Familial History of Autoimmune Disorders Among Patients With Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether family members of patients with pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) have an increased prevalence of autoimmune conditions compared with controls. METHODS: Data collected during a pediatric MS case-control study of risk factors included information about various autoimmune diseases in family members. The frequency of these disorders was compared between cases and controls. RESULTS: There was an increased rate of autoimmune diseases among family members of pediatric MS cases compared with controls with first-degree history of MS excluded (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.71-3.01, p < 0.001). There was an increased rate of MS among second-degree relatives of pediatric MS cases compared with controls (OR = 3.47, 95% CI 1.36-8.86, p = 0.009). The OR for MS was 2.64 when restricted to maternal relatives and 6.37 when restricted to paternal relatives. DISCUSSION: The increased rates of autoimmune disorders, including thyroid disorders and MS among families of patients with pediatric MS, suggest shared genetic factors among families with children diagnosed with pediatric MS.

Comparison of Hirschsprung Disease Characteristics between Those with a History of Postoperative Enterocolitis and Those without: Results from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium.

INTRODUCTION: The current understanding of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) is based mainly on single-center, retrospective studies. The aims of this study are to determine risk factors for postoperative HAEC using the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective, case-control study of children with Hirschsprung disease (HD) who had undergone a pull-through procedure and were evaluated at a PCPLC member site between February 2017 and March 2020. The cohort with a history of postoperative HAEC was compared with that without postoperative episodes of HAEC to determine relevant associations with postoperative HAEC. RESULTS: One-hundred forty of 299 (46.8%) patients enrolled had a history of postoperative HAEC. Patients with a rectosigmoid transition zone had a lower association with postoperative HAEC as compared with those with a more proximal transition zone (odds ratio [OR]: 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26, 0.84, p < 0.01). Private insurance was protective against postoperative HAEC on univariate analysis (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.99, p = 0.047), but not on multivariate analysis (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.37, 1.04, p = 0.07). Preoperative HAEC was not associated with the development of postoperative HAEC. CONCLUSION: Patients with a rectosigmoid transition zone have less postoperative HAEC compared with patients with a more proximal transition zone. Multi-institutional collection of clinical information in patients with HD may allow for the identification of additional risk factors for HAEC and afford the opportunity to improve care.

Comparison of Maternal Histories and Exposures in Children With Isolated Anorectal Malformation Versus Anorectal Malformation With Genitourinary Anomalies.

Introduction To our knowledge, there are no studies to date that have compared patients with isolated anorectal malformation (ARM) to patients with ARM and an associated genitourinary (GU) malformation despite a possible etiological difference between these two entities. We examined the differences in maternal and prenatal exposures and comorbidities between patients with isolated ARM and patients with ARM and associated GU malformations. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study of children with ARM, enrolled in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) between February 2017 and October 2019, was performed comparing those with isolated ARM to those with ARM and associated GU anomalies (GU +/- additional anomalies) as well as to those with ARM and a GU anomaly with no anomaly of any other system (GU-only). We compared the prevalence of prematurity, family history of colorectal disorders, as well as maternal and prenatal comorbidities and exposures between these two cohorts and the isolated ARM cohort. Results A total of 505 patients (117 with isolated ARM and 388 with ARM and associated GU anomalies) were enrolled. Of the 388 patients with ARM and associated GU anomalies, 48 had an ARM with a GU anomaly without an anomaly in any other system. There was an increased prevalence of premature births in the GU +/- additional anomalies cohort compared to the isolated ARM cohort (27 vs 14%, p=0.003). This difference was not seen in the GU-only cohort. There was no difference between the cohorts regarding prevalence of family history of ARM or maternal and prenatal comorbidities or exposures. Conclusions Patients with an ARM and an associated GU anomaly with or without other congenital anomalies are more likely to be born prematurely compared to patients with an isolated ARM. Parents of these children should be counseled on this increased risk.

Multi-institutional review of bowel management strategies in children with anorectal malformations.

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: To describe current bowel management program (BMP) strategies in anorectal malformation (ARM) patients based on patient-level predictors using data from a multi-institutional consortium. MATERIALS/METHODS: Patient bowel function and BMP were reviewed from Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) data. The PCPLC is comprised of multidisciplinary specialists researching colorectal and pelvic disorders. Seven US institutions submitted de-identified clinical data on ARM patients into a centralized patient registry. RESULTS: The primary ARM of 624 patients was categorized into Mild (45.2%), Moderate (40.4%) or Complex (14.2%) anomaly classifications. Patient-specific BMP were examined based on age and on the presence of spinal cord/sacral anomalies. 418 (67%) enrolled patients were prescribed BMP (<5 yo 56.4%; ≥5-<12 yo 86.7%; ≥12 81.5%). Constipation was the primary chief complaint (80.2%). Forty percent of patients on a BMP were toilet trained and approximately one-half (48.5%) reported daytime stool accidents. Secondary surgical interventions for antegrade continence enemas (ACE) were examined; 14.5% of patients employed ACE strategies and utilization increased with age and varied based on anatomic anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on BMP strategies for patients with ARM from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium. Individual patient characteristics are explored for their impact on bowel management strategy utilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Measure twice and cut once: Comparing endoscopy and 3D cloacagram for the common channel and urethral measurements in patients with cloacal malformations.

INTRODUCTION: Precise and accurate measurement of the common channel and urethra is a critical determinant prior to the repair of cloacal malformations. Endoscopy and 3D reconstruction cloacagram are two common modalities utilized to help plan the surgical approach, however the consistency between these methods is unknown. METHODS: Common channel and urethral lengths obtained by endoscopy and 3D cloacagram of cloaca patients at six pediatric colorectal centers were compared. Data are given as mean (range). RESULTS: 72 patients were included in the study. Common channel measurements determined by 3D cloacagram and endoscopy were equal in 7 cases (10%). Endoscopic measurements of the common channel were longer than 3D cloacagram in 20 (28%) cases and shorter in the remaining 44 (62%) cases. The absolute difference between measurements of the common channel was 7.2 mm (0-2.4 cm). Urethral measurements by both modalities were equal in 8 cases (12%). Endoscopic measurement of the urethra was longer than that by 3D cloacagram in 20 (31%) patients and shorter in 37 (57%) of cases. The absolute difference between measurements of the urethra was 5.1 mm (0-2.0 cm). The reconstruction (e.g. TUM or urogenital separation) that would be performed according to measurements determined by 3D cloacagram and endoscopic measurements differed in 13/62 (21%) patients with each structure identified and common channel measurements of >1 cm. CONCLUSION: Significant variation exists in the measurements of the common channel and urethra in patients with cloacal malformations as determined by endoscopy and 3D cloacagram. This variation should be considered as these measurements influence the decision to perform either a TUM or urogenital separation. Based on these findings, 3D cloacagram should be performed in all patients prior to cloaca repair to prevent mischaracterization of the malformation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.