Effect of polypharmacy on the outcomes of older patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of polypharmacy on older patients with cancer is unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of polypharmacy on the outcomes of treatment in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of older patients (aged ≥65 years) with advanced NSCLC who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with or without platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment from March 2016 to December 2020. Patients with driver oncogenes or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≥2 were excluded. Polypharmacy was defined as receiving five or more oral or inhaled medications at baseline. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and mean cumulative length of hospital stays between the polypharmacy and non-polypharmacy groups. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients, with a median age of 72 years (range, 65-89 years), were included in the analysis. Of the patients, 34 (27.8%) had a PS of 0 and 68 (55.7%) had a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50%. The median number of oral or inhaled medications was 4 (range, 0-12), and 60 (49.1%) patients were taking ≥5 medications (polypharmacy). Age and Charlson Comorbidity Index score were significantly higher in the polypharmacy group (P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with the non-polypharmacy group, the polypharmacy group had a similar median PFS (6.7 vs. 8.5 months, P = 0.94) and a shorter median OS (17.3 vs. 26.0 months, P = 0.04). In the polypharmacy group, the adjusted hazard ratio for OS (adjusted for age, PS, and PD-L1 TPS) was 1.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.86, P = 0.03). Patients in the polypharmacy group had longer hospital stays (46.3 ± 7.5 vs. 27.7 ± 4.1 days/person, P < 0.05) and more emergency hospitalizations (1.6 ± 0.3 vs. 0.8 ± 0.1 times/person, P < 0.05) during the first year. DISCUSSION: Polypharmacy was associated with shorter survival time and longer hospitalization in older patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

Exploring the relationship between anorexia and therapeutic efficacy in advanced lung cancer treatment: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced anorexia is a common occurrence in patients undergoing treatment for advanced lung cancer. However, the relationship between chemotherapy-induced anorexia and weight loss during platinum-based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors is unclear. This study explored the relationship between chemotherapy-induced anorexia and therapeutic outcomes in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 106 patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors between January 2019 and October 2022. The incidence of weight loss and its association with treatment efficacy was assessed in the chemotherapy-induced anorexia group. Chemotherapy-induced anorexia, nausea, and vomiting were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0. Progression-free and overall survival were used to measure treatment efficacy. RESULTS: Chemotherapy-induced anorexia was observed in 13.2% of patients. These patients exhibited significant weight loss at 6 and 9 weeks after treatment initiation compared to those in the non-chemotherapy-induced anorexia group. Progression-free and overall survival were shorter in the chemotherapy-induced anorexia group than in the non-chemotherapy-induced anorexia group, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy-induced anorexia was associated with significant weight loss and reduced treatment efficacy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. These results highlight the importance of implementing robust supportive care for chemotherapy-induced anorexia to mitigate weight loss and uphold treatment effectiveness during platinum-based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The efficacy and safety of anamorelin among patients with diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Anamorelin is a selective ghrelin receptor agonist approved for cancer cachexia in Japan. Little is known about predictors of anamorelin efficacy. This study aimed to assess the effect of diabetes on the efficacy and safety of anamorelin in patients with cancer cachexia. METHODS: Medical records of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung, gastric, pancreatic, or colorectal cancer who received anamorelin between January 2021 and March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The diabetic (DM) group included patients with a confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, random plasma glucose of ≥ 200 mg/dL, or hemoglobin A1c of ≥ 6.5%. The maximum body weight gain and adverse events during anamorelin administration were compared between the DM and non-DM groups. Patients with a maximum body weight gain ≥ 0 kg were classified as the responders. RESULTS: Of 103 eligible patients, 31 (30.1%) were assigned to the DM group. The DM group gained less weight (median of -0.53% vs. + 3.00%, p < 0.01) and had fewer responders (45.2% vs. 81.9%, p < 0.01) than the non-DM group. The odds ratio for non-response in the DM group was 6.55 (95% confidential interval 2.37-18.06, p < 0.01), adjusted by age and performance status. The DM group had a higher cumulative incidence of hyperglycaemic adverse events (72.2% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.01) and more discontinuations due to hyperglycaemic adverse events (25.8% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.01) than the non-DM group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes and cancer cachexia are less likely to gain weight with anamorelin despite a high risk of hyperglycaemic adverse events.

Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary LCNEC. We retrospectively reviewed patients with pulmonary LCNEC or possible LCNEC (pLCNEC) who received platinum-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Among these patients, we evaluated the efficacy of second-line treatment by comparing patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC group). Of the 61 patients with LCNEC or pLCNEC (LCNEC group) who received first-line chemotherapy, 39 patients were treated with second-line chemotherapy. Among the 39 patients, 61.5% received amrubicin monotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the LCNEC groups were 3.3 and 8.3 months, respectively. No significant differences in the PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.924, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.647-1.320; P = 0.664) and OS (HR: 0.926; 95% CI 0.648-1.321; P = 0.670) were observed between the LCNEC and SCLC groups. In patients treated with amrubicin, the PFS (P = 0.964) and OS (P = 0.544) were not different between both the groups. Second-line chemotherapy, including amrubicin, may be considered as a treatment option for patients with pulmonary LCNEC.

Real-World Data on Subsequent Therapy for First-Line Osimertinib-Induced Pneumonitis: Safety of EGFR-TKI Rechallenge (Osi-risk Study TORG-TG2101).

BACKGROUND: Although osimertinib is a promising therapeutic agent for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer, the incidence of pneumonitis is particularly high among Japanese patients receiving the drug. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of subsequent anticancer treatments, including EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) rechallenge, which are to be administered after pneumonitis recovery, remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the safety of EGFR-TKI rechallenge in patients who experienced first-line osimertinib-induced pneumonitis, with a primary focus on recurrent pneumonitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who developed initial pneumonitis following first-line osimertinib treatment across 34 institutions in Japan between August 2018 and September 2020. RESULTS: Among the 124 patients included, 68 (54.8%) patients underwent EGFR-TKI rechallenge. The recurrence rate of pneumonitis following EGFR-TKI rechallenge was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-39) at 12 months. The cumulative incidence of recurrent pneumonitis was significantly higher in the osimertinib group than in the first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI (conventional EGFR-TKI) groups (hazard ratio [HR] 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.5; p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between EGFR-TKI type (osimertinib or conventional EGFR-TKI) and pneumonitis recurrence, regardless of severity or status of initial pneumonitis (HR 3.29; 95% CI 1.12-9.68; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib rechallenge after initial pneumonitis was associated with significantly higher recurrence rates than conventional EGFR-TKI rechallenge.

Concordance of ALK fusion gene-rearrangement between immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Although various companion diagnostic tests of ALK fusion gene-rearrangement are approved, few reports have assessed the concordance of ALK fusion gene-rearrangement in two companion diagnostic tests: next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing and immunohistochemistry (IHC). METHODS: The samples evaluated for gene alterations using NGS testing between May 2019 and November 2021 were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: samples were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer; the results of the NGS analysis were informative; and samples had residual specimens for IHC. We performed IHC on the residual specimens and retrospectively collected sample characteristics from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 185 samples were analyzed using NGS. Twenty-six samples were excluded because of failure to analyze gene alterations using NGS, no residual samples, and inadequate IHC. We analyzed 159 samples. The major histological type was adenocarcinoma (115 samples). The number of surgical and transbronchial lung biopsy specimens was 59 and 56, respectively. ALK fusion gene-rearrangement was detected in four samples using NGS, and five were detected using IHC. The sensitivity and specificity of IHC referred to by NGS were 75.0% and 98.7%, respectively. The concordance rate between IHC and NGS was 98.1%. ALK rearrangement was detected in two patients using IHC but not using NGS. In addition, ALK rearrangement was detected in one patient using NGS but not using IHC. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that IHC and NGS might be complementary tests. In patients suspected of harboring ALK fusion gene-rearrangement, it should be analyzed using another diagnostic method.

Relationship between patterns of immunohistochemical conventional neuroendocrine markers and efficacy of immune check point inhibitors in patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Which patients benefit from the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. There have been few reports on the efficacy of ICIs based on conventional immunohistochemical neuroendocrine (NE) markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and neural cell adhesion molecule [NCAM]). In the present study, we aimed to analyze the relationship between the expression of immunohistochemical NE markers and the efficacy of ICIs in patients with extensive disease (ED)-SCLC, to assess whether conventional NE markers are predictive of ICIs. METHODS: Patients with untreated ED-SCLC who received first-line therapy at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between November 2002 and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy according to the expression status of each immunohistochemical NE marker in patients treated with ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI-chemo group) and with chemotherapy alone (chemo group). RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were included in the ICI-chemo and chemo groups, respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) tended to be better in patients in the ICI-chemo group than those treated with chemotherapy alone in patients with NE marker-positive SCLC. In particular, it was statistically significant in patients with chromogranin A-positive SCLC (p = 0.036). In patients with NE marker-negative SCLC, no significant differences were observed in PFS between the two groups. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS), regardless of the expression of any conventional NE marker. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the efficacy of ICIs in addition to chemotherapy may be poor in patients with NE marker-negative SCLC.