ABSTRACT
Women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), especially when exposed to immunosuppressive drugs, are at higher risk of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cervical cancer.1 A recent study has shown that cervical cancer screening (CCS) coverage is worryingly low in this population.2.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Quality indicators (QIs) for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) management based on the 2019 update of European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations have been recently proposed. We aimed to determine whether adherence to QIs was associated with patient reported outcome (PRO). METHODS: Adherence to a set of 18 EULAR-based QIs and correlation with PRO assessed by Lupus Impact Tracker (LIT) was tested in a cohort of 162 SLE patients. RESULTS: On average, SLE patients received 41% (33; 52.5) of recommended care. Higher adherence to monitoring-related QIs was associated with an older age, a shorter SLE disease duration and a more severe disease (i.e. Class III/IV/V nephritis). LIT demonstrated that the average impact of lupus on patients' life was of 30% (12.5;47.5). In multivariable analysis, patients of female gender (OR 0.25, 95% 0.05-0.94; p = 0.05), with lupus CNS (OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.08-1.05; p = 0.08) and skin involvements (OR 0.49, 95%CI 0.23-1.04; p = 0.07) had higher odds of experiencing a negative impact of the lupus on their life. No association were found between adherences to QIs by physicians and reported quality of life in lupus patients. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms a variable degree of clinicians' adherence to QIs for SLE and shows no clear association between QIs adherence and patient reported outcome. Adherence to QIs by physicians are not enough to impact the quality of life of patients.
Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Rheumatic Diseases , Humans , Female , Quality of Life , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresABSTRACT
IFNα and anti-IFNα autoantibodies have been implicated in susceptibility both for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and viral infection. We aimed to analyze the SLE disease phenotype and risk for infection associated with anti-IFN-α IgG autoantibodies in SLE patients In this multidisciplinary retrospective single referral center study, all consecutive patients with SLE admitted between January 1st and November 30th 2020 were considered. All subjects fulfilled the ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria for SLE. Anti-IFNα IgG autoantibodies were quantified at admission by ELISA. Demographic, medical history, laboratory, treatment, and outcome data were extracted from electronic medical records using a standardized data collection form. 180 patients [female 87.2%, median age of 44.4 (34-54.2) years] were included. The median disease duration was 10 years [4-20] with a median SLEDAI score of 2 [0-4] at study time. Fifty-four (30%) patients had a past-history of lupus nephritis. One hundred and forty-four (80%) had received long-term glucocorticoids and 99 (55%) immunosuppressive drugs. Overall, 127 infections-mostly bacterial and viral-were reported in 95 (52.8%) patients. Twenty SLE patients (11.1%) had positive anti-IFNα IgG autoantibodies with a titer ranging from 10 to 103 UA/mL. Age, sex, SLE phenotype and treatment did not significantly differ between SLE patients with or without anti-IFNα. Infection rate was similar in both groups except for tuberculosis which was more frequent in patients with anti-IFNα (20% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.01). The prevalence of autoantibodies against IFNα is high in SLE and associated with a higher frequency of tuberculosis.