ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite a growing body of literature supporting the safety of robotic hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) procedures, the adoption of minimally invasive techniques in HPB surgery has been slow compared to other specialties. We aimed to identify barriers to implementing robotic assisted surgery (RAS) in HPB and present a framework that highlights opportunities to improve adoption. METHODS: A modified nominal group technique guided by a 13-question framework was utilized. The meeting session was guided by senior authors, and field notes were also collected. Results were reviewed and free text responses were analyzed for major themes. A follow-up priority setting survey was distributed to all participants based on meeting results. RESULTS: Twenty three surgeons with varying robotic HPB experience from different practice settings participated in the discussion. The majority of surgeons identified operating room efficiency, having a dedicated operating room team, and the overall hospital culture and openness to innovation as important facilitators of implementing a RAS program. In contrast, cost, capacity building, disparities/risk of regionalization, lack of evidence, and time/effort were identified as the most significant barriers. When asked to prioritize the most important issues to be addressed, participants noted access and availability of the robot as the most important issue, followed by institutional support, cost, quality of supporting evidence, and need for robotic training. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports surgeons' perceptions of major barriers to equitable access and increased implementation of robotic HPB surgery. To overcome such barriers, defining key resources, adopting innovative solutions, and developing better methods of collecting long term data should be the top priorities.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is a neurovascular disorder characterized by gastrointestinal symptoms due to celiac artery and ganglion compression. Limited literature primarily focuses on adults. This study aims to characterize clinical and histopathologic findings in pediatric MALS. METHODS: Patients <18 years undergoing robotic MAL release, celiac ganglionectomy, and lymphadenectomy from 2020 to 2024 were evaluated. Clinical and histopathologic outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Twelve patients met inclusion criteria and were reviewed (15.7 ± 1.2 years, 75% female, BMI 20.9 [18.6-24.0] kg/m2). Comorbidities included depression/anxiety (83%), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) (50%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (50%), nutrition support (50%), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) (42%), hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) (42%), other vascular compression syndromes (33%). All patients who received preoperative celiac plexus block had temporary symptom relief (10/10). Mean operative time was 119.7 ± 22.4 min. No intraoperative complications, 30-day readmissions, reoperations, or complications occurred. Histopathologically, 92% had fibroadipose tissue, 100% had reactive lymph nodes, none had intraparenchymal nerves, and one had lipogranulomas. Median fibrosis scores were 1 [0.5-2] on H&E and 2 [1-2] on trichrome. Fibrosis score severity was not significantly associated with symptom improvement (χ2 = 3.67, p = 0.16). Median postoperative celiac artery velocity was 258.5 [192.5-350.5] cm/s with a median change of -80.5 [-106.1-+82.8] cm/s from preoperative 308.0 [229.3-344.0] cm/s (S = -5.0, p = 0.55). Those with lower preoperative velocities were more likely to have symptom improvement postoperatively (S = 19, p = 0.04). MALS symptoms improved in 83%; however, despite reporting "MALS pain" was improved, 64% (all female) had other comorbidities such as POTS, MCAS, hEDS, and colonic dysmotility contributing to other ongoing symptoms. CONCLUSION: Robotic MALS surgery is safe and effective in pediatrics. Clinical improvement rates and fibrosis scoring are comparable to adults; however, findings reveal challenges with multiple comorbidities contributing to separate symptoms that may continue postoperatively, particularly in females. We recommend a multidisciplinary team approach in addressing comorbidities and optimizing medical and surgical care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is the standard treatment for achalasia. Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) technology enables objective measurement of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) geometry, with literature linking specific values to improved post-POEM outcomes. Our study assesses FLIP's intraoperative use in evaluating myotomy extent in real-time. METHODS: Retrospective data from all patients undergoing POEM with intraoperative FLIP measurements were extracted from June 2020 to January 2023. The primary endpoint was intraoperative FLIP measurements, management changes, and symptom improvement (Eckardt score). RESULTS: Fourteen patients (age 56 ± 14 years, BMI 28 ± 7 kg/m2) were identified. Most patients were female (64%). Predominantly, patients presented with type II achalasia (50%). FLIP measurements were taken before and after myotomy, demonstrating increases in mean distensibility index (DI) 1.6 ± 1. 4 to 5.4 ± 2.1 mm2/mmHg (p < 0.05) and mean diameter (Dmin) 6 ± 1.8 to 10.9 ± 2.3 mm (p < 0.05) at 50 ml balloon fill. Additional myotomy was performed in one patient when an inadequate increase in FLIP values were noted. Mean operative time was 98 ± 28 min, and there were no intraoperative complications. At the 30-day follow-up, median Eckardt score decreased from mean a preoperative score of 7 ± 2 to a post-operative mean of 2 ± 3, with 10 patients (78%) having a score ≤ 2. In total, four patients experienced symptom recurrence, with repeat FLIP values revealing a significant decrease in DI from 7 ± 2.2 post-POEM to 2.5 ± 1.5 at recurrence. FLIP technology identified LES pathology in 3 out of 4 (75%) patients, facilitating referral to LES-directed therapy. CONCLUSION: Our study adds to the literature supporting the use of FLIP technology during the POEM procedure, with most patients achieving ideal values after a standard-length myotomy. This suggests the potential benefits of shorter myotomies guided by FLIP to achieve comparable outcomes and reduce postoperative GERD risk. Collaborative standardization of study designs and outcome measures is crucial for facilitating prospective trials and cross-setting outcome comparisons.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Myotomy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Humans , Middle Aged , Female , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Esophageal Achalasia/diagnostic imaging , Male , Retrospective Studies , Myotomy/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Electric Impedance , Adult , Aged , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/surgery , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/physiopathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary (MIS HPB) surgery can be performed with good outcomes, there are currently no standardized requirements for centers or surgeons who wish to implement MIS HPB surgery. The aim of this study was to create a consensus statement regarding safe dissemination and implementation of MIS HPB surgical programs. METHODS: Sixteen key questions regarding safety in MIS HPB surgery were generated after a focused literature search and iterative review by three field experts. Participants for the working group were then selected using sequential purposive sampling and snowball techniques. Review of the 16 questions took place over a single 2-h meeting. The senior author facilitated the session, and a modified nominal group technique was used. RESULTS: Twenty three surgeons were in attendance. All participants agreed or strongly agreed that formal guidelines should exist for both institutions and individual surgeons interested in implementing MIS HPB surgery and that routine monitoring and reporting of institutional and surgeon technical outcomes should be performed. Regarding volume cutoffs, most participants (91%) agreed or strongly agreed that a minimum annual institutional volume cutoff for complex MIS HPB surgery, such as major hepatectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy, should exist. A smaller proportion (74%) agreed or strongly agreed that a minimum annual surgeon volume requirement should exist. The majority of participants agreed or strongly agreed that surgeons were responsible for defining (100%) and enforcing (78%) guidelines to ensure the overall safety of MIS HPB programs. Finally, formal MIS HPB training, minimum case volume requirements, institutional support and infrastructure, and mandatory collection of outcomes data were all recognized as important aspects of safe implementation of MIS HPB surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Safe implementation of MIS HPB surgery requires a thoughtful process that incorporates structured training, sufficient volume and expertise, a proper institutional ecosystem, and monitoring of outcomes.
Subject(s)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Humans , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/standards , Patient Safety/standards , Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures/methods , Hepatectomy/methods , Hepatectomy/standards , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , ConsensusABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The introduction of the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) has provided objective, real-time feedback on the geometric variations with each component of a hiatal hernia repair (HHR). The utility of this technology in altering intraoperative decision-making has been scarcely reported. Herein, we report a single-center series of intraoperative FLIP during HHR. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic medical records between 2020 and 2022 was conducted and all patients undergoing non-recurrent HHR with FLIP were queried. Patient and hernia characteristics, intraoperative FLIP values and changes in decision-making, as well as early post-operative outcomes were reported. Both diameter and distensibility index (DI) were measured at 40 ml and 50 ml balloon inflation after hiatal dissection, after hiatal closure, and after fundoplication when indicated. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 62 ± 14 years and mean BMI was 28 ± 6 kg/m2. The majority (53%) were type I hiatal hernias. The largest drop in DI occurred after hiatal closure, with minimal change seen after fundoplication (mean DI of 4.3 ± 2. after completion of HH dissection, vs 2.7 ± 1.2 after hiatal closure and 2.3 ± 1 after fundoplication when performed). In 13 (39%) of cases, FLIP values directly impacted intraoperative decision-making. Fundoplication was deferred in 4/13 (31%) patients, the wrap was loosened in 2/13 (15%); the type of fundoplication was altered to achieve adequate anti-reflux values in 2/13 (15%) patients, and in 1/13 (3%) the wrap was tightened. CONCLUSION: FLIP measurements can be used intraoperatively to guide decision-making and alter management plan based on objective values. Long-term outcomes and further prospective studies are required to better delineate the value of this technology.
Subject(s)
Hernia, Hiatal , Herniorrhaphy , Hernia, Hiatal/surgery , Humans , Middle Aged , Female , Retrospective Studies , Male , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Aged , Fundoplication/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Two dominating theories regarding median arcuate ligament syndrome include vascular and neurogenic etiologies from celiac artery and ganglion compression, respectively. Celiac ganglionectomy is not routine during surgery, and specimens are rarely excised; therefore, the extent of nerve involvement and histopathology are unknown. Our study aims to characterize histopathologic findings in median arcuate ligament syndrome, establish a histopathologic grading system, and correlate with clinical outcomes. METHODS: Robotic median arcuate ligament release, celiac ganglionectomy, and lymphadenectomy were performed with specimens excised and stained using hematoxylin & eosin, trichrome, and S100. Neurofibrosis, adiposity, and reactive changes were described, a grading scale was developed, and results were analyzed with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were evaluated, of whom 36 met inclusion criteria (81% female, 34.9 [25.9-47.5] years, body mass index 23.5 [19.6-28.1] kg/m2). Histopathologic evaluation revealed fibrosis (hematoxylin & eosin and trichrome median score 1.5 [0-2.5]), reactive lymphadenopathy (89%), intraparenchymal nerves (31%), and lipogranulomas (31%). Greater fibrosis was associated with a lack of preoperative celiac plexus block relief (100% vs. 30%, P = .044) and lower postoperative celiac artery velocities (198 vs 323 cm/s, P = .02). Intraparenchymal nerves were associated with greater decreases in pre to postoperative velocities (161 vs 84 cm/s, P = .037). Symptoms improved in 28 patients (78%). CONCLUSION: We developed the first histopathologic grading system and identified unique findings of intraparenchymal nerves and lipogranulomas. Histopathologic abnormalities were associated with objective improvement and symptomatic relief postoperatively. These findings support nerve compression and inflammation as predominant contributors to median arcuate ligament syndrome pain, celiac ganglia resection to treat symptoms, and continued histopathologic analysis to better elucidate median arcuate ligament syndrome etiology.
Subject(s)
Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Female , Male , Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome/surgery , Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome/complications , Ganglionectomy , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Eosine Yellowish-(YS) , Hematoxylin , Celiac Artery/surgery , Lymph Node Excision , Ligaments/surgery , FibrosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic training remains inaccessible for surgeons in low- and middle-income countries, limiting its widespread adoption. We developed a novel tool for assessment of laparoscopic appendectomy skills through ALL-SAFE, a low-cost laparoscopy training system. METHODS: This pilot study in Ethiopia, Cameroon, and the USA assessed appendectomy skills using the ALL-SAFE training system. Performance measures were captured using the ALL-SAFE verification of proficiency tool (APPY-VOP), consisting of a checklist, modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (m-OSATS), and final rating. Twenty participants, including novice (n = 11), intermediate (n = 8), and expert (n = 1), completed an online module covering appendicitis management and psychomotor skills in laparoscopic appendectomy. After viewing an expert skills demonstration video, participants recorded their performance within ALL-SAFE. Using the APPY-VOP, participants rated their own and three peer videos. We used the Kruskal-Wallis test and a Many-Facet Rasch Model to evaluate (i) capacity of APPY-VOP to differentiate performance levels, (ii) correlation among three APPY-VOP components, and (iii) rating differences across groups. RESULTS: Checklist scores increased from novice (M = 21.02) to intermediate (M = 23.64) and expert (M = 28.25), with differentiation between experts and novices, P = 0.005. All five m-OSATS domains and global summed, total summed, and final rating discriminated across all performance levels (P < 0.001). APPY-VOP final ratings adequately discriminated Competent (M = 2.0), Borderline (N = 1.8), and Not Competent (M = 1.4) performances, Χ2 (2,85) = 32.3, P = 0.001. There was a positive correlation between ALL-SAFE checklist and m-OSATS summed scores, r(83) = 0.63, P < 0.001. Comparison of ratings suggested no differences across expertise levels (P = 0.69) or location (P = 0.66). CONCLUSION: APPY-VOP effectively discriminated between novice and expert performance in laparoscopic appendectomy skills in a simulated setting. Scoring alignment across raters suggests consistent evaluation, independent of expertise. These results support the use of APPY-VOP among all skill levels inside a peer rating system. Future studies will focus on correlating proficiency to clinical practice and scaling ALL-SAFE to other settings.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Surgeons , Humans , Pilot Projects , Appendectomy , Laparoscopy/education , Surgeons/education , Clinical CompetenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We reviewed outcomes following cytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with appendiceal or colorectal neoplasms and evaluated key prognostic indicators for treatment. METHODS: All patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC for appendiceal and colorectal neoplasms were identified from an IRB-approved database. Patient demographics, operative reports, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: 110 patients [median age 54.5 (18-79) years, 55% male] were included. Primary tumor location was colorectal (58; 52.7%) and appendiceal (52; 47.3%). 28.2%, .9%, and 12.7% had right, left, and sigmoid tumors, respectively; 11.8% had rectal tumors. 12/13 rectal cancer patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy. Mean Peritoneal Cancer Index was 9.6 ± 7.7; complete cytoreduction was achieved in 90.9%. 53.6% developed postoperative complications. Reoperation, perioperative mortality, and 30-day readmission rates were 1.8%, .09%, and 13.6%, respectively. Recurrence at a median of 11.1 months was 48.2%; overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 84% and 56.8%, respectively; disease-free survival was 60.8% and 33.7%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 16.8 (0-86.8) months. Univariate analysis of preoperative chemotherapy, primary malignancy location, primary tumor perforated or obstructive, postoperative bleeding complication, and pathology of adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma and negative lymph nodes were identified as possible predictive factors of survival. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative chemotherapy (P < .001), perforated tumor (P = .003), and postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding (P < .001) were independent prognostic indicators for survival. CONCLUSIONS: Cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC for colorectal and appendiceal neoplasms has low mortality and high completeness of cytoreduction score. Preoperative chemotherapy, primary tumor perforation, and postoperative bleeding are adverse risk factors for survival.
Subject(s)
Appendiceal Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Hyperthermia, Induced , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Appendiceal Neoplasms/therapy , Appendiceal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Peritoneal Neoplasms/therapy , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Surgeons directly contribute to the over-prescription of opioids. Alternative postoperative pain management strategies are necessary to reduce opioid dispensation and combat the opioid epidemic. We set out to examine the effectiveness of a laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block on reducing opioid requirements after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort analysis, we compared opioid naïve patients who underwent an elective, outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a transversus abdominis plane block with patients who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone between January 2018 and June 2021 at a single institution. Patient characteristics, perioperative pain scores, and postoperative analgesic requirements were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: There were 200 patients included in the study (laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a transversus abdominis plane block, n = 100; laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone, n = 100). The average postoperative pain scores in the postanesthesia care unit were equivalent between the groups (laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a transversus abdominis plane block = 3.39 versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone = 4.17, P = .12), with the mean postanesthesia care unit opioid requirements significantly lower in patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a transversus abdominis plane block (12.1 vs 20.4 oral morphine equivalents, P < .001). Patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a transversus abdominis plane block were prescribed fewer opioids on discharge (mean 77.5 vs 92.9 oral morphine equivalents, P < .05) and reported using a lower proportion of their opioid prescription at follow-up (83.2% vs 100%, P < .001). Of the patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a transversus abdominis plane block, 65% reported using over-the-counter pain medications compared with 82% of patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Performing a laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and effective strategy to reduce postoperative opioid requirements for the treatment of acute postoperative pain.
Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Laparoscopy , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Morphine/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Abdominal Muscles , Anesthetics, LocalABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Adipose is a known source of mesenchymal stem cells that can be used to treat musculoskeletal disorders, such as osteoarthritis. Because obesity often coexists with osteoarthritis, excess adiposity may be a useful source of mesenchymal stem cells. However, obesity is associated with systemic inflammation, which may influence the quality of adipose-derived stem cells. We performed a systematic review of the literature examining adipose-derived stem cell behavior, cytokine, and growth factor profiles from obese and nonobese patients. Two independent reviewers applied the inclusion/exclusion criteria and independently extracted data including mesenchymal stem cell count/viability/behavior, growth factor, and/or cytokine expression. Twenty-two articles met criteria for inclusion. Samples from obese patients had increased mesenchymal stem cell content (n = 6), but decreased proliferative ability (n = 3), and increased expression of interleukin 1 (n = 3), interleukin 6 (n = 3), and tumor necrosis factor α (n = 6). There was also greater macrophage content (n = 4). Weight loss normalized cellular function. In vitro behavior and quality of adipose-derived stem cell are significantly different between obese and nonobese patients. Samples from obese patients had greater adipose-derived stem cell content, lower proliferative ability, increased senescence, and increased proinflammatory cytokine expression. Differences in cellular function should be considered when using adipose to treat musculoskeletal pathology in obese and nonobese patients.
Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue , Osteoarthritis , Adipose Tissue/pathology , Cytokines/metabolism , Humans , Inflammation/metabolism , Obesity/complications , Obesity/therapy , Osteoarthritis/therapy , Stem Cells/metabolism , Stem Cells/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) has emerged as a safe and effective first line option in medically refractory gastroparesis. Determining the appropriate extent of the pyloromyotomy continues to present a challenge as there are no standardized tools for measuring changes in pyloric distensibility during the procedure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of using impedance planimetry with endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) to measure changes in pyloric distensibility after POP, and to compare these changes with improvement in symptoms and objective gastric emptying. METHODS: Patients with medically refractory gastroparesis underwent POP with FLIP measurements of the pylorus (EndoFLIP®, Medtronic, Fridley MN). FLIP measurements, as well as changes in symptoms measured by the validated gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) and scintigraphic gastric emptying studies (GES), were evaluated before and after POP. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients underwent measurement with FLIP during POP, 12 of whom had pre- and post-POP measurements. Mean pyloric diameter increased by 1.4 mm, from 13.9 mm to 15.3 mm (p = 0.0012). Mean distensibility index increased from 6.2 mm2/mmHg to 9.1 mm2/mmHg (p = 0.0074). Successful division of the pylorus was achieved in 100% of patients with a mean operative time of 36 min and no perioperative complications. The mean length of stay was 0.7 days (0-3 days). Post-POP mean GCSI score improved from 2.97 to 2.28 at a mean follow-up time of 27 days (p < 0.001). Objective improvement in gastric emptying was observed in 80% of patients with scintigraphic GES, with mean four-hour retention decreasing from 46.3% to 32.4% (p < 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: FLIP is a safe and feasible tool to provide objective measurements during POP. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up are required to determine if measured improvements in pyloric diameter and distensibility are predictive of sustained improvements in GCSI and GES.
Subject(s)
Gastroparesis , Pyloromyotomy , Gastric Emptying , Gastroparesis/diagnostic imaging , Gastroparesis/etiology , Gastroparesis/surgery , Humans , Pyloromyotomy/methods , Pylorus/diagnostic imaging , Pylorus/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Podcasts are increasingly being utilized in the surgical field as an asynchronous educational resource. This article discusses podcasts devoted to the field of surgery and their growing contribution to surgical education. METHODS: We provide examples of current podcasts and their varied structures, including those that distribute clinical and educational content, discuss recent literature and advancements, interview leaders in the field, and/or showcase unique perspectives on topics such as career development, diversity, and wellness. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Podcasts generated from surgical societies stand on unique ground to educate and engage the surgical community.
Subject(s)
Societies , Educational StatusABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiple retrospective studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic median arcuate ligament division with celiac neurolysis for the definitive management of median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS). This study queries the clinical equipoise of robotic (RMALR) versus laparoscopic MAL release (LMALR) at a high-volume center. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive 26 RMALR and 24 LMALR between March 2018 and August 2019 by a single surgeon at a quaternary academic institution was completed. Primary endpoint was postoperative decrease in celiac trunk expiratory peak systolic velocities (PSVs) measured by mesenteric duplex ultrasonography. Secondary outcomes included reported improvement in MALS-related clinical symptoms, distribution of first assistant seniority level, and involvement of second assistants in RMALR versus LMALR. RESULTS: Mean operative times for LMALR and RMALR were 86 and 134 min, respectively (p < 0.0001). There were no open conversions and mean length of hospital stay was 1 day for both cohorts. Both groups provided an equally effective decrease in postoperative peak systolic velocities (PSVs) (LMALR p = 0.0011; RMALR p = 0.0022; LMALR vs. RMALR p = 0.7772). While RMALR had significantly higher reduction of chronic abdominal pain postoperatively, there were no significant differences in other postoperative symptom relief between groups. However, RMALR patients reported significant relief of postprandial abdominal pain (p < 0.0001) and chronic nausea (p = 0.0002). RMALR had significantly more junior first assistants (p = 0.0001) and less frequently required second assistants compared to LMALR (p = 0.0381). CONCLUSIONS: In this study comparing RMALR to LMALR, postoperative chronic abdominal pain relief was significantly less in the former while other outcomes were equivalent. In comparison with LMALR, RMALR cases were associated with more junior first assistants, fewer second assistants, and longer operative times. Both approaches are safe and feasible for well-selected patients in experienced centers.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Abdominal Pain/surgery , Celiac Artery/surgery , Decompression, Surgical , Humans , Ligaments/surgery , Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP or G-POEM) provides significant short-term improvements in symptoms and objective emptying for patients with medically refractory gastroparesis, but it is unclear if patients with gastroparesis and co-existing dysmotility (small bowel or colonic delay) also benefit. In this study, we used wireless motility capsule (WMC) data to measure outcomes in patients with isolated gastroparesis (GP) and gastroparesis with co-existing dysmotility (GP + Dys) who underwent POP. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who had POP and completed WMC data during their evaluation of intestinal dysmotility. WMC data were reviewed to identify patients who demonstrated isolated GP or GP + Dys. Each patient's pre-op and post-op Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) and 4-h solid-phase scintigraphy gastric emptying studies (GES) scores were compared to evaluate improvement. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort (n = 73), 89% were female with a mean age of 47.0 ± 15.0 years old. Gastroparesis etiologies were divided among idiopathic (54.8%), diabetic (26%), postsurgical (8.2%), autoimmune (5.5%), and multifactorial (5.5%). Forty-one patients (56%) had GP and 32 patients (44%) had GP + Dys. GCSI improved after POP whether the patient had isolated GP (- 12.31, p < 0.001) or GP + Dys (- 9.58, p < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference in total GCSI improvement between the two groups. A subset of patients had postoperative GES available (n = 47). In the isolated GP and GP + Dys cohorts, 15/28 (54%) and 12/19 (63%) patients had normal post-op 4-h GES, respectively, but no statistical difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with medically refractory gastroparesis with and without concomitant gastrointestinal dysmotility show short-term subjective and objective improvement after POP. Concomitant small bowel or colonic dysmotility should not deter physicians from offering POP in carefully selected patients with gastroparesis.
Subject(s)
Gastroparesis , Pyloromyotomy , Adult , Contraindications , Female , Gastric Emptying , Gastroparesis/complications , Gastroparesis/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pyloromyotomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lymph node ratio (LNR) and margin status have prognostic significance in pancreatic cancer. Herein we examined the pathologic and clinical outcomes in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: Patients who underwent treatment between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2017 were included. Sequential patients in the BRPC group were compared to a propensity score matched cohort of patients with radiographically resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent upfront surgical resection. The BRPC group was also compared to sequential patients with radiographically resectable pancreatic cancer who required vein resection (VR) during upfront surgery. RESULTS: There were 50 patients in the BRPC group, 50 patients in the matched control group, and 38 patients in the VR group. Negative margins (R0) were seen in 72%, 64%, and 34% of the BRPC, control, and VR groups, respectively (P = 0.521 for BRPC vs. control; P = 0.002 for BRPC vs. VR), with 24% of the BRPC group requiring a vascular resection. Nodal stage was N0 in 64%, 20%, and 18% of the BRPC, control, and VR groups, respectively (P < 0.001 for BRPC vs. control or VR). When nodal status was stratified into four groups (N0, or LNR ≤ 0.2, 0.2-0.4, ≥ 0.4), the BRPC group had a more favorable distribution (P < 0.001). The median overall survival were 28.8, 38.6, and 19.0 months for the BRPC, control, and VR groups, respectively (log-rank P = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: NAT in BRPC was associated with more R0 and N0 resections and lower LNR compared to patients undergoing upfront resection for resectable disease.
Subject(s)
Lymph Node Ratio/methods , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Propensity Score , Abdominal Cavity , Aged , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/secondary , Prognosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare disease associated with mucinous ascites. Pseudomyxoma peritonei has a low incidence and is difficult to diagnose. Pseudomyxoma peritonei usually presents with vague abdominal pain after significant progression. Computed tomography imaging is the most common modality for diagnosis; however, diagnosis as a result of surgical intervention in cases of acute abdomen has become increasingly common. We present a unique case of a 66-year-old man who was incidentally diagnosed with PMP after undergoing an emergent splenectomy for presumed blunt trauma. The patient presented to the emergency room with abdominal pain, shortness of breath, and diaphoresis. Computed tomography imaging revealed a splenic hematoma with suspicion of extravasation and a moderate amount of free intraperitoneal fluid consistent with blood. The patient was taken to the operating room emergently for an emergent splenectomy where splenic laceration was noted, as were multiple areas of nodularity in the omentum and cecum. Histologic evaluation of these lesions led to the diagnosis of PMP. After recovery from his initial splenectomy, the patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, cytoreductive surgery, cholecystectomy, removal of appendiceal mucocele, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy without complication. Final pathology was consistent with PMP and primary mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma. This case highlights an unusual presentation of PMP for a patient who was undergoing surgery for presumed splenic trauma. Surgeons must maintain a high index of suspicion and should perform histological evaluation when such unexpected findings are encountered.
ABSTRACT
Flexible endoscopic procedures, such as esophagogastroduodenoscopies and colonoscopies, allow for diagnosis and treatment of numerous gastrointestinal disorders. Advanced endoscopic procedures, such as endoscopic ultrasounds, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and balloon enteroscopies, offer therapeutic options that are minimally invasive and effective. As technology advances, the equipment and tools in an endoscopist's armamentarium continue to grow. This article highlights key endoscopic equipment and supplies, from simple to advanced.
Subject(s)
Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal , Endoscopy, Digestive System/instrumentation , Endosonography/instrumentation , Gastrointestinal Diseases/surgery , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Duodenal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients. In this study, we compare oncologic outcomes between sporadic and FAP-associated duodenal cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all patients who underwent surgeries between 2000 and 2014 for either sporadic or FAP duodenal cancer were identified. The patients were grouped based on diagnoses and perioperative and survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients with duodenal cancer (43 sporadic, 13 FAP) who underwent surgery were identified. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was the most common procedure performed. The overall median survival was 7.5 years (1 year: 92%; 5 years: 58.1%). FAP patients had earlier tumor, node, and metastasis stage, less margin involvement, less perineural, and angiolymphatic invasion but had a comparable survival to sporadic patients. The median survival for FAP duodenal cancer was 7.4 vs 9.6 years for sporadic (P = .97) with similar utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy. Although not statistically significant, PD had an improved median survival compared to segmental duodenal resection (SDR) (9.6 years for PD vs 3.6 years for SDR, P = .17). Non-periampullary location and presence of positive lymph nodes were significant predictors of mortality on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: FAP duodenal cancer has no survival advantage compared to sporadic duodenal cancer despite an improved stage of resection with extraampullary lesions having a worse survival.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/mortality , Duodenal Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/complications , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/complications , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/pathology , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/surgery , Adult , Aged , Disease Management , Duodenal Neoplasms/complications , Duodenal Neoplasms/pathology , Duodenal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Young AdultABSTRACT
Splenic abscess is an uncommon but serious complication of infective endocarditis (IE). The timing of surgical management of splenic abscess can be challenging when valve surgery is required. The American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) currently recommends splenectomy before valve replacement due to fear of reinfection of the heart valve; however, published data to support this recommendation are limited. In this series, we report outcomes for 5 patients with IE and splenic abscess who underwent valve replacement first, followed by splenectomy at a median of 19 days (range: 10-77 days) after valve surgery, with no recurrent infection of the new valve. Our experience and review of the available literature provide reassurance for splenectomy after valve surgery for IE.
Subject(s)
Endocarditis, Bacterial/surgery , Splenic Diseases/surgery , Abscess , Aged , Endocarditis, Bacterial/complications , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Female , Heart Valves/microbiology , Heart Valves/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Splenectomy , Splenic Diseases/diagnosis , Splenic Diseases/etiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is a debilitating functional disorder of the stomach marked by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Patients with severe, refractory symptoms may ultimately be managed with Roux-en-Y reconstruction; however, it is unclear whether the stomach should be left in situ, similar to a conventional gastric bypass, or resected as in gastrectomy. METHODS: All patients undergoing Roux-en-Y for the treatment of gastroparesis (GP) at our institution from September 2010 through March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with prior gastric resection or whose primary operative indication was not gastroparesis were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent Roux-en-Y with stomach left in situ (RY-SIS) and twenty-seven patients underwent gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction during the study period. The mean age was 49.7 years in the RY-SIS cohort and 48.5 years in the gastrectomy cohort. Etiology of GP was similar between the two cohorts. Patients undergoing gastrectomy were more likely to have previous interventions for GP (63.0% vs. 26.9%). RY-SIS was associated with a shorter operative time (155 vs. 223 min), less blood loss (24 vs. 130 mL), and shorter length of stay (4.0 vs. 7.2 days). Twelve patients (44.4%) had complications within 30 days following gastrectomy compared to two patients (7.7%) following RY-SIS (p = 0.001). Patients in the RY-SIS cohort were more likely to require further subsequent surgical intervention for GP (23.1% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.04). At last follow-up, there were no differences in reported GP symptoms or symptom scoring. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrectomy was associated with greater perioperative morbidity compared to leaving the stomach in situ. Symptomatic improvement at intermediate follow-up was equivalent following either procedure. However, patients undergoing RY-SIS were more likely to require subsequent surgical intervention, suggesting that gastrectomy may be a more definitive operation for the management of medically refractory gastroparesis.