Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 102(3): 325-331, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30716339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preterm infants and critically ill neonates are predisposed to nosocomial infections as sepsis. Moreover, these infants acquire commensal bacteria, which might become potentially harmful. On-ward transmission of these bacteria can cause outbreaks. AIM: To report the findings of a prospective surveillance of bacterial colonization and primary sepsis in preterm infants and neonates. METHODS: The results of the surveillance of bacterial colonization of the gut and the respiratory tract, targeting meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and Gram-negative bacteria from November 2016 to March 2018 were analysed. Bacterial colonization was compared to surveillance of sepsis. FINDINGS: Six-hundred and seventy-one patients were admitted and 87.0 % (N=584) of the patients were screened; 48.3% (N=282) of the patients screened were colonized with at least one of the bacteria included in the screening; 26.2% of them (N=74) had multi-drug-resistant strains. A total of 534 bacterial isolates were found. The most frequently found species were Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella oxytoca and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Three MRSA but no VRE were detected. The surveillance detected a K. pneumoniae cluster involving nine patients. There were 23 blood-culture-confirmed sepsis episodes; 60.9% (N=14) were caused by staphylococci. Gram-negative bacteria (one Klebsiella aerogenes and two E. cloacae) caused three sepsis episodes which were preceded by colonization with the respective isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance of colonization provided a comprehensive overview of species and antibiotic resistance patterns. It allowed early detection of a colonization cluster. Knowledge of colonization and surveillance of sepsis is useful for guiding infection control measures and antibiotic treatment.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Carrier State/epidemiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Sepsis/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Carrier State/microbiology , Disease Transmission, Infectious , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Prospective Studies , Respiratory System/microbiology , Sepsis/microbiology , Tertiary Care Centers , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/isolation & purification
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 98(2): 127-133, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28756167

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a frequently encountered pathogen in burn units. Burn patients are especially susceptible to MRSA acquisition and MRSA spread may cause outbreaks in burn units. AIM: To report the characteristics and successful control of an MRSA outbreak and to demonstrate a multimodal infection control concept. METHODS: In addition to a pre-existing infection control concept, several control measures were implemented including weekly prevalence screenings for MRSA, reinforcement of disinfection, restriction of admissions, and short-term unit closure. Epidemiologic investigation and environmental examinations were performed. The outbreak isolates were analysed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and spa-typing. A PubMed search was conducted, focusing on MRSA outbreaks in burn units. FINDINGS: This outbreak of hospital-acquired MRSA affected eight patients during a seven-month period, yielding an attack rate of 8%. Epidemiologic and environmental examinations suggested patient-to-patient transmission, which was confirmed by molecular analysis of bacterial isolates revealing a monoclonal pattern. In accordance with findings from other outbreaks in burn units, the implemented measures including patient screening and temporary unit closure resulted in successful control of the outbreak. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive concept is required to control the spread of all multidrug-resistant micro-organisms including MRSA on a burn unit. Where patients colonized or infected with MRSA appear to be the main reservoir, transfer of these patients to other units, or temporary closure of the unit, accompanied by intensive cleaning are very effective measures to stop transmission events.


Subject(s)
Burns/complications , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks , Infection Control/methods , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Wound Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Molecular Epidemiology , Molecular Typing , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Wound Infection/epidemiology , Wound Infection/microbiology
3.
Ann Burns Fire Disasters ; 31(3): 189-193, 2018 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30863251

ABSTRACT

To systematically evaluate which infection control measures are in place in burn units, we conducted an online survey among 43 German-speaking burn units. The 29 units that responded and agreed to publication represented more than 125 patient beds. All units were located in advanced care hospitals. A total of 14 units provided single rooms only, and 22 units had a nurse-to-patient ratio of at least 1:2. Infection control practices included pre-emptive barrier precautions (29 units), the use of sterile filters for tap water supply (29 units), and an antibiotic stewardship program (24 units). Microbial screening of the patients on admission (23 units), regular prevalence screening (26 units) and surveillance of nosocomial infections (21 units) were also widely used. The high reply rate to the survey indicates the special relevance of infection control for burn units. Our survey shows that great efforts and several measures are being undertaken to address infection control challenges in burn patient care, but it also underlines the need for increased interdisciplinary infection control and antibiotic stewardship activities.


Afin d'évaluer les mesures préventives des infections déployées, nous avons réalisé une enquête en ligne auprès de 43 Centres de Traitement des Brûlés germanophones. Les 29 CTB ayant répondu (et accepté la publication) représentent 125 lits. Tous les CTB étaient situés dans des hôpitaux de référence. Quatorze CTB n'avaient que des chambres seules, 22 avaient un ratio infirmière/patient de1/2. Les mesures préventives comprenaient les précautions barrière (29), des filtres aux points d'eau (29), un programme d'évaluation de l'antibiothérapie (24). La cartographie bactérienne à l'entrée (23), la surveillance de la prévalence des infections (26) et des infections nosocomiales (21) étaient aussi régulièrement déployées. Le taux de réponse élevé pour ce type d'étude montre l'intérêt porté à la prévention des infections en CTB. Cette étude montre que les CTB portent une attention particulière à la prévention et à la surveillance des infections. Elle démontre aussi l'intérêt d'une approche multidisciplinaire et de la mise en place de programmes d'évaluation de l'antibiothérapie.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...