Therapeutic drug monitoring in Crohn's disease patients treated with anti-TNF: a comparison of two techniques.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring is a useful clinical decision aid in managing patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF). Various techniques are available to evaluate drug trough levels, and among these a point-of-care (POC) method has been proposed to overcome the limitations inherent to other methodologies. In this study we aimed to evaluate the capability of POC to discriminate between relapse and remission disease phases, and to assess the concordance of the POC and homogeneous mobility shift assay (HMSA) results. METHODS: Drug trough level of 46 Crohn's disease patients treated with either adalimumab or infliximab were evaluated with both a POC technique and an HMSA at various time points (week-16 and -48) during anti-TNF treatment. RESULTS: Median adalimumab trough level of patients in remission were significantly higher as compared to relapsing patients using both HMSA (week 16, P = 0.0001; week48, P = 0.001) and POC (week 16, P = 0.0003; week 48, P = 0.0012), and similar results were observed with infliximab trough level at week 16 (HMSA, P = 0.019; POC, P = 0.0072). Overall, we observed a good correlation between the techniques for both infliximab (r = 0.76; P < 0.0001) and adalimumab (r = 0.75; P < 0.0001), with no difference in discriminatory accuracy between assays (infliximab: HMSA versus POC c-index, 0.921 versus 0.895, P =0.149; adalimumab: HMSA versus POC c-index, 0.817 versus 0.850, P = 0.197). CONCLUSION: Both POC and HMSA assays are able to reliably differentiate relapse and remission phases in Crohn's disease patients treated with anti-TNF. These techniques showed good concordance and we feel that their preferential use should be based on local accessibility, physicians' experience and preference, and the need for timeliness availability of results.

Effect of a common missense variant in LIPA gene on fatty liver disease and lipid phenotype: New perspectives from a single-center observational study.

Lysosomal acid lipase deficiency (LAL-D) is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by hypoalphalipoproteinemia, mixed hyperlipemia, and fatty liver (FL) due to mutations in LIPAse A, lysosomal acid type (LIPA) gene. The rs1051338 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in LIPA gene, in vitro, could adversely affect the LAL activity (LAL-A). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is often associated with metabolic syndrome, and the diagnosis requires the exclusion of excess of alcohol intake and other causes of hepatic disease. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of rs1051338 rare allele on lipid phenotype, severity of FL, and LAL-A in patients suffering from dyslipidemia associated with NAFLD. We selected 74 subjects with hypoalphalipoproteinemia or mixed hyperlipemia and evaluated transaminases, liver assessment with controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), LAL-A, rs1051338 SNP genotype. The presence of rare allele caused higher levels of triglycerides and hepatic transaminase and lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Multivariate analysis highlighted independent association between rare allele and FL severity in subjects with NAFLD. The rs1051338 SNP may modulate FL severity and atherogenic dyslipidemia in patients suffering from NAFLD.

Appropriateness of proton pump inhibitors treatment in clinical practice: Prospective evaluation in outpatients and perspective assessment of drug optimisation.

BACKGROUND: High rates of inappropriate proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions have been reported in retrospective database analyses. Assessing the appropriateness of long-term PPIs in outpatients, with a proactive approach at drug optimisation may enhance treatment adequacy. AIMS: To describe the characteristics of outpatients who are on long-term PPIs, to assess the magnitude of inappropriate PPI prescriptions, and to evaluate the rate of drug optimisation following specialist recommendations. METHODS: Appropriateness of long-term (>8weeks) PPI prescription was prospectively assessed in 249 consecutive patients referred to a Gastroenterology outpatient clinic. We recorded reason for prescription, dose, modality, duration of therapy, and attempts at PPI optimisation. RESULTS: PPIs were inappropriately prescribed in 96/249 patients (38.6%). Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (50/143, 35.0%) and prophylaxis of anti-platelet/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (5/49, 10.2%) were the most common PPI indications and those with the lowest rate of inappropriateness, while the highest rates were observed for treatment of dyspepsia (10/12, 83.3%) and anti-coagulant therapy (21/21, 100%). PPI treatment was optimised in 112 patients (45.0%). CONCLUSIONS: PPIs are inappropriately used in about 40% of outpatients, reflecting scant attention to guidelines. A proactive approach may improve therapeutic adequacy in approximately half of patients. Educational efforts to guide PPI prescription should be further pursued.