Single-dose pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide and its active metabolite in the mucosal tissues.

Objectives: Tenofovir alafenamide, a prodrug of tenofovir, produces higher PBMC concentrations of tenofovir diphosphate (tenofovir-dp) than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. To understand tenofovir alafenamide's mucosal tissue distribution and its implications for pre-exposure prophylaxis, we characterized tenofovir-dp in female genital tract (FGT) and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tissues. Methods: Healthy seronegative women were given 5, 10 or 25 mg of tenofovir alafenamide ( n = 8/group). Each participant provided plasma, PBMC and cervical, vaginal and rectal tissue samples over 14 days. Plasma, cell lysate and tissue homogenate concentrations were analysed by LC-MS/MS. Dose proportionality was declared in plasma and PBMCs if the natural log AUC versus natural log dose regression line 90% CI was within 0.57-1.43. In vitro tenofovir-dp formation was assessed in PBMCs and ectocervical (Ect1/E6E7) and vaginal (VK2/E6E7) cells incubated in 0.5 and 10 µM tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir. clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02357602. Results: Following single doses of 5, 10 and 25 mg, median (IQR) tenofovir plasma AUC 0-14 days was 52.8 (49.5-59.6), 78.1 (68.2-86.9) and 169.7 (131.2-211.4) ng·h/mL and tenofovir-dp PBMC AUC 0-14 days was 2268 (1519-4090), 4584 (3113-5734) and 9306 (6891-10785) fmol·h/10 6 cells, respectively. Tenofovir was quantifiable in 52% and 92% of FGT and GI tissues, whereas tenofovir-dp was quantifiable in only 5% and 19% of FGT and GI tissues, respectively. Plasma tenofovir and PBMC tenofovir-dp were dose proportional (90% CI = 0.87-1.15 and 0.62-1.02, respectively). In vitro tenofovir-dp was 1.7-17-fold higher in epithelial cells than PBMCs. Conclusions: After tenofovir alafenamide dosing in vivo , tenofovir-dp was unquantifiable in most tissues (91%) although cervical and vaginal epithelial cells efficiently formed tenofovir-dp from tenofovir alafenamide in vitro . These findings warrant further investigation of tenofovir alafenamide's pharmacology.

Models for predicting effective HIV chemoprevention in women.

OBJECTIVE: Model systems that rapidly identify tissue drug concentrations protective of HIV infection could streamline the development of chemoprevention strategies. Tissue models are promising, but limited concentration targets exist, and no systematic comparison to cell models or clinical studies has been performed. DESIGN: We explored the efficacy of maraviroc (MVC) and tenofovir (TFV) for HIV prevention by comparing Emax models from TZM-bl cells to vaginal tissue explants and evaluated their predictive capabilities with a dose-challenge clinical study. METHODS: HIV-1JR-CSF was used for viral challenge. Drug efficacy was assessed using a luciferase reporter assay in TZM-bl cells and real-time PCR to quantify spliced RNA in a tissue explant model. Cell and tissue concentrations of MVC, TFV, and the active metabolite tenofovir diphosphate were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry and used to create Emax models of efficacy. Efficacy after a single oral dose of 600 mg MVC and 600 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was predicted from cell and tissue models and confirmed in a clinical study with viral biopsy challenge postdose. RESULTS: TFV was >10-fold and MVC >1000-fold, more potent in TZM-bl cells compared with vaginal explant tissue. In the dose-challenge study, tissues from 3 of 6 women were protected from HIV infection, which was 49% lower than predicted by TZM-bl data and 36% higher than predicted by tissue explant data. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative effective concentration data were generated for TFV and MVC in 3 HIV chemoprophylaxis models. These results provide a framework for future early investigations of antiretroviral efficacy in HIV prevention to optimize dosing strategies in clinical investigations.