ABSTRACT
Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) is an early presurgical intervention to facilitate primary cleft lip repair by reducing cleft severity and improving labial and nasal form. However, it continues to be associated with the burden of care that influences access and completion of therapy. The authors, therefore, aim to determine the burden of care of NAM therapy for families seeking treatment at a high-volume urban cleft center. A retrospective study of all patients undergoing primary cleft repair between 2012 and 2020 was performed. Patients were grouped based on whether or not NAM therapy was offered. Variables including physical, psychosocial, and financial factors were assessed. Two hundred and thirty patients underwent primary cleft repair between 2012 and 2020. Of these, 176 patients were indicated for NAM, with 4% discontinuing, and 54 patients did not undergo NAM. The 169 patients who completed NAM had a mean duration of treatment of 13.6±8.8 wks consisting of 15±6 scheduled NAM adjustment visits and 1±1 unscheduled visit made urgently to assess caregiver concerns. The mean travel distance was 28.6±37.1 miles. Eighty-four percent of caregivers were married, and 16% did not have English as a primary language. Though 57% had private insurance, 43% of patients received charity support for their treatment. NAM is a finite presurgical intervention that requires caregivers to participate in patient care for approximately three months of their early life. The decision to pursue NAM should be considered alongside the burden of care for caregivers to complete treatment.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional printed bioceramic scaffolds composed of 100% ß-tricalcium phosphate augmented with dipyridamole (3DPBC-DIPY) can regenerate bone across critically sized defects in skeletally mature and immature animal models. Before human application, safe and effective bone formation should be demonstrated in a large translational animal model. This study evaluated the ability of 3DPBC-DIPY scaffolds to restore critically sized calvarial defects in a skeletally immature, growing minipig. METHODS: Unilateral calvarial defects (~1.4 cm) were created in 6-week-old Göttingen minipigs ( n = 12). Four defects were filled with a 1000 µm 3DPBC-DIPY scaffold with a cap (a solid barrier on the ectocortical side of the scaffold to prevent soft-tissue infiltration), four defects were filled with a 1000 µm 3DPBC-DIPY scaffold without a cap, and four defects served as negative controls (no scaffold). Animals were euthanized 12 weeks postoperatively. Calvariae were subjected to micro-computed tomography, 3D reconstruction with volumetric analysis, qualitative histologic analysis, and nanoindentation. RESULTS: Scaffold-induced bone growth was statistically greater than in negative controls ( P ≤ 0.001), and the scaffolds with caps produced significantly more bone generation compared with the scaffolds without caps ( P ≤ 0.001). Histologic analysis revealed woven and lamellar bone with haversian canals throughout the regenerated bone. Cranial sutures were observed to be patent, and there was no evidence of ectopic bone formation or excess inflammatory response. Reduced elastic modulus and hardness of scaffold-regenerated bone were found to be statistically equivalent to native bone ( P = 0.148 for reduced elastic modulus of scaffolds with and without caps and P = 0.228 and P = 0.902 for hardness of scaffolds with and without caps, respectively). CONCLUSION: 3DPBC-DIPY scaffolds have the capacity to regenerate bone across critically sized calvarial defects in a skeletally immature translational pig model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study assessed the bone generative capacity of 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds composed of 100% ß-tricalcium phosphate and augmented with dipyridamole placed within critical-sized calvarial defects in a growing porcine model.
Subject(s)
Bone Regeneration , Tissue Scaffolds , Animals , Swine , Humans , X-Ray Microtomography , Swine, Miniature , Skull/surgery , Dipyridamole/pharmacology , Printing, Three-Dimensional , OsteogenesisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of orthognathic surgery (OGS) in patients with craniofacial microsomia (CFM) who had previously undergone mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed including all patients with CFM who were treated with OGS at a single institution between 1996 and 2019. The clinical records, operative reports, and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were reviewed. CBCT data before OGS (T1), immediately after OGS (T2), and at long-term follow-up (T3) were analyzed using Dolphin three-dimensional software to measure the occlusal cant and chin point deviation. RESULTS: The study included 12 patients with CFM who underwent OGS (6 underwent OGS without MDO and 6 underwent OGS after MDO). There was a statistically significant improvement in occlusal cant and chin point deviation in both groups postoperatively. Occlusal cant relapsed by a mean of 0.6° (standard deviation [SD] 1.1°) in the patients who had OGS alone compared with 0.7° (SD 1.2°) in the patients who had OGS after MDO (P = .745) between T2 and T3. There was no statistically significant difference in chin point relapse between patients who had OGS alone compared with those who had OGS after MDO (0.1 mm [SD 2.5mm] vs 0.7mm [SD 2.2mm]; P = .808). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, these findings suggest that OGS after MDO in patients with CFM can produce stable results.
ABSTRACT
Alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) has been used for the reconstruction of atrophic alveolus for decades. The advantage of this technique is that it augments the bone and soft tissues together, creating a better alveolar platform for subsequent surgeries and dental rehabilitation. It is especially useful in patients with large and/or complex alveolar clefts for which approximating the alveolar segments reduces the size of the bony cleft and associated fistula. Displacement of the transported segment is the most frequently encountered complication of ADO but can be managed by constructing case-specific distractors.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Grafting , Alveolar Process/surgery , Alveoloplasty/methods , Cleft Palate/surgery , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , Adolescent , Alveolar Process/abnormalities , Humans , Male , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Osteogenesis, Distraction/instrumentation , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hematoma after non-oncologic breast surgery is a common concern requiring expeditious treatment. The purpose of this study is to perform an evidence-based review of perioperative factors that may contribute to hematoma in non-oncologic breast procedures. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed of non-oncologic breast procedures: breast augmentation, single-stage augmentation-mastopexy, mastopexy, and reduction. In total, 28 studies highlighting incidence and potential risk factors for hematoma were included; overall level of evidence was established regarding each perioperative factor examined and hematoma rate. RESULTS: The hematoma rate in breast augmentation ranges from 0.2 to 5.7%. There is inconclusive evidence to support an association between pocket choice or incision location and hematoma rate (Level III) and no evidence of an association between implant type and hematoma (Level V). Single-stage augmentation-mastopexy may have a lower hematoma rate than augmentation alone (Level II). Hematoma may increase the risk of capsular contracture (Level III). In breast reduction, the hematoma rate ranges from 1.0 to 9.3%. Evidence of an association between incision choice and hematoma rate is inconclusive (Level III). Use of epinephrine-containing solution, pedicle choice, and resection weight do not appear to affect hematoma rate (Level V, II, and II, respectively). The use of postoperative drains and ketorolac do not affect the incidence of hematoma (Level I and III, respectively). Intraoperative hypotension may increase the risk of hematoma after breast reduction (Level III). CONCLUSIONS: Breast hematomas are not uncommon complications. Current literature lacks ample evidence for risk factors for hematoma after non-oncologic breast procedures, warranting further, high-powered investigations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Subject(s)
Breast Implantation , Breast Implants , Mammaplasty , Breast Implantation/adverse effects , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Esthetics , Hematoma/epidemiology , Hematoma/etiology , Humans , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
We longitudinally assessed speech intelligibility (percent words correct/pwc), communication efficiency (intelligible words per minute/iwpm), temporal control markers (speech and pause coefficients of variation), and formant frequencies associated with lip motion in a 41-year-old face transplant recipient. Pwc and iwpm at 13 months post-transplantation were both higher than preoperative values. Multivariate regression demonstrated that temporal markers and all formant frequencies associated with lip motion were significant predictors (Pâ<â0.05) of communication efficiency, highlighting the interplay of these variables in generating intelligible and effective speech. These findings can guide us in developing personalized rehabilitative approaches in face transplant recipients for optimal speech outcomes.
Subject(s)
Facial Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Male , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Production Measurement , Transplant RecipientsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Online resources have become a major source of medical information for the general public. To date, there has not been an assessment of patient-oriented online resources for face and upper extremity transplantation candidates and patients. The goal of this study is to perform a comprehensive assessment of these resources. METHODS: Our analysis relied on 2 dimensions: comprehensiveness and readability. Comprehensiveness was evaluated using 14 predetermined variables. Readability was evaluated using 8 different readability scales through the Readability Studio Professional Edition Software (Oleander Software, Ltd, Vandalia, Ohio). Data were also collected from solid organ transplantation (SOT), specifically kidney and liver, programs for comparison. RESULTS: Face and upper extremity transplantation programs were significantly more likely to list exclusion criteria (73.9% vs 41.2%; P = 0.02), the need for life-long immunosuppression (87.0% vs 58.8%; P = 0.02), and benefits of transplantation (91.3% vs 61.8%; P = 0.01) compared with SOT programs. The average readability level of online resources by all face and upper extremity transplantation programs exceeded the sixth grade reading level recommended by the National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association. The average reading grade level of online resources by these programs was also significantly higher than those of SOT with both exceeding the recommended reading level (13.95 ± 1.55 vs 12.60 ± 1.65; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Future efforts in face and upper extremity transplantation should be directed toward developing standardized, comprehensive, and intelligible resources with high-quality content and simple language.
Subject(s)
Facial Transplantation , Internet , Patient Education as Topic , Upper Extremity/surgery , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation , Comprehension , Humans , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Informed decision-making relies on available information, including online resources. We evaluated the content and readability of websites published by American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA)-approved cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) teams in the United States. DESIGN: Team websites were reviewed, and teams with no accessible website or <30 sentences of content were excluded. Website content was scored by presence/absence of 20 variables derived from ACPA approval standards. Readability was evaluated with 8 scales. Readability was then compared to American Medical Association (AMA) recommendations. The relationship between website content and readability was assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Content and readability of team websites. RESULTS: From 167 reviewed teams, 47 (28.1%) had nonfunctional links, 17 (10.2%) had no accessible website, and 39 (23.4%) had <30 sentences. The average content score for all 111 team websites included was 14.5 (2.6) of 20. The combined average reading level across all scales (10.7 [1.9]) exceeded the AMA-recommended sixth-grade reading level; this finding held true for each individual website. Children's Hospital-affiliated teams (n = 86) had a significantly higher content score (14.8 vs 13.5; P = .03) and better readability as evidenced by lower reading grade level (10.5 vs 11.4; P = .04). On linear regression, a higher content score significantly predicted better readability (ß = -0.226; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Websites published by ACPA-approved CLP teams vary in accessibility and content and exceed the recommended reading level. These findings could inform future efforts to improve patient-oriented resources.
Subject(s)
Cleft Palate , Comprehension , Child , Humans , Internet , Reading , United StatesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Orthognathic surgery plays an important role in restoring aesthetic facial contour, correcting dental malocclusion, and the surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. However, the rate of complications following bimaxillary as compared with single-jaw orthognathic surgery remains unclear. The authors therefore sought to evaluate complication rates following bimaxillary as compared with single-jaw orthognathic surgery MATERIALS AND METHODS:: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify comparison groups. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. The listed procedures have different operating times and characteristics with longer time expected in the bimaxillary osteotomies group. Regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: The 3 groups of interest included patients who underwent mandibular osteotomies (nâ=â126), LeFort I osteotomy (nâ=â194), and bimaxillary osteotomies (nâ=â190). These procedures have different operating times, with a longer time expected with bimaxillary osteotomies. Patients undergoing bimaxillary osteotomies had significantly higher rates of early wound complications, overall complications, longer mean operative time, and mean hospital length of stay. Performing bimaxillary osteotomies in the outpatient setting was an independent risk factor for wound complications (ORâ=â12.58; 95% CI: 1.66-95.20; Pâ=â0.01), while an ASA class of 3 or more was an independent risk factor for overall complications (ORâ=â3.61; 95% CI: 1.02-12.75; Pâ=â0.04) and longer hospital length of stay (ßâ=â4.96; 95% CI: 2.64 - 7.29; Pâ<â0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery in the outpatient setting as well as patient American Society of Anesthesiology physical status class 3 or higher were independent factors for postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing modifiable risk factors preoperatively and the need for closer postoperative monitoring in this patient population for optimal outcomes.