Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Genetics ; 220(3)2022 03 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35239966

ABSTRACT

Muscles are required for animal movement, feeding, heartbeat, and reproduction. Disruption of muscle function can lead to mobility impairments and diseases like muscular dystrophy and cardiac myopathy; therefore, research in this area has significant implications for public health. Recent work by Vaziri and colleagues has taken genetic, cell biological, and biochemical approaches to identify Protein kinase C-d (Pkcδ) as a novel regulator of the essential myosin light chain 2 (MLC2) by phosphorylation. The authors determine which residues of MLC2 are modified by Pkcδ and show that phosphorylation by Pkcδ is required for proper sarcomere assembly and function. This study underscores the importance of Drosophila melanogaster as a model system for muscle function and highlights how protein phosphorylation is a vital part of post-translational gene regulation.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster , Myosin Light Chains , Animals , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Myosin Light Chains/chemistry , Phosphorylation , Protein Kinase C-delta/metabolism
2.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 17724, 2020 10 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33082360

ABSTRACT

Pyrosomes are tunicates in the phylum Chordata, which also contains vertebrates. Their gigantic blooms play important ecological and biogeochemical roles in oceans. Pyrosoma, meaning "fire-body", derives from their brilliant bioluminescence. The biochemistry of this light production is unknown, but has been hypothesized to be bacterial in origin. We found that mixing coelenterazine-a eukaryote-specific luciferin-with Pyrosoma atlanticum homogenate produced light. To identify the bioluminescent machinery, we sequenced P. atlanticum transcriptomes and found a sequence match to a cnidarian luciferase (RLuc). We expressed this novel luciferase (PyroLuc) and, combined with coelenterazine, it produced light. A similar gene was recently predicted from a bioluminescent brittle star, indicating that RLuc-like luciferases may have evolved convergently from homologous dehalogenases across phyla (Cnidaria, Echinodermata, and Chordata). This report indicates that a widespread gene may be able to functionally converge, resulting in bioluminescence across animal phyla, and describes and characterizes the first putative chordate luciferase.


Subject(s)
Luciferases/genetics , Urochordata , Animals , Biological Evolution , Chordata , Computational Biology , Evolution, Molecular , Gene Expression Profiling , Imidazoles , Luminescence , Luminescent Measurements , Models, Molecular , Phylogeny , Pyrazines , Sequence Alignment , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Species Specificity
3.
Genetics ; 201(2): 599-612, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26281848

ABSTRACT

Studies of natural populations of many organisms have shown that traits are often complex, caused by contributions of mutations in multiple genes. In contrast, genetic studies in the laboratory primarily focus on studying the phenotypes caused by mutations in a single gene. However, the single mutation approach may be limited with respect to the breadth and degree of new phenotypes that can be found. We have taken the approach of isolating complex, or polygenic mutants in the lab to study the regulation of transcriptional activation distance in yeast. While most aspects of eukaryotic transcription are conserved from yeast to human, transcriptional activation distance is not. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the upstream activating sequence (UAS) is generally found within 450 base pairs of the transcription start site (TSS) and when the UAS is moved too far away, activation no longer occurs. In contrast, metazoan enhancers can activate from as far as several hundred kilobases from the TSS. Previously, we identified single mutations that allow transcription activation to occur at a greater-than-normal distance from the GAL1 UAS. As the single mutant phenotypes were weak, we have now isolated polygenic mutants that possess strong long-distance phenotypes. By identification of the causative mutations we have accounted for most of the heritability of the phenotype in each strain and have provided evidence that the Mediator coactivator complex plays both positive and negative roles in the regulation of transcription activation distance.


Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Mediator Complex/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , Transcriptional Activation/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , Mutation , Phenotype , Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Transcription Initiation Site
4.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol ; 4(4): 357-75, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25728002

ABSTRACT

The somatic muscle system formed during Drosophila embryogenesis is required for larvae to hatch, feed, and crawl. This system is replaced in the pupa by a new adult muscle set, responsible for activities such as feeding, walking, and flight. Both the larval and adult muscle systems are comprised of distinct muscle fibers to serve these specific motor functions. In this way, the Drosophila musculature is a valuable model for patterning within a single tissue: while all muscle cells share properties such as the contractile apparatus, properties such as size, position, and number of nuclei are unique for a particular muscle. In the embryo, diversification of muscle fibers relies first on signaling cascades that pattern the mesoderm. Subsequently, the combinatorial expression of specific transcription factors leads muscle fibers to adopt particular sizes, shapes, and orientations. Adult muscle precursors (AMPs), set aside during embryonic development, proliferate during the larval phases and seed the formation of the abdominal, leg, and flight muscles in the adult fly. Adult muscle fibers may either be formed de novo from the fusion of the AMPs, or are created by the binding of AMPs to an existing larval muscle. While less is known about adult muscle specification compared to the larva, expression of specific transcription factors is also important for its diversification. Increasingly, the mechanisms required for the diversification of fly muscle have found parallels in vertebrate systems and mark Drosophila as a robust model system to examine questions about how diverse cell types are generated within an organism.


Subject(s)
Body Patterning/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Gene Regulatory Networks/physiology , Metamorphosis, Biological/physiology , Muscle Development/physiology , Muscles/embryology , Signal Transduction/physiology , Animals , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Mesoderm/embryology , Species Specificity , Transcriptome
5.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol ; 4(4): 313-34, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25758712

ABSTRACT

In Drosophila melanogaster, the somatic muscle system is first formed during embryogenesis, giving rise to the larval musculature. Later during metamorphosis, this system is destroyed and replaced by an entirely new set of muscles in the adult fly. Proper formation of the larval and adult muscles is critical for basic survival functions such as hatching and crawling (in the larva), walking and flying (in the adult), and feeding (at both larval and adult stages). Myogenesis, from mononucleated muscle precursor cells to multinucleated functional muscles, is driven by a number of cellular processes that have begun to be mechanistically defined. Once the mesodermal cells destined for the myogenic lineage have been specified, individual myoblasts fuse together iteratively to form syncytial myofibers. Combining cytoplasmic contents demands a level of intracellular reorganization that, most notably, leads to redistribution of the myonuclei to maximize internuclear distance. Signaling from extending myofibers induces terminal tendon cell differentiation in the ectoderm, which results in secure muscle-tendon attachments that are critical for muscle contraction. Simultaneously, muscles become innervated and undergo sarcomerogenesis to establish the contractile apparatus that will facilitate movement. The cellular mechanisms governing these morphogenetic events share numerous parallels to mammalian development, and the basic unit of all muscle, the myofiber, is conserved from flies to mammals. Thus, studies of Drosophila myogenesis and comparisons to muscle development in other systems highlight conserved regulatory programs of biomedical relevance to general muscle biology and studies of muscle disease.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Metamorphosis, Biological/physiology , Models, Biological , Muscle Development/physiology , Muscles/physiology , Sarcomeres/physiology , Animals , Larva/physiology , Microtubules/physiology , Molecular Motor Proteins/physiology , Muscles/innervation , Myoblasts/physiology , Organelles/physiology , Tendons
6.
Genetics ; 199(3): 777-91, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25614583

ABSTRACT

Drosophila Midline (Mid) is an ortholog of vertebrate Tbx20, which plays roles in the developing heart, migrating cranial motor neurons, and endothelial cells. Mid functions in cell-fate specification and differentiation of tissues that include the ectoderm, cardioblasts, neuroblasts, and egg chambers; however, a role in the somatic musculature has not been described. We identified mid in genetic and molecular screens for factors contributing to somatic muscle morphogenesis. Mid is expressed in founder cells (FCs) for several muscle fibers, and functions cooperatively with the T-box protein H15 in lateral oblique muscle 1 and the segment border muscle. Mid is particularly important for the specification and development of the lateral transverse (LT) muscles LT3 and LT4, which arise by asymmetric division of a single muscle progenitor. Mid is expressed in this progenitor and its two sibling FCs, but is maintained only in the LT4 FC. Both muscles were frequently missing in mid mutant embryos, and LT4-associated expression of the transcription factor Krüppel (Kr) was lost. When present, LT4 adopted an LT3-like morphology. Coordinately, mid misexpression caused LT3 to adopt an LT4-like morphology and was associated with ectopic Kr expression. From these data, we concluded that mid functions first in the progenitor to direct development of LT3 and LT4, and later in the FCs to influence whichever of these differentiation profiles is selected. Mid is the first T-box factor shown to influence LT3 and LT4 muscle identity and, along with the T-box protein Optomotor-blind-related-gene 1 (Org-1), is representative of a new class of transcription factors in muscle specification.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Muscle Development/genetics , T-Box Domain Proteins/genetics , Animals , Body Patterning/genetics , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression , Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors/metabolism , Organ Specificity , Transcription Factors/genetics
7.
Cell Rep ; 8(3): 858-70, 2014 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25088419

ABSTRACT

Skeletal muscles are formed in numerous shapes and sizes, and this diversity impacts function and disease susceptibility. To understand how muscle diversity is generated, we performed gene expression profiling of two muscle subsets from Drosophila embryos. By comparing the transcriptional profiles of these subsets, we identified a core group of founder cell-enriched genes. We screened mutants for muscle defects and identified functions for Sin3A and 10 other transcription and chromatin regulators in the Drosophila embryonic somatic musculature. Sin3A is required for the morphogenesis of a muscle subset, and Sin3A mutants display muscle loss and misattachment. Additionally, misexpression of identity gene transcription factors in Sin3A heterozygous embryos leads to direct transformations of one muscle into another, whereas overexpression of Sin3A results in the reverse transformation. Our data implicate Sin3A as a key buffer controlling muscle responsiveness to transcription factors in the formation of muscle identity, thereby generating tissue diversity.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Genome, Insect , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Myoblasts/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Muscle, Skeletal/cytology , Muscle, Skeletal/embryology , Myoblasts/cytology , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Sin3 Histone Deacetylase and Corepressor Complex
8.
PLoS One ; 9(6): e99553, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24915423

ABSTRACT

Twist (Twi), a conserved basic helix-loop-helix transcriptional regulator, directs the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and regulates changes in cell fate, cell polarity, cell division and cell migration in organisms from flies to humans. Analogous to its role in EMT, Twist has been implicated in metastasis in numerous cancer types, including breast, pancreatic and prostate. In the Drosophila embryo, Twist is essential for discrete events in gastrulation and mesodermal patterning. In this study, we derive a twi allelic series by examining the various cellular events required for gastrulation in Drosophila. By genetically manipulating the levels of Twi activity during gastrulation, we find that coordination of cell division is the most sensitive cellular event, whereas changes in cell shape are the least sensitive. Strikingly, we show that by increasing levels of Snail expression in a severe twi hypomorphic allelic background, but not a twi null background, we can reconstitute gastrulation and produce viable adult flies. Our results demonstrate that the level of Twi activity determines whether the cellular events of ventral furrow formation, EMT, cell division and mesodermal migration occur.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/cytology , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Gastrulation , Muscle Development , Twist-Related Protein 1/metabolism , Alleles , Animals , Cell Division/genetics , Cell Movement/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition , Gastrulation/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Genes, Insect , Mesoderm/cytology , Mesoderm/embryology , Mesoderm/metabolism , Models, Biological , Muscle Development/genetics , Mutation/genetics , Phenotype , Twist-Related Protein 1/genetics
9.
Fly (Austin) ; 5(2): 68-75, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21339707

ABSTRACT

Myogenesis in Drosophila embryos requires fusion between Founder cells (FCs) and Fusion Competent myoblasts (FCMs) to form multinucleate myotubes. Myoblast fusion is well characterized in embryos, and many factors required for this process have been identified; however, a number of questions pertaining to the mechanisms of fusion remain and are challenging to answer in the embryo. We have developed a modified primary cell culture protocol to address these questions in vitro. Using this system, we determined the optimal time for examining fusion in culture and confirmed that known fusion proteins are expressed and localized as in embryos. Importantly, we disrupted the actin and microtubule networks with the drugs latrunculin B and nocodazole, respectively, confirming that actin is required for myoblast fusion and showing for the first time that microtubules are also required for this process in Drosophila. Finally, we show that myotubes in culture adopt and maintain specific muscle identities.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Morphogenesis/genetics , Muscle Development/genetics , Animals , Cell Culture Techniques , Cell Differentiation , Cells, Cultured , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Myoblasts/cytology
10.
Mol Cell Biol ; 27(15): 5575-86, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17526727

ABSTRACT

Most fundamental aspects of transcription are conserved among eukaryotes. One striking difference between yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and metazoans, however, is the distance over which transcriptional activation occurs. In S. cerevisiae, upstream activation sequences (UASs) are generally located within a few hundred base pairs of a target gene, while in Drosophila and mammals, enhancers are often several kilobases away. To study the potential for long-distance activation in S. cerevisiae, we constructed and analyzed reporters in which the UAS-TATA distance varied. Our results show that UASs lose the ability to activate normal transcription as the UAS-TATA distance increases. Surprisingly, transcription does initiate, but proximally to the UAS, regardless of its location. To identify factors affecting long-distance activation, we screened for mutants allowing activation of a reporter when the UAS-TATA distance is 799 bp. These screens identified four loci, SIN4, SPT2, SPT10, and HTA1-HTB1, with sin4 mutations being the strongest. Our results strongly suggest that long-distance activation in S. cerevisiae is normally limited by Sin4 and other factors and that this constraint plays a role in ensuring UAS-core promoter specificity in the compact S. cerevisiae genome.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , Transcriptional Activation , Alcohol Dehydrogenase/genetics , Blotting, Northern , Chromatin/genetics , Genes, Fungal , Genes, Reporter , Mutant Proteins/isolation & purification , Mutation/genetics , Nucleic Acid Conformation , Phenotype , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/genetics , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/isolation & purification , Sequence Analysis, DNA , TATA Box/genetics , Terminator Regions, Genetic/genetics
11.
Development ; 129(14): 3325-34, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12091303

ABSTRACT

Translational repression of maternal nanos (nos) mRNA by a cis-acting Translational Control Element (TCE) in the nos 3'UTR is critical for anterior-posterior patterning of the Drosophila embryo. We show, through ectopic expression experiments, that the nos TCE is capable of repressing gene expression at later stages of development in neuronal cells that regulate the molting cycle. Our results predict additional targets of TCE-mediated repression within the nervous system. They also suggest that mechanisms that regulate maternal mRNAs, like TCE-mediated repression, may function more widely during development to spatially or temporally control gene expression.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Insect Proteins/genetics , Neurosecretory Systems/embryology , Protein Biosynthesis , RNA-Binding Proteins , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Body Patterning/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins , Drosophila/physiology , Female , Fungal Proteins/genetics , Genes, Insect , Male , Neurosecretory Systems/physiology , Phenotype , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Signal Transduction , Transcription Factors/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...