Asymptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Following Endovascular Stroke Therapy Is Not Benign: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (aICH) occurs in approximately 35% of patients with acute ischemic stroke after endovascular thrombectomy. Unlike symptomatic ICH, studies evaluating the effect of aICH on outcomes have been inconclusive. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the long-term effects of postendovascular thrombectomy aICH. METHODS AND RESULTS: The meta-analysis protocol was submitted to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews a priori. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through September 2023, yielding 312 studies. Two authors independently reviewed all abstracts. Included studies contained adult patients with ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy with follow-up imaging assessment of ICH reporting comparative outcomes according to aICH versus no ICH. After screening, 60 papers were fully reviewed, and 10 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria (n=5723 patients total, 1932 with aICH). Meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane RevMan v5.4. Effects were estimated by a random-effects model to estimate summary odds ratio (OR) of the effect of aICH versus no ICH on primary outcomes of 90-day modified Rankin Scale 3 to 6 and mortality. The presence of aICH was associated with a higher odds of 90-day mRS 3 to 6 (OR, 2.17 [95% CI, 1.81-2.60], P<0.0001, I2 46% Q 19.15) and mortality (OR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.17-2.53], P:0.005, I2 79% Q 27.59) compared with no ICH. This difference was maintained following subgroup analysis according to hemorrhage classification and recanalization status. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of aICH is associated with worse 90-day functional outcomes and higher mortality. Further studies to evaluate the factors predicting aICH and treatments aimed at reducing its occurrence are warranted.

Management of intracranial arterial stenosis during mechanical thrombectomy: Survey of neuro-interventionalists.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of emergent large vessel occlusion due to underlying intracranial stenosis (intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion) remains unknown. The primary aim of this survey analysis was to measure variation in the clinical management of intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion during mechanical thrombectomy. METHODS: A survey was designed using a web-based survey-building platform and distributed via the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN) websites for a response. Predictors of respondents' level of comfortability stenting were estimated using a binomial logistic regression model. RESULTS: We received 105 responses to the survey. Most respondents (54.3%) practiced at an academic Stroke Center. Nearly half of the respondents (49%) had been practicing for 5 or more years independently after fellowship. An average of 54 mechanical thrombectomies were performed by each respondent annually. There was variation in the definition of intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion, number of passes performed before pursuing rescue stenting, as well as intra and post-procedural antiplatelet management. Of respondents, 58% felt rescue stenting was very risky, and 55.7% agreed that there was equipoise regarding emergent angioplasty and/or stenting versus medical therapy for intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion. Respondents who encountered intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion more frequently thought that rescue stenting was less risky. CONCLUSION: There is notable variability in the diagnosis and management of intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion during mechanical thrombectomy. While most respondents felt rescue stenting was risky, the majority believed the benefit could outweigh the risk. The majority of respondents agreed that equipoise exists regarding the management of intracranial stenosis related large vessel occlusion, highlighting the need for clinical trials in this rare patient population.

Admission Blood Pressure and Outcome of Endovascular Therapy: Secondary Analysis of ASTER Trial.

BACKGROUND: Elevated blood pressure (BP) is common among patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions. The literature is inconsistent regarding the association between admission BP and outcome of mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Moreover, it is unclear whether the first line thrombectomy strategy (stent retriever [SR] versus contact aspiration [CA]) modifies the relationship between BP and outcome. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the ASTER (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization) randomized trial. BP was measured prior to randomization in all included patients. Co-primary outcomes included 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) and successful revascularization (modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia [mTICI] 2b-3). Secondary outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) within 24 hours. RESULTS: A total of 381 patients were included in the present study. Mean (SD) systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were 148 (26) mm Hg and 81 (16) mm Hg, respectively. There was no association between SBP or DBP and successful revascularization or 90-day functional independence. Similarly, there was no association between admission SBP or DBP with sICH or PH. Subgroup analysis based on the first-line thrombectomy strategy revealed similar results with no heterogeneity across groups. CONCLUSION: Admission BP was not associated with functional, angiographic or safety outcomes. Results were similar in both CA and CA groups.

Reproducibility of ABC/2 method to determine infarct volume and mismatch percentage with CT perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Our aim is to implement a simple, rapid, and reliable method using computed tomography perfusion imaging and clinical judgment to target patients for reperfusion therapy in the hyper-acute stroke setting. We introduce a novel formula (1-infarct volume [CBV]/penumbra volume [MTT] × 100%) to quantify mismatch percentage. METHODS: Twenty patients with anterior circulation strokes who underwent CT perfusion and received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) were analyzed retrospectively. Nine blinded viewers determined volume of infarct and ischemic penumbra using the ABC/2 method and also the mismatch percentage. RESULTS: Interrater reliability using the volumetric formula (ABC/2) was very good (intraclass correlation [ICC] = .9440 and ICC = .8510) for hemodynamic parameters infarct (CBV) and penumbra (MTT). ICC coefficient using the mismatch formula (1-MTT/CBV × 100%) was good (ICC of .635). CONCLUSIONS: The ABC/2 method of volume estimation on CT perfusion is a reliable and efficient approach to determine infarct and penumbra volumes. The 1-CBV/MTT × 100% formula produces a mismatch percentage assisting providers in communicating the proportion of salvageable brain and guides therapy in the setting of patients with unclear time of onset with potentially salvageable tissue who can undergo mechanical retrieval or intraarterial thrombolytics.