Does Epidural Corticosteroid Application During Spinal Surgery Reduce Postoperative Pain?: An Adjunct to Multimodal Analgesia.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of intraoperative epidural administration of Depo-Medrol on postoperative back pain and radiculitis symptoms in patients undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative pain is commonly experienced by patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Adequate management of intense pain is necessary to encourage early ambulation, increase patient satisfaction, and limit opioid consumption. Intraoperative steroid application has been shown to improve postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgeries. There have been no studies examining the effect of epidural steroids on both back pain and radicular pain in patients undergoing TLIF. METHOD: In all, 151 patients underwent TLIF surgery using rh-BMP2 with 3 surgeons at a single institution. Of those, 116 remained in the study and were included in the final analysis. Based on a 1:1 randomization, a collagen sponge saturated with either Saline (1 cc) or Depo-Medrol (40 mg/1 cc) was placed at the annulotomy site on the TLIF level. Follow-up occurred on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 7, and postoperative months 1, 2, and 3. Lumbar radiculopathy was measured by a modified symptom- and laterality-specific Visual Analog Scale (VAS) regarding the severity of back pain and common radiculopathy symptoms. RESULTS: The patients who received Depo-Medrol, compared with those who received saline, experienced significantly less back pain on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7 (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in back pain beyond day 7. Radiculopathy-related symptoms such as leg pain, numbness, tingling, stiffness, and weakness tended to be reduced in the steroid group at most time points. CONCLUSION: This study provides Level 1 evidence that intraoperative application of Depo-Medrol during a TLIF surgery with rh-BMP2 significantly reduces back pain for the first week after TLIF surgery. The use of epidural Depo-Medrol may be a useful adjunct to multimodal analgesia for pain relief in the postoperative period.

Pulmonary Co-Infections Detected Premortem Underestimate Postmortem Findings in a COVID-19 Autopsy Case Series.

Bacterial and fungal co-infections are reported complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in critically ill patients but may go unrecognized premortem due to diagnostic limitations. We compared the premortem with the postmortem detection of pulmonary co-infections in 55 fatal COVID-19 cases from March 2020 to March 2021. The concordance in the premortem versus the postmortem diagnoses and the pathogen identification were evaluated. Premortem pulmonary co-infections were extracted from medical charts while applying standard diagnostic definitions. Postmortem co-infection was defined by compatible lung histopathology with or without the detection of an organism in tissue by bacterial or fungal staining, or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with broad-range bacterial and fungal primers. Pulmonary co-infection was detected premortem in significantly fewer cases (15/55, 27%) than were detected postmortem (36/55, 65%; p < 0.0001). Among cases in which co-infection was detected postmortem by histopathology, an organism was identified in 27/36 (75%) of cases. Pseudomonas, Enterobacterales, and Staphylococcus aureus were the most frequently identified bacteria both premortem and postmortem. Invasive pulmonary fungal infection was detected in five cases postmortem, but in no cases premortem. According to the univariate analyses, the patients with undiagnosed pulmonary co-infection had significantly shorter hospital (p = 0.0012) and intensive care unit (p = 0.0006) stays and significantly fewer extra-pulmonary infections (p = 0.0021). Bacterial and fungal pulmonary co-infection are under-recognized complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

The Effect of Patients' Understanding of Sling Necessity and Home Assistance on Sling Wear After Shoulder Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative education and socioeconomic factors influence patient behavior. Recent evidence has suggested that sling compliance is associated with improved outcomes after shoulder surgery; it is important to investigate factors that influence sling compliance. PURPOSE: To determine the associations between postoperative sling wear and patients' understanding of sling necessity, postoperative home assistance, and social deprivation. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 66 patients were prospectively enrolled from 2018 to 2020 if they were ≥18 years of age and undergoing shoulder surgery requiring a sling for at least 1 month postoperatively. Sling wear was measured using a temperature-sensing device. At 6 weeks postoperatively, patients' understanding for sling necessity was determined by their response to a question on the Medical Adherence Measure questionnaire, "Why did you have to wear a shoulder sling?" The Patient Understanding Grading Scale (PUGS) was developed to quantify patient responses. PUGS was graded 1 to 3, with grade 1 corresponding to the least technical knowledge. Patient characteristics, social deprivation (Area Deprivation Index [ADI]), and home assistance were additionally analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients when stratified by PUGS grade. Multivariable linear regression analysis for total hours of sling wear per week showed that patients with PUGS grade 2 (ß, 48.2 hours; P = .007) and grade 3 (ß, 59.5 hours; P = .003) wore their slings significantly more than grade 1 patients. Patients with home assistance had significantly greater day hours (73.5 ± 33.0 vs 44.0 ± 24.5 hours; P = .037) of sling wear per week, but there was no difference in night sling hours. Patients older than 60 years wore their slings significantly more, while men and those with a higher body mass index (BMI) wore their slings significantly less. ADI was not significantly associated with sling wear. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients with greater understanding for sling necessity, those with home assistance, and patients >60 years have greater sling wear, while male patients and those with a higher BMI have lower sling compliance. ADI was not a significant contributor.

Treatment of cervical non-union with cervical disc replacement: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has become prevalent in the treatment of cervical pathology. CDR is an appealing option for several reasons, including improvement of symptoms, preservation of range of motion, and the absence of risk for nonunion - a complication of an anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery. In this case series, we explore the use of CDR to treat cervical nonunion. METHODS: Four patients, ages 50 to 64, presented to one surgeon with symptomatic cervical nonunion. Three of the four patients possessed risk factors for further nonunion and were therefore considered especially well-suited to a CDR rather than a revision ACDF. X-ray, MRI, and CT were used to confirm the presence of nonunion and to determine the architectural feasibility of replacing the level with a cervical disc arthroplasty. Six total nonunion levels were present in four patients (two levels in two patients and one level in two patients). Each of the nonunion levels was successfully treated with a revision decompression and CDR. RESULTS: Postoperatively, all four patients experienced improvement of nonunion symptoms. Neck Disability Index improved on average by 75% (preoperative score 51% to postoperative score 13%). Flexion-extension X-rays were available in three patients, which showed an increase in an average range of motion from 2 degrees to 7 degrees at the revised levels. CONCLUSION: The series describing four successful cases expands the current literature and provides support for future investigation into CDR as a treatment for cervical nonunion. We propose CDR as a viable option to treat symptomatic cervical nonunion and restore range of motion in patients without significant arthrosis and with preserved endplate architecture.

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine induced higher antibody affinity and IgG titers against variants of concern in post-partum vs non-post-partum women.

BACKGROUND: Limited knowledge exists in post-partum women regarding durability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced antibody responses and their neutralising ability against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC). METHODS: We elucidated longitudinal mRNA vaccination-induced antibody profiles of 13 post-partum and 13 non-post-partum women (control). FINDINGS: The antibody neutralisation titres against SARS-CoV-2 WA-1 strain were comparable between post-partum and non-post-partum women and these levels were sustained up to four months post-second vaccination in both groups. However, neutralisation titers declined against several VOCs, including Beta and Delta. Higher antibody binding was observed against SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) mutants with key VOC amino acids when tested with post-second vaccination plasma from post-partum women compared with controls. Importantly, post-vaccination plasma antibody affinity against VOCs RBDs was significantly higher in post-partum women compared with controls. INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates that there is a differential vaccination-induced immune responses in post-partum women compared with non-post-partum women, which could help inform future vaccination strategies for these groups. FUNDING: The antibody characterisation work described in this manuscript was supported by FDA's Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMi) grant #OCET 2021-1565 to S.K and intramural FDA-CBER COVID-19 supplemental funds.

Spinal Anesthesia with Targeted Sedation based on Bispectral Index Values Compared with General Anesthesia with Masked Bispectral Index Values to Reduce Delirium: The SHARP Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Reducing depth of anesthesia and anesthetic exposure may help prevent delirium, but trials have been conflicting. Most studies were conducted under general anesthesia or in cognitively impaired patients. It is unclear whether reducing depth of anesthesia beyond levels consistent with general anesthesia reduces delirium in cognitively intact patients. The authors' objective was to determine whether a bundled approach to reduce anesthetic agent exposure as determined by Bispectral Index (BIS) values (spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation based on BIS values) compared with general anesthesia (masked BIS) reduces delirium. METHODS: Important eligibility criteria for this parallel-arm randomized trial were patients 65 yr or greater undergoing lumbar spine fusion. The intervention group received spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation to BIS greater than 60 to 70. The control group received general anesthesia (masked BIS). The primary outcome was delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method daily through postoperative day 3, with blinded assessment. RESULTS: The median age of 217 patients in the analysis was 72 (interquartile range, 69 to 77). The median BIS value in the spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation based on BIS values group was 62 (interquartile range, 53 to 70) and in the general anesthesia with masked BIS values group was 45 (interquartile range, 41 to 50; P < 0.001). Incident delirium was not different in the spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation based on BIS values group (25.2% [28 of 111] vs. the general anesthesia with masked BIS values group (18.9% [20 of 106]; P = 0.259; relative risk, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.85 to 1.76]). In prespecified subgroup analyses, the effect of anesthetic strategy differed according to the Mini-Mental State Examination, but not the Charlson Comorbidity Index or age. Two strokes occurred among patients receiving spinal anesthesia and one death among patients receiving general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation based on BIS values compared with general anesthesia with masked BIS values did not reduce delirium after lumbar fusion.

Does Local Steroid Reduce Dysphagia After Cervical Disc Replacement? A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blinded Study.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of intraoperatively administered local Depo-Medrol on the incidence and severity of postoperative dysphagia in patients undergoing cervical disk replacement (CDR) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Dysphagia is often reported as an adverse event after anterior cervical surgeries. One method for reducing the incidence of postoperative dysphagia in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgeries is the intraoperative application of topical corticosteroids to the retroesophageal space. There have been no studies examining the effect of local steroids on dysphagia after CDR surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients underwent CDR surgery by a single surgeon at a single institution. A 1 cm ×3 cm ×3 mm gel foam collagen sponge was saturated by the nurse with either saline (1 cc) or Depo-Medrol (40 mg/1 cc) based on randomization protocol. The sponge was placed ventral to the cervical disk implant in the retroesophageal space. Study follow-up occurred on postoperative day 1, 4, 7, 14 and postoperative month 1, 2, and 3. Dysphagia outcomes were classified using the Bazaz Dysphagia Score and Eating Assessment Tool 10. RESULTS: The steroid group, compared with the control group, had significantly reduced incidence of dysphagia (50% vs. 75%; P=0.0427) and severe dysphagia (12% vs. 36% Bazaz score, P=0.0253; 18% vs. 42% Eating Assessment Tool 10, P=0.0378) at POD4. There was no significant long-term difference in rates of dysphagia between the control and the steroid group. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides level 1 evidence that the use of intraoperative locally administered Depo-Medrol significantly reduces the incidence and severity of dysphagia within the first week after CDR surgery. The use of local steroid may provide patients undergoing CDR surgery with a more pleasant early recovery experience with respect to dysphagia.

Spinal Anesthesia for Geriatric Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Comparative Case Series.

BACKGROUND: The use of spinal anesthesia (SA) as opposed to general anesthesia (GA) during elective lumbar spine surgery is an emerging technique and represents a potentially modifiable factor to limit perioperative complications. Few studies, however, have compared these anesthetic techniques in an elderly population. The aim of this study is to determine if SA is a safe alternative to GA for lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients. METHODS: A retrospective, consecutive case series study was performed. All patients aged 70 years and older who underwent lumbar spine decompression or combined decompression and fusion using either SA or GA during a 2-year period at a single institution were identified. Demographics and perioperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of all patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 56 patients (19%) received SA and 239 (81%) received GA. Patients receiving SA were slightly older (median age, 77 years versus 75 years, P = .002), consisted of more men (57% versus 36%, P = .01), and had a lower mean body mass index (28.3 versus 30.1, P = .03). Indications for surgery and type of surgery were similar between groups. On average, operative times with SA were 101 minutes versus 103 minutes with GA (P = .71). After controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, patients receiving SA had decreased estimated blood loss (ß = -75 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], -140.6, -9.4; P = .025) and intraoperative intravenous fluid requirements (ß = -205 mL; 95% CI, -389.4, -21.0; P = .029), shorter postanesthesia care unit stays (ß = -41 minutes; 95% CI, -64.6, -16.9; P = .001), lower maximum visual analog scale pain scores (ß = -0.89 points; 95% CI, -1.6, -0.1; P = .020), and decreased odds of receiving blood transfusion (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01, 0.62; P = .45); there were no significant differences in operative time, length of stay, nausea, or oral morphine equivalents consumed per day. Complication rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia is a reasonable, safe alternative to general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients with degenerative conditions.

Lengthy complex lumbar fusion surgery in high-risk elderly patient under spinal anesthesia: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal Anesthesia (SA) continues to be an emerging technique for lumbar fusion surgery in the elderly population. SA is an appealing option in the high-risk geriatric population for several reasons, including the potential for reduced systematic stress, reduced blood loss, and reduced post-operative delirium. The safe limits of spine surgery under SA remain undetermined. PRESENTATION OF CASE: The following case-study describes an elderly high-risk patient (ASA III) with severe spinal stenosis and degenerative scoliosis who presented with lower back and right leg pain and underwent a 3-level lumbar fusion surgery with spinal anesthesia. The procedure lasted 3 h and 44 min with sufficient anesthesia maintained throughout. The patient experienced minor post-operative complications, but had an excellent clinical outcome at 3-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Further research should be conducted to define the temporal limits of SA in elderly patients and the etiology of post-operative complications following lumbar fusion surgery under spinal anesthesia in the geriatric population. CONCLUSION: The case reported, herein, demonstrates the feasibility of SA in elderly patients undergoing lengthy complex lumbar surgeries who have been designated "high-risk" patients (ASA > II) and provides support for future investigation into surgical and anesthesia treatment options for geriatric high-risk patients presenting with complex lumbar spine pathologies.