Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 33(7): e13829, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35871456

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus molecule Der p 23 is a major allergen whose clinical relevance has been shown in cross-sectional studies. We longitudinally analysed the trajectory of Der p 23-specific IgE antibody (sIgE) levels throughout childhood and youth, their early-life determinants and their clinical relevance for allergic rhinitis and asthma. METHODS: We obtained sera and clinical data of 191 participants of the German Multicentre Allergy Study, a prospective birth cohort. Serum samples from birth to 20 years of age with sIgE reactivity to Der p 23 in a customised semiquantitative microarray were newly analysed with a singleplex quantitative assay. Early mite exposure was assessed by measuring the average content of Der p 1 in house dust at 6 and 18 months. RESULTS: Der p 23-sIgE levels were detected at least once in 97/191 participants (51%). Prevalence of Der p 23 sensitisation and mean sIgE levels increased until age 10 years, plateaued until age 13 years and were lowest at age 20 years. Asthma, allergic rhinitis (AR) and atopic dermatitis (AD) were more prevalent in Der p 23-sensitised children, including those with monomolecular but persistent sensitisation (11/97, 11%). A higher exposure to mites in infancy and occurrence of AD before 5 years of age preceded the onset of Der p 23 sensitisation, which in turn preceded a higher incidence of asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Der p 23 sensitisation peaks in late childhood and then decreases. It is preceded by early mite exposure and AD. Asthma and AR can occur in patients persistently sensitised to Der p 23 as the only mite allergen, suggesting the inclusion of molecular testing of Der p 23-sIgE for subjects with clinical suspicion of HDM allergy but without sIgE to other major D.pt. allergens.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Dermatitis, Atopic , Mites , Rhinitis, Allergic , Adolescent , Adult , Allergens , Animals , Antigens, Dermatophagoides , Birth Cohort , Child , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Immunoglobulin E , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 31 Suppl 25: 1-101, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32436290

ABSTRACT

Allergen immunotherapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of allergic children. The clinical efficiency relies on a well-defined immunologic mechanism promoting regulatory T cells and downplaying the immune response induced by allergens. Clinical indications have been well documented for respiratory allergy in the presence of rhinitis and/or allergic asthma, to pollens and dust mites. Patients who have had an anaphylactic reaction to hymenoptera venom are also good candidates for allergen immunotherapy. Administration of allergen is currently mostly either by subcutaneous injections or by sublingual administration. Both methods have been extensively studied and have pros and cons. Specifically in children, the choice of the method of administration according to the patient's profile is important. Although allergen immunotherapy is widely used, there is a need for improvement. More particularly, biomarkers for prediction of the success of the treatments are needed. The strength and efficiency of the immune response may also be boosted by the use of better adjuvants. Finally, novel formulations might be more efficient and might improve the patient's adherence to the treatment. This user's guide reviews current knowledge and aims to provide clinical guidance to healthcare professionals taking care of children undergoing allergen immunotherapy.


Subject(s)
Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Pediatrics/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Administration, Sublingual , Adolescent , Allergens/immunology , Animals , Asthma/immunology , Asthma/therapy , Biomarkers/analysis , Child , Child, Preschool , Desensitization, Immunologic/standards , Health Personnel , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Injections, Subcutaneous , Pollen/immunology , Pyroglyphidae/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology
3.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 31 Suppl 24: 61-64, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32017213

ABSTRACT

Mobile health is the "medical and public health practice supported by mobile devices, such as mobile phones, patient monitoring devices, personal digital assistants, and other wireless devices." For example, mobile apps (such as MASK-Air, Allergy.Monitor, Pollen, and others) have proven useful in the management of patients with allergic rhinitis. These apps can be used in the context of broader clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for enhancing allergy-related decisions and actions with pertinent, organized clinical knowledge and patient information to improve allergy care. A CDSS targeted to control rhinitis with drugs and other interventions guiding the patient in his/her self- and doctor-driven management is currently being produced and investigated by the MACVIA network. Another one, called @IT-2020, is targeted to support etiologic diagnostics and allergen immunotherapy (AIT) prescriptions for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Intensive investigation is necessary to better define the advantages and limitations of mobile-health technology in allergology and establish guidelines for their proper use in daily practice in the context of a rapidly evolving European regulatory environment.


Subject(s)
Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Telemedicine/methods , Clinical Decision-Making , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Humans , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Italy/epidemiology , Mobile Applications , Quality Improvement
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...