Dapagliflozin added to metformin reduces perirenal fat layer in type 2 diabetic patients with obesity.

Sodium-glucose co-transporters type 2 inhibitors (SLGT2i) are highly effective in controlling type 2 diabetes, but reported beneficial cardiovascular effects suggest broader actions on insulin resistance. Weight loss may be initially explained by glycosuria-induced net caloric output and secondary volumetric reduction, but its maintenance could be due to loss of visceral fat mass. Structured ultrasound (US) imaging of abdominal adipose tissue ("eco-obesity") is a recently described methodology used to measure 5 consecutive layers of abdominal fat, not assessable by DEXA or CT scan: superficial subcutaneous (SS), deep subcutaneous (DS), preperitoneal (PP), omental (Om) and right perirenal (RK). PP, Om and RK are predictors of metabolic syndrome (MS) with defined cut-off points. To assess the effect of SLGT2i on every fat depot we enrolled 29 patients with type 2 Diabetes (HbA1c 6.5-9%) and Obesity (IMC > 30 kg/m2) in an open-label, randomized, phase IV trial (EudraCT: 2019-000979-16): the Omendapa trial. Diabetes was diagnosed < 12 months before randomization and all patients were treatment naïve. 14 patients were treated with metformin alone (cohort A) and 15 were treated with metformin + dapaglifozin (cohort B). Anthropometric measures and laboratory tests for glucose, lipid profile, insulin, HOMA, leptin, ultrasensitive-CRP and microalbuminuria (MAL) were done at baseline, 3rd and 6th months. At 6th month, weight loss was -5.5 ± 5.2 kg (5.7% from initial weight) in cohort A and -8.4 ± 4.4 kg (8.6%) in cohort B. Abdominal circumference showed a -2.7 ± 3.1 cm and -5.4 ± 2.5 cm reduction, respectively (p = 0.011). Both Metformin alone (-19.4 ± 20.1 mm; -21.7%) or combined with Dapaglifozin (-20.5 ± 19.4 mm; -21.8%) induced significant Om fat reduction. 13.3% of cohort A patients and 21.4% of cohort's B reached Om thickness below the cut-off for MS criteria. RK fat loss was significantly greater in cohort B group compared to cohort A, at both kidneys. Only in the Met + Dapa group, we observed correlations between Om fat with leptin/CRP/MAL and RK fat with HOMA-IR. US is a useful clinical tool to assess ectopic fat depots. Both Metformin and Dapaglifozin induce fat loss in layers involved with MS but combined treatment is particularly effective in perirenal fat layer reduction. Perirenal fat should be considered as a potential target for cardiovascular dapaglifozin beneficial effects.

Effect of Liraglutide in Different Abdominal Fat Layers Measured by Ultrasound: The Importance of Perirenal Fat Reduction.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasonography (US) in patients with obesity allows us to measure different layers of abdominal fat (superficial subcutaneous, deep subcutaneous, preperitoneal, omental, and perirenal), not assessable by DEXA or CT scan. Omental and perirenal fat depots are considered predictors of metabolic complications. Liraglutide is particularly effective in reducing weight in patients with insulin-resistance, but its direct impact on each abdominal fat layer is unknown. METHODS: We measured, at the L4 level, all 5 abdominal fat depots in 860 patients with obesity (72.8% women, mean age 56.6 ± 1.5 years, BMI 34.4 ± 4.7 kg/m2, body fat 47 ± 2%, abdominal circumference 105.8 ± 3 cm), before and after 6 months of liraglutide treatment. Laboratory tests for glucose, insulin, and lipid profile were routinely done. T-student was used to compare intraindividual differences. RESULTS: Weight loss was 7.5 ± 2.8 kg (7.96% from baseline), with no differences by sex/age/BMI. Greater loss was observed in patients with higher dosages and NAFLD. All US-measured fat layers showed a significant reduction (p < 0.05) at 6th months. Preperitoneal fat showed a -26 ± 5.5% reduction and 46% of the patients went below metabolic syndrome (MS) risk cut-off values. Omental fat was reduced by -17.8 ± 5% (67% of the patients below MS risk) and perirenal fat by -22.4 ± 4.4% (56% of the patients below MS). Both omental and perirenal fat reduction correlated with total and LDL cholesterol. Higher perirenal fat reduction (-28%) was seen among patients with obesity and hypertension. Perirenal fat also correlated with blood pressure reduction. CONCLUSION: Liraglutide induces greater fat loss in the layers involved with MS. However, the maximal reduction is seen at perirenal fat, which has been recently related with hypertension and could play an important role in modulating kidney's expansion and intraglomerular pressure. US is a reproducible clinical tool to assess pathologic fat depots in patients living with obesity.

Asociación de obesidad general y abdominal con hipertensión, dislipemia y presencia de prediabetes en el estudio PREDAPS / Association of general and abdominal obesity with hypertension, dyslipidemia and prediabetes in the PREDAPS study

Introducción y objetivos: Algunas medidas antropométricas muestran mayor capacidad que otras para discriminar la presencia de factores de riesgo cardiovascular. Este trabajo estima la magnitud de la asociación de diversos indicadores antropométricos de obesidad con hipertensión, dislipemia y prediabetes (glucemia basal o glucohemoglobina alteradas). Métodos: Análisis transversal de la información recogida en 2.022 sujetos del estudio PREDAPS (etapa basal). Se definió obesidad general como índice de masa corporal ≥ 30 kg/m2 y obesidad abdominal con 2 criterios: a) perímetro de cintura (PC) ≥ 102 cm en varones/PC ≥ 88 cm en mujeres, y b) índice cintura/estatura (ICE) ≥ 0,55. La magnitud de la asociación se estimó mediante regresión logística. Resultados: La hipertensión arterial mostró la asociación más alta con la obesidad general en mujeres (OR = 3,01; IC95%, 2,24-4,04) y con la obesidad abdominal según el criterio del ICE en varones (OR = 3,65; IC95%, 2,66-5,01). La hipertrigliceridemia y los valores bajos de colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de alta densidad mostraron la asociación más alta con obesidad abdominal según el criterio del ICE en mujeres (OR = 2,49; IC95%, 1,68-3,67 y OR = 2,70; IC95%, 1,89-3,86) y la obesidad general en varones (OR = 2,06; IC95%, 1,56-2,73 y OR = 1,68; IC95%, 1,21-2,33). La prediabetes mostró la asociación más alta con obesidad abdominal según el criterio del ICE en mujeres (OR = 2,48; IC95%, 1,85-3,33) y con obesidad abdominal según el criterio del PC en varones (OR = 2,33; IC95%, 1,75-3,08). Conclusiones: Los indicadores de obesidad abdominal mostraron la mayor asociación con la presencia de prediabetes. La relación de los indicadores antropométricos con hipertensión y con dislipemia mostró resultados heterogéneos (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Some anthropometric measurements show a greater capacity than others to identify the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. This study estimated the magnitude of the association of different anthropometric indicators of obesity with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and prediabetes (altered fasting plasma glucose and/or glycosylated hemoglobin). Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of information collected from 2022 participants in the PREDAPS study (baseline phase). General obesity was defined as body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 and abdominal obesity was defined with 2 criteria: a) waist circumference (WC) ≥ 102 cm in men/WC ≥ 88 cm in women, and b) waist-height ratio (WHtR) ≥ 0.55. The magnitude of the association was estimated by logistic regression. Results: Hypertension showed the strongest association with general obesity in women (OR, 3.01; 95%CI, 2.24-4.04) and with abdominal obesity based on the WHtR criterion in men (OR, 3.65; 95%CI, 2.66-5.01). Hypertriglyceridemia and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol showed the strongest association with abdominal obesity based on the WHtR criterion in women (OR, 2.49; 95%CI, 1.68-3.67 and OR, 2.70; 95%CI, 1.89-3.86) and with general obesity in men (OR, 2.06; 95%CI, 1.56-2.73 and OR, 1.68; 95%CI, 1.21-2.33). Prediabetes showed the strongest association with abdominal obesity based on the WHtR criterion in women (OR, 2.48; 95%CI, 1.85-3.33) and with abdominal obesity based on the WC criterion in men (OR, 2.33; 95%CI, 1.75-3.08). Conclusions: Abdominal obesity indicators showed the strongest association with the presence of prediabetes. The association of anthropometric indicators with hypertension and dyslipidemia showed heterogeneous results (AU)

Perfil clínico de los pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 tratados con inhibidores del cotransportador sodio-glucosa tipo 2 y experiencia clínica real en España / Clinical profile of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with sodiumglucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and experience in real-world clinical practice in Spain

El objetivo fundamental del tratamiento en la diabetes tipo 2 es el control global de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular. En casi la mitad de los diabéticos tipo 2 no se logra alcanzar el objetivo de control glucémico y en muchos menos el control del peso y la presión arterial, a pesar de todo el arsenal terapéutico que en la última década ha ido apareciendo para el tratamiento de esta enfermedad. Por otra parte, los antidiabéticos secretagogos y la insulina se asocian a un incremento ponderal y aumentan el riesgo de hipoglucemias. Los inhibidores del cotransportador sodio-glucosa tipo 2 (iSGLT2) se han posicionado en las guías como una alternativa en el mismo escalón terapéutico que el resto de opciones tras el inicio con metformina. En este trabajo se revisa el perfil del paciente más adecuado para ser tratado con iSGLT2 sobre la base de su eficacia y seguridad demostrada en ensayos clínicos controlados. Teniendo en cuenta los posibles efectos secundarios propios del mecanismo de acción de este nuevo grupo terapéutico, se valora en qué pacientes de riesgo deben emplearse con precaución. Estas consideraciones acerca del perfil del paciente susceptible de ser tratado con iSGLT2 se contrastan con los resultados obtenidos en la práctica clínica diaria, tanto en estudios retrospectivos de otros países como en experiencias en práctica clínica real en España. Se presenta una selección de estudios realizados en diferentes centros con un seguimiento mínimo de 6 meses y se comparan con los resultados de los ensayos clínicos. Los iSGLT2 se utilizan en la práctica clínica en cualquier escalón terapéutico y se obtienen resultados de eficacia muy similares a los reportados en ensayos controlados, con una proporción algo más elevada de infecciones genitourinarias y una escasa tasa de abandonos. La mitad de los pacientes reportados son diabéticos insulinizados, a los que se añade una gliflozina, lo que demuestra la gran aceptación por parte de los clínicos de esta estrategia terapéutica. Los iSGLT2 resultan especialmente atractivos por su eficacia añadida en control del peso y presión arterial y la posibilidad de utilizarlos en asociación a otros antidiabéticos o en monoterapia en cualquier estadio evolutivo de la diabetes tipo 2 (AU)

The main aim of the treatment of type 2 diabetes is overall control of cardiovascular risk factors. Almost 50% of patients with type 2 diabetes do not achieve glycaemic targets, and a much higher percentage do not achieve weight and blood pressure targets, despite the therapeutic arsenal that has appeared in the last decade for the treatment of this disease. In addition, antidiabetic secretatogues and insulin are associated with weight gain and an increased risk of hyperglycaemic episodes. Clinical practice guidelines recommend sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as an alternative in the same therapeutic step as the other options after initiation of metformin therapy. The present study reviews the most appropriate patient profile for SGLT2i therapy, based on their safety and efficacy demonstrated in controlled clinical trials. The article discusses which patients are at risk of experiencing the possible secondary effects due to the mechanism of action of this new therapeutic class, in whom SGLT2i should be used with caution. These considerations on the profile of patients suitable for SGLT2i therapy are contrasted with the results obtained in daily clinical practice, both in retrospective studies from other countries and from real-world experiences in Spain. This article presents a selection of studies performed in distinct centres with a minimum follow-up of 6 months and compares their results with those from clinical trials. SGLT2i are used in clinical practice in any therapeutic step and the efficacy results are very similar to those reported by controlled clinical trials, with a slightly higher proportion of genitourinary infections and a low dropout rate. Half the reported patients are diabetics receiving insulin therapy plus a gliflozin, showing the wide uptake of this therapeutic strategy by clinicians. SGLT2i are especially attractive due to their additional effectiveness in weight and blood pressure control and the possibility of using them in association with other antidiabetic agents or in monotherapy in patients at any stage of type 2 diabetes (AU)