Comparison of Three Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis Strategies after T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Hematopoietic Transplantation: Tacrolimus versus Calcineurin Inhibitors + Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Sirolimus + Mycophenolate Mofetil.

Since the introduction of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) has become a real alternative for patients who lack other eligible donors. The standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after PTCy has been a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (up to day +35), but promising results with sirolimus (with or without MMF) and single-agent tacrolimus have been published recently. This multicenter retrospective study compared the outcomes of 372 adult haploSCT recipients who received conditioning with thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF), PTCy, and additional GVHD prophylaxis with 1 of 3 strategies: cohort A, single-agent tacrolimus (n = 222); cohort B, CNI + MMF (n = 49); or cohort C, sirolimus + MMF (n = 101). No differences among the 3 cohorts were found in terms of grade II-IV acute GVHD (20% in cohort A, 25% in cohort B, and 30% in cohort C) or grade III-IV acute GVHD (9%, 6%, and 15%, respectively) at 100 days; however, cohort A had the lowest incidence of overall chronic GVHD (24%, 47%, and 52%, respectively; P = .001) and moderate-severe chronic GVHD (13%, 35%, and 33%, respectively; P = .001). There were no differences in 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, or relapse among the 3 cohorts. Overall, our study suggests that single-agent tacrolimus, CNI + MMF, and sirolimus + MMF GVHD prophylaxis lead to similar outcomes following haploSCT with TBF and PTCy, with a low incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD, although possible differences in chronic GVHD require further investigation.

Improved outcome of COVID-19 over time in patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy: Update of the European COVID-19 multicenter study on behalf of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Infectious Diseases Working Party (IDWP) and the European Hematology Association (EHA) Lymphoma Group.

COVID-19 has been associated with high mortality in patients treated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies. Here, we investigated whether the outcome has improved over time with the primary objective of assessing COVID-19-attributable mortality in the Omicron period of 2022 compared to previous years. Data for this multicenter study were collected using the MED-A and COVID-19 report forms developed by the EBMT. One-hundred-eighty patients were included in the analysis, 39 diagnosed in 2020, 35 in 2021 and 106 in 2022. The median age was 58.9 years (min-max: 5.2-78.4). There was a successive decrease in COVID-19-related mortality over time (2020: 43.6%, 2021: 22.9%, 2022: 7.5%) and in multivariate analysis year of infection was the strongest predictor of survival (p = 0.0001). Comparing 2022 with 2020-2021, significantly fewer patients had lower respiratory symptoms (21.7% vs 37.8%, p = 0.01), needed oxygen support (25.5% vs 43.2%, p = 0.01), or were admitted to ICU (5.7% vs 33.8%, p = 0.0001). Although COVID-19-related mortality has decreased over time, CAR T-cell recipients remain at higher risk for complications than the general population. Consequently, vigilant monitoring for COVID-19 in patients undergoing B-cell-targeting CAR T-cell treatment is continuously recommended ensuring optimal prevention of infection and advanced state-of-the art treatment when needed.

Ibrutinib followed by ofatumumab consolidation in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): GELLC-7 trial from the Spanish group of CLL (GELLC).

Background: BTK inhibitors have been concurrently administered with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, the optimal regimen for combining these two drugs remains pending. Methods: This multi-center phase 2 study aimed to analyze whether consolidation with ofatumumab improved the response in patients with CLL receiving front-line treatment with ibrutinib. Patients received 12 cycles of ibrutinib monotherapy. Those who achieved CR after this induction were maintained on ibrutinib. Conversely, those who did not attain CR continued with ibrutinib in addition to a consolidation, which involved 7 doses of ofatumumab. The primary objective was the complete response (CR) rate at cycle 20. This study is registered within the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2016-004937-26). Findings: Between September 8, 2017, and May 21, 2018, 84 patients (median age, 69 years) were included. After completion of 12 cycles of ibrutinib (n = 80), 4 patients (5%) were in CR, 67 (84%) in partial response (PR), and 6 patients (7%) had a PR with lymphocytosis (PRL). After consolidation with ofatumumab, 20 patients improved the response from PR to CR and 6 patients with PRL obtained a PR. Seventy-one patients (85%) completed 20 cycles of treatment, with a CR rate of 24/71 (34%). According to the intention-to-treat analysis at cycle 20, the ORR was 69/84 (82.2%), with a CRR of 24/84 (28.6%). Progression-free survival and overall survival at 48-months were 89.9% (CI: 82.4-95.5) and 92.2% (CI: 85.3-97.1), respectively. Interpretation: These findings underscore the potential for a consolidation strategy in CLL, wherein the addition of a mAb in patients with low tumor burden might enhance the quality of the response. Funding: The study was funded by Janssen that also supplied ibrutinib, whereas ofatumumab was supplied by Novartis.

Efficacy and safety of mRNA1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Single center experience

Background: COVID-19 represents a worldwide pandemic and vaccination remains the most effective preventive strategy. Among hematological patients, COVID-19 has been associated with a high mortality rate. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has shown high efficacy in reducing community transmission, hospitalization and deaths related to severe COVID-19 disease. However, patients with impaired immunity may have lower sero-responsiveness to vaccination.MethodsThis study focuses on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. We performed a unicenter, prospective, observational study of a cohort of 31 allogeneic and 56 autologous-HSCT recipients monitored between March 2021 and May 2021 for serological response after COVID-19 vaccination with two doses of mRNA1273 vaccine (Moderna). In order to determine seroconversion, serological status before vaccination was studied.ResultsAt a median range of 75 days after the second vaccine dose, seroconversion rates were 84% and 85% for the autologous and allogeneic-HSCT groups, respectively. We confirmed some potential risk factors for a negative serological response, such as receiving anti-CD20 therapy in the previous year before vaccination, a low B-lymphocyte count and hypogammaglobulinemia. Neutralizing antibodies were quantified in 44 patients, with a good correlation with serological tests. Adverse events were minimal.ConclusionmRNA1273 vaccination is safe and effective in HSCT recipients, especially in those presenting recovered immunity. (AU)

Introducción: Entre los pacientes hematológicos, la COVID-19 se ha asociado a una mayor mortalidad. La vacunación frente a SARS-CoV-2 es la principal estrategia de prevención y ha demostrado eficacia en la reducción de la transmisión, de la hospitalización y de la tasa de mortalidad. Aun así, los pacientes oncohematológicos con un sistema inmunológico disfuncional podrían presentar una respuesta menor a la vacunación.MétodosEstudio unicéntrico, prospectivo y observacional, con una cohorte de 31 receptores de un trasplante alogénico de progenitores hematopoyéticos y de 56 receptores de un trasplante autólogo que recibieron la vacunación frente a SARS-CoV-2 entre marzo de 2021 y mayo de 2021, con 2 dosis de la vacuna mRNA1273 (Moderna). Para poder determinar la tasa de seroconversión, se determinó el estado serológico previamente a la vacunación y posteriormente se monitorizó la respuesta serológica.ResultadosCon un tiempo medio de seguimiento de 75 días después de la segunda vacuna, la tasa de seroconversión fue del 84%, y del 85% en el grupo receptor de trasplante autólogo y alogénico, respectivamente. Se confirmaron algunos potenciales factores de riesgo para la ausencia de respuesta serológica, como haber recibido terapias anti-CD20, un recuento bajo de linfocitos B y la hipogammaglobulinemia. En 44 pacientes se cuantificaron títulos de anticuerpos neutralizantes, con buena correlación con los test serológicos. Los efectos adversos de la vacuna fueron mínimos.ConclusiónLa vacunación con mRNA1273 es segura y efectiva en los pacientes receptores de un trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos, especialmente en los que presentan reconstitución inmune previa. (AU)

Efficacy and safety of mRNA1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Single center experience.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 represents a worldwide pandemic and vaccination remains the most effective preventive strategy. Among hematological patients, COVID-19 has been associated with a high mortality rate. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has shown high efficacy in reducing community transmission, hospitalization and deaths related to severe COVID-19 disease. However, patients with impaired immunity may have lower sero-responsiveness to vaccination. METHODS: This study focuses on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. We performed a unicenter, prospective, observational study of a cohort of 31 allogeneic and 56 autologous-HSCT recipients monitored between March 2021 and May 2021 for serological response after COVID-19 vaccination with two doses of mRNA1273 vaccine (Moderna). In order to determine seroconversion, serological status before vaccination was studied. RESULTS: At a median range of 75 days after the second vaccine dose, seroconversion rates were 84% and 85% for the autologous and allogeneic-HSCT groups, respectively. We confirmed some potential risk factors for a negative serological response, such as receiving anti-CD20 therapy in the previous year before vaccination, a low B-lymphocyte count and hypogammaglobulinemia. Neutralizing antibodies were quantified in 44 patients, with a good correlation with serological tests. Adverse events were minimal. CONCLUSION: mRNA1273 vaccination is safe and effective in HSCT recipients, especially in those presenting recovered immunity.

Development of an in-house bone marrow collection kit: The Catalan bone marrow transplantation group experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bone marrow (BM) harvesting is one of the essential sources of stem cells for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In 2019, commercial BM collection kits became unavailable in Europe. Consequently, we created an in-house BM collection kit as an alternative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared two groups of BM collections. The first collections were taken using an in-house kit from June 2022 through February 2023 and the second with a commercial kit from February 2021 through May 2022. These all took place at seven collection centres (CC). We analysed the harvest quality (cell blood count, CD34+ cells, viability, potency and sterility), the incidents occurring with each kit and the time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in recipients. RESULTS: A total of 23 donors underwent BM harvesting with the in-house kit and 23 with the commercial one. Both cohorts were comparable regarding donor characteristics, CC and time to procedure. No statistical differences were found in harvest quality between the in-house and commercial kits. A new transfusion set was required in three BM harvests (13%) with the in-house kit because of filter clogging. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 21 days for both cohorts and 29 days (in-house) and 33 days (commercial), p = 0.284, respectively. CONCLUSION: The in-house BM collection kit offers a real approach to solve the diminished supply of commercial kits. A higher risk of filter clogging was observed compared with commercial kits due to the lack of 850 and 500 µm filters.

Role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas in the CART era.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) has rapidly been adopted as the standard third-line therapy to treat aggressive B-cell lymphomas (ABCL) after failure of second-line therapy despite the lack of direct comparisons with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT)-based strategies. Using the Grupo Español de Trasplante y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) registry, we selected patients with the following characteristics: CART or alloHCT performed between 2016 and 2021; ≥18 years old; ABCL diagnosis; ≥2 lines of therapy; and either anti-CD19 CART or alloHCT as therapy at relapse. The analysis included a total of 316 (CART = 215, alloHCT = 101) patients. Median follow-up was 15 and 36 months for the CART and alloHCT cohorts, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, CART was confirmed to be similar to alloHCT for the primary study endpoint (progression-free survival) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, CI95%:0.56-1.51, p = 0.75). Furthermore, when the analysis was limited to only patients with chemo-sensitive diseases (complete and partial response) at infusion (CART = 26, alloHCT=93), no differences were reported (progression-free survival at month +18: 65% versus 55%, p = 0.59). However, CART had lower non-relapse mortality (HR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.85, p = 0.02). Given the lower toxicity and similar survival outcomes, these results suggest the use of CART before alloHCT.

Outcome of SARS-CoV2 infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients for autoimmune diseases.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients may be at high risk of mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, specific data on COVID-19 after treatment with HSCT in patients affected by autoimmune diseases (ADs) are still lacking. In this multicenter observational study of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), clinical data on COVID-19 in 11 patients affected by severe ADs treated with HSCT (n = 3 allogeneic transplant; n = 8 autologous transplant) are reported. All patients were symptomatic during the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 infection. At screening, 5 patients reported upper respiratory symptoms, 3 patients had cough without oxygen requirement, and 6 patients exhibited extra-pulmonary symptoms. Four cases developed a lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD). Hospitalization was required in 6 cases, without necessity of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and/or ventilation/supplemental oxygen. Different interventions were adopted: remdesivir (n = 1), nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (n = 1), sotrovimab (n = 1), immunoglobulins (n = 1). At last follow-up, all patients are alive and had resolution of the infection. The current analysis describing the mild-moderate course of COVID-19 in transplant recipients affected by ADs, similar to the course observed in ADs under standard treatments, provides useful information to support the delivery of HSCT programs in this field. Vaccination and new treatments available for SARS-CoV-2 may be useful to further minimize the risk of infection.

LAG3 genotype of the donor and clinical outcome after allogeneic transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors.

Introduction: The association of polymorphisms in molecules involved in the immune response (checkpoint inhibitors) with the clinical outcome after allogeneic transplantation (alloHSCT) has been described. Lymphocyte Activation 3 (LAG3) is a surface protein that plays a regulatory role in immunity as an inhibitory immune checkpoint molecule. Methods: To determine its role in the alloHSCT setting, we analyzed 797 patients transplanted from HLA-identical sibling donors. The LAG3 rs870849 C>T polymorphism was genotyped in donors. Results: We detected a higher incidence of severe acute GVHD in patients transplanted from donors with TT genotype (p: 0.047, HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.01 - 2.67). Overall survival (OS) was worse for patients transplanted from donors with the rs870849 CT/TT genotype (0.020; HR, 1.44; 95% CI 1.06 - 1.96), as well as disease-free survival (DFS) (p: 0.002; HR 1.58, 95%CI: 1.18 - 2.14) and transplant-related mortality (TRM) (p< 0.001; HR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.29 - 2.74). When combining the LAG3 rs870849 and the PDCD1 rs36084323 genotypes of the donor, three genetic groups were well defined, allowing a good stratification of the risk of acute GVHD, TRM, OS and DFS. Discussion: We conclude that the LAG3 genotype of the donor may be considered in donors' selection. As this selection may be limited in the HLA-identical sibling donor scenario, further studies exploring the impact of LAG3 genotype of the donor in unrelated transplantation are warranted.

Front-line fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) in 110 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL): real-life experience with long-term outcomes, toxicities and responses to second-line therapies.

Fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) has been the gold standard front-line treatment for fit CLL patients until novel agent's introduction. Decision between either time-limited FCR or "endless" Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) therapy may be difficult in fit IGHV-mutated-non-TP53 cases. We describe the outcomes after front-line FCR in 110 CLL patients from 5 centres in Catalonia, Spain, over a period of more than 10 years. ORR was 96.3% and CR 74.5%. Median second-treatment free survival (TFS1) was 6.2 years and median OS was 10.8 years. 50 (45.5%) patients required a subsequent therapy. Median third-treatment free survival was better for BTKi than for chemotherapy ± antiCD20 strategies (not reached vs 3.1 years, p = 0.003). Only 50 (45.5%) patients completed 6 cycles of FCR, and the main reason for discontinuation was cytopenia 29 (26.4%). 15 (13.6%) patients developed a second cancer, and 5 (4.5%) patients experienced a Richter's transformation (RT). At the end of follow-up, 50 (45.5%) patients remained in CR. Response rates, TFS1, OS, RT, and second cancers did not differ between patients treated with 6 vs 4 cycles of FCR. In conclusion, front-line FCR treatment leads to very long CR in almost half of patients, and BTKi yields excellent outcomes in relapsed patients.

Leukocytapheresis variables and transit time for allogeneic cryopreserved hpc: better safe than sorry.

Cryopreservation was recommended to ensure continuity in allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Several groups have shown no impact on clinical outcomes for patients who underwent HPC transplantation with cryopreserved products during the first months of this pandemic. However, concerns about quality control attributes after cryopreservation have been raised. We investigated, in 155 allogeneic peripheral blood cryopreserved HPC, leukocytapheresis characteristics influencing viable CD34+ and CD3+ cells, and CFU-GM recoveries after thawing. Collection characteristics such as volume, nucleated cells (NC)/mL and hematocrit correlated with viable CD34+ and CD3+ cells recoveries after thawing in univariate analysis but only CD3+ cells remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis (r2 = 0.376; P = < 0.001). Additionally, transit time also showed correlation with viable CD34+ (r2 = 0.186), CD3+ (r2 = 0.376) and CFU-GM recoveries (r2 = 0.212) in multivariate analysis. Thus, diluting leukocytapheresis below 200 × 106 NC/mL, avoiding red cells contamination above 2%, cryopreserving below 250 × 106 NC/mL and minimizing transit time below 36 h, prevented poor viable CD34+ and CD3+ cells, and CFU-GM recoveries. In summary, optimizing leukocytapheresis practices and minimizing transportation time may better preserve the quality attributes of HPC when cryopreservation is indicated.

Long-term outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and other high-risk myeloid malignancies after undergoing sequential conditioning regimen based on IDA-FLAG and high-dose melphalan.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) remains the only curative option for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and other high-risk myeloid malignancies. To improve alloHCT results in this setting, sequential regimens were designed as a strategy to lower tumor burden and quickly induce the graft-versus-leukemia effect. We analyzed long-term outcomes of a sequential regimen based on IDA-FLAG and high-dose melphalan, as set forth by the CETLAM cooperative group. This protocol yielded a high complete response rate (89%) and a lower cumulative relapse incidence (30% at five years) compared to other regimens. Five-year non-relapse mortality, however, reached 45%, with grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease being the most frequent adverse event (a 100-day incidence of 29%). Altogether, 5-year overall survival was 25% in this group of patients with otherwise dismal prognosis. Long-term survivors enjoyed a good quality of life after a median follow-up of 68 months.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Mantle Cell Lymphoma; Insights into Its Potential Role in the Era of New Immunotherapeutic and Targeted Therapies: The GETH/GELTAMO Experience.

Allo-SCT is a curative option for selected patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL, but with significant NRM. We present the long-term results of patients receiving allo-SCT in Spain from March 1995 to February 2020. The primary endpoints were EFS, OS, and cumulative incidence (CI) of NRM, relapse, and GVHD. We included 135 patients, most (85%) receiving RIC. After a median follow-up of 68 months, 5-year EFS and OS were 47 and 50%, respectively. Overall and CR rates were 86 and 80%. The CI of relapse at 1 and 3 years were 7 and 12%. NRM at day 100 and 1 year were 17 and 32%. Previous ASCT and Grade 3-4 aGVHD were associated with a higher NRM. Grade 3-4 aGVHD, donor type (mismatch non-related), and the time-period 2006-2020 were independently related to worse EFS. Patients from 1995-2005 were younger, most from HLA-identical sibling donors, and were pretreated less. Our data confirmed that allo-SCT may be a curative option in R/R MCL with low a CI of relapse, although NRM is still high, being mainly secondary to aGVHD. The arrival of new, highly effective and low toxic immunotherapeutic or targeted therapies inevitably will relegate allo-SCT to those fit patients who fail these therapies, far away from the optimal timing of treatment.

Resultados del trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos de donante no emparentado con o sin globulina antitimocítica como profilaxis de la enfermedad del injerto contra receptor en pacientes con leucemia aguda y síndrome mielodisplásico / Outcomes of unrelated donor stem cell transplantation with or without anti-thymocyte globulin used as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in patients with acute leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome

Fundamento y objetivo: La enfermedad del injerto contra el receptor (EICR) y las infecciones son complicaciones del trasplante alogénico de progenitores hematopoyéticos (alo-TPH). La globulina antitimocítica (ATG) es una estrategia empleada para la profilaxis de la EICR. Este estudio analiza los resultados y la frecuencia de infecciones en función del uso de ATG, después de un alo-TPH de donante no emparentado (DNE) en pacientes con leucemia aguda y síndrome mielodisplásico.Pacientes y métodoEstudio retrospectivo de pacientes que recibieron un alo-TPH de DNE entre diciembre de 2007 y abril de 2019. Se compararon los principales resultados en función del uso de ATG.ResultadosSe incluyó a 66 pacientes. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en el grupo ATG (n=50) frente al no ATG (n=16) en supervivencia global, incidencia acumulada de recaída, mortalidad no debida a recaída o incidencia acumulada de EICR aguda o crónica. Hubo mayor frecuencia de infecciones en el grupo ATG (60 frente a 19%; p=0,004).ConclusionesEn este estudio no se demostró diferencia en los principales resultados del alo-TPH en función del uso de ATG, pero hubo más infecciones en el grupo que recibió ATG. (AU)

Background and purpose: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infections are complications after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is a strategy used as prophylaxis for GVHD. The study analyses the outcomes and frequency of infections with or without ATG after an unrelated donor alloSCT in patients with acute leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.Patients and methodsRetrospective study of patients receiving an unrelated donor alloSCT between December 2007 and April 2019. The main outcomes were analysed according to use or not of ATG.ResultsSixty-six patients were included. No significant differences were found between the ATG group (n=50) vs. no-ATG group (n=16) in overall survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality or cumulative incidence of acute GVHD or chronic GVHD. There was a greater frequency of infections in the ATG group (60 vs. 19%, P=.004).ConclusionsIn this study, no differences were shown in the main outcomes of alloSCT based on the use of ATG, although more infections were documented in the ATG group. (AU)

Estudio prospectivo del seguimiento de pacientes largos supervivientes a un trasplante alogénico de progenitores hematopoyéticos / Prospective follow-up of adult long-term survivors of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Fundamento y objetivo: Los pacientes que sobreviven más allá de 2 años del trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos (TPH), tienen un riesgo aumentado de complicaciones a largo plazo, que tienen impacto en su supervivencia y calidad de vida. El objetivo de este estudio fue diseñar y aplicar un protocolo de seguimiento a largo plazo para detectar necesidades no cubiertas y tratar precozmente dichas complicaciones.Pacientes y métodoA los supervivientes más allá de 2 años del TPH alogénico (aloTPH) se aplicó una sistemática de estudio para detectar y tratar complicaciones y problemas a largo plazo dentro de una unidad funcional interdisciplinar.ResultadosTreinta y seis (36%) de los 99 pacientes incluidos, requirieron de intervención en alguno de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular mediante educación sanitaria o administración de fármacos antihipertensivos e hipolipemiantes. Nueve (25%) de 36 pacientes requirieron aporte de calcio y vitamina D. Se detectó una baja reincorporación de las mujeres a los protocolos de detección de neoplasias ginecológicas, y una baja adherencia al seguimiento odontológico tras el aloTPH.ConclusiónEl seguimiento de los largos supervivientes a un aloTPH en una unidad multidisciplinaria permitió detectar necesidades no cubiertas, que afectaron especialmente al riego cardiovascular, metabolismo óseo, prevención del cáncer y control odontológico. (AU)

Background and objective: Patients who survive beyond two years after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have an increased risk of long-term complications, which impact on their survival and quality of life. The aim of this study was to design and apply a long-term follow-up protocol to detect unmet needs and treat these complications early.Patients and methodA prospective study to detect and treat complications and long-term problems within an interdisciplinary functional unit was applied to survivors beyond 2 years of allogeneic HSCT (alloHSCT).ResultsThirty-six (36%) of the 99 patients included, required intervention in a cardiovascular risk factor by health education or antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs. Nine of 36 (25%) patients required calcium and vitamin D intake. Low inclusion of women in gynaecological neoplasm detection protocols was detected, as well as a low adherence to dental follow-up after alloHSCT.ConclusionThe follow-up of long-term survivors after alloHSCT in a multidisciplinary unit allowed unmet needs to be detected and controlled, especially in cardiovascular risk, bone metabolism, cancer prevention, and dental control. (AU)

Severe infections and infection-related mortality in a large series of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide.

Severe infections and their attributable mortality are major complications in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). We herein report 236 adult patients who received haploSCT with PTCy. The median follow-up for survivors was 37 months. The overall incidence of bloodstream infections by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria at 37 months was 51% and 46%, respectively. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was 69%, while Epstein Barr virus infections occurred in 10% of patients and hemorrhagic cystitis in 35% of cases. Invasive fungal infections occurred in 11% at 17 months. The 3-year incidence of infection-related mortality was 19%. The median interval from transplant to IRM was 3 months (range 1-30), 53% of IRM occurred >100 days post-haploSCT. Risk factors for IRM included age >50 years, lymphoid malignancy, and developing grade III-IV acute GvHD. Bacterial infections were the most common causes of IRM (51%), mainly due to gram-negative bacilli BSI. In conclusion, severe infections are the most common causes of NRM after haploSCT with PTCy, with a reemergence of gram-negative bacilli as the most lethal pathogens. More studies focusing on the severe infections after haploSCT with PTCy and differences with other types of alloSCT in adults are clearly warranted.