Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 151(3): 1593, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35364950

ABSTRACT

This study is aimed at the quantitative investigation of wave propagation through the skull bone and its dependence on different coupling methods of the bone conduction hearing aid (BCHA). Experiments were conducted on five Thiel embalmed whole head cadaver specimens. An electromagnetic actuator from a commercial BCHA was mounted on a 5-Newton steel headband, at the mastoid, on a percutaneously implanted screw (Baha® Connect), and transcutaneously with a Baha® Attract (Cochlear Limited, Sydney, Australia), at the clinical bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA) location. Surface motion was quantified by sequentially measuring ∼200 points on the skull surface via a three-dimensional laser Doppler vibrometer (3D LDV) system. The experimental procedure was repeated virtually, using a modified LiUHead finite element model (FEM). Both experiential and FEM methods showed an onset of deformations; first near the stimulation area, at 250-500 Hz, which then extended to the inferior ipsilateral skull surface, at 0.5-2 kHz, and spread across the whole skull above 3-4 kHz. Overall, stiffer coupling (Connect versus Headband), applied at a location with lower mechanical stiffness (the BAHA location versus mastoid), led to a faster transition and lower transition frequency to local deformations and wave motion. This behaviour was more evident at the BAHA location, as the mastoid was more agnostic to coupling condition.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Hearing Aids , Bone Conduction/physiology , Head , Skull/physiology , Vibration
2.
Int J Audiol ; 61(8): 678-685, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34097554

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate transcranial transmission (TT) and the dampening effect of the skin in patients and cadaver heads. DESIGN: In patients a pure tone bone conduction audiogram for ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation was performed. The TT was defined as the difference between ipsilateral and contralateral hearing thresholds. In cadaver heads ipsilateral and contralateral promontory motion was measured using a three-dimensional Laser Doppler Vibrometer system. STUDY SAMPLE: Seven single-sided deaf patients fitted with a Baha® Connect, fifteen single-sided deaf patients without a bone conduction hearing aid and five Thiel-embalmed cadaver heads were included. RESULTS: The TT decreased with increasing frequency in patients and cadaver heads. No significant difference was seen between patients and cadaver heads. Measurements on patients and cadaver heads showed increasing skin attenuation with increasing frequency. However, the dampening effect was 3-12 dB higher in patients than in cadavers at all frequencies. CONCLUSION: The TT was not significantly different for patients compared to cadaver heads. The value of promontory motion to estimate TT in patients need to be further evaluated. The skin attenuates a BC stimulus by 10-20 dB in patients and by a smaller amount in cadaver heads, probably due to changes in the properties of the Thiel-conserved skin.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Hearing Aids , Bone Conduction/physiology , Cadaver , Hearing , Humans , Sound , Vibration
3.
Hear Res ; 395: 108041, 2020 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32810722

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Experimental investigation of the contribution of the middle ear to bone conduction (BC) hearing sensation. METHODS: Experiments were conducted on 6 fresh cadaver whole head specimens. The electromagnetic actuators from a commercial bone conduction hearing aid (BCHA), Baha® 5 SuperPower and BoneBridge (BB), were used to provide stepped sine stimulus in the range of 0.1-10 kHz. The middle ear transfer function (METF) of each cadaver head was checked against the ASTM F2504-05 standard. In a first step, the stapes stimulus into the cochlea, under BC, was estimated based on the differential velocity between the stapes footplate and the promontory. This was based on sequential measurements of the 3D velocity of the stapes footplate and the promontory. In parallel, the differential tympanic membrane (TM) pressure was recorded by measuring sound pressure in the middle ear and in the external auditory canal each measured 1-2 mm from the TM. The measurement procedure was then sequentially repeated, after: a) opening the middle ear cavity; b) ISJ interruption; c) closing the middle ear cavity. At the end, the velocity at each actuator is measured for comparison purposes. Stapes footplate and promontory motion was quantified as the 3D motion at a single measurement point via a three-dimensional laser Doppler vibrometer (3D LDV) system. The combined motion was used for all motion parameters. RESULTS: The METF, based on the combined motion, matches better to the ASTM standard, making the measurements resilient to oblique measurement directions. The Baha actuator produced ∼10 dB SPL more output than the BB above 2 kHz. This resulted in 2-5 dB increase in the differential pressure across the TM, after middle ear cavity opening, for Baha stimulation, and up to 9 dB drop (around 2 kHz) for BB stimulation. The differential stapes motion follows linearly the level of motion of the stimulation area, however, it is affected by actuator resonances in a more complex way. Interruption of the ISJ, reduces the differential motion of the stapes with 1-5 dB, only at 1-3 kHz. CONCLUSION: Combined velocity more objectively describes the stapes and skull motion, than any individual motion component. The state of the ME cavity and the ISJ affect the cochlear input of the stapes, however, the effect is limited in frequency and magnitude.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Ear, Middle , Acoustic Stimulation , Cadaver , Humans , Sound , Stapes , Vibration
4.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 147(3): 1985, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32237811

ABSTRACT

In order to better understand bone conduction sound propagation across the skull, three-dimensional (3D) wave propagation on the skull surface was studied, along with its dependence on stimulation direction and location of a bone conduction hearing aid (BCHA) actuator. Experiments were conducted on five Thiel embalmed whole head cadaver specimens. Stimulation, in the 0.1-10 kHz range, was sequentially applied at the forehead and mastoid via electromagnetic actuators from commercial BCHAs, supported by a 5-N steel band. The head response was quantified by sequentially measuring the 3D motion of ∼200 points (∼15-20 mm pitch) across the ipsilateral, top, and contralateral skull surface via a 3D laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) system, guided by a robotic positioner. Low-frequency stimulation (<1 kHz) resulted in a spatially complex rigid-body-like motion of the skull that depended on both the stimulation condition and head support. The predominant motion direction was only 5-10 dB higher than other components below 1 kHz, with no predominance at higher frequencies. Sound propagation direction across the parietal plates did not coincide with stimulation location, potentially due to the head base and forehead remaining rigid-like at higher frequencies and acting as a large source for the deformation patterns across the parietal sections.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Vibration , Acoustic Stimulation , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Sound
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...