Genomic analysis across 53 canine cancer types reveals novel mutations and high clinical actionability potential.

A genomic understanding of the oncogenic processes and individual variability of human cancer has steadily fueled improvement in patient outcomes over the past 20 years. Mutations within tumour tissues are routinely assessed through clinical genomic diagnostic assays by academic and commercial laboratories to facilitate diagnosis, prognosis and effective treatment stratification. The application of genomics has unveiled a wealth of mutation-based biomarkers in canine cancers, suggesting that the transformative principles that have revolutionized human cancer medicine can be brought to bear in veterinary oncology. To advance clinical genomics and genomics-guided medicine in canine oncology, we have developed and validated a canine cancer next-generation sequencing gene panel for the identification of multiple mutation types in clinical specimens. With this panel, we examined the genomic landscapes of 828 tumours from 813 dogs, spanning 53 cancer types. We identified 7856 alterations, encompassing copy number variants, single nucleotide variants, indels and internal tandem duplications. Additionally, we evaluated the clinical utility of these alterations by incorporating a biomarker framework from comprehensive curation of primary canine literature and inferences from human cancer genomic biomarker literature and clinical diagnostics. Remarkably, nearly 90% of the cases exhibited mutations with diagnostic, prognostic or therapeutic implications. Our work represents a thorough assessment of genomic landscapes in a large cohort of canine cancers, the first of its kind for its comprehensive inclusion of multiple mutation types and structured annotation of biomarkers, demonstrating the clinical potential of leveraging mutation-based biomarkers in veterinary oncology.

Genomic tumor analysis provides clinical guidance for the management of diagnostically challenging cancers in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic utility of a cancer genomic diagnostic assay (SearchLight DNA; Vidium Animal Health) for diagnostically ambiguous cancer cases. ANIMALS: 69 privately owned dogs with ambiguous cancer diagnoses and for which the genomic assay was performed. PROCEDURES: Genomic assay reports generated between September 28, 2020, and July 31, 2022, for dogs with malignancy or suspected malignancy were reviewed to determine the assay's clinical utility defined as providing diagnostic clarity, prognostic information, and/or therapeutic options. RESULTS: Genomic analysis provided diagnostic clarity in 37 of 69 cases (54%; group 1) and therapeutic and/or prognostic information in 22 of the remaining 32 cases (69%; group 2) for which the diagnosis remained elusive. Overall, the genomic assay was clinically useful in 86% (59/69) of cases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To our knowledge, this was the first study to evaluate the multifaceted clinical utility of a single cancer genomic test in veterinary medicine. Study findings supported the use of tumor genomic testing for dogs with cancer, particularly those that are diagnostically ambiguous and therefore inherently challenging to manage. This evidence-driven genomic assay provided diagnostic guidance, prognostic support, and therapeutic options for most patients with an unclear cancer diagnosis that would otherwise have an unsubstantiated clinical plan. Furthermore, 38% (26/69) of samples were easily obtained aspirates. Sample factors (sample type, percentage of tumor cells, and number of mutations) did not influence diagnostic yield. Our study demonstrated the value of genomic testing for the management of canine cancer.

The impact of value-based healthcare for inflammatory bowel diseases on healthcare utilization: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Value-based healthcare (VBHC) is considered to be the solution that will improve quality and decrease costs in healthcare. Many hospitals are implementing programs on the basis of this strategy, but rigorous scientific reports are still lacking. In this pilot study, we present the first-year outcomes of a VBHC program for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management that focuses on highly coordinated care, task differentiation of providers, and continuous home monitoring. METHODS: IBD patients treated within the VBHC program were identified in an administrative claims database from a commercial insurer allowing comparisons to matched controls. Only patients for whom data were available the year before and after starting the program were included. Healthcare utilization including visits, hospitalizations, laboratory and imaging tests, and medications were compared between groups. RESULTS: In total, 60 IBD patients treated at the VBHC Center were identified and were matched to 177 controls. Significantly fewer upper endoscopies were performed (-10%, P=0.012), and numerically fewer surgeries (-25%, P=0.49), hospitalizations (-28%, 0=0.71), emergency department visits (-37%, P=0.44), and imaging studies (-25 to -86%) were observed. In addition, 65% fewer patients (P=0.16) used steroids long term. IBD-related costs were 16% ($771) lower than expected (P=0.24). CONCLUSION: These are the first results of a successfully implemented VBHC program for IBD. Encouraging trends toward fewer emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and long-term corticosteroid use were observed. These results will need to be confirmed in a larger sample with more follow-up.

Value redefined for inflammatory bowel disease patients: a choice-based conjoint analysis of patients' preferences.

PURPOSE: Value-based healthcare is an upcoming field. The core idea is to evaluate care based on achieved outcomes divided by the costs. Unfortunately, the optimal way to evaluate outcomes is ill-defined. In this study, we aim to develop a single, preference based, outcome metric, which can be used to quantify overall health value in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: IBD patients filled out a choice-based conjoint (CBC) questionnaire in which patients chose preferable outcome scenarios with different levels of disease control (DC), quality of life (QoL), and productivity (Pr). A CBC analysis was performed to estimate the relative value of DC, QoL, and Pr. A patient-centered composite score was developed which was weighted based on the stated preferences. RESULTS: We included 210 IBD patients. Large differences in stated preferences were observed. Increases from low to intermediate outcome levels were valued more than increases from intermediate to high outcome levels. Overall, QoL was more important to patients than DC or Pr. Individual outcome scores were calculated based on the stated preferences. This score was significantly different from a score not weighted based on patient preferences in patients with active disease. CONCLUSIONS: We showed the feasibility of creating a single outcome metric in IBD which incorporates patients' values using a CBC. Because this metric changes significantly when weighted according to patients' values, we propose that success in healthcare should be measured accordingly.

Stem cell-based therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: promises and pitfalls.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, often relapsing, condition that deeply impacts the quality of life for many patients. Although there have been significant advances in medical treatments, a large proportion of patients become refractory to available therapeutic options. Stem-cell therapy through hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) or mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells (MSCs) is a promising therapeutic option for severe refractory cases especially when surgery is not feasible. In HSC transplantation, the objective is to destroy the 'autoreactive' immune cells responsible for disease chronicity, and to re-establish gut tolerance to gut microbes. In perianal Crohn's disease (CD), the objective is to deposit MSCs locally in fistulizing tracts to down-regulate the local immune response and induce wound healing. Results from upcoming and ongoing clinical trials will set the path of these novel therapeutic options that have the capability to successfully treat severe refractory Crohn's patients.