A Palliative Care Curriculum May Promote Resident Self-Reflection and Address Moral Injury.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of formal palliative care education for surgical trainees, and the demanding nature of surgical training and exposure to challenging clinical scenarios can contribute to moral injury. We developed a palliative care curriculum to promote self-reflection, aiming to address moral injury in residents. METHODS: Five 1-h palliative care sessions were delivered over the academic year to all post-graduate year (PGY) levels covering the following topics: personal awareness, delivering bad news, surgical palliation for cancer pathology, surgical palliation for noncancer pathology, and urgent palliative care. The curriculum focused on reflection and small group discussions. The Moral Injury Symptom Scale-Health Professional was administered to assess feelings of moral injury. Descriptive statistics, chi-squared analysis, and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare the demographics and survey responses. RESULTS: 23 participants completed the preintervention survey, and 9 participants completed it postintervention. Over 50% of participants were PGY1 or PGY2 residents. Preintervention, 52% of participants reported feeling guilt over failing to save someone from being seriously injured or dying. 30% of participants reported that the feelings of guilt, shame, or distrust impaired their ability to function in relationships, at work, or other areas of life to at least a moderate degree. CONCLUSIONS: The described palliative care curriculum accomplishes several goals as follows: it educates residents on palliative care topics, teaches communication tools, encourages self-reflection, and provides space for building peer relationships. The ease of implementation makes this curriculum applicable across various types of institutions, offering the potential to positively impact surgical training on a national scale.

Minorities Face Delays to Pancreatic Cancer Treatment Regardless of Diagnosis Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Our analysis was designed to characterize the demographics and disparities between the diagnosis of pancreas cancer during emergency presentation (EP) and the outpatient setting (OP) and to see the impact of our institutions pancreatic multidisciplinary clinic (PMDC) on these disparities. METHODS: Institutional review board-approved retrospective review of our institutional cancer registry and PMDC databases identified patients diagnosed/treated for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between 2014 and 2022. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables, and one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction was used for continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients met inclusion criteria. Eighty-nine patients (31.1%) were underrepresented minorities (URM). Fifty-seven (64.0%) URMs presented during an EP versus 100 (50.8%) non-URMs (p = 0.037). Forty-one (46.1%) URMs were reviewed at PMDC versus 71 (36.0%) non-URMs (p = 0.10). No differences in clinical and pathologic stage between the cohorts (p = 0.28) were present. URMs took 22 days longer on average to receive treatment (66.5 days vs. 44.8 days, p = 0.003) in the EP cohort and 18 days longer in OP cohort (58.0 days vs. 40.5 days, p < 0.001) compared with non-URMs. Pancreatic Multidisciplinary Clinic enrollment in EP cohort eliminated the difference in time to treatment between cohorts (48.3 days vs. 37.0 days; p = 0.151). RESULTS: Underrepresented minorities were more likely to be diagnosed via EP and showed delayed times to treatment compared with non-URM counterparts. Our PMDC alleviated some of these observed disparities. Future studies are required to elucidate the specific factors that resulted in these findings and to identify solutions.

Impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula on outcomes in pancreatoduodenectomy: a comprehensive analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a major surgical procedure associated with significant risks, particularly postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Studies have highlighted the importance of certain risk factors for POPF, which are crucial for surgical decision-making and the management of high-risk patients undergoing PD. This study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing PD who met the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery - Class D (ISGPS-D) criteria. METHODS: This study analyzed American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data (2014-2021) for patients undergoing ISGPS-D PD, classified as having a soft pancreatic texture and a pancreatic duct of ≤3 mm. This study focused on mortality rates and the correlation between several factors and POPF (ISGPS grade B/C). RESULTS: From 5964 patients who underwent PD and met the ISGPS-D criteria, the 30-day mortality rate was 1.98%. Males had a higher incidence of POPF than females (57.42% vs 47.35%, respectively; P < .001). Patients with POPF experienced significantly higher rates of major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa), including thrombosis, pneumonia, sepsis, delayed gastric emptying, wound disruption, infections, and acute renal failure. There was a marked increase in the 30-day readmission and mortality rates in patients with POPF (30.0% vs 17.6% and 3.2% vs 1.4%, respectively; all P < .001). Multivariate analysis highlighted female sex as a protective factor against mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.47; P < .001) and extended hospital stay (>10 days) as a predictor of increased mortality risk (OR, 2.37; P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study underscored the significant association between POPF and increased postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Future efforts should concentrate on refining surgical techniques and improving preoperative assessments to mitigate the risks associated with POPF in patients undergoing PD.

Surgery for Oligometastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Defining Biologic Resectability.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is most often metastatic at diagnosis. As systemic therapy continues to improve alongside advanced surgical techniques, the focus has shifted toward defining biologic, rather than technical, resectability. Several centers have reported metastasectomy for oligometastatic PDAC, yet the indications and potential benefits remain unclear. In this review, we attempt to define oligometastatic disease in PDAC and to explore the rationale for metastasectomy. We evaluate the existing evidence for metastasectomy in liver, peritoneum, and lung individually, assessing the safety and oncologic outcomes for each. Furthermore, we explore contemporary biomarkers of biological resectability in oligometastatic PDAC, including radiographic findings, biochemical markers (such as CA 19-9 and CEA), inflammatory markers (including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, and scoring indices), and liquid biopsy techniques. With careful consideration of existing data, we explore the concept of biologic resectability in guiding patient selection for metastasectomy in PDAC.

Decreasing utilization of surgical interventions amongst patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Since 2013, North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) consensus-guidelines have endorsed consideration of surgical intervention for pancreatic- neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) with liver metastases. METHODS: Patients with non-functional PNET with liver only metastases from 2010 to 2019 were identified from the National Cancer Database. RESULTS: 34.7% underwent surgical intervention (13% PNET resection, 2.1% surgical management of liver metastases (SMLM), 19.5% PNET resection â€‹+ â€‹SMLM). In multivariable analysis, government insurance, year of diagnosis>2013, increasing primary tumor size were associated with lower rate of surgical intervention. Receiving treatment at an academic center (OR 3.59, 95%CI 1.81-7.11; P â€‹< â€‹0.001) or integrated cancer network (OR 3.21, 95%CI 1.57-6.54; P â€‹= â€‹0.001) was associated with a higher rate of surgical intervention. The overall rate of surgical intervention decreased from 45.7% in 2010 to 23.0% in 2019. CONCLUSION: Despite guideline recommendations and the suggested survival benefits, only one-third of patients underwent surgical intervention, potentially influenced by the rising utilization of systemic therapy in the past decade.

Educational Quality of YouTube Videos for Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: YouTube has become a main resource used by patients for self-education on medicine. It is important for surgeons to understand the quality and reliability of videos that patients are likely to view about elective procedures. METHODS: Videos were categorized by view count and content creators. The top 20 videos for each term, sorted by relevance, were evaluated using DISCERN criteria, a question set externally validated to assess the quality of information regarding health treatment choices. DISCERN score (DS) closer to 5 indicate higher quality information and 1 indicates the opposite. Total scores were given: 15-26 (very poor), 27-38 (poor), 39-50 (fair), 51-62 (very good), and 63-75 (excellent). Search terms included "Wound Care", "Skin Grafting", "Tracheostomy", and "percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement". RESULTS: In total, 80 unique videos were evaluated with a total view of 8,848,796. The mean overall DS was 2.15 and a mean bias DS was 2.46. The median DISCERN total score for each key term was Tracheostomy: 35 (poor), Skin Grafting 26 (very poor), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: 32 (poor), and Wound Care: 40 (fair). CONCLUSIONS: YouTube videos surrounding elective procedures should be viewed cautiously in patient education despite wide availability. The videos in this study show high levels of bias and low DS. Healthcare providers should be aware of poor-quality consumer health information often disseminated in online media such as YouTube.

Potential Role for Observation in Small Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm (SPN).

BACKGROUND: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) are rare tumors of the pancreas, typically affecting young women. Resection is the mainstay of treatment but is associated with significant morbidity and potential mortality. We explore the idea that small, localized SPN could be safely observed. METHODS: This retrospective review of the Pancreas National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2018 identified SPN via histology code 8452. RESULTS: A total of 994 SPNs were identified. Mean age was 36.8 ± 0.5 years, 84.9% (n = 844) were female, and most had a Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Coefficient (CDCC) of 0-1 (96.6%, n = 960). Patients were most often staged clinically as cT2 (69.5%, n = 457) followed by cT3 (17.6%, n = 116), cT1 (11.2%, n = 74), and cT4 (1.7%, n = 11). Clinical lymph node and distant metastasis rates were 3.0 and 4.0%, respectively. Surgical resection was performed in 96.6% of patients (n = 960), most commonly partial pancreatectomy (44.3%) followed by pancreatoduodenectomy (31.3%) and total pancreatectomy (8.1%). In patients clinically staged as node (N0) and distant metastasis (M0) negative, occult pathologic lymph node involvement was found in 0% (n = 28) of patients with stage cT1 and 0.5% (n = 185) of patients with cT2 disease. The risk of occult nodal metastasis significantly increased to 8.9% (n = 61) for patients with cT3 disease. The risk further increased to 50% (n = 2) in patients with cT4 disease. CONCLUSIONS: Herein, the specificity of excluding nodal involvement clinically is 99.5% in tumors ≤ 4 cm and 100% in tumors ≤ 2 cm. Therefore, there may be a role for close observation in patients with cT1N0 lesions to mitigate morbidity from major pancreatic resection.

Social Media, Misinformation, and Online Patient Education in Emergency General Surgical Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Patients use the internet to learn about diagnoses and treatment options. These sources vary in quality and accuracy of medical information. Thus, utilization of social media may lead to misinformation regarding treatment for patients in need of emergent general surgery procedures. METHODS: YouTube was searched with keywords "cholecystectomy," "cholecystitis," and "gallbladder surgery" and "appendectomy," "appendicitis," and "appendix surgery." For each procedure, the 100 videos with the greatest views were reviewed. Videos were assessed by four surgical trainees using validated instruments, DISCERN and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and Likert scales for patient education and misinformation. After appendectomy or cholecystectomy, patients completed a survey assessing use of social media preoperatively. RESULTS: The median DISCERN score was 28.0 of 75. The median PEMAT scores were 66.7% for understandability and 0% for actionability. Nearly half (49%) of videos provided no patient education and only 22% provided moderate or more. More than a third (35%) of videos contained misinformation. Doctors, medical education, and healthcare systems published videos with less misinformation, whereas patients, health/wellness groups published more misinformation (P < 0.001). Videos discoverable with colloquial terms "appendix surgery" and "gallbladder surgery" were more likely to contain misinformation (45.3%) compared to 20.5% of videos with misinformation discoverable using medical search terms only (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a range of video quality online with most videos of poor quality and provide little patient education. Understanding information available to patients online can tailor surgeon-patient discussions to combat misinformation and improve the informed consent process for patients.

Recovery of Skill Decay After COVID-19 Redeployments and Implications for Competency Attainment.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic immediately interrupted procedural training. The lasting impact of reduced caseloads and service redeployments on procedural-resident training has been underexplored. This longitudinal study investigated the long-term perspectives of skill decay after short breaks in training and implications for ensuring resident competency attainment. METHODS: Web-based cross-sectional surveys distributed immediately after (June 2020) compared to 1 y after (July 2021) COVID-19 redeployments at two tertiary academic medical centers of an integrated health system in New York. Participants included general surgery, surgical subspecialty, and anesthesiology residents and faculty. RESULTS: Fifty-five residents and 33 faculty completed the survey. Ninety-point nine percent of residents and 36.4% of faculty were redeployed to COVID-ICUs. Sixty-three-point seven percent of residents and 75.0% of faculty reported a reduction in resident technical skills in the short-term, with significantly less (45.5% of residents and 21.2% of faculty) reporting persistent reduction in technical skill after 1 y (P = 0.001, P < 0.001). Seventy-five percent of residents and 100% of faculty were confident residents would be able to practice independently at the conclusion of their training. Sixty-five-point five percent of residents and 63.6% of faculty felt that residents experienced a durable improvement in critical care skills. Residents also reported a positive long-term impact on professional core competencies at 1 y. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal surveillance of residents after COVID-19 redeployments suggests washout of temporary skill decay and return of resident confidence upon resumption of traditional training. This may provide insight into the impact of other short-term training interruptions on resident skill and promote greater resident support upon training resumption to ensure competency attainment.

Implementation and Assessment of Mentoring and Professionalism in Training (MAP-IT): A Humanistic Curriculum as a Tool to Address Burnout in Surgical Residents.

OBJECTIVE: Mentoring and Professionalism in Training (MAP-IT), a humanistic mentorship program, has demonstrated positive impact in non-surgical fields. This study assesses the feasibility of implementing MAP-IT in surgical residency and adapts MAP-IT to include residents-as-teachers (RAT). We hypothesize that MAP-IT will benefit surgical residents by building humanistic teaching skills, increasing resilience, reducing burnout, and improving connectedness. DESIGN: MAP-IT was implemented monthly during protected educational time. Faculty surgeons who had previously completed MAP-IT served as facilitators. Small groups consisted of 12 trainees, two faculty facilitators, and one resident facilitator. Each session comprised 60 minutes of reflection, readings, and discussion surrounding humanistic mentoring skills. The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and Humanistic Teaching Practices Effectiveness Questionnaire (HTPE) were administered before and after participation in MAP-IT. Qualitative interviews and surveys assessed residents' perspectives of the MAP-IT program. SETTING: MAP-IT was implemented at Northwell-North Shore/LIJ in Manhasset, NY in a general surgery residency program hosted by two tertiary care hospitals within a large health system. PARTICIPANTS: 55 residents participated as learners, five residents served as resident-facilitators, and 10 surgical faculty served as paired-facilitators of the MAP-IT course. RESULTS: 31.6% of residents had participated in a reflective medicine curriculum prior to MAP-IT, and these residents reported greater resilience and less burnout. This disparity was eliminated after participation in MAP-IT. Frequency of burnout was reduced from 64.1% to 46.1% after MAP-IT participation. Post-program, residents reported greater effectiveness in humanistic teaching practices when compared to baseline assessments. Quantitative and qualitative feedback demonstrated that MAP-IT was well received by resident participants and addressed a gap in their surgical training. CONCLUSIONS: A humanistic mentorship program involving RAT can be effectively implemented in surgical residency, is well-received by residents, and addresses a need surgical training by building skills and improving resident well-being.

Practice-Based Learning and Improvement: Improving Morbidity and Mortality Review Using Natural Language Processing.

INTRODUCTION: Practice-Based Learning and Improvement, a core competency identified by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, carries importance throughout a physician's career. Practice-Based Learning and Improvement is cultivated by a critical review of complications, yet methods to accurately identify complications are inadequate. Machine-learning algorithms show promise in improving identification of complications. We compare a manual-supplemented natural language processing (ms-NLP) methodology against a validated electronic morbidity and mortality (MM) database, the Morbidity and Mortality Adverse Event Reporting System (MARS) to understand the utility of NLP in MM review. METHODS: The number and severity of complications were compared between MARS and ms-NLP of surgical hospitalization discharge summaries among three academic medical centers. Clavien-Dindo (CD) scores were assigned to cases with identified complications and classified into minor (CD I-II) or major (CD III-IV) harm. RESULTS: Of 7774 admissions, 987 cases were identified to have 1659 complications by MARS and 1296 by ms-NLP. MARS identified 611 (62%) cases, whereas ms-NLP identified 670 (68%) cases. Less than one-third of cases (299, 30.3%) were detected by both methods. MARS identified a greater number of complications with major harm (457, 46.30%) than did ms-NLP (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Both a prospectively maintained MM database and ms-NLP review of discharge summaries fail to identify a significant proportion of postoperative complications and overlap 1/3 of the time. ms-NLP more frequently identifies cases with minor complications, whereas prospective voluntary reporting more frequently identifies major complications. The educational benefit of reporting and analysis of complication data may be supplemented by ms-NLP but not replaced by it at this time.

Private Equity and Its Increasing Role in US Healthcare.

Private equity investments in health care and surgery are on the rise. There are potential advantages and drawbacks of private equity investment in health care. However, if done under the right parameters, PE investment may have the potential to address some of the challenges and inefficiencies of the current health care system.

Learning to SuRRF: Sustained Engagement and Increased Academic Productivity Over Two Years of a Resident-Led Virtual Laboratory.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if implementation of a resident-led virtual laboratory can sustain increased engagement and academic productivity in residents and faculty. DESIGN: We developed and introduced a multimodal virtual Surgery Resident Research Forum (SuRRF) in July 2019. SuRRF utilizes monthly virtual lab meetings, weekly newsletters, a centralized database of projects, project tracking tools, and a shared calendar of deadlines to facilitate research among surgical residents. Data on number of participating residents, faculty, and projects across SuRRF meetings at 1-year (7/2020) and 2-years post-implementation (9/2021) were collected to evaluate engagement. Institutional ACGME Resident Scholarly Activity and Faculty Scholarly Activity reports were evaluated for the pre-SuRRF implementation (2018-2019) and post-implementation (2020-2021) academic years to assess productivity pre- and post-implementation. SETTING: Three tertiary academic hospitals of a single health system in New York. PARTICIPANTS: All residents in our general surgery program during the study period, including research residents, were eligible to participate in our study. RESULTS: At 1-year, there were 2 attendings, 13 residents, and 23 projects, compared to 12 attendings, 25 residents, and 42 projects at 2-years post-implementation. Post-SuRRF implementation, residents had significantly more publications (0.56 ± 0.15 vs. 1.10 ± 0.15, p = 0.005), textbook chapters (0.00 vs. 0.010 ± 0.044, p = 0.014), research participation (p < 0.01), and scholarly activity (p = 0.02). Post-SuRRF, faculty had significantly more publications (0.74 ± 0.15 vs. 2.20 ± 0.33, p < 0.001) and scholarly activity (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: SuRRF promotes exposure to projects and resources and increases collaboration and peer-to-peer mentorship. Our experience with SuRRF suggests that resident-led virtual laboratories may increase peer-reviewed publications and improve resident and faculty engagement in scholarly activity, thus supporting academic growth.

Pancreatic Cancer Patient-derived Organoids Can Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if patient-derived organoids (PDOs) may predict response to neoadjuvant (NAT) chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. BACKGROUND: PDOs have been explored as a biomarker of therapy response and for personalized therapeutics in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: During 2017-2021, patients were enrolled into an IRB-approved protocol and PDO cultures were established. PDOs of interest were analyzed through a translational pipeline incorporating molecular profiling and drug sensitivity testing. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six samples, including both surgical resections and fine needle aspiration/biopsy from 117 patients with pancreatic cancer were collected. This biobank included diversity in stage, sex, age, and race, with minority populations representing 1/3 of collected cases (16% Black, 9% Asian, 7% Hispanic/Latino). Among surgical specimens, PDO generation was successful in 71% (15 of 21) of patients who had received NAT prior to sample collection and in 76% (39 of 51) of patients who were untreated with chemotherapy or radiation at the time of collection. Pathological response to NAT correlated with PDO chemotherapy response, particularly oxaliplatin. We demonstrated the feasibility of a rapid PDO drug screen and generated data within 7 days of tissue resection. CONCLUSION: Herein we report a large single-institution organoid biobank, including ethnic minority samples. The ability to establish PDOs from chemotherapy-naive and post-NAT tissue enables longitudinal PDO generation to assess dynamic chemotherapy sensitivity profiling. PDOs can be rapidly screened and further development of rapid screening may aid in the initial stratification of patients to the most active NAT regimen.

"Residents as Teachers" Workshops Designed by Surgery Residents for Surgery Residents.

BACKGROUND: A core tenet of medical education is the expectation that senior residents will teach junior residents and medical students. However, many general surgery residency programs lack a formalized curriculum to equip trainees with necessary teaching skills. We evaluated the impact of resident-led residents-as-teachers (RAT) workshops (RATW) and assessed adaptability from in-person to virtual delivery. We hypothesized these courses would improve trainees' confidence in their roles as resident-teachers. METHODS: Pre-COVID-19, an in-person workshop for residents (PGY1-5) was conducted over two days. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a virtual RATW for incoming interns (PGY1) was conducted during intern boot camp. Topic fidelity was preserved between the two RATWs. Resident-educators were responsible for content and delivery; the program director and associate program directors served as facilitators only. Surveys were used to evaluate residents' confidence in four core topics. A Wilcoxon test was used to compare quantitative data. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in confidence in all areas following RATW attendance, except for "Teaching in the OR". In sub-analysis, there was a significant improvement in this category among incoming interns post-RATW (P < 0.001). The majority of interns agreed that the RATW helped them transition into their new teaching role and agreed that the resident-led RATW was effective. CONCLUSIONS: A resident-designed and resident-led RAT curriculum in general surgery effectively improves residents' confidence in teaching and is well received by residents. We recommend the implementation of a RAT curriculum in general surgery residency and intern boot camp. The RATW was well adapted to distance-learning format.

A Survey of the Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on Skill Decay Among Surgery and Anesthesia Residents.

OBJECTIVE: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has profoundly impacted healthcare delivery and strained medical training. This study explores resident and faculty perceptions regarding the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on technical skill decay of surgical and anesthesia residents. We hypothesized that many residents perceived that their technical abilities diminished due to a short period of interruption in their training. DESIGN: An IRB-exempt, web-based cross-sectional survey distributed to residents and faculty SETTING: Two large academic tertiary medical centers, North Shore University Hospital and Long Island Jewish Medical Center, of the Northwell Health System in New York. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery, anesthesiology, plastic surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, orthopedic surgery, oral maxillofacial surgery, urology, podiatry residents and faculty. RESULTS: All residents reported a significant impact on their training. Residents (82%) and faculty (94%) reported a significant reduction in case volumes due to the COVID-19 pandemic (p < 0.05). 64% of residents reported a reduction in technical skills, and 75% of faculty perceived a decrease in resident technical skills. Residents were concerned about fulfilling ACGME case requirements, however faculty were more optimistic that residents would achieve level-appropriate proficiency by the conclusion of their training. Both residents and faculty felt that resident critical care skills improved as a result of redeployment to COVID-19 intensive care units (66% and 94%). Additionally, residents reported increased confidence in their ability to care for critically ill patients and positive impact on professional competencies. CONCLUSIONS: Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on residency training are multi-dimensional. The majority of surgical and anesthesia residents perceived that their technical ability diminished as a result of skill decay, whereas other skillsets improved. Longitudinal surveillance of trainees is warranted to evaluate the effect of reduced operative volume and redeployment on professional competency.

Advance care planning in patients undergoing surgery to resect pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Underlying tension between balancing hope and realism.

BACKGROUND: The timing and the dose of Advanced Care Planning in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing curative-intent resection are generally dictated by the surgeon performing the operation. METHODS: A qualitative investigation using 1:1 interviews with 40 open-ended questions was conducted with a convenience sample of 10 high-volume pancreatic surgeons from across the country. The grounded theory approach was used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 10 interviews were conducted with expert pancreatic surgeons-6 males and 4 females. During preoperative counseling, all surgeons attempt to motivate patients by emphasizing hope, optimism, and the fact that surgery offers the only opportunity for cure. All surgeons discuss the possibility of recurrence as well as postoperative complications; however, a majority perceived that patients do not fully appreciate the likelihood of recurrence or postoperative complications. All surgeons acknowledged the importance of end-of-life conversations when death is imminent. Seventy percent of surgeons had mixed opinions regarding benefits of preoperative Advanced Care Planning in the preoperative setting, while 20% felt it was definitely beneficial, particularly that delivery of care aligned with patient goals. All surgeons emphasized that Advanced Care Planning should be led by a physician who both knows the patient well and understands the nuances of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma management. Most common barriers to in-depth Advanced Care Planning discussion reported by surgeons include taking away hope, lack of time, and concern for sending "mixed messages." CONCLUSION: We identified that surgeons experience a fundamental tension between promoting realistic long-term goals and expectations versus focusing on hope and enabling an overly optimistic perception of prognosis.