Is the burden of metastatic lymph node stations a prognostic factor in patients with resected lung cancer?

OBJECTIVES: The burden of metastatic lymph node (LN) stations might reflect a distinct N subcategory with a more aggressive biology and behaviour than the traditional N classification. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2018, we analyzed 1236 patients with pN1/2 lung cancer. Survival was analyzed based on LN station metastasis, determining the optimal threshold for the number of metastatic LN stations that provided additional prognostic information. N prognostic subgrouping was performed using thresholds for the number of metastatic LN stations with the maximum chi-square log-rank value, and validated at each pT-stage. RESULTS: Survival showed stepwise statistical deterioration with an increase in the number of metastatic LN stations., Threshold values for the number of metastatic LN stations were determined and N prognostic subgroupswas created as sN-alpha; one LN station metastases (n = 632), sN-beta; two-three LN stations metastases (n = 505), and sN-gamma; ≥4 LN stations metastasis (n = 99). The 5-year survival rate was 57.7% for sN-alpha, 39.2% for sN-beta, and 12.7% for sN-gamma (chi-square log rank = 97.906, p < 0.001). A clear tendency of survival deterioration was observed from sN-alpha to sN-gamma in the same pT stage, except for pT4 stage. Multivariate analysis showed that age (p < 0.001), sex (p = 0.002), tumour histology (p < 0.001), IASLC-proposed N subclassification (p < 0.001), and sN prognostic subgroups (p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for survival. CONCLUSION: The burden of metastatic LN stations is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with lung cancer. It could provide additional prognostic information to the N classification.

Selection of the appropriate treatment for the combination of interstitial lung disease and lung cancer: A retrospective observational study.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) independently heightens the risk of lung cancer (LC), often necessitating chemoradiotherapy (CRT) due to advanced disease stages. However, CRT may compromise survival through complications such as ILD exacerbation or radiation pneumonitis. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal surgical or nonsurgical treatment approaches for patients with concurrent ILD and LC. Over a 10-year period, a retrospective evaluation was conducted on 647 patients with confirmed diagnoses of LC and ILD from a total of 4541 patients examined in the polyclinic. This assessment included a comprehensive review of demographic, treatment, and survival records. Study groups included those treated for both ILD and LC with surgical treatment (ST), chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), or CRT. A control group comprised ILD-only cases. In the whole sample of 647 patients with complete data, the length of stay in hospital and respiratory intensive care unit was significantly shorter in the ST group and longer in the CT group. Significant differences in discharge status (P < .001) were observed, with higher recovery rates in the ST and RT groups. The CT group showed an increased rate of transfer to other centers, in-hospital mortality was determined to be higher in the CRT group, and the control group exhibited no change in discharge. No statistically significant difference was determined between the groups with respect to the 24- and 48-month survival rates (P = .100). Although no disparity was found in 2- and 4-year survival rates, there were seen to be advantages in survival and quality of life with the addition of radiotherapy to regions aligning with surgical margins for LC patients with ILD, evaluated as radiological N0, undergoing wedge resection. This underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies to balance effective cancer control and to minimize ILD-related complications.