Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
BMC Psychiatry ; 22(1): 105, 2022 02 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35144562

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The conceptualization of personal recovery began in Europe and North America and has spread worldwide. However, the concept of personal recovery in addition to recovery-promoting factors may be influenced by culture. We explored how users of mental health services in Japan perceive their own personal recovery and the factors that promote it. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group interviews with individuals using mental health services. The interview data were analysed using thematic analysis with a grouped framework analysis approach. We used a coding framework based on the existing CHIME framework (connectedness, hope and optimism about the future, identity, meaning in life, and empowerment). RESULTS: Data were obtained from 30 users of mental health services (mean age: 40.4 years; 46.7% women; 50.0% with schizophrenia). "Compassion for others" was newly extracted in "Connectedness", and "Rebuilding/redefining identity not being as shaped by social norms" was newly extracted in "Identity" as personal recovery. "Positive experiences in childhood" (including positive parenting support from neighbours) was newly extracted as a recovery-promoting factor. CONCLUSIONS: Our unique findings on the rebuilding identity/defining identity free from conformity to social norms due to interactions with familiar people, including peers, may be culture dependent. This study raises overarching questions regarding how socio-cultural values influence the development of identity and personal values and how they are in turn reflected in personal recovery.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Mental Health Services , Schizophrenia , Adult , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Japan , Male , Optimism , Qualitative Research , Schizophrenia/therapy
2.
BMC Psychiatry ; 20(1): 12, 2020 Jan 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31918708

ABSTRACT

After publication of our article [1] we were notified that the 5-point Likert-type scale in Additional file 1 needs to change from "1 to 5" to "0 to 4". The updated Additional file 1 is included in this correction.

3.
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 74(1): 40-48, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31482653

ABSTRACT

AIM: Utena's Brief Objective Measures (UBOM) was developed to assess psychophysiological functions proximal to real-world functioning in individuals with psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia (SCZ), to facilitate shared decision-making. However, the validity of UBOM has not been fully examined. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study to evaluate the validity of each of the three tests in UBOM: UBOM-Pulse, UBOM-Ruler, and UBOM-Random. We investigated associations: (i) between UBOM and existing cognitive- and autonomic-function tests; and (ii) between UBOM and daily social functioning. The participants included SCZ individuals and healthy controls. We evaluated the cognitive and autonomic function using UBOM, the heart rate variability test, the simple reaction time test, and the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, Japanese version. We also assessed the daily social functioning using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 and the modified Global Assessment of Functioning, Japanese version. RESULTS: Thirty-one SCZ individuals and 35 healthy control individuals participated in this study. In the SCZ group, UBOM-Ruler was significantly associated with the Cognition and Getting Along domains of WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. UBOM-Random was significantly associated with the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia's Working Memory, Verbal Fluency and Attention domains, and the modified Global Assessment of Functioning in the SCZ group. CONCLUSION: The validity of the current version of UBOM is imperfect and further improvements will be necessary to attain the originally intended goal of developing a brief assessment tool for real-world functioning in SCZ.


Subject(s)
Autonomic Nervous System , Behavior Rating Scale/standards , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Neuropsychological Tests/standards , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Social Behavior , Adult , Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Schizophrenia/complications
4.
BMC Psychiatry ; 17(1): 360, 2017 11 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29115928

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Personal recovery is increasingly recognised as an important outcome measure in mental health services. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-J) and test its validity and reliability. METHODS: The study comprised two stages that employed the cross-sectional and prospective cohort designs, respectively. We translated the questionnaire using a standard translation/back-translation method. Convergent validity was examined by calculating Pearson's correlation coefficients with scores on the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) and the Short-Form-8 Health Survey (SF-8). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine factorial validity. We used intraclass correlation and Cronbach's alpha to examine the test-retest and internal consistency reliability of the QPR-J's 22-item full scale, 17-item intrapersonal and 5-item interpersonal subscales. We conducted an EFA along with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: Data were obtained from 197 users of mental health services (mean age: 42.0 years; 61.9% female; 49.2% diagnosed with schizophrenia). The QPR-J showed adequate convergent validity, exhibiting significant, positive correlations with the RAS and SF-8 scores. The QPR-J's full version, subscales, showed excellent test-retest and internal consistency reliability, with the exception of acceptable but relatively low internal consistency reliability for the interpersonal subscale. Based on the results of the CFA and EFA, we adopted the factor structure extracted from the original 2-factor model based on the present CFA. CONCLUSION: The QPR-J is an adequately valid and reliable measure of the process of recovery among Japanese users with mental health services.


Subject(s)
Health Surveys/standards , Mental Health Recovery , Mental Health Services/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Health Surveys/methods , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Translations
5.
Nihon Rinsho ; 71(4): 718-24, 2013 Apr.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23678606

ABSTRACT

Outreach services are very important in community mental health care. There are two types for outreach services. One is mental health activities, such as early intervention and consultation, and the other is intended to prevent recurrence and readmission by supporting the daily living activities of a patient in a community. We have 2.73 psychiatric care beds in hospitals per 1,000 population. So, it is just the beginning in changing from hospital centered psychiatry to community mental health care. Outreach services are being tried in several places in our country. In this essay, we describe mental health outreach services in Japan and we have illustrated vocational rehabilitation and outreach job support in our day treatment program.


Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services , Mental Disorders/therapy , Early Medical Intervention , Humans , Japan , Referral and Consultation , Secondary Prevention
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...