ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Different types of recurrent atrial tachycardia (AT) after Cox-maze procedures have been reported, whereas biatrial tachycardia (BiAT) has not been systematically analyzed. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we retrospectively investigated the electrophysiologic characteristics of BiAT after Cox-maze procedures by use of an ultrahigh-density mapping system. METHODS: Of a consecutive 76 patients who underwent catheter ablation of AT after Cox-maze procedures, 12 BiATs were identified. High-density activation mapping was performed in both the left atrium and right atrium in combination with entrainment pacing to confirm the circuit. RESULTS: We classified these BiATs into 2 groups. In group 1 (7 patients), the bidirectional block of maze linear lesions to prevent the macroreentrant AT was achieved; the posterior interatrial connections were involved in the circuit. In group 2 (5 patients), the bidirectional block of maze linear lesions was not blocked, and the most common gap was located at the end of the linear lesion near the annulus. In group 1, all the ATs were terminated by targeting the corresponding left atrium end of the posterior interatrial connections. In group 2, the ATs were terminated by targeting the gap near the annulus. CONCLUSION: The optimal ablation strategy for BiATs after the maze procedure should be based on detailed demonstration of the circuit by high-density mapping.
ABSTRACT
Background: Increasing age is a significant risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation (CA). We accomplished this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion (VOM-EI) with CA in elderly patients with persistent AF (PsAF). Methods: This retrospective observational study included 360 consecutive adult patients with PsAF, of which 141 were in the Elder group (age ≥65 years) and 219 were in the Younger group (age <65 years), who underwent the VOM-EI and radiofrequency CA (RFCA) between May 2020 and April 2022. The efficacy endpoint was no recurrence of AF within one year after CA. Results: The VOM-EI was successfully performed in 90.8% of patients from the Elder and 88.6% from the Younger group. All patients achieved PVI; 97.9% of patients from the Elder and 98.6% from the Younger group reached LA roof block, and 93.6% of patients from the Elder and 95.9% from the Younger group achieved MI block. There was no significant difference in 1-year survival without recurrence of AF between the two groups (83.0% and 84.5%, respectively). The incidence of complications within 30 days after the procedure from the two groups was low and did not differ significantly. Conclusion: The VOM-EI combined with RFCA proved to be an effective and safe strategy for treating PsAF in elderly and younger patients.