Letrozole and palbociclib versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk luminal breast cancer.

Background: Palbociclib is a CDK4/6 inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy and safety in combination with endocrine therapy in advanced luminal breast cancer (LBC). We evaluated the respective efficacy and safety of chemotherapy and letrozole-palbociclib (LETPAL) combination as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with high-risk LBC. Patients and methods: NeoPAL (UCBG10/4, NCT02400567) is a randomised, parallel, non-comparative phase II study. Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, Prosigna®-defined luminal B, or luminal A and node-positive, stage II-III breast cancer, not candidate for breast-conserving surgery, were randomly assigned to either letrozole (2.5 mg daily) and palbociclib (125 mg daily, 3 weeks/4) during 19 weeks, or to FEC100 (5FU 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2)×3 21-day courses followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2×3 21-day courses. Primary end point was residual cancer burden (RCB 0-I rate). Secondary end points included clinical response, proliferation-based markers, and safety. Results: Overall, 106 patients were randomised [median Prosigna® ROR Score 71 (22-93)]. RCB 0-I was observed in four and eight patients in LETPAL [7.7% (95% CI 0.4-14.9)] and chemotherapy [15.7% (95% CI 5.7-25.7)] arms, respectively. Pathological complete response rates were 3.8% and 5.9%. Clinical response (75%) and breast-conserving surgery rates (69%) were similar in both arms. Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index 0 scores (breast cancer-specific survival) were observed in 17.6% and 8.0% of patients in LETPAL and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Safety profile was as expected, with 2 versus 17 serious adverse events (including 11 grade 4 serious AEs in the chemotherapy arm). Conclusion: LETPAL combination was associated with poor pathological response but encouraging clinical and biomarker responses in Prosigna®-defined high-risk LBC. Contemporary chemotherapy regimen was associated with poor pathological and biomarker responses, with a much less favourable safety profile. LETPAL combination might represent an alternative to chemotherapy in early high-risk LBC. Clinical Trial Number: NCT02400567.

Impact of a tailored oral vitamin D supplementation regimen on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in early breast cancer patients: a randomized phase III study.

BACKGROUND: A minority of early breast cancer (EBC) patients treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy have sufficient baseline vitamin D (vitD) level. This randomized phase III study assessed the safety and efficacy of a tailored, high-dose, oral vitD supplementation in restoring a normal 25-hydroxy vitD (25OHD) level in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants received a 6-month conventional (C) vitD and calcium supplementation or a 6-month high-dose oral vitD regimen tailored on the deficiency (T) and a conventional calcium supplementation. The primary end point was the 6-month percentage of 25OHD serum level normalization. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients including 197 patients with vitD deficiency were recruited, and 195 patients were randomized (T, 100; C, 95). Compliance to the daily oral supplementation was 68.4% and 67% in the C and T arms, respectively. Discontinuous high-dose vitD compliance appeared higher in the T arm (77%). At 6 months, more patients presented with a normalized vitD level in the T arm (30% versus 12.6%; P = 0.003). Supplementation was well tolerated, and no significant difference in the treatment-related toxicity between the two arms was reported. Fifty-two patients without vitD normalization from the C arm switched to the T arm after 6 months. At 12 months, 44% of these patients achieved vitD normalization. CONCLUSION: A tailored high-dose oral vitD supplementation safely allows a higher percentage of the serum 25OHD level normalization compared with a conventional regimen in chemotherapy-treated EBC patients. As compliance to a daily oral supplementation remains poor in this setting, an adaptation of the treatment schedule is warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01480869.

Evaluation of the quality of the management of cancer of the corpus uteri--selection of relevant quality indicators and implementation in Belgium.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the methodology and selection of quality indicators (QI) to be implemented in the EFFECT (EFFectiveness of Endometrial Cancer Treatment) project. EFFECT aims to monitor the variability in Quality of Care (QoC) of uterine cancer in Belgium, to compare the effectiveness of different treatment strategies to improve the QoC and to check the internal validity of the QI to validate the impact of process indicators on outcome. METHODS: A QI list was retrieved from literature, recent guidelines and QI databases. The Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Center methodology was used for the selection process and involved an expert's panel rating the QI on 4 criteria. The resulting scores and further discussion resulted in a final QI list. An online EFFECT module was developed by the Belgian Cancer Registry including the list of variables required for measuring the QI. Three test phases were performed to evaluate the relevance, feasibility and understanding of the variables and to test the compatibility of the dataset. RESULTS: 138 QI were considered for further discussion and 82 QI were eligible for rating. Based on the rating scores and consensus among the expert's panel, 41 QI were considered measurable and relevant. Testing of the data collection enabled optimization of the content and the user-friendliness of the dataset and online module. CONCLUSIONS: This first Belgian initiative for monitoring the QoC of uterine cancer indicates that the previously used QI selection methodology is reproducible for uterine cancer. The QI list could be applied by other research groups for comparison.

Phase I trial combining temozolomide plus lapatinib for the treatment of brain metastases in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: the LAPTEM trial.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BMs) pose a clinical challenge in breast cancer (BC). Lapatinib or temozolomide showed activity in BM. Our study assessed the combination of both drugs as treatment for patients with HER2-positive BC and BM. METHODS: Eighteen patients were enrolled, with sixteen of them having recurrent or progressive BM. Any type of previous therapy was allowed, and disease was assessed by gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary end points were the evaluation of the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the determination of the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary end points included objective response rate, clinical benefit and duration of response. RESULTS: The lapatinib-temozolomide regimen showed a favorable toxicity profile because the MTD could not be reached. The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, diarrhea and constipation. Disease stabilization was achieved in 10 out of 15 assessable patients. The estimated median survival time for the 16 patients with BM reached 10.94 months (95% CI: 1.09-20.79), whereas the median progression-free survival time was 2.60 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82-3.37]. CONCLUSIONS: The lapatinib-temozolomide combination is well tolerated. Preliminary evidence of clinical activity was observed in a heavily pretreated population, as indicated by the volumetric reductions occurring in brain lesions.

Genome-wide gene expression profiling to predict resistance to anthracyclines in breast cancer patients.

Validated biomarkers predictive of response/resistance to anthracyclines in breast cancer are currently lacking. The neoadjuvant Trial of Principle (TOP) study, in which patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors were treated with anthracycline (epirubicin) monotherapy, was specifically designed to evaluate the predictive value of topoisomerase II-alpha (TOP2A) and develop a gene expression signature to identify those patients who do not benefit from anthracyclines. Here we describe in details the contents and quality controls for the gene expression and clinical data associated with the study published by Desmedt and colleagues in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2011 (Desmedt et al., 2011). We also provide R code to easily access the data and perform the quality controls and basic analyses relevant to this dataset.

Advanced ovarian cancer: phase III randomized study of sequential cisplatin-topotecan and carboplatin-paclitaxel vs carboplatin-paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Topotecan has single-agent activity in recurrent ovarian cancer. It was evaluated in a novel combination compared with standard frontline therapy. METHODS: Women aged 75 years or younger with newly diagnosed stage IIB or greater ovarian cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 1 or less, were stratified by type of primary surgery and residual disease, treatment center, and age; then randomly assigned to one of the two 21-day intravenous regimens. Patients in arm 1 (n = 409) were administered four cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1 and topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, then four cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) over 3 hours on day 1 followed by carboplatin (area under the curve = 5) on day 1. Patients in arm 2 (n = 410) were given paclitaxel plus carboplatin as in arm 1 for eight cycles. We compared progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and cancer antigen-125 normalization rates in the two treatment arms. A stratified log-rank test was used to assess the primary endpoint, PFS. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: A total of 819 patients were randomly assigned. At baseline, the median age of the patients was 57 years (range = 28-78); 81% had received debulking surgery, and of these, 55% had less than 1 cm residual disease; 66% of patients were stage III and 388 (47.4%) patients had measurable disease. After a median follow-up of 43 months, 650 patients had disease progression or died without documented progression and 406 had died. Patients in arm 1 had more hematological toxicity and hospitalizations than patients in arm 2; PFS was 14.6 months in arm 1 vs 16.2 months in arm 2 (hazard ratio = 1.10, 95% confidence interval = 0.94 to 1.28, P = .25). Among patients with elevated baseline cancer antigen-125, fewer in arm 1 than in arm 2 had levels return to normal by 3 months after random assignment (51.6% vs 63.3%, P = .007) CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan and cisplatin, followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel, were more toxic than carboplatin and paclitaxel alone, but without improved efficacy. Carboplatin plus paclitaxel remains the standard of care for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Current management of ovarian carcinosarcoma.

Ovarian carcinosarcomas (OCS), also known as malignant mixed müllerian tumors, are uncommon malignancies that carry a poor prognosis. The presentation of OCS is usually indistinguishable from that of epithelial ovarian cancer. Due to its low frequency, prospective trials have been difficult to perform, but there is evidence that OCS are sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy. Recent studies have shown encouraging results with platinum-ifosfamide and platinum-taxane schedules, which are usually considered the treatment of choice. However, poor performance status at presentation is also a common problem, so that many patients may be unsuitable for combination chemotherapy but may still benefit from single-agent platinum or ifosfamide or, occasionally, from nonplatinum schedules such as ifosfamide plus paclitaxel. Aggressive cytoreductive surgery appears to have a positive impact on outcome and should probably be offered to most patients. However, this procedure has been associated with higher rates of complication in OCS and should only be attempted by experienced (gynecological) surgeons in centers with expertise in the management of gynecological malignancies.

Will the dark sky over advanced renal cell carcinoma soon become brighter?

Until recently, immunotherapy has been the most efficient treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma, but clinical results are largely unsatisfactory. More promising agents are being developed as a result of an improved understanding of the biology of the disease. Several agents that target known biological abnormalities of the disease are now being tested in the clinic. This review describes the encouraging clinical results obtained to date with these new drugs or combinations of drugs.

[Acute interstitial pneumonia and bronchial cancer]. / Pneumopathie interstitielle aiguë et cancer bronchique.

A 64 year-old woman with a lung cancer metastatic to the bone was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for a hypoxemic interstitial diffuse pneumonia. The diagnosis was obtained with a further complementary investigation. The differential diagnosis of intestitial pneumonia is discussed.

Chemoprotection and selection by chemotherapy of multidrug resistance-associated protein-1 (MRP1) transduced cells.

Utilization of chemotherapy for treatment of tumors is mainly limited by its hematological toxicity. Because of the low level expression of drug resistance genes, transduction of hematopoietic progenitors with multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) or multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1) genes should provide protection from chemotherapy toxicity. Successful transfer of drug resistance genes into hematopoietic cells might allow the administration of higher doses of chemotherapy and, therefore, increase regression of chemosensitive tumors. In addition, this approach can be used to select in vivo transduced cells by their enrichment after administration of cytotoxic drugs. Our group has studied the potential value of MRP1 to protect hematopoietic cells. The interest in the use of MRP1 as an alternative to MDR1 gene transfer for bone marrow protection lies in its different modulation. Indeed, classical P-gp reversal agents, tested in clinic to decrease MDR1 tumor resistance, have little or no effect on MRP1 function. This would allow, in the same patient, the use of reversal agents to decrease P-gp tumor resistance without reversing bone marrow protection of the transduced hematopoietic cells provided by MRP1. We constructed two different MRP1-containing vectors with either the Harvey retroviral long terminal repeat (LTR) or phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) as promoters and generated ecotropic producer cells. MRP1 transduced fibroblasts were more resistant to doxorubicin, vincristine, and etoposide and their chemoprotection was increased after selection with chemotherapeutic agents in the presence of glutathione, a co-factor for MRP1 function. Lethally irradiated mice were engrafted with bone marrow (BM) cells transduced with MRP1 vectors (PGK promoter). We demonstrated that high expression of MRP1 in murine hematopoietic cells reduces doxorubicin-induced leukopenia and mortality. In addition, in vivo selection of MRP1-transduced BM cells was achieved following doxorubicin administration and allowed a better chemoprotection after the second chemotherapy cycle.

Unreliability of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in detecting contaminating breast cancer cells in peripheral blood stem cells due to induction of CEA by growth factors.

RT-PCR is increasingly used for the detection of minimal residual disease in solid tumors. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) RT-PCR seemed to be highly specific for detection of tumor cells when tested on PBMC. A very high frequency of RT-PCR amplification product for CEA in PBSC from breast cancer patients mobilized with G-CSF was found. However, this result contrasted with tumor cell detection by immunocytochemistry (ICC) which showed no correlation with RT-PCR results. In addition, CEA mRNA was amplified in most G-CSF-mobilized PBSC samples derived from patients with hematological malignancies and from healthy donors of allogeneic stem cells, although no circulating epithelial cells could be demonstrated by ICC. CEA RT-PCR expression was observed in PBMC from healthy individuals incubated in vitro with G-CSF. These data suggest that CEA transcription can be induced by G-CSF, resulting in a loss of specificity of CEA RT-PCR for tumor cell detection in PBMC. We conclude, CEA RT-PCR may not be recommended to detect tumor cell contamination in peripheral blood from patients treated with G-CSF. This may have implications on tumor cell detection by RT-PCR in tissues where endogenous or exogenous growth factors may induce the transcription of CEA or other genes.

Clearance kinetics of CD34+ cells from peripheral blood: an independent predictor of hematologic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

We measured the concentration of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood (PB) (1/2) h prior to and (1/2), 1, 3, 6, and 12 h following hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) infusion in 34 breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). The decrease in these concentrations over time enabled us to determine the clearance kinetics of CD34+ cells from PB. The absolute number of CD34+ cells in PB generally peaked at (1/2) h after infusion, then rapidly declined from 1 to 3 h post infusion and continued to fall until 12 h post transplant, but more slowly. In univariate analysis, CD34+cells/kg infused, CFU-GM/kg infused, the CD34+ count at (1/2) h, and the 12-h clearance of CD34+ cells from PB were predictors of hematologic recovery, as were each of the two phases of clearance when the slope was divided into rapid and slow phases (from (1/2) to 3 and from 3 to 12 h post transplant, respectively). We then stratified our population by the number of CD34+ cells/kg infused. In group 1, patients received 7.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. After adjusting for CD34+ cells injected, age, and purged or unpurged graft in multivariate analysis, the 12 h clearance remained a predictor of hematologic recovery in group 1. In addition, the second phase of clearance (from 3 to 12 h after infusion) was an even better predictor than the 12 h clearance. In group 2, however, no statistically significant correlation was observed, even with the number of HSC injected. Results suggest that rapidity of clearance of CD34+cells from PB is an independent indicator of hematologic recovery in patients receiving lower doses of CD34+ cells. When the cell dose injected is over a threshold, PB clearance correlations with hematologic recovery are masked.

Retrovirus-mediated gene transfer of the human multidrug resistance-associated protein into hematopoietic cells protects mice from chemotherapy-induced leukopenia.

Utilization of chemotherapy for the treatment of tumors is mainly limited by its hematological toxicity. Because of the low-level expression of drug resistance genes, transduction of hematopoietic progenitors with multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) or multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) genes should provide protection from chemotherapeutic agent toxicity. Successful transfer of drug resistance genes into hematopoietic cells may allow the administration of higher doses of chemotherapy and, thus, increase regression of chemosensitive tumors. The interest in the use of MRP as an alternative to MDR1 for bone marrow protection lies in its different modulation. This would allow, in the same patient, the use of MDR1 reversal agents to decrease MDR1 tumor resistance without reversing bone marrow (BM) protection of the MRP-transduced hematopoietic cells, since MRP expression is not reversed by these agents. We have constructed MRP-containing retroviral vectors using the phosphoglycerate kinase promoter and generated ecotropic producer cells. Lethally irradiated mice were engrafted with BM cells transduced by coculture with MRP producer cells. Evidence of long-term (9 months) gene transfer was provided by PCR of peripheral blood from MRP-transduced mice. Southern blot analysis confirmed the integrity of the provirus in the MRP-transduced mice. Long-term MRP expression (>5 months) was detected by RT-PCR and fluorescence-activated cell sorting of blood from living mice. High-level expression of MRP in murine hematopoietic cells reduces doxorubicin-induced leukopenia and mortality. Furthermore, we show in vivo selection of MRP-transduced cells following doxorubicin administration, with better and more significant chemoprotection after the second chemotherapy cycle. These data indicate that MRP retroviral gene transfer may be useful for chemoprotection and selection.

Retrovirus-mediated gene transfer of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) cDNA protects cells from chemotherapeutic agents.

Transduction of hematopoietic progenitors with a multidrug resistance gene like mdr-1 or mrp aims to protect bone marrow from toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. The interest in the use of mrp as an alternative to mdr-1 gene transfer for bone marrow protection lies in its different modulation. Indeed, classical P-gp reversal agents, tested in the clinic to decrease mdr-1 tumor resistance, have little or no effect on MRP function. This would allow, in the same patient, the use of reversal agents to decrease P-gp tumor resistance without reversing bone marrow protection of the transduced hematopoietic cells provided by multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP). As a first step, we have constructed and tested two different mrp-containing vectors with either the Harvey retroviral long terminal repeat (LTR) or PGK as promoters and generated ecotropic producer cells. We have shown by Southern blot analysis that retroviral supernatant from these producer cells can efficiently transmit the mrp gene to target cells. Mrp expression could be detected by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis in the producer cells. The transduced cells have increased resistance to doxorubicin, vincristine, and etoposide. Furthermore, chemoprotection of the transduced cells was increased after selection with chemotherapeutic agents in the presence of glutathione, a co-factor for MRP function. These data indicate that mrp retroviral vectors may be useful for chemoprotection and selection.

Thrombopoietic effects and toxicity of interleukin-6 in patients with ovarian cancer before and after chemotherapy: a multicentric placebo-controlled, randomized phase Ib study.

Recombinant human interleukin-6 (IL-6) has previously been shown to increase platelet counts in normal and sublethally irradiated mice, dogs, and primates. To assess its tolerance and efficacy in clinical use, we performed a randomized phase Ib study in patients with ovarian carcinoma. IL-6 was administered during an initial 7-day cycle before any chemotherapy. Beginning 7 days later, six cycles of chemotherapy containing carboplatin were administered every 3 weeks. During chemotherapy cycles 2 to 6, IL-6 was administered from day 4 through day 17 at escalating dose levels from 0.5 to 10 micrograms/kg/d. At each level, three patients received IL-6 and one patient received a placebo. During the prechemotherapy cycle of IL-6, a dose-dependent increase in platelet count was observed from day 12 to 15 and was maximal on day 15 (r = .77; P < .01). The median ploidy of bone marrow megakaryocytes shifted from 16 N to 32 N after 7 days of the initial prechemotherapy IL-6 administration. Dose-dependent increases in C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen levels were observed on day 8 (P < .0001 for both). A significant decrease in hemoglobin level occured rapidly after initiation of IL-6 therapy and was maximal on day 8 (P < .001). When given after chemotherapy, IL-6 accelerated platelet recovery after chemotherapy cycles 2 to 6. Postponements of scheduled chemotherapy due to thrombocytopenia were less frequent in patients treated with IL-6. No difference in either neutrophils or peripheral blood progenitor assays was observed during or after IL-6 treatment. Toxicity of IL-6 appeared mild and was not dose-limiting up to 10 micrograms/kg/d. Systemic symptoms such as fever, headache, and myalgia were the main side effects and were easily relieved by acetaminophen administration. No biologic toxicity was observed. The data indicate that IL-6 is a well-tolerated cytokine and capable of accelerating platelet recovery in patients receiving chemotherapy.

Tolerance of sequential or simultaneous administration of IL-3 and G-CSF in improving peripheral blood stem cells harvesting following multi-agent chemotherapy: a pilot study.

A pilot study was devised to assess tolerance of combined administration of interleukin-3 (IL-3) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) given after chemotherapy to mobilize peripheral blood progenitors cells (PBPC). Eight patients with advanced malignancies received 1 week courses of both IL-3 and G-CSF in one of three schedules: simultaneous 7 days administration (3 patients), sequential administration (3 patients) or partial (3 days) overlap of the two growth factors (2 patients). IL-3 (7.5 micrograms/kg/day) and G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day for the simultaneous schedule and 12 micrograms/kg/day for the partial overlapping and sequential schedules) were administered subcutaneously. Side-effects during cytokine administration included WHO grade I-II fever in 6 of 8 patients, flu-like symptoms (including myalgias and arthralgias) in 4 of 8, WHO grade I-II headache in 2 of 8 and WHO grade II nausea and vomiting in 1 of 8. Overall, side-effects appeared similar during combined administration of IL-3 and G-CSF to those observed during administration of IL-3 alone. No fever was observed when G-CSF was administered alone. Two leukaphereses were performed following the treatment with cytokines. Only the seven patients who received cytokines following chemotherapy were analyzed for PBPC mobilization. The median collection of CFU-GM/kg per patient in the seven analyzed patients was 1.3 x 10(5) (range 5.7 x 10(2)-3.6 x 10(5)). In two patients, a second cycle of mobilization with either granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or G-CSF was administered to allow safe engraftment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dose-dependent interleukin-3 stimulation of thrombopoiesis and neutropoiesis in patients with small-cell lung carcinoma before and following chemotherapy: a placebo-controlled randomized phase Ib study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, tolerance, and hematologic effects of recombinant human interleukin-3 (IL-3) in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) before and following multiagent antineoplastic therapy in a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (22 men and six women; median age, 60 years) with previously untreated SCLC entered the study. Patients were assigned to six groups of escalating-dose IL-3 ranging from 0.25 to 10 micrograms/kg/d administered by continuous infusion for 7 days, with one patient in each group receiving placebo. After a 1-week interval, the first of three cycles of carboplatin, etoposide (VP16), and epirubicin (CVE) given every 3 weeks was administered. The second cycle of CVE was followed by 7 days of IL-3 administered at the same daily dose as administered during the first infusion. RESULTS: The maximum-tolerated dose was not encountered in this study. Fever was the most frequently observed side effect. Before any chemotherapy, World Health Organization (WHO) grade II fever only appeared at doses > or = 2.5 micrograms/kg/d. Other side effects included rash, headache, and myalgia. During the first infusion of IL-3, before administration of chemotherapy, dose-dependent increases in peripheral-platelet counts (r = .613; P < .001) and neutrophil counts (r = .505; P = .007) were observed. Following the second cycle of CVE, recovery of peripheral platelet counts was faster as compared with the first cycle of CVE for patients treated with 7.5 and 10 micrograms/kg of IL-3 (P = .021). Chemotherapy postponements due to myelotoxicity were also less frequent following the second cycle of CVE as compared with the first for patients treated with > or = 2.5 micrograms/kg of IL-3 (P = .036). Compared with an age-matched historical group receiving identical chemotherapy (n = 191), administration of IL-3 did not modify either disease-free survival or overall patient survival rates. CONCLUSION: IL-3 is well tolerated at doses up to 10 micrograms/kg/d. In the absence of chemotherapy, biologic effects on both neutrophils and platelets were seen at doses > or = 2.5 micrograms/kg/d. IL-3 infusion following the second cycle of CVE appears to reduce chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression, but does not alter tumor response or patient survival rates.

IL-3 and peripheral blood stem cell harvesting.

Transplantation of blood-derived stem cells is increasingly performed because when used alone or when combined with autologous bone marrow grafting, it can demonstrably shorten myelosuppression following multi-agent chemotherapy. Hematopoietic growth factors can mobilize peripheral blood stem cells from the bone marrow to therapeutically intervene in accelerating hematologic recovery. Interleukin 3 (IL-3), whose hematopoietic activities were first described some ten years ago, is one of several candidate growth factors that may prove useful in enhancing this mobilization in order to obtain adequate yields of circulating stem cells for transplantation. IL-3 used in conjunction with synergistically acting cytokines such as granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or granulocyte CSF (G-CSF) have already yielded interesting results, while new factors like stem cell factor are in the process of clinical evaluations and appear promising. However, further issues remain to be clarified to confirm the general applicability of cytokine-augmented peripheral blood stem cells in improving on-schedule delivery of high-dose myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with malignancies.