Impact of an online, individualised, patient reported outcome measures based patient decision aid on patient expectations, decisional regret, satisfaction, and health-related quality-of-life for patients considering total knee arthroplasty: Results from a randomised controlled trial.

RATIONALE: Total knee arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure but not appropriate for all patients with knee osteoarthritis. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) can promote shared decision making and enhance understanding and expectations of procedures among patients, resulting in better discussions between patients and healthcare providers about whether total knee arthroplasty is the most appropriate option. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Evaluate impact of an individualised PtDA for osteoarthritis patients considering total knee arthroplasty 1 year after baseline assessment. METHODS: Prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing an intervention arm (IA) and routine care arm (RCA). The IA included an online individualised patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) based PtDA and one-page summary report for the surgeon. We report secondary outcomes from the final assessment: patient expectations, decisional regret, patient satisfaction with outcomes of knee replacement, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) and depression. We report changes in HRQOL between baseline and final assessments, study arms, and surgical versus non-surgical patients. Descriptive statistics were used to describe participant characteristics and continuous variables. Dichotomous outcomes (expectations, decisional regret, satisfaction) were analyzed using logistic regression and continuous outcomes (HRQOL, depression) were modelled using linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, 140 participants completed all study assessments (IA: n = 69, RCA: n = 71); n = 108 underwent surgery (IA: n = 49, RCA: n = 59). Regardless of study arm, most participants reported expectations were met, minimal decisional regret, satisfaction with outcomes of knee replacement, and had improvements in HRQOL. While no significant differences in study outcomes were found between study arms, IA results were in the direction hypothesised in favour of the PtDA. CONCLUSIONS: Although we were not able to detect statistically significant benefits associated with implementing this PROMs-based PtDA, there was no apparent negative effect on these outcomes 1 year after baseline. We anticipate there may be benefit to implementing this PtDA earlier in the osteoarthritis care pathway where patients have more opportunities to manage their disease non-surgically.

An online individualised patient decision aid improves the quality of decisions in patients considering total knee arthroplasty in routine care: A randomized controlled trial.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an online patient decision aid with individualised potential outcomes of surgery, on the quality of decisions for knee replacement surgery in routine clinical care. Design: A pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) in patients considering total knee replacement at a high-volume orthopedic clinic. Patients were randomized at their routine online pre-surgical assessment to either complete a decision aid or not. At their consultation, those in the intervention arm had a surgeon report summarizing the decision aid results. The primary outcome was decision quality, defined as being knowledgeable and choosing the option that matched informed treatment preferences. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was conducted to consider surgeon level clustering and baseline differences between study arms. Results: Of 163 patients randomized, 155 completed post-surgical surveys and were included in the analysis. The average patient was aged 65 years, obese and had moderate to severe osteoarthritis symptoms at baseline. Patients in the intervention arm had a higher odds of making a quality decision (Odds Ratio â€‹= â€‹2.08, 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.02), predominantly through increased knowledge. Conclusions: This study supports the benefit of a decision aid in combination with a surgeon report to significantly improve decision quality in routine care. While the independent contribution of tailoring the decision aid to patient baseline characteristics and including a surgeon report remains unclear, we demonstrated the feasibility of integrating the decision aid into an online pre-surgical assessment in routine clinical care.

Chronic volar distal radioulnar joint instability: joint capsular plication to restore function.

BACKGROUND: Volar instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is uncommon, and there is little written about it. The purpose of this study is to describe a new procedure to treat volar DRUJ instability and to present the outcomes of patients who received this unique surgical repair at a minimum of 1 year follow-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case series of 6 consecutive patients treated with a volar and dorsal capsular plication procedure by an upper extremity specialist surgeon at a teaching hospital between April 1999 and October 2004. We evaluated measures, including wrist range of motion, grip strength, radiographs, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), at final follow-up. RESULTS: Five of 6 patients had resolution of pain and instability symptoms. The average difference in range of motion between operative and contralateral sides was -7 degrees flexion, 2 degrees extension, 4 degrees radial deviation, 2 degrees ulnar deviation, -17 degrees supination and -2 degrees pronation. Average grip strength measured 83% of the uninjured side. The average DASH score was 13.5 (range 0-46.7), and the average PRWE score was 26.7 (range 0-70). One patient had a low ulnar neuropathy, which resolved. One patient fractured the temporary DRUJ stabilization screw and had radiographic evidence of nonbridging heterotopic ossification. CONCLUSION: Joint capsular plication for DRUJ has not yet been described in the literature. It is less elaborate in that it does not require a tendon graft with bone tunnels. The results at an average 16.5 months postoperatively are promising.

The influence of early weight-bearing compared with non-weight-bearing after surgical repair of the Achilles tendon.

BACKGROUND: The optimal rehabilitation protocol after surgical repair of an Achilles tendon rupture has not been well defined. The objective of this randomized study was to compare the effect of early weight-bearing with that of non-weight-bearing on early postoperative recovery following repair of an acutely ruptured Achilles tendon. METHODS: Between October 2003 and May 2006, 110 patients with a surgically repaired Achilles tendon rupture were enrolled from one of two major trauma-care tertiary hospitals. All patients were non-weight-bearing for the first two weeks postoperatively. At the two-week postoperative visit, patients were randomized to either weight-bearing or non-weight-bearing for an additional four weeks. Compliance was measured with a pressure sensor in the fixed-hinge ankle-foot orthosis given to each patient. Follow-up assessments were performed at six weeks, three months, and six months postoperatively. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life assessed with use of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36). Secondary outcomes were activity level, calf strength, ankle range of motion, return to sports and work, and complications. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients (89%) completed the six-month follow-up. At six weeks, the weight-bearing group had significantly better scores than the non-weight-bearing group in the RAND-36 domains of physical functioning, social functioning, role-emotional, and vitality scores (p < 0.05). Patients in the weight-bearing group also reported fewer limitations of daily activities at six weeks postoperatively (p < 0.001). At six months, no significant differences between the groups were seen in any outcome, although both groups had poor endurance of the calf musculature. No rerupture occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Early weight-bearing after surgical repair of an acute Achilles tendon rupture improves health-related quality of life in the early postoperative period and has no detrimental effect on recovery.