Subject(s)
Axilla , Breast Neoplasms , Lymph Node Excision , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The targeted axillary dissection (TAD) procedure is used in clinically positive lymph node (cN+) breast cancer to assess whether pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) to decide on de-escalation of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). In this study, we review the implementation of the TAD procedure in a large regional breast cancer center. METHODS: All TAD procedures between 2016 and 2022 were reviewed. The TAD procedure consists of marking pre-NST the largest suspected metastatic lymph node(s) using a radioactive I-125 seed. During surgery, the marked node was excised together with a sentinel node procedure. Axillary therapy (ALND, axillary radiotherapy, or nothing) recommendations were based on the amount of suspected positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs < 4 or ≥ 4) pre-NST and if pCR was achieved after NST. RESULTS: A total of 312 TAD procedures were successfully performed in 309 patients. In 134 (43%) cases, pCR of the TAD lymph nodes were achieved. Per treatment protocol, 43 cases (14%) did not receive any axillary treatment, 218 cases (70%) received adjuvant axillary radiotherapy, and 51 cases (16%) underwent an ALND. During a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 46 patients (14%) developed recurrence, of which 11 patients (3.5%) had axillary recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of the TAD procedure has resulted in a reduction of 84% of previously indicated ALNDs. Moreover, 18% of cases did not receive adjuvant axillary radiotherapy. These data show that implementation of de-escalation axillary treatment with the TAD procedure appeared to be successful.
Subject(s)
Axilla , Breast Neoplasms , Lymph Node Excision , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Prognosis , Aged, 80 and over , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Accurate preoperative localization is imperative to guide surgery in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). It remains unclear which second-line imaging technique is most effective after negative first-line imaging. In this study, we compare the diagnostic effectiveness of [11C]methionine PET/CT, [11C]choline PET/CT, and four dimensional (4D)-CT head-to-head in patients with pHPT, to explore which of these imaging techniques to use as a second-line scan. METHODS: We conducted a powered, prospective, blinded cohort study in patients with biochemically proven pHPT and prior negative or discordant first-line imaging consisting of ultrasonography and 99mTc-sestamibi. All patients underwent [11C]methionine PET/CT, [11C]choline PET/CT, and 4D-CT. At first, all scans were interpreted by a nuclear medicine physician, and a radiologist who were blinded from patient data and all imaging results. Next, a non-blinded scan reading was performed. The scan results were correlated with surgical and histopathological findings. Serum calcium values at least 6 months after surgery were used as gold standard for curation of HPT. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were included in the study. With blinded evaluation, [11C]choline PET/CT was positive in 28 patients (88%), [11C]methionine PET/CT in 23 (72%), and 4D-CT in 15 patients (47%), respectively. In total, 30 patients have undergone surgery and 32 parathyroid lesions were histologically confirmed as parathyroid adenomas. Based on the blinded evaluation, lesion-based sensitivity of [11C]choline PET/CT, [11C]methionine PET/CT, and 4D-CT was respectively 85%, 67%, and 39%. The sensitivity of [11C]choline PET/CT differed significantly from that of [11C]methionine PET/CT and 4D-CT (p = 0.031 and p < 0.0005, respectively). CONCLUSION: In the setting of pHPT with negative first-line imaging, [11C]choline PET/CT is superior to [11C]methionine PET/CT and 4D-CT in localizing parathyroid adenomas, allowing correct localization in 85% of adenomas. Further studies are needed to determine cost-benefit and efficacy of these scans, including the timing of these scans as first- or second-line imaging techniques.
Subject(s)
Hyperparathyroidism, Primary , Parathyroid Neoplasms , Humans , Parathyroid Neoplasms/complications , Parathyroid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/diagnostic imaging , Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/surgery , Methionine , Choline , Cohort Studies , Prospective Studies , Parathyroid Glands , Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi , RacemethionineABSTRACT
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended for patients with >pT1b cutaneous melanoma, and should be considered and discussed with patients diagnosed with pT1b cutaneous melanoma for the purpose of staging, prognostication and determining eligibility for adjuvant therapy. Previously, the clinicopathologic and gene expression profile (CP-GEP, Merlin Assay®) model was developed to identify patients who can forgo SLNB because of a low risk for sentinel node metastasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical use and implementation of the CP-GEP model in a prospective multicenter study in the Netherlands. Both test performance and feasibility for clinical implementation were assessed in 260 patients with T1-T4 melanoma. The CP-GEP model demonstrated an overall negative predictive value of 96.7% and positive predictive value of 23.7%, with a potential SLNB reduction rate of 42.2% in patients with T1-T3 melanoma. With a median time of 16 days from initiation to return of test results, there was sufficient time left before the SLNB was performed. Based on these outcomes, the model may support clinical decision-making to identify patients who can forgo SLNB in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Sentinel Lymph Node , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/surgery , Melanoma/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Transcriptome , Prospective Studies , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Phyllodes tumors of the breast are rare fibroepithelial lesions that are classified as benign, borderline or malignant. There is little consensus on best practice for the work-up, management, and follow-up of patients with phyllodes tumors of the breast, and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of surgeons and oncologists with the aim to describe current clinical practice in the management of phyllodes tumors. The survey was constructed in REDCap and distributed between July 2021 and February 2022 through international collaborators in sixteen countries across four continents. RESULTS: A total of 419 responses were collected and analyzed. The majority of respondents were experienced and worked in a university hospital. Most agreed to recommend a tumor-free excision margin for benign tumors, increasing margins for borderline and malignant tumors. The multidisciplinary team meeting plays a major role in the treatment plan and follow-up. The vast majority did not consider axillary surgery. There were mixed opinions on adjuvant treatment, with a trend towards more liberal regiments in patients with locally advanced tumors. Most respondents preferred a five-year follow-up period for all phyllodes tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows considerable variation in clinical practice managing phyllodes tumors. This suggests the potential for overtreatment of many patients and the need for education and further research targeting appropriate surgical margins, follow-up time and a multidisciplinary approach. There is a need to develop guidelines that recognize the heterogeneity of phyllodes tumors.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Oncologists , Phyllodes Tumor , Surgeons , Humans , Female , Phyllodes Tumor/surgery , Phyllodes Tumor/pathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Margins of Excision , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Follow-up for breast cancer survivors consists of after care and surveillance. The benefits of routine surveillance visits remain debatable. In this study we compared the severity of locoregional recurrences (LRRs) and the subsequent risk of a distant metastasis (DM) between LRRs detected at routine and interval visits. METHODS: Women diagnosed with early breast cancer between 2003 and 2008 in one of the 15 participating hospitals, and who developed a LRR as first event after primary treatment, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (Cohort A). Chi-squared tests were used to compare the severity of routine- and interval-detected local recurrences (LRs) and regional recurrences (RRs), using tumor size, tumor grade, and number of positive lymph nodes. Data on the development of a subsequent DM after a LRR were available for a subset of patients (Cohort B). Cohort B was used to estimate the association between way of LRR-detection and risk of a DM. RESULTS: Cohort A consisted of 109 routine- and 113 interval-LRR patients. The severity of routine-detected LRs or RRs and interval-detected LRs or RRs did not significantly differ. Cohort B consisted of 66 routine- and 61 interval-LRR patients. Sixteen routine- (24%) and 17 (28%) interval-LRR patients developed a DM. After adjustment, way of LRR-detection was not significantly associated with the risk of a DM (hazard ratio: 1.22; 95% confidence interval: 0.49-3.06). CONCLUSION: The current study showed that routine visits did not lead to less severe LRRs and did not decrease the risk of a subsequent DM.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Netherlands/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: The MELFO (MELanoma FOllow-up) study is an international phase III randomized controlled trial comparing an experimental low-intensity schedule against current national guidelines. BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines for the follow-up of sentinel node-negative melanoma patients are lacking. METHODS: Overall, 388 adult patients diagnosed with sentinel node-negative primary melanoma patients were randomized in cancer centers in the Netherlands and United Kingdom between 2006 and 2016. The conventional schedule group (control: n=196) was reviewed as per current national guidelines. The experimental schedule group (n=192) was reviewed in a reduced-frequency schedule. Quality of life was the primary outcome measurement. Detection rates and survival outcomes were recorded. Patient satisfaction rates and compliance with allocated schedules were compared. RESULTS: At 5 years, both arms expressed high satisfaction with their regimens (>97%). This study found no significant group effect on any patient-reported outcome measure scores between the follow-up protocols. In total, 75/388 (19.4%) patients recurred, with no difference in incidence found between the 2 arms (hazard ratio=0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.54-1.39, P =0.57). Self-examination was the method of detection for 25 experimental patients and 32 control patients (75.8% vs. 76.2%; P =0.41). This study found no difference in any survival outcomes between the 2 study arms (disease-free survival: hazard ratio=1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.49-2.07, P =0.99). CONCLUSIONS: A reduced-intensity, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage-adjusted follow-up schedule for sentinel node-negative melanoma patients is a safe strategy, and patient self-examination is effective for recurrence detection with no evidence of diagnostic delay. Patients' acceptance is very high.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Adult , Delayed Diagnosis , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Melanoma/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Quality of Life , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Melanoma, Cutaneous MalignantABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm with a poor prognosis. The surgical approaches for anorectal melanoma can be categorized into local excision (procedures without lymph node removal and preservation of the rectum) and extensive resection (procedures with rectum and pararectal lymph node removal). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the survival of patients who underwent extensive resection with that of patients who underwent local excision, stratifying patients according to tumour stage. METHODS: A literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines by searching MEDLINE/PubMed for manuscripts published until March 2021. Studies comparing survival outcomes in patients with anorectal melanoma who underwent local excision versus extensive resection were screened for eligibility. Meta-analysis was performed for overall survival after the different surgical approaches, stratified by tumour stage. RESULTS: There were 347 studiesidentified of which 34 were included for meta-analysis with a total of 1858 patients. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the surgical approaches in patients per stage (stage I odds ratio 1.30 (95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 2.72, P = 0.49); stage II odds ratio 1.61 (95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 4.18, P = 0.33); stage I-III odds ratio 1.19 (95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 1.70, P = 0.35). Subgroup analyses were conducted for the time intervals (<2000, 2001-2010 and 2011-2021) and for continent of study origin. Subgroup analysis for time interval and continent of origin also showed no statistically significant differences in overall survival. CONCLUSION: No significant survival benefit exists for patients with anorectal melanoma treated with local excision or extensive resection, independent of tumour stage.
Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms , Melanoma , Rectal Neoplasms , Anus Neoplasms/pathology , Anus Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the adherence to consensus guidelines on preoperative imaging of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) in real local practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 411 patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for pHPT from 2007 to 2017 in three referral centers. RESULTS: In 286/411 patients (69%) the preoperative imaging workup adhered to guidelines (utilizing ultrasound and parathyroid scintigraphy). In patients in whom guidelines were followed 63% were discharged within one day versus 37% in whom guidelines were not followed (P < .0005). The use of a bimodality imaging workup, starting with ultrasound and parathyroid scintigraphy followed by imaging upscaling aiming for anatomical and functional concordance, was a predictor for the performance of a minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (OR 4.098, 95% CI 2.296-7.315, P < .0005). CONCLUSION: The level of compliance to preoperative imaging guidelines is suboptimal in this population. Patients in whom adherence was achieved showed a shorter length of stay. More education of physicians is required regarding the appropriate preoperative imaging workup in pHPT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b (individual cohort study).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study compares well-being, recurrences, and deaths of early-stage cutaneous melanoma patients in follow-up, as recommended in the Dutch guideline, with that of patients in a stage-adjusted reduced follow-up schedule, 3 years after diagnosis, as well as costs. METHODS: Overall, 180 eligible pathological American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IB-IIC, sentinel node staged, melanoma patients (response rate = 87%, 48% male, median age 57 years), randomized into a conventional (CSG, n = 93) or experimental (ESG, n = 87) follow-up schedule group, completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at diagnosis (T1): State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State version (STAI-S), Cancer Worry Scale (CWS), Impact of Event Scale (IES), and RAND-36 (Mental and Physical Component scales [PCS/MCS]). Three years later (T3), 110 patients (CSG, n = 56; ESG, n = 54) completed PROMs, while 42 declined (23%). RESULTS: Repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) showed a significant group effect on the IES (p = 0.001) in favor of the ESG, and on the RAND-36 PCS (p = 0.02) favoring the CSG. Mean IES and CWS scores decreased significantly over time, while those on the RAND-36 MCS and PCS increased. Effect sizes were small. Twenty-five patients developed a recurrence or second primary melanoma, of whom 13 patients died within 3 years. Cox proportional hazards models showed no differences between groups in recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71 [0.32-1.58]; p = 0.400) and disease-free survival (HR 1.24 [0.42-3.71]; p = 0.690). Costs per patient after 3 years (computed for 77.3% of patients) were 39% lower in the ESG. CONCLUSION: These results seemingly support the notion that a stage-adjusted reduced follow-up schedule forms an appropriate, safe, and cost-effective alternative for pathological AJCC stage IB-IIC melanoma patients to the follow-up regimen as advised in the current melanoma guideline.
Subject(s)
Aftercare/methods , Melanoma/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aftercare/economics , Aftercare/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , General Practice/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs , Hospital Costs , Humans , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Staging , Netherlands , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Proportional Hazards Models , Quality of Life , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the diagnostic implications of a small-voxel reconstruction for lymph node characterization in breast cancer patients, using state-of-the-art FDG-PET/CT. We included 69 FDG-PET/CT scans from breast cancer patients. PET data were reconstructed using standard 4 × 4 × 4 mm3 and small 2 × 2 × 2 mm3 voxels. Two hundred thirty loco-regional lymph nodes were included, of which 209 nodes were visualised on PET/CT. All nodes were visually scored as benign or malignant, and SUVmax and TBratio(=SUVmax/SUVbackground) were measured. Final diagnosis was based on histological or imaging information. We determined the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for both reconstruction methods and calculated optimal cut-off values to distinguish benign from malignant nodes. RESULTS: Sixty-one benign and 169 malignant lymph nodes were included. Visual evaluation accuracy was 73% (sensitivity 67%, specificity 89%) on standard-voxel images and 77% (sensitivity 78%, specificity 74%) on small-voxel images (p = 0.13). Across malignant nodes visualised on PET/CT, the small-voxel score was more often correct compared with the standard-voxel score (89 vs. 76%, p < 0.001). In benign nodes, the standard-voxel score was more often correct (89 vs. 74%, p = 0.04). Quantitative data were based on the 61 benign and 148 malignant lymph nodes visualised on PET/CT. SUVs and TBratio were on average 3.0 and 1.6 times higher in malignant nodes compared to those in benign nodes (p < 0.001), on standard- and small-voxel PET images respectively. Small-voxel PET showed average increases in SUVmax and TBratio of typically 40% over standard-voxel PET. The optimal SUVmax cut-off using standard-voxels was 1.8 (sensitivity 81%, specificity 95%, accuracy 85%) while for small-voxels, the optimal SUVmax cut-off was 2.6 (sensitivity 78%, specificity 98%, accuracy 84%). Differences in accuracy were non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: Small-voxel PET/CT improves the sensitivity of visual lymph node characterization and provides a higher detection rate of malignant lymph nodes. However, small-voxel PET/CT also introduced more false-positive results in benign nodes. Across all nodes, differences in accuracy were non-significant. Quantitatively, small-voxel images require higher cut-off values. Readers have to adapt their reference standards.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Three commonly used techniques for localization of nonpalpable breast cancer are radioactive seed localization (RSL), wire-guided localization (WGL) and radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL). In this study, we analysed the surgical margins of these three techniques. METHODS: Women diagnosed with nonpalpable breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery with one of the above-mentioned techniques were retrospectively included. The primary outcome parameter was tumour-free margin rate. Secondary outcomes were re-excision rate, recurrence of disease and volume of removed tissue. RESULTS: In total, 272 women were included in whom RSL (n=69), WGL (n=76) or ROLL (n=137) was performed. RSL showed a higher tumour-free margin rate [64 (92.8%)] compared with WGL [51 (67.1%)] and ROLL [113 (82.5%)] (P=0.001). In our multivariable analysis, RSL showed a higher tumour-free margin rate as well compared with WGL (P=0.036) and ROLL (P=0.049). Also, fewer re-excisions were encountered using RSL [5 (7.2%)] compared with WGL [13 (17.1%)] and ROLL [15 (10.9%)] (P=0.171). In 11 patients (WGL n=2, ROLL n=9), recurrence of disease occurred, despite a radical excision. The mean resection volumes were comparable within the three groups. CONCLUSION: RSL results in a higher tumour-free margin rate in nonpalpable breast tumours compared with WGL and ROLL. Therefore, we prefer using RSL in nonpalpable breast tumours.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Female , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental/instrumentation , RecurrenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Guidelines for evidence-based follow-up in melanoma patients are not available. This study examined whether a reduced follow-up schedule affects: patient-reported outcome measures, detection of recurrences, and follow-up costs. METHODS: This multicenter trial included 180 patients treated for AJCC stage IB-II cutaneous melanoma, who were randomized in a conventional follow-up schedule group (CSG, 4 visits first year, n = 93) or experimental follow-up schedule group (ESG, 1-3 visits first year, n = 87). Patients completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, cancer worry scale, impact of events scale, and a health-related quality of life questionnaire (HRQoL, RAND-36). Physicians registered clinicopathologic features and the number of outpatient clinic visits. RESULTS: Sociodemographic and illness-related characteristics were equal in both groups. After 1-year follow-up, the ESG reported significantly less cancer-related stress response symptoms than the CSG (p = 0.01), and comparable anxiety, mental HRQoL, and cancer-related worry. Mean cancer-related worry and stress response symptoms decreased over time (p < 0.001), whereas mental HRQoL increased over time (p < 0.001) in all melanoma patients. Recurrence rate was 9 % in both groups, mostly patient-detected and not physician-detected (CSG 63 %, ESG 43 %, p = 0.45). Hospital costs of 1-year follow-up were reduced by 45 % in the ESG compared to the CSG. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the stage-adjusted, reduced follow-up schedule did not negatively affect melanoma patients' mental well-being and the detection of recurrences compared with conventional follow-up as dictated by the Dutch guideline, at 1 year after diagnosis. Additionally, reduced follow-up was associated with significant hospital cost reduction.
Subject(s)
Aftercare/methods , Melanoma/psychology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/psychology , Adult , Aftercare/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/etiology , Appointments and Schedules , Female , Hospital Costs , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/secondary , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/economics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/secondary , Neoplasm Staging , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Quality of Life , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Specific clinical questions rise when patients, who are diagnosed with breast cancer, are at risk of carrying a mutation in BRCA1 and -2 gene due to a strong family history or young age at diagnosis. These questions concern topics such as 1. Timing of genetic counseling and testing, 2. Choices to be made for BRCA1 or -2 mutation carriers in local treatment, contralateral treatment, (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy, and 3. The psychological effects of rapid testing. The knowledge of the genetic status might have several advantages for the patient in treatment planning, such as the choice whether or not to undergo mastectomy and/or prophylactic contralateral mastectomy. The increased risk of developing a second breast cancer in the ipsilateral breast in mutation carriers, is only slightly higher after primary cancer treatment, than in the general population. Prophylactic contralateral mastectomy provides a substantial reduction of contralateral breast cancer, although only a small breast cancer specific survival benefit. Patients should be enrolled in clinical trials to investigate (neo)-adjuvant drug regimens, that based on preclinical and early clinical evidence might be targeting the homologous recombination defect, such as platinum compounds and PARP inhibitors. If rapid testing is performed, the patient can make a well-balanced decision. Although rapid genetic counseling and testing might cause some distress, most women reported this approach to be worthwhile. In this review the literature regarding these topics is evaluated. Answers and suggestions, useful in clinical practice are discussed.
Subject(s)
BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Genetic Testing , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Humans , Mastectomy/psychology , Mutation , Neoadjuvant TherapySubject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Indoles/therapeutic use , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/surgery , Mutation , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Humans , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/secondary , Middle Aged , Multimodal Imaging , Neoplasm Staging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/drug effects , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , VemurafenibABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To develop more evidence-based guidelines for the frequency of patient follow-up after treatment of localized (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage I or II) melanoma. METHODS: We used data from Melanoma Institute Australia on an inception cohort of 3,081 consecutive patients first diagnosed with stage I or II melanoma between January 1985 and December 2009. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models were used to characterize the time course and predictors for recurrence and new primaries. We modeled the delay in diagnosis of recurrence or new primary as well as the number of monitoring visits required using two monitoring schedules: first, according to 2008 Australian and New Zealand guidelines and, second, with fewer visits, especially for those at lowest risk of recurrence. RESULTS: For every 1,000 patients beginning follow-up, 229 developed recurrence and 61 developed new primary within 10 years. There was only a small difference in modeled delay in diagnosis (extra 44.9 and 9.6 patients per 1,000 for recurrence and new primary, respectively, with delay greater than 2 months) using a schedule that requires far fewer visits (3,000 fewer visits per 1,000 patients) than recommended by current guidelines. AJCC substage was the most important predictor of recurrence, whereas age and date of primary diagnosis were important predictors of developing new primary. CONCLUSION: By providing less intensive monitoring, more efficient follow-up strategies are possible. Fewer visits with a more focused approach may address the needs of patients and clinicians to detect recurrent or new melanoma.
Subject(s)
Aftercare/methods , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Aftercare/standards , Appointments and Schedules , Australia/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Melanoma/epidemiology , Melanoma/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Staging , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
Melanoma patients with lymph node metastases have to deal with diagnostic tests to exclude the presence of distant metastases; results of the tests could have major implications for their prognosis and treatment. There are, however, few studies concerning the patients' psychological issues and perception of diagnostic tests. The aim of this study was to describe the burden of diagnostic tests [radiograph, computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET)] experienced by melanoma patients with lymph node metastases. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning satisfaction and burden experienced during the diagnostic tests. The levels of embarrassment, discomfort and anxiety for the different tests, as well as total scores for each burden were calculated. Logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with the degree of experienced burden. Fifty-nine of the 68 patients completed the questionnaire and the response rate was 87%. The overall mean scores on satisfaction and quality of life were high. More than half of the patients experienced no burden during PET, 65% no burden during computed tomography and 80% no burden during chest radiograph. Patients experienced significantly more discomfort during the PET scan than during the CT (P=0.003). Less burden was experienced (in univariate analysis) by patients who were more satisfied. The overall experienced burden by patients is low and should therefore not interfere with primary choice for a diagnostic test based on accuracy, costs and percentage of patients upstaged. Attention should be paid in explaining the procedure and answering questions of the patients to reduce burden.
Subject(s)
Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/psychology , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Information on prognosis for patients with cutaneous melanoma after locoregional or distant recurrence is sparse and controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze factors influencing outcome after the development of a first relapse. METHODS: Information was extracted from the Sydney Melanoma Unit database for 873 melanoma patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage I and II disease treated between 1960 and 2002 who relapsed following treatment of their primary melanoma. Clinical and pathologic factors predicting survival were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Initial presentation of recurrence was local: 95 patients (10.9%), in transit: 86 patients (9.9%), regional lymph node: 300 patients (34.4%), and distant: 392 patients (44.9%). Independent prognostic factors for survival of the 481 patients with only locoregional recurrence were type of recurrence, primary tumor ulceration, and patient age. Predictors for longer survival in the 392 patients with distant metastasis at the time of first presentation with recurrence were lung vs other sites and diagnosis of relapse after 1990 compared with diagnosis before 1980. CONCLUSIONS: The type of recurrence is the most important prognostic factor in melanoma patients who relapse. Primary tumor ulceration is the most important pathologic predictor. The results of this study suggest that management of distant metastases may have improved over the last 25 years, but many confounders and improved staging techniques make assessment of this unreliable.