Qualitative analysis of expressions used in the end-of-life discussions and their associated factors.

OBJECTIVES: Discussing end-of-life (EOL) issues with patients remains challenging for health professionals. Physicians may use various expressions, including euphemistic ones, when disclosing the prognosis to their patients to reduce their psychological impact. However, the actual expressions of EOL disclosure in clinical practice are unclear. This study aims to investigate the expressions used in EOL disclosures and explore their associated factors. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted enrolling all the patients who died in a university-affiliated hospital. Expressions used in the EOL disclosure were qualitatively analyzed. The patients' participation rate and length from the discussion to death were investigated. RESULTS: EOL disclosures were observed in 341 of 358 patients. The expressions used by the physicians were categorized into 4 groups; Group 1: Clear presentation of life expectancy (n = 106; 31.1%), Group 2: Euphemistic presentation of life expectancy (n = 24; 7.0%), Group 3: Presentation of risk of sudden death (n = 147; 43.1%), Group 4: No mention on life expectancy (n = 64; 18.8%). The proportion of male patients was higher in Group 2 (79%) and lower in Group 4 (56%). Patients with cancer accounted for approximately 70% of Groups 1 and 4, but only approximately 30% of Group 3. The patient participation rate was highest in Group4 (84.4%), followed by Group 2 (50.0%). The median time from EOL disclosure to death was longer in Groups 1 and 4 (26 and 29.5 days, respectively), compared to Groups 2 and 3 (18.5 and 16 days, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: A variety of expressions are used in EOL disclosure. Patterns of communication are influenced by patients' gender and type of illness (cancer or noncancer). Euphemisms do not seem to facilitate timely disclosure of life expectancy or patient participation. For health professionals, not only devising the expressions to alleviate their patients' distress when breaking bad news but also considering the communication process and patient background are essential.

Understanding Patient Perspectives Toward Shared Decision-Making in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension.

Clinical guidelines for pulmonary hypertension (PH) recommend shared decision-making and individualized treatment. However, patient perspectives on PH treatment goals, preference toward a decision-making style of treatment, and adoption of shared decision-making remain unclear. This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study assessed the patients' preferred and actual participation role in treatment decision-making, rated on 5 scales (ranging from passive [patients leave all decisions to physicians] to active [patients make the decision after physicians show patients several options]) and evaluated the concordance between preferred and actual participation roles. The important factors underlying patients' perspectives in treatment decision-making (i.e., prognosis; symptom, financial, family, and social burdens; patient values; and physician recommendation) were evaluated. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the patients with a positive preference toward "physician recommendation" in treatment decision-making. Among 130 patients with PH (median age: 58 years; mean pulmonary arterial pressure: 23 mm Hg; 27.7% were males), 59.2% preferred that "physicians make the decision regarding treatment after showing patients therapeutic options (i.e., intermediate between passive and active roles)." The patient-preferred and actual participation roles in decision-making had moderate agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.46). The most important factor in treatment decisions was "symptom burden reduction" (93.8%). Although 85.0% of patients chose "physician recommendation" as an important factor, 49.6% chose "alignment with my values." The determinants of patients who chose "physician recommendation" were less severe hemodynamics and better functional capacity. In conclusion, patients with PH preferred that the "physicians make the decision after showing patients therapeutic options" and prioritized physician recommendation over their values.

Perspectives of hospitalized heart failure patients: preferred and perceived participation roles in treatment decisions.

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a pivotal process in seeking optimal individual treatment and incorporating clinical evidence and patients' autonomous preferences. However, patients' actual attitudes toward participation in decision-making for state-of-the-art heart failure (HF) treatment remain unclear. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey distributed by nurses and physicians specializing in HF care to assess patients' preferred and perceived participation roles in treatment decision-making during the index hospitalization, rated on five scales (from extremely passive to purely autonomous attitudes). Simultaneously, we investigated the important factors underlying treatment decision-making from the perspective of hospitalized HF patients. Of the 202 patients who were approached by our multidisciplinary HF team between 2017 and 2020, 166 (82.2%) completed the survey. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the clinical determinants of patients who reported that they left all decisions to physicians (i.e., extremely passive attitude). Of the 166 participants (male 67.5%, median age 73 years), 32.5% preferred an extremely passive attitude, while 61.4% reported that they actually chose an extremely passive attitude. A sole determinant of choosing an extremely passive decision-making role was lower educational status (odds ratio: 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.11-4.00). The most important factor underlying the decision-making was "Physician recommendation" (89.2%). Notably, less than 50% considered "In alignment with my values and preferences" as an important factor underlying treatment decision-making. The majority of HF patients reported that they chose an extremely passive approach, and patients prioritized physician recommendation over their own values and preferences.

Decreased Interoceptive Awareness as a Risk Factor for Moderate to Severe Pain in Japanese Full-Time Workers: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Interoceptive awareness, the conscious perception of internal bodily states, is a key construct of mind-body interaction. Decreases in interoceptive awareness, as measured by the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA), are found in chronic pain patients. In this study, we explored whether a specific aspect of interoceptive awareness is a risk for the onset and chronicity of pain. A longitudinal cohort study was conducted in 2018 and 2020 among a sample of full-time workers in an industrial manufacturing company in Japan. Participants completed a questionnaire on pain intensity, MAIA, exercise habits, kinesiophobia, psychological distress and work stress. Principal component analyses using the MAIA identified two principal components: self-control and emotional stability. Low emotional stability was associated with the prevalence of moderate to severe pain in 2020 among people with mild or no pain in 2018 (p < 0.01). Lack of exercise habits were associated with the prevalence of moderate to severe pain in 2020 among people with pain in 2018 (p < 0.01). Furthermore, exercise habits were associated with reduction in kinesiophobia among people with moderate to severe pain in 2018 (p = 0.047). Overall, these findings indicate that low emotional stability may be a risk for the onset of moderate to severe pain; lack of exercise habits may sustain kinesiophobia and be a risk for the chronicity of pain.

Comorbid psychiatric disorders and long-term survival after liver transplantation in transplant facilities with a psychiatric consultation-liaison team: a multicenter retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Comorbid psychiatric disorders negatively affect the survival rate of patients with some physical disorders. In liver transplant recipients, various psychiatric disorders have been identified as worsening prognosis. However, little is known about how the presence of any comorbid (overall) disorders affect the survival rate of transplant recipients. In this study, we examined the effect of overall comorbid psychiatric disorders on survival rate in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: A total of 1006 recipients who underwent liver transplantation between September 1997 and July 2017 across eight transplant facilities with a psychiatric consultation-liaison team were identified consecutively. Recipients were categorized into those with comorbid psychiatric disorders and those without comorbid psychiatric disorders. In the comorbid psychiatric disorder group, psychiatric disorder diagnosis and time of diagnosis were investigated retrospectively. RESULTS: Of the 1006 recipients, 294 (29.2%) had comorbid psychiatric disorders. Comorbid psychiatric disorders in the 1006 recipients were insomnia (N = 107, 10.6%), delirium (N = 103, 10.2%), major depressive disorder (N = 41, 4.1%), adjustment disorder (N = 19, 1.9%), anxiety disorder (N = 17, 1.7%), intellectual disability (N = 11, 1.1%), autism spectrum disorder (N = 7, 0.7%), somatic symptom disorder (N = 4, 0.4%) schizophrenia (N = 4, 0.4%), substance use disorder (N = 24, 2.4%) and personality disorder (N = 2, 0.2%). The most common time of psychiatric disorder diagnosis was within the first 3 months after liver transplantation (51.6%). The final mortality in patients with comorbid psychiatric disorder diagnosis during the five periods (pretransplant, transplant to 3 months, months to 1 year, 1 to 3 years, and over 3 years posttransplant) was 16.2%, 18.8%, 39.1%, 28.6%, and 16.2% respectively, and there were no significant differences between the five periods (χ2 = 8.05, df = 4, p = 0.09). Overall comorbid psychiatric disorders were significantly associated with shorter survival time (log-rank test: p = 0.01, hazard ratio: 1.59 [95% confidence interval: 1.14-2.21], survival rate at the endpoint [%]: 62.0 vs. 83.3). However, after adjusting for confounding variables using Cox proportional hazards regression, there was no significant effect of overall comorbid psychiatric disorders on prognosis. CONCLUSION: Comorbid psychiatric disorders did not affect the survival rate of liver transplant recipients in this study.

Intravenous pulse methylprednisolone and corticosteroid-induced psychiatric disorders: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Corticosteroids can cause psychiatric symptoms known as corticosteroid-induced psychiatric disorders (CIPDs). Little is known regarding the relationship between intravenous pulse methylprednisolone (IVMP) and CIPDs. Therefore, we aimed to examine the relationship between corticosteroid use and CIPDs in this retrospective study. METHODS: Patients who were prescribed corticosteroids during their hospitalization at a university hospital and referred to our consultation-liaison service were selected. Patients diagnosed with CIPDs according to the ICD-10 codes were included. The incidence rates were compared between patients receiving IVMP and those receiving any other corticosteroid treatment. The association between IVMP and CIPDs was examined by classifying patients with CIPD into three groups according to the use of IVMP and timing of CIPD onset. RESULTS: Of the 14,585 patients who received corticosteroids, 85 were diagnosed with CIPDs, with an incidence rate of 0.6%. Among the 523 patients who received IVMP, the incidence rate of CIPDs was 6.1% (n = 32), which was significantly higher than that in patients receiving any other corticosteroid treatment. Among the patients with CIPDs, 12 (14.1%) developed CIPDs during IVMP, 19 (22.4%) developed CIPDs after IVMP, and 49 (57.6%) developed CIPDs without IVMP. There was no significant difference in the doses at the time of CIPD improvement among the three groups when we excluded one patient whose CIPD improved during IVMP. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving IVMP were more likely to develop CIPDs than those who did not receive IVMP. Furthermore, corticosteroid doses at the time of improvement of CIPDs were constant, regardless of IVMP use.

Influence of dosing pattern of antipsychotics on treatment outcome of delirium in patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend antipsychotics for the treatment of delirium; however, there has been no confirmed recommendation regarding their administrating patterns. This study aims to investigate whether different dosing patterns of antipsychotics (single or multiple administrations) influence the outcomes of delirium treatment. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study involving patients with advanced cancer and delirium receiving antipsychotics. The Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98 was administered at baseline and after 72 h of starting pharmacotherapy. Patients were classified into single administration group (received a single dosage within 24 h before the assessment) and multiple administration group (received more than one dosage). RESULTS: A total of 555 patients (single administration 492 (88.6%); multiple administration 63 (11.4%)) were subjected to analyses. The patients in the multiple administration group were more likely to be male, in psycho-oncology consulting settings, with lower performance status, with hyperactive delirium and with severer delirium symptoms. In the multivariate analysis, single administration was significantly associated with better improvement of delirium (p < 0.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.83-5.87) even after controlling covariates. There were no significant differences in the mean dosages of antipsychotics per day in chlorpromazine equivalent (single administration 116.8 mg/day, multiple administration 123.5 mg/day) and the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study sample, Delirium Rating Scale severity score improvement in single administration was higher than that seen in multiple administration. There was no difference in adverse events between the two groups.

International collaboration for assessing unmet needs of cancer survivors and family caregivers: Lens of healthcare professionals.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer patients and their family caregivers have reported various needs that are not met. Recognition of the unmet needs by healthcare professionals may be a first step to adequately and systematically addressing them. Thus, the International Psycho-Oncology Society Survivorship Online Survey was developed to measure healthcare professionals' evaluation about the unmet needs of their patients and family caregivers around the globe. METHODS: The survey was developed in English and translated to additional 14 different languages. The survey was distributed on the web-based REDCap application to over 50 psycho-oncology societies and their networking platforms as well as social media and to authors who have published in psycho-oncology journals globally. RESULTS: A total of 1472 participants from 36 countries at least partially completed the survey. Healthcare professionals evaluated needs for managing one's emotional distress and patients' medical care and symptoms as the most common concerns for both patients and their family caregivers across all patient age groups. Less than two-thirds of the participating healthcare professionals reported that their institution had services or programs to address the needs of the patients or caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest several directions for further analyses to provide more specific information that would be readily translated into clinical practices, research, and policy aimed to enhance the quality of life of cancer patients, survivors, and family caregivers around the globe. In addition, this collaborative effort also hints at the importance of establishing international networks to promote equity in care for people touched by cancer worldwide.

Confidence in self-care after heart failure hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Understanding patient perspectives of self-care is critical for improving multidisciplinary education programs and adherence to such programs. However, perspectives of self-care for patients with heart failure (HF) as well as the association between patient perspectives and patient-physician communication remain unclear. METHODS: Confidence levels regarding self-care behaviors (eight lifestyle behaviors and four consulting behaviors) and self-monitoring were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire survey, which was directly distributed by dedicated physicians and nurses to consecutive patients hospitalized with HF in a tertiary-level hospital. Patient-physician communication was evaluated according to the quality of physician-provided information regarding "treatment and treatment choices" and "prognosis" using the Prognosis and Treatment Perception Questionnaire. Out of 202 patients, 187 (92.6 %) agreed to participate, and 176 completed the survey [valid response rate, 87.1 %; male, 67.0 %; median age, 73 (63-81) years]. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to predict low confidence in self-care (score in the lowest quartile). RESULTS: High confidence (confident or completely confident >75 % of patients) was observed for all self-care behavior categories except low-salt diet (63.1 %), regular exercise (63.1 %), and flu vaccination (65.9 %). Lower confidence in self-care behavior was associated with low quality of patient-physician communication. With regard to self-monitoring, 62.5 % of patients were not confident in distinguishing worsening symptoms of HF from other diseases; non-confidence was also associated with low quality of patient-physician communication. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients with HF had low confidence regarding regular exercise, salt restriction, and flu vaccination. The results also suggest patient-physician communication affects patient confidence.

Group multi-component programme based on cognitive behavioural therapy and positive psychology for family caregivers of people with dementia: a randomised controlled study (3C study).

BACKGROUND: Caregivers of people with dementia frequently experience an elevated level of psychological distress and burden. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a group-format multi-component programme which is based on cognitive behavioural therapy and positive psychology. METHODS: Family caregivers of dementia were allocated (1:1) to the intervention group and the wait-list control group, stratified by age (<65 years, ≥65 years) and care status (at home or in an institution). The intervention group received a six-session, 10-week, group-format programme. The primary outcome was the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS). Secondary outcomes were the short-version of the Zarit Burden Interview (personal strain and role strain), Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire, Dementia Caregiver Positive Feeling Scale, and Self-Compassionate Reactions Inventory. The evaluations were conducted at baseline, 10 weeks (post-intervention), and 14 weeks (follow-up). RESULTS: The analyses were performed with 64 registered participants. In the whole sample, no significant effect was observed on HADS. There was medium effect on role strain (P = 0.04, partial η2  = 0.08). Positive feelings of caregiving increased after the intervention but were not maintained at follow-up. In the subgroup analysis of caregivers under 65 years of age, a statistically significant effect was observed for personal strain (P = 0.03, partial η2 = 0.16). An interaction effect was also found for the total score of positive feelings of caregiving (P < 0.05, partial η2 = 0.02) and the meaning of caregiving (P = 0.02, partial η2 = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: This programme did not show significant improvement in depression and anxiety of caregivers of dementia; however, it reduced the burden of their role conflict (role strain) and yielded favourable short-term effects on the positive feelings and the meaning of caregiving among the participants. Also, the programme effectively reduced the personal strain of caregivers under 65 years.

Experience of application of the meaning-centered psychotherapy to Japanese bereaved family of patients with cancer - A mixed-method study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to adapt the meaning-centered psychotherapy (MCP) to treat post-bereavement grief in Japanese bereaved families who lost their loved ones to cancer and to examine the feasibility of the intervention using both quantitative and qualitative methods. METHODS: A modified version of MCP was developed with cultural consideration. Bereaved individuals aged ≥18 years who had lost their family members to cancer at least 6 months before and had severe or persistent grief with a score of ≥26 on the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG-19) were included in the study. The participants received the modified version of MCP, which was provided in a 5-session monthly format. The levels of grief (ICG-19), depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale [CES-D]), general health (General Health Questionnaire-12), and post-traumatic growth (Post-traumatic Growth Inventory -Short Form) were compared before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Five bereaved individuals were enrolled, and all the participants completed the program. The mean scores of the ICG-19. The participants' sense of regret, guilt, and being separated from the deceased person gradually shifted to the reappraisal of the experience, leading to a broadened view of the relationship with the deceased, and rediscovery of the core values, identity, and roles of the participants through the process of rediscovery of the meaning of life. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: A modified version of the MCP was well accepted by Japanese bereaved families. The intervention appears to promote the rediscovery of the meaning of life and appears to have the potential to alleviate the bereaved individuals' depression and grief-related symptoms and to facilitate their post-traumatic growth.

Impact of continued mindfulness practice on resilience and well-being in mindfulness-based intervention graduates during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.

Aim: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused unprecedented stress. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are known to be effective in reducing stress. However, it is unclear how long-term outcomes differ between those who continue mindfulness practice after MBIs and those who do not. In this study, we hypothesized that those who continued mindfulness practice would have higher stress tolerance, and we examined this hypothesis through a survey of MBI graduates. In this study, we examined the association between the continuation of mindfulness practice among MBI completers and individual stress during the COVID-19 epidemic. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of MBI graduates was conducted. The physical and mental health states were compared between those who established a habit of mindfulness practice (practice group) and those who did not (no practice group). Results: The data were collected from 95 participants (response rate: 53.7%). Of the total respondents, 66 (69.5%) practiced mindfulness. Although the degree of perceived stress due to the COVID-19 pandemic was not statistically different between the practice and no practice groups, the practice group showed significantly lower levels of depression (p = 0.007), higher levels of resilience (p = 0.006), higher levels of overall health (p = 0.006), and higher levels of mental health (p = 0.039). The effect of mindfulness practice on reducing depression was fully mediated by resilience. Conclusion: Among MBI graduates, those who regularly practiced mindfulness had lower levels of depression and higher levels of physical and mental health. Thus, the continuation of mindfulness practice increases resilience, buffers against new stressors such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and has the potential to prevent depression.

Development and preliminary validation of the Group Cognitive Therapy Scale.

Aim: The aim of this research was to create a scale to assess the competency of therapists who conduct group cognitive behavioral therapy (G-CBT). The scale is intended to serve as a tool to aid the training of therapists. Methods: Three stepped studies were conducted. Process 1: Through literature review and experts' consensus process, essential skills for G-CBT were articulated and categorized according to the criteria of the Cognitive Therapy Scale, a well-established rating scale for evaluating clinicians' skills in individual cognitive behavioral therapy. The list of those skills was organized into a rating scale. Process 2: Behavioral anchors were added to each skill and were classified by the levels of difficulty (beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels), based on the rating by G-CBT experts. Process 3: Inter-rater reliability and validity of the rating scale were examined in a sample of 41 videotaped G-CBT sessions of actual clinical sessions and educational role-plays. Results: The 12-item Group Cognitive Therapy Scale (G-CTS) was developed. It consists of 11 items that are adapted from the original Cognitive Therapy Scale, and a new 12th item called "Intervention using relationships with other participants," which describes therapists' skills to address group dynamics. The G-CTS showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α: 0.95), satisfactory inter-rater reliability (interclass correlation coefficients: 0.65-0.88), and high predictive validity. Conclusion: A novel rating scale to evaluate therapists' competency in G-CBT was developed and successfully validated. The G-CTS behavioral checklist created in this study provides concrete guidelines that can be used by therapists to hone their skills in G-CBT.

Implementations of an evidence-based assertive case management intervention for suicide attempters: Post-ACTION-J Study (PACS).

Aim: An assertive case management intervention program, ACTION-J, proved effective for preventing suicide attempters from reattempting suicide within 6 months. The ACTION-J randomized trial was conducted as part of the "National Strategic Research Projects." The program has been covered by the national medical payment system of Japan since 2016. The aim of the Post-ACTION-J Study (PACS) was to examine the current implementation status of assertive case management in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: PACS was a prospective, multicenter registry cohort study. The participants were suicide attempters admitted to the emergency departments of 10 participating medical facilities from October 2016 to September 2018. The assertive case management intervention developed by the ACTION-J Study was offered to all patients, and the primary outcome was the duration and frequency of use of the intervention at 6 months. Results: A total of 1159 patients were admitted to emergency departments after a suicide attempt during the study period, 144 of whom were included in our analysis. The proportion of participants who received the intervention for 6 months was 72.2% (104/144), and 63.9% (92/144) of the patients completed ≥7 case management interviews within 6 months. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate successful implementation of an assertive case management intervention program based on the ACTION-J Study in a real-world clinical setting, following its integration with the national medical payment scheme in Japan. The study provided the useful information that could improve the implementation of assertive case management interventions in future.

Development of a novel COMPAssion focused online psyChoTherapy for bereaved informal caregivers: the COMPACT feasibility trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: An easy-to-access and effective psychotherapy for bereaved informal caregivers has not been established. People with higher self-compassion status tend to have lower bereavement related grief, psychotherapy focused on self-compassion can be promising for this population. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of online self-compassion focused psychotherapy for bereaved informal caregivers. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: A total of 60 study participants will undergo an intervention programme comprising online sessions of 2 hours per week for five consecutive weeks and undertake postsession work. The intervention personnel will comprise psychologists who have received more than 10 hours of structured training. The primary endpoint will be assessed on the intervention completion rate, with secondary endpoints consisting of the Complicated Grief Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, Brief Resilience Scale and Self-Compassion Scale. Evaluations will be conducted preintervention, immediately after intervention, and 4 and 12 weeks after intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Kyoto University Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Japan (Approved ID: C1565). The results of this study will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000048554.

Most Important Things and Associated Factors With Prioritizing Daily Life in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients' values and priorities in their lives should be appreciated from an early phase of incurable diseases such as advanced cancer. However, studies examining these characteristics have been lacking. This study attempted to determine what patients with advanced lung cancer valued most, once they had been diagnosed, and any associated factors. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer (N = 248) were enrolled in a questionnaire survey conducted at 16 hospitals in Japan. Their priorities were assessed using a free-text response to the question what is the most important thing to you now? at the time of diagnosis and 3 months after diagnosis. The free-text responses were classified into 10 categories for quantification. The clinical characteristics associated with the category describing daily life were further examined. RESULTS: Free-text comments were obtained from 103 (44.0%) and 66 (42.6%) patients at the time of diagnosis and at 3 months, respectively. The most frequent categories were family (at diagnosis: 50.5%; at 3 months: 50.0%) and daily life (at diagnosis: 33.0%; at 3 months: 36.4%), followed by health (at diagnosis: 32.0%; at 3 months: 27.3%) at both time points. The patients mentioning daily life, the issues related to how to spend daily life, showed significantly higher total scores and functional well-being subscale scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung scale at both time points and lower depression scores at diagnosis and lower anxiety scores at 3 months on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. CONCLUSION: Family and daily life were highly valued by patients with advanced lung cancer at diagnosis. A better quality of life and better mood were associated with mentioning daily life, which should be taken into account in care planning to maintain patients' involvement in daily life even with incurable diseases.

Trazodone and Mianserin for Delirium: A Retrospective Chart Review.

BACKGROUND: Although antipsychotics are commonly used for delirium, their adverse effects are a serious concern in light of extrapyramidal symptoms and cardiovascular disturbances. In clinical practice, sedative antidepressants are frequently used as an alternative treatment for delirium; however, there is scarce evidence. Thus, we conducted a retrospective chart review to examine the use and effectiveness of trazodone and mianserin for delirium. METHODS: Patients who were admitted to a university hospital during 4 years and received either trazodone or mianserin on a regular schedule as monotherapy for the treatment of delirium were included. The rates of and times to the improvement of delirium were compared. RESULTS: Among 3971 patients who developed delirium, 379 (9.5%) and 341 (8.6%) patients received trazodone and mianserin on a regular schedule; 52 and 46 patients met the eligibility criteria (ie, monotherapy) for trazodone and mianserin, respectively. The percentages of patients 65 years or older were 86.5% (n = 45) for trazodone and 89.1% (n = 41) for mianserin. The rates of the improvement of delirium were 63.5% for trazodone and 50.0% for mianserin. Times to the improvement of delirium were 5.3 days (95% confidence interval, 3.2-7.4 days) for trazodone and 9.3 days (95% confidence interval, 5.3-13.3 days) for mianserin. There were no significant differences in the primary outcomes between the 2 groups ( P = 0.17 and P = 0.13, respectively). CONCLUSION: Considering potentially serious, sometimes lethal, adverse effects of antipsychotics, sedative antidepressants such as trazodone and mianserin may be a treatment option for delirium, especially in the elderly.

Social Isolation and Implementation of Advanced Care Planning Among Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure.

Background The implementation of advance care planning (ACP) in heart failure management is insufficient. Social isolation (SI) could be a barrier to ACP initiation, albeit the relationship between SI and patients' preference for ACP or end-of-life care remains unknown. Methods and Results We conducted a questionnaire survey, including assessments of SI using the 6-item Lubben Social Network Scale as well as patients' perspectives on ACP and end-of-life care. Of the 160 patients approached by our multidisciplinary heart failure team during admission, 120 patients (75.0%) completed the survey (median age, 73.0 years; men, 74.2%). A Cox proportional hazard model was constructed to elucidate the short-term (180-day) prognostic impact of SI. Overall, 28.3% of participants were at high risk for SI (6-item Lubben Social Network Scale score <12). High-risk patients had more negative attitudes toward ACP than those without (61.8% versus 80.2%; P=0.035). The actual performance of ACP conversation in patients with and without high risk were 20.6% and 30.2%, respectively. Regarding preference in end-of-life care, "Saying what one wants to tell loved ones" (73.5% versus 90.6%; P=0.016) and "Spending enough time with family" (58.8% versus 77.9%; P=0.035) were less important in high-risk patients. High risk for SI was associated with higher 180-day risk-adjusted all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 7.89 [95% CI, 1.53-40.75]). Conclusions In hospitalized patients with heart failure, high risk for SI was frequently observed. High-risk patients were associated with a negative attitude toward ACP, despite higher mortality. Further research is required to establish an ideal approach to provide ACP in socially vulnerable patients.

Improvement in Disability Mediates the Effect of Self-Efficacy on Pain Relief in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients with Exercise Therapy.

Background: The biopsychosocial mechanism by which exercise leads to improvement in chronic low back pain (CLBP) remains unstudied. This prospective cohort study was performed to examine the effectiveness of exercise on pain, disability, and psychological status for CLBP. We also tested path analytic models in which changes in these variables were included. Methods: CLBP patients who visited the Interdisciplinary Pain Center of Keio University Hospital from July 2018 to April 2020 were included. The propensity score matching was performed between patients who underwent exercise (the exercise group) and those who did not (the control group). At the first visit and at the 3-month follow-up, pain (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)), disability (Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS)), and psychological status (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)) were assessed. Changes in pain and disability at the follow-up were compared between the groups. The relationships between changes in pain, disability, and psychological variables were examined using Pearson's correlation and mediation analysis. Results: A significantly larger decrease in the PDAS was observed in the exercise group (N = 49) than in the control (N = 49) (p < 0.05). Increased PSEQ scores were significantly correlated with decreased NRS scores in both groups. In the exercise group, decreased PDAS fully mediated the relationship between increased PSEQ and decreased NRS (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Exercise improved disability, and the improved disability by exercise mediated the effect of increased self-efficacy on pain relief in CLBP patients.