Cómo publicar artículos de gestión en salud en revistas de gerencia de alto índice de impacto / How to Publish Papers on Healthcare Management in High Impact Management Reviews / Como publicar artigos de gestão em saúde em revistas de gerência de alto índice de impacto

El proceso de publicar una investigación como un trabajo científico es el último eslabón de la cadena de investigación. Intentar publicar es un proceso largo y desgastante, que en muchas ocasiones no termina en éxito. En revistas de alto impacto en el área de gerencia, donde se publican trabajos originales relacionados con el área de la salud, solo pasan a primera ronda de revisión de pares el 10% de los artículos y logran ser publicados apenas el 5% del total de trabajos sometidos a revisión. En el siguiente trabajo se exponen algunos consejos útiles, que pueden contribuir a que sus trabajos se encuentren en ese selecto 5% . Si bien (se dará cuenta) es difícil, no es imposible.

Publishing scientific papers is the last process in the research chain. Publishing is a long and exhausting process, which, in many cases, does not have a happy end. In high-impact management journals publishing original works in the health area,, only about 10% of the articles passed to the first round of peer review, and only 5% of all papers subject to review are eventually published. My paper discusses some useful tips that can help your papers to belong to that 5%-elite. Even if you find it is difficult, it is not impossible.

O processo de publicar uma pesquisa como um trabalho científico é o último processo da cadeia de pesquisa. Tentar publicar é um processo longo e desgastante, que em muitas ocasiões não termina em sucesso. Em revistas de alto impacto de management onde se publicam trabalhos originais relacionados com a área da saúde, só passam a primeira ronda de revisão de pares o 10% dos artigos e conseguem ser publicados a penas o 5% do total de trabalhos submetidos à revisão. No seguinte trabalho expõem-se alguns conselhos úteis, que podem contribuir a que seus trabalhos se encontrem nesse seleto 5%. Se bem que (será evidente) é difícil, não é impossível.

¿DISENSO ENTRE PARES REVISORES? NO SE PREOCUPE, QUE A FIN DE CUENTAS EL EDITOR SIEMPRE TIENE LA ÚLTIMA PALABRA / DISSENT BETWEEN PEER REVIEWERS? DON'T WORRY, ULTIMATELY THE EDITOR HAS THE LAST WORD

Todos hemos sometido algún artículo científico a revisión con la idea de que sea publicado en cierta revista. Frecuentemente, los autores experimentan muchas barreras para alcanzar el éxito (lograr la publicación) cuando someten artículos a revisión. Estas barreras dependen de la escritura del artículo en sí mismo, de los sesgos de los pares revisores, de la forma en que se escribe la carta de presentación (cover letter), y de la manera en la cual se implementa una estrategia para abordar y responder a las observaciones (erradas o no) que emiten los pares revisores y el editor de la revista. El propósito de este artículo vivencial es el de brindar consejos útiles a autores que investigan en el área de la ingeniería clínica, sobre cómo publicar artículos que aborden temas en el área de la salud en revistas de alto impacto en el área del operations research & management sciences.

All of us have at some point submitted a scientific paper for review with the idea of being published in a given journal. Often, the authors experience many barriers to success (achieving publication) when they submit articles for publication. These barriers depend on the quality of the writing itself, on the biases of the peer reviewers, the way you write your cover letter, and the way in which you address and respond to the observations (erroneous or not) emitted by peer reviewers and the editor of the journal. The purpose of this paper is to provide useful pieces of advice on how to publish articles that tackle issues in the health area in high impact journals in the area of Operations Research & Management Sciences.

[A view of clinical engineering from scientific publications]. / Una mirada a la ingeniería clínica desde las publicaciones científicas.

The aim of this paper was to characterize clinical engineering from the perspective of scientific publications. First of all, the most significant factors that influence the change in health systems are briefly exposed. Then, clinical engineering is defined and its main functions and evolution within the development of the health system is explained. Finally, the author describes the state of the field from the viewpoint of the scientific publications; an apparent lack of interest in the engineering community to publish scientific research was observed. This behavior can be seen in the clear declining tendency in the number of citations and the number of publications (in volume or quantity) in major scientific journals in the field. Finally, current challenges and future developments must be addressed to accomplish a better positioning of the specialty in the publishing world.

Clustering techniques: measuring the performance of contract service providers.

This paper investigates the use of clustering technique to characterize the providers of maintenance services in a health-care institution according to their performance. A characterization of the inventory of equipment from seven pilot areas was carried out first (including 264 medical devices). The characterization study concluded that the inventory on a whole is old [exploitation time (ET)/useful life (UL) average is 0.78] and has high maintenance service costs relative to the original cost of acquisition (service cost /acquisition cost average 8.61%). A monitoring of the performance of maintenance service providers was then conducted. The variables monitored were response time (RT), service time (ST), availability, and turnaround time (TAT). Finally, the study grouped maintenance service providers into clusters according to performance. The study grouped maintenance service providers into the following clusters. Cluster 0: Identified with the best performance, the lowest values of TAT, RT, and ST, with an average TAT value of 1.46 days; Clusters 1 and 2: Identified with the poorest performance, highest values of TAT, RT, and ST, and an average TAT value of 9.79 days; and Cluster 3: Identified by medium-quality performance, intermediate values of TAT, RT, and ST, and an average TAT value of 2.56 days.

La ingeniería biomédica en Colombia: una perspectiva desde la formación del pregrado / Biomedical engineering in colombia: an undergraduate studies approach

El presente artículo expone el estado de la formación en Ingeniería Biomédica en Colombia a nivel de pregrado. Se revisaron programas de la Unión Europea y los Estados Unidos. A nivel nacional, se revisaron, bajo la categoría de Ingeniería Biomédica y Bioingeniería, los planes de estudio de quince instituciones de educación superior a partir de tres fuentes de información: Páginas Web de Universidades, Sistema de Información de Educación Superior y Observatorio Laboral (Ministerio de Educación Nacional). Se encontró que la oferta de los programas nacionales de Ingeniería Biomédica y Bioingeniería en su conjunto en la ciudad de Bogotá D.C. representa el 30% de la totalidad de la oferta en el país, Antioquia (Medellín) representa el 27%, Valle del Cauca (Cali) el 13% y los demás departamentos representan el 30% restante. Los programas de educación superior en Ingeniería Biomédica muestran una uniformidad en cuanto a la duración y a las competencias a desarrollar con ligeras diferencias en los énfasis y los perfiles de egreso. Actualmente existen al menos 528 Ingenieros Biomédicos y Bioingenieros graduados en el país (0,27% del total de las ingenierías). La tasa de graduados por año, entre 2001 y 2007 es en promedio de 75 Ingenieros Biomédicos y Bioingenieros. Se puede concluir que a pesar de la oferta de programas activos de Ingeniería Biomédica a nivel nacional, la tasa de graduados es baja con relación a: la población colombiana que va en aumento, el incremento de personas con discapacidad y adultos mayores y el número de graduados de otras ingenierías. Se propone la reflexión, sobre el reto que imponen los avances científicos y tecnológicos mundiales que de alguna manera se convierten en directrices de formación.

This academic paper presents the state of Colombia`s undergraduate education in Biomedical Engineering. Programs of the European Union and of the United States were reviewed. In the national level, fifteen programs of different higher education institutions were reviewed under the category of Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering, based on three information sources: University official Website, Information System on higher education and work observatory of the National Education Ministry. It was found that the total offer of national undergraduate programs in Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering in Bogota D.C represents the 30% of the total offer in the country, Antioquia (Medellín) represents the 27%, Valle del Cauca (Cali) the 13% and the other departments represent the 30% left. The undergraduate programs in Biomedical Engineering show similar standards regarding length, and professional developing competences with slight differences in the graduation profiles and the emphasis. In the present, there are at least 528 graduated Biomedical Engineering and bioengineers in the country (0,27% of all engineering graduates). The rate of graduates per year, between 2001 and 2007, is close to 75 biomedical Engineers and bioengineers. It can be concluded, that despite the offer of active programs in the national level, the rate of graduates is low in relation to: the Colombian population which is growing, the growth of the number of people with disabilities and elders, and the number of graduates from other engineering fields. A reflection is proposed, regarding the challenges that worldwide scientific and technological advances present, which in some measure become formation directives.

Una mirada a la ingeniería clínica desde las publicaciones científicas / A view of clinical engineering from scientific publications

El objetivo de este trabajo es hacer una caracterización del estado de la ingeniería clínica desde las publicaciones científicas. En primer lugar, se exponen brevemente los factores más significativos que influyen en el cambio y en la evolución de los sistemas sanitarios. Luego, se define el concepto de ingeniería clínica, sus funciones fundamentales y su evolución dentro del desarrollo de los sistemas sanitarios. Finalmente, se expone el estado de la especialidad, dando una mirada desde las publicaciones científicas. Se puede observar una aparente falta de interés en la comunidad de ingenieros por publicar trabajos de investigación científica. Esto se puede constatar por la franca tendencia al decrecimiento del número de citaciones y el número de publicaciones (en volumen o en cantidad) en las principales revistas del gremio científico. Finalmente, se exponen, a criterio del autor, los retos actuales y los futuros desarrollos que tiene que enfrentar la especialidad para poder posicionarse en el mundo de las publicaciones.

The aim of this paper was to characterize clinical engineering from the perspective of scientific publications. First of all, the most significant factors that influence the change in health systems are briefly exposed. Then, clinical engineering is defined and its main functions and evolution within the development of the health system is explained. Finally, the author describes the state of the field from the viewpoint of the scientific publications; an apparent lack of interest in the engineering community to publish scientific research was observed. This behavior can be seen in the clear declining tendency in the number of citations and the number of publications (in volume or quantity) in major scientific journals in the field. Finally, current challenges and future developments must be addressed to accomplish a better positioning of the specialty in the publishing world.

A fuzzy inference system to evaluate contract service provider performance.

This paper puts forward a fuzzy inference system for evaluating the quality performance of service contract providers. An Application Service Provider was designed and put online, featuring surveys to establish the most useful indicators to evaluate the quality of the service. This model was implemented in 10 separate hospitals. As a result, the service cost-acquisition cost ratio in these cases was reduced from 16.14% to 6.09% in the period 2001-January 2003.