Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 5(10)2016 09 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27688235

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a major public health problem with significant mortality. A better understanding of where IHCA occurs in hospitals (intensive care unit [ICU] versus monitored ward [telemetry] versus unmonitored ward) could inform strategies for reducing preventable deaths. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective study of adult IHCA events in the Get with the Guidelines-Resuscitation database from January 2003 to September 2010. Unadjusted analyses were used to characterize patient, arrest, and hospital-level characteristics by hospital location of arrest (ICU versus inpatient ward). IHCA event rates and outcomes were plotted over time by arrest location. Among 85 201 IHCA events at 445 hospitals, 59% (50 514) occurred in the ICU compared to 41% (34 687) on the inpatient wards. Compared to ward patients, ICU patients were younger (64±16 years versus 69±14; P<0.001) and more likely to have a presenting rhythm of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (21% versus 17%; P<0.001). In the ICU, mean event rate/1000 bed-days was 0.337 (±0.215) compared with 0.109 (±0.079) for telemetry wards and 0.134 (±0.098) for unmonitored wards. Of patients with an arrest in the ICU, the adjusted mean survival to discharge was 0.140 (0.037) compared with the unmonitored wards 0.106 (0.037) and telemetry wards 0.193 (0.074). More IHCA events occurred in the ICU compared to the inpatient wards and there was a slight increase in events/1000 patient bed-days in both locations. CONCLUSIONS: Survival rates vary based on location of IHCA. Optimizing patient assignment to unmonitored wards versus telemetry wards may contribute to improved survival after IHCA.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units , Registries , Tachycardia, Ventricular/epidemiology , Ventricular Fibrillation/epidemiology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Heart Arrest/mortality , Heart Arrest/therapy , Hospital Mortality , Hospital Units , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Tachycardia, Ventricular/therapy , Telemetry , United States/epidemiology , Ventricular Fibrillation/therapy
2.
Crit Care Med ; 42(4): 841-8, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24247472

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Over 200,000 in-hospital cardiac arrests occur in the United States each year and many of these events may be preventable. Current vital sign-based risk scores for ward patients have demonstrated limited accuracy, which leads to missed opportunities to identify those patients most likely to suffer cardiac arrest and inefficient resource utilization. We derived and validated a prediction model for cardiac arrest while treating ICU transfer as a competing risk using electronic health record data. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: An academic medical center in the United States with approximately 500 inpatient beds. PATIENTS: Adult patients hospitalized from November 2008 until August 2011 who had documented ward vital signs. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Vital sign, demographic, location, and laboratory data were extracted from the electronic health record and investigated as potential predictor variables. A person-time multinomial logistic regression model was used to simultaneously predict cardiac arrest and ICU transfer. The prediction model was compared to the VitalPAC Early Warning Score using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and was validated using three-fold cross-validation. A total of 56,649 controls, 109 cardiac arrest patients, and 2,543 ICU transfers were included. The derived model more accurately detected cardiac arrest (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.88 vs 0.78; p < 0.001) and ICU transfer (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.77 vs 0.73; p < 0.001) than the VitalPAC Early Warning Score, and accuracy was similar with cross-validation. At a specificity of 93%, our model had a higher sensitivity than the VitalPAC Early Warning Score for cardiac arrest patients (65% vs 41%). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a prediction tool for ward patients that can simultaneously predict the risk of cardiac arrest and ICU transfer. Our model was more accurate than the VitalPAC Early Warning Score and could be implemented in the electronic health record to alert caregivers with real-time information regarding patient deterioration.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Hospital Administration/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Rapid Response Team/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Survivors , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL