ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic approach used for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is usually translated also for the rarer acinar counterpart, which shows a different mutational landscape nevertheless. While dMMR/MSI-H status is rare in the ductal histotype, it appears to be more prevalent in pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC). CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a patient with locally advanced MSI-H PACC in whom the treatment with the anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab, administered as third line, made possible surgical resection, achieving even an exceptional pathological complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of PACC should be tailored based on the peculiar molecular features that distinguish PACC from ductal adenocarcinoma. Evaluation of potentially therapeutically targetable alterations should be mandatory in case of PACC diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Carcinoma, Acinar Cell , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Acinar Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Acinar Cell/pathology , Male , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy has improved the survival of patients with stage IV melanoma. In responders, clinical benefits may be long-lasting and persist even after treatment discontinuation. The optimal duration of anti-PD1 (anti-Programmed cell death-1) therapy in metastatic melanoma patients remains to be elucidated. Moreover, limited data are available on clinical outcomes of patients that discontinued anti-PD1 immunotherapy in a real-life setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic melanoma who interrupted anti-PD-1 treatment in the in the absence of disease progression. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD1 immunotherapy at 23 Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI) centres. The study investigated the risk of relapse in patients who stopped anti-PD1 therapy due to CR (Complete response), treatment-related toxicity, or by their own choice after a long period of treatment. Clinical and biological factors associated with or without recurrence were evaluated. RESULTS: The study population included 237 patients. The median age of patients was 68.9 years (standard deviation: 13; range 33-95). The median time on treatment was 33 months (standard deviation: 18, 7; range 1-98). Among the 237 patients, 128 (54%) interrupted the anti-PD1 for CR, 74 patients (31.2%) for adverse events (37 patients in CR, 27 patients in partial response (PR), ten patients in stable disease (SD), and 35 patients (14.8%) by their own choice (12 patients in CR, 17 patients in PR, and 6 patients in SD). After a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 1-81), PFS after anti-PD1 discontinuation was 85.7%. Thirty-four patients (14.3%) developed disease progression after a median of 12 months (range 1-35): ten patients (29.4%) after discontinuation in CR, 17 patients (50%) after discontinuation for treatment-related toxicity (seven in CR, five in PR, five in SD), and seven (20.6%) after discontinuation due to the patient's decision (two in CR, four in PR, one in SD). Only 7.8% of patients who interrupted in CR (10/128), along with 23% of patients who interrupted for limiting toxicity (17/74) and 20% of patients who interrupted by their own choice (7/35), developed recurrence. Regarding patients who discontinued therapy because of CR, we observed a negative association between recurrence and site of primary melanoma, especially mucosal sites (p = <0.05, HR (Hazard ratio) 15.57 IC (confidence interval) 95% 2.64-91.73). Moreover, M1b patients who achieved a CR showed a lower number of relapses (p = <0.05, HR 3.84 IC 95% 1.40-8.48). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows in a real-life setting that, with anti-PD-1 therapy, long-lasting responses, can be maintained after anti-PD1 interruption. In 70.6% of cases, recurrences were observed among patients who did not obtain a CR at treatment discontinuation.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Humans , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Melanoma/pathology , Disease Progression , Progression-Free Survival , SyndromeABSTRACT
The mainstay treatment for patients with immediate resectable pancreatic cancer remains upfront surgery, which represents the only potentially curative strategy. Nevertheless, the majority of patients surgically resected for pancreatic cancer experiences disease relapse, even when a combination adjuvant therapy is offered. Therefore, aiming at improving disease free survival and overall survival of these patients, there is an increasing interest in evaluating the activity and efficacy of neoadjuvant and perioperative treatments. In this view, it is of utmost importance to find biomarkers able to select patients who may benefit from a preoperative therapy rather than upfront surgical resection. Defined genomic alterations and a dynamic inflammatory microenvironment are the major culprits for disease recurrence and resistance to chemotherapeutic treatments in pancreatic cancer patients. Signal transduction pathways or tumor immune microenvironment could predict early recurrence and response to chemotherapy. In the last decade, distinct molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer have been described, laying the bases to a tailored therapeutic approach, started firstly in the treatment of advanced disease. Patients with homologous repair deficiency, in particular with mutant germline BRCA genes, represent the first subgroup demonstrating to benefit from specific therapies. A fraction of patients with pancreatic cancer could take advantage of genome sequencing with the aim of identifying possible targetable mutations. These genomic driven strategies could be even more relevant in a potentially curative setting. In this review, we outline putative predictive markers that could help in the next future in tailoring the best therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancer patients with a potentially curable disease.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Evidence for the efficacy of radiation therapy for primary liver cancer is growing. In this context, proton therapy (PT) can potentially improve the therapeutic ratio, as demonstrated by recent clinical studies. Here we report the first European clinical experience on the use of PT for primary liver cancer. METHODS: All patients treated for primary liver cancer in our center entered the analysis. Patients were simulated during deep expiration breath-hold. A 15-fraction treatment schedule was adopted using active scanning PT. Clinical outcome and toxicity were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and December 2019, 18 patients were treated. Fourteen patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), three patients had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), and one patient had synchronous ICC-HCC. The Child-Pugh score was A5 in the majority of patients with HCC (71.4%). Median prescription dose was 58.05 Gy (range, 50.31-67.5). Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 1-19). The majority of deaths occurred from liver tumor progression. One-year overall survival (OS) was 63%. A significant correlation between worse OS and patient performance status, vascular invasion, and tumor stage was recorded. One-year local control was 90%. Toxicity was low, with a decrease in Child-Pugh score ⩾2 points detected in one patient. No cases of classic radiation-induced liver disease occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial results of active scanning PT for primary liver cancer demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of this advanced technique in this setting. The potential of the combination of PT with other locoregional therapies is under evaluation.
Subject(s)
Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Liver/radiation effects , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Radiation Injuries/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Liver/injuries , Liver/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Injuries/epidemiology , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for resected biliary tract cancer (BTC) is still unclear and there is no specific recommendation by international guidelines. AIM: To perform a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to better define the clinical benefit and risks of ACT or observation in resected BTC. METHOD: A systematic literature search of Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to April 2019. A meta-analysis was carried out using the random effects model. RESULTS: ACT provided a mild improvement in recurrence free survival (RFS) (HR:0.83, 95%CI 0.69-0.99) and no effect on overall survival (OS) (HR:0.91, 95%CI 0.75-1.09). Similarly, ACT showed no effect on OS in lymph-node positive subgroup (HR:0.84, 95% CI 0.65-1.08) and surgical margin positive subgroup (HR:0.95, 95%CI 0.69-1.31). Moreover, ACT led to a substantial increase of chemotherapy-associated adverse events (RR:3.03, 95%CI 2.22-4.15). CONCLUSION: ACT for resected BTC patients modestly improved RFS with no effect on OS and a substantial increase in chemotherapy associated AEs.
Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
To assess the activity of weekly paclitaxel (wPCT) in pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). In 2005, we included wPCT 80 mg/m for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week interval in our department's everyday clinical practice guidelines for the second-line (or subsequent) treatment of patients with nonsquamous histologies who have previously received pemetrexed-based treatments and patients with squamous histology. In the absence of clinical evidence of disease progression, patients repeat the pretreatment staging procedures after 16 weeks (two cycles) and, in the absence of disease progression or severe toxicity, continue treatment for a maximum of four courses. Between May 2005 and December 2013, we treated 60 patients (47 in second-line and 13 in third/fourth line), who received a median of two courses (range: 1-4). The most frequent toxicity was grade 1-2 neutropaenia (five patients); only four patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity. When used as a second-line treatment, wPCT led to a disease control rate of 36.2%, with a median progression-free survival of 3.7 months and a median overall survival of 9.0 months; when used in the third/fourth line, the disease control rate was 41.7%, the median progression-free survival was 5.0 months and the median overall survival was 10.3 months. Our data confirm that wPCT is active and well tolerated in an unselected patient population with aNSCLC and can be considered a valuable alternative to docetaxel in a second-line treatment.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Drug Administration Schedule , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the feasibility and efficacy of multiple sequential rechallenges and analyze the predictive factors that may aid in selecting patients who are more likely to respond. Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility and activity of a single docetaxel rechallenge in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), thus providing an additional opportunity for treatment in docetaxel-sensitive CRPC patients in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CRPC patients who completed first-line docetaxel therapy without disease progression have been offered a docetaxel rechallenge, and the responders have undergone further rechallenges until the appearance of docetaxel resistance. We assessed their clinical outcomes and evaluated all the variables potentially capable of predicting the response to rechallenge by means of uni- and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Forty-six consecutive patients underwent 92 rechallenges. The overall biochemical response rate (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] reduction >50%) was 66%. Median overall survival was 32 months with a projected 2-year overall survival from the first docetaxel administration of 77.5%. Multivariate analysis showed that the time slope-log PSA, the time from the previous cycle, and the response to the previous cycle were predictive of the response to a rechallenge. CONCLUSION: A docetaxel rechallenge may be safely repeated several times in CRPC patients and in selected patients could improve disease control. The predictive factors found in our analysis may help select the most appropriate strategy in the light of the availability of active second-line drugs.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease Progression , Docetaxel , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Orchiectomy , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Permanent interstitial brachytherapy (IB) has become an increasingly appealing therapeutic option for localized prostate cancer (LPC) among physicians and patients because it involves short hospitalization and treatment and its postulated low degree of toxicity may reduce its impact on the patients' quality of life (QoL). The aim of this prospective study was to assess the impact of IB on the QoL of patients with LPC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A validated self-completed questionnaire was administered to the patients before and after IB and then at yearly intervals. The items allowed the identification of seven subscales exploring physical well-being (PHY), physical autonomy (POW), psychological well-being (PSY), relational life (REL), urinary function (URI), rectal function (REC), and sexual function (SEX). RESULTS: The assessment of the QoL of 147 patients treated between May 2000 and February 2005 revealed no relevant differences in the PHY scale scores 1 month after IB or later, and the same was true of the POW, PSY, and REL scales. Urinary function significantly worsened after IB and returned to pretreatment levels only after 3 years; the impact of the treatment on the URI scale was greater in the patients with good baseline urinary function than in those presenting more urinary symptoms before IB. Rectal and sexual functions were significantly worse only at the post-IB evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study confirm that the impact of IB on the patients' QoL is low despite its transient negative effects on some function, and extend existing knowledge concerning QoL after IB.
Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Aged , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Coitus , Health Surveys , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/psychology , Rectal Diseases/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urination Disorders/etiologyABSTRACT
Laminin is a basement membrane glycoprotein implicated in a large number of biologic activities of cancer progression, many of which are mediated by the presence of the laminin receptor (67LR) on the cell membrane. We studied the correlations of laminin and its receptor with standardized and new prognostic factors (including bone marrow micrometastases) in a series of 112 patients with operable breast cancers. Laminin-positive cells were detected in 60% of the tumors and 67LR-positive cells in 55%; both were present in 35% of the cases. No association was found between laminin or 67LR positivity and pathologic tumor size, pathologic nodal status, grading, Ki-67, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, or bone marrow micrometastases. The only statistically significant association was with menopausal status and age, with a higher percentage of 67LR-positive tumors among premenopausal and younger patients. The median follow-up was approximately 7 years. The prognosis of disease-free survival was similar in the laminin-positive and laminin-negative subjects but was significantly better in 67LR-negative patients; there were no significant differences in overall survival. The prognostic role of laminin and 67LR in disease-free survival and overall survival varied according to nodal status. In the absence of nodal involvement, the risk of relapse (and death) was greater in the patients who were positive for laminin, 67LR, or both than in those who were negative for laminin, 67LR, or both; in the case of 4 or more involved nodes, the prognostic role of laminin and 67LR was reversed. These results did not change after adjustment for age, menopausal status, tumor status, nodal status, grading, or bone marrow micrometastases.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Neoplasm/analysis , Bone Marrow Neoplasms/secondary , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Laminin/analysis , Receptors, Laminin/analysis , Adult , Age Factors , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Menopause , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Prognosis , Survival RateABSTRACT
Proliferative activity has been proposed as a prognostic and predictive marker for breast cancer; Ki-67 is one of the most frequently used markers to assess proliferative activity. In the current study, Ki-67 immunoreactivity was comparatively assessed, even in terms prognostic relevance, with 3H-thymidine labeling index as a reference standard for proliferation in 126 patients with stage I and II breast cancer. There was a significant but weak correlation between Ki-67 values and the 3H-thymidine labeling index (r = 0.19, P = 0.03). Analysis of variance showed that the mean 3H-thymidine labeling index values were not statistically different in terms of pathologic size (T1, T2. T3, T4), number of pathologically positive axillary nodes (neg, pos 1-3, pos > 3), and grading classes (1, 2, 3), but significantly and inversely correlated with estrogen receptor status (P = 0.033) and progesterone receptor status (P = 0.08). The Ki-67 values significantly correlated with N status (P = 0.041), estrogen receptor status (P < 0.001), progesterone receptor status (P < 0.001), and grading (P < 0.001). The median follow-up was 37 months. In terms of prognosis, Ki-67 was associated significantly with overall survival (P = 0.01) and marginally with disease-free survival (P = 0.095). A significant difference in prognosis was found for both disease-free survival (P = 0.024) and overall survival (P = 0.040) when a 3H-thymidine labeling index cut-off of 6.5% was used (P = 0.024). The results suggest that, although both are indicators of proliferative activity, 3H-thymidine labeling index and Ki-67 seem to identify breast cancers with different phenotypes.