Daratumumab for antibody-mediated rejection: Is it time to target the real culprit?

We report the case of a sensitized woman who underwent successful transplantation after a desensitization protocol, with an optically normal 8-day biopsy. At 3 months, she developed active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) due to preformed donor-specific antibodies. It was decided to treat the patient with daratumumab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. The mean fluorescence intensity of donor-specific antibodies decreased, pathologic signs of AMR regressed, and kidney function returned to normal. A molecular assessment of biopsies was retrospectively performed. By doing so, regression of the molecular signature of AMR was evidenced between the second and third biopsies. Interestingly, the first biopsy revealed a gene expression profile of AMR, which helped retrospectively classify this biopsy as AMR, illustrating the relevance of molecular phenotyping of biopsy in high-risk situations such as desensitization.

Characterization of the novel HLA-C*04:438 allele by next generation sequencing.

HLA-C*04:438 differs from HLA-C*04:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 237 in exon 4.

Characterization of the novel HLA-DQA1*01:80 allele by next generation sequencing.

HLA-DQA1*01:80 differs from HLA-DQA1*01:04:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon -18 in exon 1.

Intensity of de novo DSA detected by Immucor Lifecodes assay and C3d fixing antibodies are not predictive of subclinical ABMR after Kidney Transplantation.

De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) are associated with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and allograft loss. We tested Immucor* (IM) Luminex Single-antigen beads (LSAB) assay and C3d-fixing antibodies in the setting of dnDSA and subclinical (s) ABMR. This retrospective multicentric study included 123 patients biopsied because of the presence of subclinical de novo DSA detected by One Lamda* Labscreen (MFI > 1000). In 112 patients, sera of the day of the biopsy were available and tested in a central lab with IM Lifecodes LSAB and C3d fixing antibodies assays. In 16 patients (14.3%), no DSA was detected using Immucor test. In 96 patients, at least one DSA was determined with IM. Systematic biopsies showed active sABMR in 30 patients (31.2%), chronic active sABMR in 17 patients (17.7%) and no lesions of sABMR in 49 KT recipients (51%). Intensitity criteria (BCM, BCR and AD-BCR) of DSA were not statistically different between these 3 histological groups. The proportion of patients with C3d-fixing DSA was not statistically different between the 3 groups and did not offer any prognostic value regarding graft survival. Performing biopsy for dnDSA could not be guided by the intensity criteria of IM LSAB assay. C3d-fixing DSA do not offer added value.

Protocol Biopsies in Patients With Subclinical De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies After Kidney Transplantation: A Multicentric Study.

BACKGROUND: De novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and allograft loss. Whether monitoring of de novo DSA (dnDSA) paired with systematic kidney biopsy should become routine remains to be established. METHODS: A retrospective multicentric study (9 French kidney transplant units of the Spiesser group) included patients without graft dysfunction biopsied because of the presence of dnDSA (One Lambda, mean fluorescence intensity [MFI], >1000). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients (85 male/38 female; mean age, 49.5 ± 13.1 y old) were biopsied after the detection of a dnDSA, 65.3 months (median) after kidney transplantation. Graft function was stable within 3 months before biopsy (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 55.3 ± 18.9 mL/min/1.73 m). Fifty-one subclinical AMRs (sAMRs) (41.4%) were diagnosed, of which 32 (26%) active and 19 (15.5%) chronic active sAMR. Seventy-two biopsies revealed no AMR (58.5%). Predictive factors associated with the diagnosis of active sAMR were MFI of immunodominant DSA >4000, MFI of the sum of DSA >6300, age of the recipient <45 years old, and the absence of steroids at biopsy. The presence of proteinuria >200 mg/g was predictive of chronic active sAMR. The decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate at 5 years post-biopsy was significantly higher in patients with acute sAMR (-25.2 ± 28.3 mL/min/1.73 m) and graft survival significantly lower. CONCLUSIONS: Performing a kidney graft biopsy for the occurrence of dnDSA without renal dysfunction leads to the diagnosis of a sAMR in over 40% of cases. Nevertheless, we did not observe any effect of standard treatment in acute sAMR.

Comparison of Two Luminex Single-antigen Bead Flow Cytometry Assays for Detection of Donor-specific Antibodies After Renal Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Defining the clinical relevance of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) detection by Luminex single-antigen (LSA) flow beads assay is critical in monitoring posttransplant outcome. METHODS: Sera of kidney transplanted patients were tested by LSA1 and LSA2 with One Lambda Labscreen (test 1) and Immucor Lifecodes (test 2), at the time of a graft biopsy. The first group (G1, n = 50) had a biopsy highly suggestive of humoral rejection, and the second (G2, n = 50) had no criteria of rejection. Positivity criteria for DSA was mean fluorescence intensity greater than 500 for test 1, whereas specificity assignation respected the provider's recommendations for test 2. RESULTS: In G1, we identified at least 1 DSA in 44 patients with test 1, and in 39 patients with test 2. In G2, test 1 identified at least 1 DSA in 16 (32%) patients and test 2 in 7 (14%) patients. Sensitivity and specificity for antibody-mediated rejection diagnosis was 88% and 68%, respectively, with One Lambda, and 78% and 86%, respectively, with Immucor. Correlation and agreement were found in class I and II between intensity parameters of the 2 manufacturers. The use of the sum of the intensity of DSA improved the sensitivity and specificity of the 2 tests. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first comparative study of the 2 Luminex assays available for detecting DSA in the postkidney transplant setting. Although there is a good correlation and reliability between the 2 assays, significant differences exist. Positivity criteria for DSA determination differ and interpretation should take these specificities into account.