ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Characterization of visible abnormalities in Barrett esophagus (BE) patients can be challenging, especially for unexperienced endoscopists. This results in suboptimal diagnostic accuracy and poor inter-observer agreement. Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) systems may assist endoscopists. We aimed to develop, validate and benchmark a CADx system for BE neoplasia. METHODS: The CADx system received pretraining with ImageNet with consecutive domain-specific pretraining with GastroNet which includes 5 million endoscopic images. It was subsequently trained and internally validated using 1,758 narrow-band imaging (NBI) images of early BE neoplasia (352 patients) and 1,838 NBI images of non-dysplastic BE (173 patients) from 8 international centers. CADx was tested prospectively on corresponding image and video test sets with 30 cases (20 patients) of BE neoplasia and 60 cases (31 patients) of non-dysplastic BE. The test set was benchmarked by 44 general endoscopists in two phases (phase 1: no CADx assistance; phase 2: with CADx assistance). Ten international BE experts provided additional benchmark performance. RESULTS: Stand-alone sensitivity and specificity of the CADx system were 100% and 98% for images and 93% and 96% for videos, respectively. CADx outperformed general endoscopists without CADx assistance in terms of sensitivity (p=0.04). Sensitivity and specificity of general endoscopist increased from 84% to 96% and 90 to 98% with CAD assistance (p<0.001), respectively. CADx assistance increased endoscopists' confidence in characterization (p<0.001). CADx performance was similar to Barrett experts. CONCLUSION: CADx assistance significantly increased characterization performance of BE neoplasia by general endoscopists to the level of expert endoscopists. The use of this CADx system may thereby improve daily Barrett surveillance.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is a precursor of pancreatic cancer. While earlier research has shown a high prevalence of synchronous/metachronous extrapancreatic tumors in IPMN patients, these studies have often been small with retrospective data collection. The aim of the study was to examine absolute and relative risks of non-pancreatic gastrointestinal (GI) cancer precursors and mortality in histologically confirmed IPMN. METHODS: Through the nationwide ESPRESSO histopathology cohort, we retrieved data on IPMN between 1965 and 2016. Each index case was matched to ≤5 general population controls. Through Cox regression, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for future GI cancer precursors and death. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients with IPMN and 539 age- and sex-matched controls were included. Over a median of 2.1 years of follow up, we confirmed two (1.7%) incident GI cancer precursors in IPMN vs. four (0.7%) in controls, corresponding to an HR of 1.89 (95%CI = 0.34-10.55). By contrast, IPMN patients were at increased risk of death (HR 3.61 (95%CI = 1.79-7.27)). The most common cause of death in IPMN was pancreatic cancer (n = 14; 45.2% of all deaths). CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between IPMN and other GI cancer precursors. This argues against comprehensive routine surveillance for other GI cancer precursors in IPMN patients. Mortality was increased in IPMN with pancreatic cancer being the most common cause of death, indicating the need for lifelong follow up in all resected and non-resected patients with IPMN. However, results should be confirmed in larger cohorts.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/mortality , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Proportional Hazards Models , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/mortality , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology , Risk Factors , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/mortality , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is clinically heterogenous according to location (cardia/non-cardia) and histopathology (diffuse/intestinal). We aimed to characterize the genetic risk architecture of GC according to its subtypes. Another aim was to examine whether cardia GC and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) and its precursor lesion Barrett's oesophagus (BO), which are all located at the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ), share polygenic risk architecture. METHODS: We did a meta-analysis of ten European genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of GC and its subtypes. All patients had a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. For the identification of risk genes among GWAS loci we did a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) and expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) study from gastric corpus and antrum mucosa. To test whether cardia GC and OAC/BO share genetic aetiology we also used a European GWAS sample with OAC/BO. FINDINGS: Our GWAS consisting of 5816 patients and 10,999 controls highlights the genetic heterogeneity of GC according to its subtypes. We newly identified two and replicated five GC risk loci, all of them with subtype-specific association. The gastric transcriptome data consisting of 361 corpus and 342 antrum mucosa samples revealed that an upregulated expression of MUC1, ANKRD50, PTGER4, and PSCA are plausible GC-pathomechanisms at four GWAS loci. At another risk locus, we found that the blood-group 0 exerts protective effects for non-cardia and diffuse GC, while blood-group A increases risk for both GC subtypes. Furthermore, our GWAS on cardia GC and OAC/BO (10,279 patients, 16,527 controls) showed that both cancer entities share genetic aetiology at the polygenic level and identified two new risk loci on the single-marker level. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show that the pathophysiology of GC is genetically heterogenous according to location and histopathology. Moreover, our findings point to common molecular mechanisms underlying cardia GC and OAC/BO. FUNDING: German Research Foundation (DFG).
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Genome-Wide Association Study , Genetic Heterogeneity , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus is difficult. Computer Aided Detection (CADe) systems may assist in neoplasia detection. The aim of this study was to report the first steps in the development of a CADe system for Barrett's neoplasia and to evaluate its performance when compared with endoscopists. METHODS: This CADe system was developed by a consortium, consisting of the Amsterdam University Medical Center, Eindhoven University of Technology, and 15 international hospitals. After pretraining, the system was trained and validated using 1.713 neoplastic (564 patients) and 2.707 non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE; 665 patients) images. Neoplastic lesions were delineated by 14 experts. The performance of the CADe system was tested on three independent test sets. Test set 1 (50 neoplastic and 150 NDBE images) contained subtle neoplastic lesions representing challenging cases and was benchmarked by 52 general endoscopists. Test set 2 (50 neoplastic and 50 NDBE images) contained a heterogeneous case-mix of neoplastic lesions, representing distribution in clinical practice. Test set 3 (50 neoplastic and 150 NDBE images) contained prospectively collected imagery. The main outcome was correct classification of the images in terms of sensitivity. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the CADe system on test set 1 was 84%. For general endoscopists, sensitivity was 63%, corresponding to a neoplasia miss-rate of one-third of neoplastic lesions and a potential relative increase in neoplasia detection of 33% for CADe-assisted detection. The sensitivity of the CADe system on test sets 2 and 3 was 100% and 88%, respectively. The specificity of the CADe system varied for the three test sets between 64% and 66%. CONCLUSION: This study describes the first steps towards the establishment of an unprecedented data infrastructure for using machine learning to improve the endoscopic detection of Barrett's neoplasia. The CADe system detected neoplasia reliably and outperformed a large group of endoscopists in terms of sensitivity.
Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Deep Learning , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) include various malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract. Due to their anatomical location, HNCs can cause obstruction, odynophagia, or trismus, leading to dysphagia. In addition, this patient group may be vulnerable to treatment side effects both by surgery and oncological treatment, exposing the patients to an even higher risk of malnutrition. The risk of malnourishment is often resolved by applying a feeding gastrostomy tube. The present study aims to identify complication rates after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and open gastrostomy (OG) in patients treated for HNC in a high-volume center. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all patients treated for a new diagnosis of HNC at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery at Karolinska University Hospital between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2018 in whom gastrostomy was performed. RESULTS: Regarding tumor location, 165 (56.7%) were in the pharynx, 68 (23.4%) in the oral cavity, 57 (19.6%) in the larynx, and 1 (0.3%) in the nasal cavity. PEG was performed in 240 (82.5%) and OG in 51 (17.5%) patients. The overall complication rate was 28.2%: 64 (26.7%) among PEG patients and 18 (35.3%) among OG patients. The incidence of major complications was 3.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that enteral feeding via gastrostomy is a safe method, regardless of the technique used (PEG or OG), with a low rate of major complications and no mortality linked to the procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1778-1784, 2022.
Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Malnutrition , Deglutition Disorders/epidemiology , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Enteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Gastrostomy/adverse effects , Gastrostomy/methods , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Malnutrition/etiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The poor survival of patients with gastroesophageal cancers may improve if additional esophageal precursor lesions to Barrett's esophagus and squamous dysplasia are identified. We estimated the risk for gastroesophageal cancers among patients with various histopathological abnormalities in the esophagus, including Barrett's esophagus, subdivided by histopathological types. METHODS: Histopathology data from esophageal biopsies obtained 1979-2014 were linked with several national population-based registers in Sweden. Patients were followed from 2 years after the first biopsy date until cancer, death, emigration, esophagectomy/gastrectomy or end of follow-up, 31st of December 2016, whichever came first. We estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) as measures of relative risk with the Swedish general population as reference. RESULTS: In total 367 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) cases were ascertained during 831,394 person-years of follow-up. The incidence rate (IR) for EAC was 0.1 per 1000 person-years for normal morphology, 0.2-0.5 for inflammatory changes, and 0.8-2.9 for metaplasia. The IR was 1.0 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval 0.7-1.3) among patients with non-dysplastic intestinal metaplasia, 0.9 (0.8-1.1) in non-dysplastic gastric/glandular metaplasia and 2.9 (2.0-4.2) among columnar metaplasia patients with low-grade dysplasia. The SIRs were 11.7 (95% confidence interval 8.6-15.5), 12.0 (10.0-14.2) and 30.2 (20.5-42.8), respectively. The SIRs for gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) were moderately elevated. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we demonstrate that patients with esophageal inflammatory and other metaplastic abnormalities than Barrett's esophagus have an increased risk of EAC and GCA compared to the general population. Moreover, patients with different histopathologic subtypes of Barrett's esophagus have a comparable risk for EAC.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Stomach Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/epidemiology , Cardia/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Humans , Metaplasia/complications , Metaplasia/epidemiology , Metaplasia/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/etiology , Sweden/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Endoscopic sutures can be used in various clinical situations where closure or fixation is needed. Stents that migrate and dislocated probes can be fixated by endoscopic sutures. The sutures can be used to stop gastrointestinal bleeding. It is possible to close perforations, leaks and fistulas with endoscopic sutures, but as with ordinary sutures, the indication must be correct for the procedure to be successful. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) can be done by a series of sutures reducing the volume of the stomach. Defects after endoscopic resections, where bleeding or perforations can be expected, can be closed with endoscopic sutures. Complications are uncommon but intraabdominal fluid collection may occur after ESG. Endoscopic sutures have the same possibilities and limitations as traditional or laparoscopic sutures. Properly used, the method is safe, but the instruments are still difficult to work with and require an experienced endoscopist who has undergone proper training.
Subject(s)
Gastroplasty , Weight Loss , Humans , Obesity/surgery , Sutures , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
ESGE recommends considering the following indications for enteral tube insertion: (i) clinical conditions that make oral intake impossible (neurological conditions, obstructive causes); (ii) acute and/or chronic diseases that result in a catabolic state where oral intake becomes insufficient; and (iii) chronic small-bowel obstruction requiring a decompression gastrostomy.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the use of temporary feeding tubes placed through a natural orifice (either nostril) in patients expected to require enteral nutrition (EN) for less than 4 weeks. If it is anticipated that EN will be required for more than 4 weeks, percutaneous access should be considered, depending on the clinical setting.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the gastric route as the primary option in patients in need of EN support. Only in patients with altered/unfavorable gastric anatomy (e.âg. after previous surgery), impaired gastric emptying, intolerance to gastric feeding, or with a high risk of aspiration, should the jejunal route be chosen.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE suggests that recent gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding due to peptic ulcer disease with risk of rebleeding should be considered to be a relative contraindication to percutaneous enteral access procedures, as should hemodynamic or respiratory instability.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE suggests that the presence of ascites and ventriculoperitoneal shunts should be considered to be additional risk factors for infection and, therefore, further preventive precautions must be taken in these cases.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that percutaneous tube placement (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy [PEG], percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension [PEG-J], or direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy [D-PEJ]) should be considered to be a procedure with high hemorrhagic risk, and that in order to reduce this risk, specific guidelines for antiplatelet or anticoagulant use should be followed strictly.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends refraining from PEG placement in patients with advanced dementia.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends refraining from PEG placement in patients with a life expectancy shorter than 30 days.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence*.
Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Adult , Gastrostomy/adverse effects , Humans , Intestine, SmallABSTRACT
ESGE recommends the "pull" technique as the standard method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the direct percutaneous introducer ("push") technique for PEG placement in cases where the "pull" method is contraindicated, for example in severe esophageal stenosis or in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) or esophageal cancer.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the intravenous administration of a prophylactic single dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (or appropriate alternative antibiotic, in the case of allergy) to decrease the risk of post-procedural wound infection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends that inadvertent insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) into the respiratory tract should be considered a serious but avoidable adverse event (AE).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that each institution should have a dedicated protocol to confirm correct positioning of NGTs placed "blindly" at the patient's bedside; this should include: radiography, pH testing of the aspirate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, but not auscultation alone.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends confirmation of correct NGT placement by radiography in high-risk patients (intensive care unit [ICU] patients or those with altered consciousness or absent gag/cough reflex).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that EN may be started within 3â-â4 hours after uncomplicated placement of a PEG or PEG-J.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE recommends that daily tube mobilization (pushing inward) along with a loose position of the external PEG bumper (1â-â2âcm from the abdominal wall) could mitigate the risk of development of buried bumper syndrome.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition , Gastrostomy , Adult , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Gastrostomy/adverse effects , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Weight loss and dysphagia are frequent features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and influence prognosis. The aim of this study was to determine complications and outcomes in patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertion in a high-volume center. METHODS: A single center retrospective study on a prospectively collected cohort of 187 consecutive patients who have undergone PEG placement due to ALS was performed. Demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 51.3% male; mean age at insertion was 65.7 years. Major complications occurred in 5 (2.7%) patients: 3 with local infections requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment, 1 patient with PEG dislocation required laparotomy and a new surgically introduced gastrostomy and 1 patient with buried-bumper syndrome. Improvement in Body Mass Index (BMI) and serum albumin levels were recorded in 37.3% and 51.9%, respectively. Mortality after 30 days, 6 months and 12 months was 5.3%, 38% and 64.3%, respectively. At the time of data collection, 78.9% of the patients had died. Mean survival after ALS diagnosis was 20.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: PEG placement is as an effective, safe nutritional method with a low complication rate in patients with ALS, with or without non-invasive ventilation. The BMI and albumin levels stabilize after PEG placement, indicating benefits of early placement.
Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/complications , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Gastroscopy , Gastrostomy/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Weight LossABSTRACT
A stenosing tumour in the throat region is a common indication for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), which may be used for enteral nutrition in palliative cases or placed prior to curative treatment (surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) and removed when the patient has recovered and has a reliable and adequate oral intake. Major complications related to PEG are rare, but their treatment poses a challenge. We are presenting a case of the transmission of metastasis to the gastrostomy site in a patient with pharynx cancer after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
Subject(s)
Gastrostomy , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Neoplasm Metastasis , Pharyngeal Neoplasms , Enteral Nutrition , Humans , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
Introduction: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method of choice for long-term enteral feeding for patients with swallowing disorders and normal gut function. There is limited data regarding the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients from whom PEG was removed. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive adult patients who underwent first placement of PEG between 1 August 2013 and 31 December 2015 at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. Results: In total, 495 PEG were inserted in 495 patients during the study period, 56% male, mean age at insertion 67 years (range 19-95). Most patients belonged to the neurologic group (52%), followed by the oncologic (32%), another diagnosis (9%) and trauma (7%). Major complications occurred in 10 (2.0%) patients. There were no differences in the age or BMI of patients with either minor or major complications but both parameters were risk factors in terms of survival. PEG was removed from 165 (33.3%) patients, most of them from the oncology group, due to the improvement of general status of patients after specific oncologic treatment. Conclusion: Increased age and low BMI were identified as risk factors for mortality but did not correspond with the rate of complications. Antibiotic prophylaxis with sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim provides good protection for patients with PEG.
Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Endoscopy , Gastrostomy/adverse effects , Hospitals, High-Volume , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Body Mass Index , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Enteral Nutrition/mortality , Female , Gastrostomy/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Nervous System Diseases/complications , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Sweden/epidemiology , Time Factors , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Primary antireflux surgery has high success rates but 5 to 20% of patients undergoing antireflux operations can experience recurrent reflux and dysphagia, requiring reoperation. Different surgical approaches after failed fundoplication have been described in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate resection of the gastroesophageal junction with jejunal interposition (Merendino procedure) as a rescue procedure after failed fundoplication. METHODS: All patients who underwent a Merendino procedure at the Karolinska University Hospital between 2004 and 2012 after a failed antireflux fundoplication were identified. Data regarding previous surgical history, preoperative workup, postoperative complications, subsequent investigations and re-interventions were collected retrospectively. The follow-up also included questionnaires regarding quality of life, gastrointestinal function and the dumping syndrome. RESULTS: Twelve patients had a Merendino reconstruction. Ten patients had undergone at least two previous fundoplications, of which one patient had four such procedures. The main indication for surgery was epigastric and radiating back pain, with or without dysphagia. Postoperative complications occurred in 8/12 patients (67%). During a median follow-up of 35 months (range 20-61), four (25%) patients had an additional redo procedure with conversion to a Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy within 12 months, mainly due to obstructive symptoms that could not be managed conservatively or with endoscopic techniques. Questionnaires scores were generally poor in all dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the Merendino procedure seems to be an unsuitable surgical option for patients who require an alternative surgical reconstruction due to a failed fundoplication. However, the small number of patients included in this study as well as the small number of participants who completed the postoperative workout limits this study.
Subject(s)
Esophagogastric Junction/surgery , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Jejunum/transplantation , Adult , Aged , Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y/adverse effects , Anastomosis, Surgical , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/surgery , Esophagostomy , Female , Fundoplication , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Humans , Jejunostomy , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Quality of Life , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment FailureABSTRACT
This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Introduction: Malawi is among the world's least developed countries. There are 2.1 physicians per 100 000 people and a high trauma-related mortality and morbidity. The lack of healthcare resources requires essential high capacity trauma training at a low cost. Methods: A one-week trauma course was conducted at the Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. 15 students (13 interns and 2 chief nurses) attended the course. They were trained in initial trauma care, triage and basic practical procedures. Thereafter, evaluated through an identical multiple-choice exam, pre- (PRE) and post-course (POE), following a similar exam 6 months post-course (6MPOE). Prior to, and after the course a confidence-based questionnaire was completed. Results: The participants presented significantly higher test-scores after the course in both POE (26.2±3.2 vs. 21.8±3.1; p>0.001) and 6MPOE (25.7±2.4 vs. 21.8±3.1; p 0.003). We also identified the nurses to improve significantly after the course. The highest score of improvement was 27.3%. Higher confidence scores were noticed after the course. Conclusion: This study shows that any healthcare personnel in a low-income setting could benefit from a designed course in trauma management. Thus, we emphasize that healthcare staff undertake similar course to orient towards correct management and assessment of initial trauma patients.
ABSTRACT
Idiopathic achalasia is a severe motility disorder of the esophagus and is characterized by a failure of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax due to a loss of neurons in the myenteric plexus. Most recently, we identified an eight-amino-acid insertion in the cytoplasmic tail of HLA-DQß1 as strong achalasia risk factor in a sample set from Central Europe, Italy and Spain. Here, we tested whether the HLA-DQß1 insertion also confers achalasia risk in the Polish and Swedish population. We could replicate the initial findings and the insertion shows strong achalasia association in both samples (Poland P=1.84 × 10(-04), Sweden P=7.44 × 10(-05)). Combining all five European data sets - Central Europe, Italy, Spain, Poland and Sweden - the insertion is achalasia associated with Pcombined=1.67 × 10(-35). In addition, we observe that the frequency of the insertion shows a geospatial north-south gradient. The insertion is less common in northern (around 6-7% in patients and 2% in controls from Sweden and Poland) compared with southern Europeans (~16% in patients and 8% in controls from Italy) and shows a stronger attributable risk in the southern European population. Our study provides evidence that the prevalence of achalasia may differ between populations.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia/genetics , HLA-DQ beta-Chains/genetics , Mutagenesis, Insertional , Esophageal Achalasia/epidemiology , Esophageal Achalasia/ethnology , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Mutation Rate , Polymorphism, Genetic , Prevalence , White People/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD) is a treatment option for oesophagus tumours localized to the mucosa enabling en bloc removal of large lesions. The resulting larger mucosal defects have resulted in an increase in the occurrence of post-treatment strictures. Transplantation of autologous cell sheets, cultured from oral mucosa, has been shown to prevent post-ESD strictures. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of cell sheet transplantation after oesophageal ESD in a Western patient population where reflux-associated pre-malignant and malignant conditions predominate. METHODS: Patients with Barrett's oesophagus associated high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma where ESD entailed a resection >3 cm in length and ≥75% of the circumference were eligible for treatment under hospital exemption. Cell sheets were cultured from buccal mucosa according to Good Manufacturing Practice and were endoscopically applied to the post-ESD defect directly after resection. Patients were followed with weekly endoscopy examinations, including confocal laser microscopy, for a total of four weeks. RESULTS: Five patients were treated. ESD was extensive with resections being circumferential in three patients and 9-10 cm in length in two. The number of transplanted cell sheets ranged from two to six. Three patients developed strictures requiring two to five dilatation sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Cell sheet transplantation shows to be safe and feasible in a Western population. Results suggest that transplantation has a protective effect on the mucosal defect after ESD, decreasing both the risk for and extent of stricture formation.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To investigate possible predictors for failed self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) therapy in consecutive patients with benign esophageal perforation-rupture (EPR). METHODS: All patients between 2003-2013 treated for EPR at the Karolinska University Hospital, a tertiary referral center, were studied with regard to initial management with SEMS. Patients with malignancy as an underlying cause and those with anastomotic leakages were excluded. Sealing of the perforation with a covered SEMS was the primary strategy whenever feasible. Stent therapy failure was defined as a radical change of treatment strategy due to uncontrolled mediastinitis, which in this setting consisted of emergency esophagectomy with end-esophagostomy or death as a consequence of the perforation and subsequent uncontrolled sepsis. Patient and lesion characteristics were analyzed and are presented as median and interquartile range. Possible predictors for failed stent therapy were analyzed with uni-variate logistic regression, while variables with P < 0.2 were further analyzed with multi-variate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the total number of 48 patients presenting with EPR, 40 patients (83.3%) were treated with SEMS at the time of admission, with an intention to heal the perforation. Twenty-three patients had Boerhaave's syndrome (58%), 16 had an iatrogenic perforation (40%) and 1 had external trauma to the esophagus (3%). The total in-hospital mortality, including the cases that had other initial treatments (n = 8), was 10.4% and 7.5% among those who were subjected to the SEMS-based strategy. In 33 of the 40 patients (82.5%) who were treated with stent, the EPR healed without further change in treatment strategy. Patients classified as treatment success received a SEMS at a median time of 1 (1-1) d after the actual EPR, compared to 3 (1-10) d among those where the initial treatment failed, P = 0.039 in uni-variate analysis and P = 0.052 in multi-variate analysis. No other significant factors emerged, indicating an increased risk for failure. Six of 7 patients, where stent treatment of the defect failed, underwent an emergency esophagectomy with end esophagostomy and one patient died. CONCLUSION: SEMS as an upfront therapeutic strategy seems to be a successful concept, when applied to an unselected group of patients with EPR.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Perforation/therapy , Mediastinitis/etiology , Prosthesis Failure , Stents , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Esophageal Perforation/diagnosis , Esophageal Perforation/etiology , Esophageal Perforation/mortality , Esophagectomy , Esophagostomy , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, University , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mediastinitis/diagnosis , Mediastinitis/mortality , Mediastinitis/surgery , Metals , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Prosthesis Design , Risk Factors , Sweden , Tertiary Care Centers , Time Factors , Treatment Failure , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The traditional endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is argon plasma coagulation, but results are not always positive. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a new endoscopic therapy that may be an attractive option for the treatment of GAVE. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of RFA for the treatment of GAVE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, retrospective, case series study. The main outcome measures were number of red blood cell (RBC) packs transfused (transfusion requirement) and hemoglobin concentrations (g/dL) in the 6 months prior to and after RFA. Success was defined as a decrease in transfusion requirement in the 6 months after RFA compared with before treatment. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients underwent a mean of 1.8 ± 0.8 RFA sessions. No complications were reported. One patient was referred for additional argon plasma coagulation during follow-up. The mean number of RBC packs decreased in all 23 transfusion-dependent patients, from a mean of 10.6 ± 12.1 during the 6 months prior to RFA, to a mean of 2.5 ± 5.9 during the 6 months after RFA treatment (P < 0.001), and 15 patients (65.2 %) were weaned off transfusions completely. An increase in the hemoglobin concentration was reported in all patients after RFA (from 6.8 ± 1.4 g/dL to 9.8 ± 1.8 g/dL; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: RFA for the treatment of GAVE seems feasible and safe, and significantly reduced the need for RBC transfusion and increased the hemoglobin level in this retrospective case series.