Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Infect Prev ; 23(6): 278-284, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36277859

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Through routine respiratory samples surveillance among COVID-19 patients in the intensive care, three patients with aspergillus were identified in a newly opened general intensive care unit during the second wave of the pandemic. Methodology: As no previous cases of aspergillus had occurred since the unit had opened. An urgent multidisciplinary outbreak meeting was held. The possible sources of aspergillus infection were explored. The multidisciplinary approach enabled stakeholders from different skills to discuss possible sources and management strategies. Environmental precipitants like air handling units were considered and the overall clinical practice was reviewed. Settle plates were placed around the unit to identify the source. Reports of recent water leaks were also investigated. Results: Growth of aspergillus on a settle plate was identified the potential source above a nurse's station. This was the site of a historic water leak from the ceiling above, that resolved promptly and was not investigated further. Subsequent investigation above the ceiling tiles found pooling of water and mould due to a slow water leak from a pipe. Conclusion: Water leaks in patient areas should be promptly notified to infection prevention. Detailed investigation to ascertain the actual cause of the leak and ensure any remedial work could be carried out swiftly. Outbreak meetings that include diverse people with various expertises (clinical and non-clinical) can enable prompt identification and resolution of contaminated areas to minimise risk to patients and staff. During challenging pandemic periods hospitals must not lose focus on other clusters and outbreaks occurring simultaneously.

2.
J Infect Prev ; 22(4): 156-161, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34295376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We report an outbreak of SARS coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among healthcare workers (HCW) in an NHS elective healthcare facility. METHODOLOGY: A narrative chronological account of events after declaring an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 among HCWs. As part of the investigations, HCWs were offered testing during the outbreak. These were: (1) screening by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT- PCR) to detect a current infection; and (2) serum samples to determine seroprevalence. RESULTS: Over 180 HCWs were tested by real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The rate of infection was 15.2% (23.7% for clinical or directly patient-facing HCWs vs. 4.8% in non-clinical non-patient-facing HCWs). Of the infected HCWs, 57% were asymptomatic. Seroprevalence (SARS-CoV-2 IgG) among HCWs was 13%. It was challenging to establish an exact source for the outbreak. The importance of education, training, social distancing and infection prevention practices were emphasised. Additionally, avoidance of unnecessary transfer of patients and minimising cross-site working for staff and early escalation were highlighted. Establishing mass and regular screening for HCWs are also crucial to enabling the best care for patients while maintaining the wellbeing of staff. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first UK outbreak report among HCWs and we hope to have highlighted some key issues and learnings that can be considered by other NHS staff and HCWs globally when dealing with such a task in future.

3.
Nurs Stand ; 26(20): 35-40, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22375340

ABSTRACT

Urinary catheters are the main cause of hospital-acquired urinary tract infections among inpatients. Healthcare staff can reduce the risk of patients developing an infection by ensuring they give evidence-based care and by removing the catheter as soon as it is no longer necessary. An audit conducted in a Hampshire hospital demonstrated there was poor documented evidence that best practice was being carried out. Therefore a urinary catheter assessment and monitoring tool was designed to promote best practice and produce clear evidence that care had been provided.


Subject(s)
Medical Audit , Quality of Health Care , Urinary Catheterization , Clinical Competence , Humans , United Kingdom
4.
Nurs Older People ; 23(2): 14-9, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21413662

ABSTRACT

The use of indwelling urethral catheters has become a common aspect of patient care, but they can be a source of infection. Nurses can help to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections by using aseptic technique on insertion, following best practice in ongoing care and promptly removing catheters. The urinary catheter assessment and monitoring form (UCAM) is used at the Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, to remind staff of best practice and promote their early removal.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheterization/nursing , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Catheters, Indwelling , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Nursing Assessment , Nursing Records , United Kingdom
5.
Prof Nurse ; 20(1): 25-6, 28, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15468777

ABSTRACT

What is the true incidence of needlestick and sharps injuries among health-care professionals in the UK and what is the real cost of such injuries? This article identifies the obvious and not-so-obvious risks to staff in community and hospital settings and examines how such risks can be minimised, drawing on guidance from NICE and the RCN.


Subject(s)
Infection Control/standards , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control , Nursing/standards , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Risk Management/methods , Guidelines as Topic/standards , Humans , Nursing/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL