Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Rev Med Chil ; 148(3): 393-398, 2020 Mar.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32730385

ABSTRACT

The catastrophic emergency experienced by many countries with the COVID-19 pandemic emphasized the importance of bioethics for decision-making, both at the public health (equitable and effective policies) and at the clinical level. At the clinical level, the issues are the fulfillment of medical care demand with adequate health care teams, infrastructure, and supplies, and to cover critical care demands that surpass the available resources. Therefore, ethically correct approaches are required for the allocation of life sustaining resources. There are recommendations for the allocating life support during disasters based on multiple considerations, including ethical ones. However, the ethical criteria of existing guidelines are variable. Ethical principles usually considered are saving the greatest number of lives, saving the greatest number of years of life and the principle of the life cycle or the goal to give each individual equal opportunity to live through the various phases of life. However, the centrality of the human being and the search for the common good should be considered. Knowledge of public perspectives and moral benchmarks on these issues is essential. A successful assignment effort will require everyone's trust and cooperation. Decision making should be planned and discussed in advance, since in-depth deliberation will be extremely complex during the disaster. Our goal is to help the health care teams to wisely allocate resources in shortage periods.


Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making/ethics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Health Care Rationing/ethics , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , COVID-19 , Chile/epidemiology , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
2.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 148(3): 393-398, mar. 2020.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1115804

ABSTRACT

The catastrophic emergency experienced by many countries with the COVID-19 pandemic emphasized the importance of bioethics for decision-making, both at the public health (equitable and effective policies) and at the clinical level. At the clinical level, the issues are the fulfillment of medical care demand with adequate health care teams, infrastructure, and supplies, and to cover critical care demands that surpass the available resources. Therefore, ethically correct approaches are required for the allocation of life sustaining resources. There are recommendations for the allocating life support during disasters based on multiple considerations, including ethical ones. However, the ethical criteria of existing guidelines are variable. Ethical principles usually considered are saving the greatest number of lives, saving the greatest number of years of life and the principle of the life cycle or the goal to give each individual equal opportunity to live through the various phases of life. However, the centrality of the human being and the search for the common good should be considered. Knowledge of public perspectives and moral benchmarks on these issues is essential. A successful assignment effort will require everyone's trust and cooperation. Decision making should be planned and discussed in advance, since in-depth deliberation will be extremely complex during the disaster. Our goal is to help the health care teams to wisely allocate resources in shortage periods.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Health Care Rationing/ethics , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Clinical Decision-Making/ethics , Chile/epidemiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic
3.
Rev Med Chil ; 130(3): 259-66, 2002 Mar.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12043367

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Propionic aciduria (PA) and Methymalonic aciduria (MMA) result from an inherited abnormality of the enzymes propionyl CoA carboxylase and methylmalonyl CoA mutase respectively. This produces marked increases in the amino acids methionine, threonine, valine and isoleucine (MTVI). Their clinical presentation can be neonatal or late onset forms. AIM: To report 23 children with organic acidurias. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty three cases of organic acidurias diagnosed since 1980 (17 PA and 6 MMA) and followed at the Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, are reported. RESULTS: The average age of diagnosis was 3.9 days for the neonatal form and 8.3 months for the late onset form. The most frequent symptoms were hypotonia, lethargy and vomiting. Neonatal PA had mean ammonemias of 1089 +/- 678.3 micrograms/dl. The figure for MMA was 933 +/- 801.9 micrograms/dl. Seven children were dialyzed and 30% died. 16 children are followed and 81.2% have normal weight for age. Seven children required gastrostomy because of anorexia and failure to thrive. The nutritional treatment is based on natural and artificial proteins without MTVI, with periodical controls, amino acid and ammonia quantification. Some patients were submitted to enzyme assays and molecular studies. CONCLUSIONS: An early diagnosis and a very strict follow up allows a normal development of children with organic acidurias. There is a relationship between prognosis and the presentation form, the nutritional status and the emergency treatment during acute episodes. The importance of the enzymatic and molecular studies is emphasized because they facilitate treatment, accurate diagnosis and allow an adequate genetic counseling.


Subject(s)
Carboxy-Lyases/urine , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/urine , Methylmalonyl-CoA Mutase/urine , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Metabolism, Inborn Errors/complications , Methylmalonyl-CoA Decarboxylase
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL