the age-related variability in symptoms, we found no differences in nasopharyngeal viral load by age or between symptomatic and asymptomatic children. CONCLUSIONS: Hispanic ethnicity and an infected sibling close contact are associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among children, while a history of asthma is associated with decreased risk. Age-related differences in the clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection must be considered when evaluating children for COVID-19 and in developing screening strategies for schools and childcare settings.