Neutralization of EP217609, a new dual-action FIIa/FXa anticoagulant, by its specific antidote avidin: a phase I study.

INTRODUCTION: EP217609 is a representative of a new class of synthetic parenteral anticoagulants with a dual mechanism of action. It combines in a single molecule a direct thrombin inhibitor and an indirect factor Xa inhibitor. EP217609 can be neutralized by a specific antidote avidin, which binds to the biotin moiety of EP217609. PURPOSE: The primary objective was to assess the neutralization of EP217609 by avidin in healthy subjects. Secondary objectives were to define the optimal avidin monomer/EP217609 molar ratio to achieve an adequate neutralization of EP217609 and to assess the safety and tolerability of EP217609 and avidin. METHODS: Healthy subjects (n = 36) were randomized to a 3 by 3 replicated Latin square design between 3 EP217609 doses (4, 8, 12 mg) and 3 avidin monomer/EP217609 molar ratios (1:1; 2:1; 3:1). EP217609 was administered as a single intravenous bolus, and avidin as a 30-min intravenous infusion, starting 90 min after EP217609 administration. RESULTS: Overall, EP217609 and avidin were well tolerated. One subject experienced a benign and transient typical pseudo-allergic reaction. The administration of EP217609 resulted in dose-dependent increases in pharmacodynamic markers. Avidin triggered a rapid and irreversible neutralization of EP217609 without rebound effect. Adequate neutralization of the anticoagulant activity was achieved with both 2:1 and 3:1 avidin monomer/EP217609 molar ratios. All safety parameters did not show any treatment-emergent clinically relevant changes or abnormalities in any dose group. CONCLUSIONS: These results will allow further investigation in patients requiring a neutralizable anticoagulant as those undergoing cardiac surgery. STUDY REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2010-020216-10.

First in man study of EP217609, a new long-acting, neutralisable parenteral antithrombotic with a dual mechanism of action.

UNLABELLED: EP217609 is a parenteral antithrombotic compound combining in one molecule an indirect anti-factor Xa inhibitor, a direct thrombin active site inhibitor and a biotin moiety. AIMS: The aim of the study is to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single ascending intravenous doses of EP217609. METHODS: In this randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study, healthy male subjects were administered intravenously single ascending doses (1, 3 or 10 mg) of EP217609 or placebo. Each treatment group consisted of 10 subjects of whom 8 received EP217609 and 2 received placebo. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All doses of EP217609 were well tolerated. A total of five treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, all considered unrelated, but no bleedings or other significant adverse events occurred during this study. In both plasma and urine, there was a strong correlation between EP217609 concentrations as measured by anti-factor IIa and Xa specific bioassays indicating that the two pharmacological activities of EP217609 did not dissociate in vivo. EP217609 pharmacokinetics were dose proportional and characterised by a low clearance, a small volume of distribution and a terminal half-life of 20.4 h. The long half-life was reflected in long-lasting, dose-dependent effects on activated and ecarin clotting time, thrombin and prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin generation time and anti-factor Xa activity. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling indicated that the concentration of EP217609 producing 50 % of the pharmacodynamic effect was 3400 and 2210 ng/mL for activated clotting time and anti-factor Xa activity, respectively. These results warranted further clinical development of EP217609. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: • There is a limited number of neutralisable anticoagulants, particularly when rapid neutralisation is required. • Synthetic anti-Xa compounds have predictable pharmacokinetic profiles. However, problems with thrombin rebound remain because of the inability to inhibit clot-bound thrombin. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: • This manuscript provides a comprehensive investigation of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of EP217609, and the results were the basis of future clinical studies in both healthy subjects and patients. • The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling provided information for dose selection in such future studies.

EP42675, a synthetic parenteral dual-action anticoagulant: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and absence of interactions with antiplatelet drugs.

BACKGROUND: EP42675 is a first-in-class, synthetic, parenteral, anticoagulant combining in a single molecule a direct thrombin inhibitor and an indirect factor Xa(FXa) inhibitor. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of EP42675 and its interaction with aspirin, clopidogrel, and unfractionated heparin (UFH). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In study 1, healthy male subjects were administered intravenously single-ascending doses (1-10 mg) of EP42675 or placebo. In study 2, healthy male subjects were administered intravenously a single dose of 5 mg EP42675 on day 1 followed by oral administration of aspirin (100 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) once daily from day 8 to 21. On day 15, a second dose of 5 mg EP42675 was administered, and subjects were then randomized to receive a single dose of UFH (30 or 60 IU kg(-1) ) or placebo. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Mild bleedings were the only drug-related adverse events. EP42675 pharmacokinetics were dose-proportional and characterized by a low clearance, a small volume of distribution, a long terminal half-life. EP42675 pharmacodynamics were characterized by a long-lasting, dose-dependent increase in activated clotting time, ecarin clotting time, thrombin time, anti-FXa activity, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and a decrease in endogenous thrombin potential, measured by a thrombin generation test. Dose-dependent additive effects were seen with UFH on coagulation tests. EP42675 had no additive effect on the inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by aspirin and clopidogrel. These results warrant further clinical development of this new class of anticoagulant.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of roledumab, a novel human recombinant monoclonal anti-RhD antibody with an optimized Fc for improved engagement of FCγRIII, in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A human recombinant monoclonal anti-RhD IgG may be useful to prevent RhD allo-immunization. Roledumab is such an antibody with a glycosylation pattern optimized for biological activity. The objective of the study was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of roledumab in healthy RhD-negative volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 46 subjects received doses of 30-3000 µg i.v. of roledumab or placebo using a double-blind escalating single-dose design; 12 of these subjects also received 300 µg i.m. of roledumab. Subjects were followed for 6 months after administration. Serum roledumab concentrations were determined using flow cytometry. RESULTS: Fourteen treatment-emergent adverse events related to treatment were reported in nine subjects, with no apparent difference in their frequency or nature after placebo or roledumab administration. No anti-roledumab antibodies were detected. AUC(last) increased from 4·4 ng/ml.day at 30 µg i.v. to 2257 ng/ml.day at 3000 g i.v. The t(½) ranged from 18 to 22 days, and the absolute bioavailability after i.m. administration was between 73% and 80%. CONCLUSION: Roledumab is safe and well tolerated in healthy RhD-negative volunteers and shows a pharmacokinetic profile similar to that of polyclonal anti-RhD immunoglobulin.

Supporting the recommended paediatric dosing regimen for rufinamide in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome using clinical trial simulation.

Rufinamide was approved for the treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) as adjunctive therapy in patients aged 4 years and older. Rufinamide pharmacokinetics (PK) has been established on pooled data from several clinical studies in epilepsy, including one in LGS patients. Demographic covariates and drug-drug interactions with several antiepileptic drugs have been explored using population PK modelling. Two types of drug-drug interactions models were developed and compared. The PK analysis demonstrated that the coadministration of valproate decreases rufinamide clearance, requiring potential dose adjustment. To explore rufinamide exposure under different dosing regimens in LGS patients, clinical trial simulations were performed. The objective of the simulations was to select the doses giving an exposure shown to be safe and efficacious in larger populations. The concentrations simulated in a subgroup of patients with body weight less than 30 kg presented a larger inter-individual variability than in other patients. Additional simulations demonstrated that this increased variability was due partly to greater valproate concentrations in some of the children treated with rufinamide. Simulations of the rufinamide exposure under different maximum daily dose in presence and in absence of valproate co-administration were used to establish the dosing recommendation. The simulations support the proposal of a lower maximum daily rufinamide dose for patients under 30 kg receiving both drugs: the dose of 600 mg/day was proposed as a maximum daily dose in children also receiving valproate concomitantly, whereas in absence of valproate, the maximum daily dose is 1000 mg/day.

CNS effects of sumatriptan and rizatriptan in healthy female volunteers.

This study investigates the CNS effects of sumatriptan and rizatriptan, with temazepam as an active comparator, in healthy female volunteers. Sixteen volunteers completed a randomized, double-blind, crossover study and on four separate occasions received either 100 mg sumatriptan, 20 mg rizatriptan or 20 mg temazepam. The main parameters were eye movements, EEG, body sway, visual analogue scales and a cognitive test battery. Rizatriptan and sumatriptan decreased saccadic peak velocity by 18.3 (95% CI: 5.7, 30.8) and 15.0 (2.2, 27.9) degrees/sec, respectively, about half the decrease induced by temazepam (35.0 (22.1, 47.8) degrees/sec). Body sway increased (30% for rizatriptan (16%, 45%) and 14% for sumatriptan (1%, 27%), respectively). Temazepam caused larger, similar effects. In contrast to temazepam, sumatriptan and rizatriptan decreased reaction times of recognition tasks and increased EEG alpha power (significant for sumatriptan, 0.477 (0.02, 0.935). Therapeutic doses of sumatriptan and rizatriptan caused CNS effects indicative of mild sedation. For EEG and recognition reaction times the effects were opposite to temazepam, indicating central stimulation.

Modeling and stimulation for clinical trial design involving a categorical response: a phase II case study with naratriptan.

PURPOSE: The overall aim of the present study was to investigate retrospectively the feasibility and utility of model-based clinical trial simulation as applied to the clinical development of naratriptan with effect measured on a categorical scale. METHODS: A PK-PD model for naratriptan was developed by using information gathered from previous naratriptan and sumatriptan preclinical and clinical trials. The phase IIa naratriptan data were used to check the PK-PD model in its ability to describe future data. A further PK-PD model was developed by using the phase IIa naratriptan data, and a phase IIb trial was designed by simulation with the use of Matlab. The design resulting from clinical trial simulation was compared with that derived by using D-optimal design. RESULTS: The PK-PD model showed reasonable agreement with the data observed in the phase IIa naratriptan clinical trial. Clinical trial simulation resulted in a design with four or five arms at 0 mg, 2.5 and/or 5 mg, 10 mg, and 20 mg, PD measurements to be taken at 0, 2, and 4 or 6 h and at least 150 patients per arm. A sub-D-optimal design resulted in two dosing arms at 0 and 10 mg and PD measurements to be taken at 1 and 2 h. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trial simulation is a useful tool for the quantitative assessment of the influence of the controllable factors and is the only tool for the quantitative assessment of the uncontrollable factors on the power of a clinical trial.

Effect of encapsulation on absorption of sumatriptan tablets: data from healthy volunteers and patients during a migraine.

BACKGROUND: Some comparative trials of selective serotonin 1B/ID-agonists in migraine have reported -15% lower efficacy for sumatriptan tablets than that reported in placebo-controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the encapsulation methods used to mask active drug may delay absorption of sumatriptan from dosing to 2 hours after dosing (the traditional end point in clinical trials of migraine treatment), an effect that may be enhanced by migraine-associated gastric stasis. METHODS: Two randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover trials were conducted to evaluate the absorption and bioequivalence of conventional 50-mg sumatriptan tablets and encapsulated 50-mg sumatriptan tablets in supine, fasted, healthy volunteers (Glaxo Wellcome protocol SUM40270) and supine patients experiencing a migraine (Glaxo Wellcome protocol SUM40268). Absorption was assessed by calculating the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from dosing to 2 hours after dosing (AUC2) and the times to first measurable plasma concentration, 10 ng/mL, 20 ng/mL, and maximum plasma concentration. Data for the AUC from time zero to infinity and maximum plasma concentration were used to assess standard bioequivalence, which is considered to occur when the 90% CIs for the geometric mean treatment ratios (test/reference) fall between 0.8 and 1.25. RESULTS: Study 1 included 26 healthy subjects (73% men, 27% women; mean age, 39.1 years), and study 2 included 30 patients with migraine (67% women, 33% men; mean age, 42.7 years). Sumatriptan absorption was delayed with the encapsulated tablet compared with the conventional tablet 0 to 2 hours after dosing, particularly during a migraine. AUC2 values with encapsulated sumatriptan compared with the conventional tablet were 21% lower in healthy volunteers (ratio of capsule/tablet, 0.79; 90% CI, 0.588-1.050) and 27% lower in patients experiencing a migraine (ratio of capsule/tablet, 0.73; 90% CI, 0.519-1.023). Standard bioequivalence was demonstrated in both healthy volunteers and patients experiencing a migraine. CONCLUSIONS: Encapsulation delayed absorption of sumatriptan 0 to 2 hours after dosing, particularly during a migraine. This delay in absorption of the encapsulated form may account for the lower efficacy of sumatriptan in some comparative studies.

Pharmacokinetics of naratriptan in adolescent subjects with a history of migraine.

Naratriptan is a novel 5-HT1 agonist developed to treat acute migraine. The study objective was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of oral naratriptan in adolescent migraine patients outside a migraine attack. Subjects received a single 2.5 mg naratriptan tablet. Serial serum samples for naratriptan concentrations were collected over 24 hours. Blood pressure, pulse rate, and 12-lead ECG were recorded at baseline and at regular intervals after dosing. Seven patients--3 males and 4 females, 12 to 16 years of age--received drug and completed the study. The geometric mean and 95% confidence interval maximum concentration (Cmax) was 8.0 ng/mL (5.9-10.7), elimination half-life (t1/2) was 4.9 hours (4.5-5.4), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was 74.6 ng.h/mL (56.6-98.2), and apparent total clearance (Cl/F) was 558.8 mL/min (424.3-735.9). The median time to maximal concentration (tmax) was 4 hours, with a range of 1.5 to 4. Blood pressure, pulse rate, and ECG parameters did not change significantly from baseline. No serious adverse events or subject withdrawal after drug administration occurred. Oral naratriptan pharmacokinetic parameters in adolescents were similar to values reported in adults. Naratriptan doses for adolescents older than 12 years of age would be expected to be similar to adult doses.

Mixed effect modeling of sumatriptan pharmacokinetics during drug development: II. From healthy subjects to phase 2 dose ranging in patients.

Sumatriptan is indicated for the treatment of migraine attack and cluster headache; it is currently marketed as a subcutaneous injection, nasal spray, and oral tablet. New formulations are under consideration. The knowledge of sumatriptan absorption, combined with PK/PD information would help the design of more efficient formulations. In this perspective, we attempted to model the absorption of sumatriptan by population PK analysis. Data following administration by the intravenous (i.v.), the subcutaneous (s.c.), and the oral (po) route in healthy subjects were analyzed. A large database with full kinetic profiles was constituted. Sumatriptan was administered to 215 healthy subjects (i.v., s.c., and po) and to 143 migraine sufferers (po). The mean age was 31 years (18-86 years) in healthy subject population and was 38 years (18-65 years) in migraine patients. The mean weights were 74 kg (54-104 kg) and 66 kg (38-136 kg) in healthy subjects and migraine patients, respectively, and the mean heights were 176 cm (157-193 cm) and 164 cm (152-183 cm) in healthy subjects and migraine patients, respectively. A NONMEN analysis was performed using a two-compartment disposition model. Oral absorption was modeled with a first-order input followed by a zero-order input. Less biased results were obtained using the FOCE method. The total clearance and the distribution volume at steady state were 71.2 L/hr and 94.5 L after i.v. dosing and 68.7 L/hr and 109 L after inclusion of the s.c. and po data. The absorption phase appeared to last for about 5 hr. The interindividual variability of the main PK parameters was low: It was around 20% for the total clearance and around 30% for the distribution volume at steady state. Although significant, the combination of age and height on clearance did not decrease considerably the interindividual variability of this parameter (decrease of 2.2%); nor was it possible to establish clearly if a migraine attack has an effect on drug absorption because of the sampling scheme during absorption. Simulations have shown that it would have been possible to estimate all the PK parameters with a data set reduced to one quarter of its actual number of samples.

A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of repeated measures time-to-event pharmacodynamic responses: the antiemetic effect of ondansetron.

This paper presents and illustrates methodology for specifying, estimating, and evaluating a predictive model for repeated measures time-to-event responses. The illustrative example specifies a model of the antiemetic effect vs. concentration relationship for the 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron in the human ipecac model for emesis. A key part of this model is a time-dependent log hazard function for emesis that is increased by ipecac administration and decreased by ondansetron concentration. The model is fit using an approximate maximum likelihood method. The data consist of the time free of emeses and, for those individuals with emetic episodes, the time(s) of the episode(s). Model evaluation is accomplished using residual plots adapted to time-to-event data and a "posterior predictive check" wherein observed data statistics are compared to those obtained from data simulated from the fitted model. The ondansetron concentration required to obtain a 50% reduction in the hazard of emesis is estimated to be 1.4 +/- 0.2 ng/ml, and the rate constant for elimination of ipecac-induced hazard is 1.5 +/- 0.2 hr-1.

Comparative clinical pharmacokinetics of single doses of sumatriptan following subcutaneous, oral, rectal and intranasal administration.

Sumatriptan, a 5-HT1 receptor agonist active for the acute treatment of migraine, is currently available as subcutaneous injection and oral tablets. Rectal or intranasal formulations may offer advantages over those marketed. This study compared the pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan via all four routes. Usual absorption parameters were described and the rate of absorption was assessed using deconvolution technics. There were no statistical differences between the non-parenteral routes for tmax or Cmax/AUCinfinity. However, Cmax and AUCtmax were statistically greater with the suppository than with the tablet, but there was no difference between intranasal and oral routes. The highest rate of absorption occurred earlier with the intranasal than with the oral route. Relative to the subcutaneous route, the bioavailability for the suppository was greater than for intranasal spray and oral tablet. The amount of sumatriptan excreted in the urine unchanged was similar for all routes. Sumatriptan in this study was well tolerated.

Early clinical experience with subcutaneous naratriptan in the acute treatment of migraine: a dose-ranging study.

Naratriptan is a novel, potent agonist at the 5HT1B/1D receptor. A total of 335 migraine patients were treated in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, in-clinic study, to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of five doses of subcutaneous (sc) naratriptan (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5 or 10 mg) in comparison with sc sumatriptan (6 mg) and placebo in the acute treatment of a moderate/severe migraine attack. Headache relief [reduction of headache severity from moderate or severe (grade 2/3) to mild or none (grade 1/0)] at 1 and 2 h after each dose, was reported by a statistically significantly higher proportion of patients for all doses of sc naratriptan and sc sumatriptan (6 mg) than for placebo. The percentages of patients with headache relief at 2 h post-dose were: naratriptan (0.5 mg) 65%, (1 mg) 75%, (2.5 mg) 83%, (5 mg) 94% and (10 mg) 91%; sumatriptan (6 mg) 89%; placebo 41%, (P < 0.005). The earliest report of a statistically significant difference compared with placebo for the times assessed was with sc naratriptan (10 mg) at 10 min post-dose (P = 0.023). The percentages of patients reporting adverse events were dose-related; sc naratriptan (0.5 mg) 33%, (1 mg) 29%, (2.5 mg) 43%, (5 mg) 59% and (10 mg) 71%; sc sumatriptan 53%; placebo 22%. There were no clinically significant changes in electrocardiogram (ECG), vital signs or laboratory parameters. Systemic exposure increased proportionally to the dose, the absorption of sc naratriptan was rapid (tmax = 10 min) and the half-life was 5 h. In conclusion, sc naratriptan was an effective and well-tolerated acute treatment for migraine. Copyright 1998 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan in healthy subjects following ascending single intranasal doses and multiple intranasal doses.

The delivery of sumatriptan doses intranasally could add greater flexibility in the treatment of migraine than is possible with the currently available subcutaneous and oral sumatriptan preparations. Two independent double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of intranasally administered sumatriptan following ascending single doses (three different dose levels) and multiple doses. In the four-way, crossover, ascending-dose study, 20 healthy female subjects were randomized to receive on separate occasions single intranasal spray doses of 5, 10, or 20 mg sumatriptan (as the hemisulphate salt) or placebo into one nostril. Adverse events were mild and consisted mainly of bitter taste at the back of the throat and events typical of sumatriptan administered by other routes (headache, lightheadedness and tingling). Area under the plasma sumatriptan concentration versus time curve (AUC infinity) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) increased with the dose. Dose proportionality was demonstrated between 5 and 10 mg but not across the dose range 5-20 mg. Time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was variable due to multiple peaking. The elimination half-life (t1/2), approximately 2 h, was unaffected by the magnitude of dose. In the two-period, multiple-dose, crossover study, 12 healthy adult male and female subjects were randomized to receive either sumatriptan hemisulphate 20 mg or placebo, administered intranasally as a spray three times a day for 4 days. The two dosing periods were separated by 3 to 14 days. Multiple doses of sumatriptan were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events occurring or withdrawals due to adverse events. All patients reported a mild to moderate drug-related disturbance of taste. Nasal examinations remained normal, and olfactory function was unaffected. The AUC over the first 8 h following dosing (AUC8) and fraction of the dose excreted in the urine (fe; 6.2% vs 3.6%) were similar on Days 1 and 4. Day 4 values were significantly higher (p < or = 0.05) for Cmax (16.9 ng/ml vs 13.1 ng/ml), renal clearance (Clr; 19.0 l/h vs 14.2 l/h), and t1/2 (2.18 h vs 1.93 h), and shorter for tmax (0.88 h vs 1.75 h). Some accumulation (22%) occurred over the 4 days of dosing. Serum concentrations of the pharmacologically inactive indole acetic acid metabolite of sumatriptan were fourfold to fivefold higher than corresponding sumatriptan concentrations. Overall, these studies show that the sumatriptan intranasal spray formulation is well tolerated, allows rapid absorption of sumatriptan, and results in only a clinically insignificant degree of sumatriptan accumulation upon repeated dosing.

Mixed effect modeling of sumatriptan pharmacokinetics during drug development. I: Interspecies allometric scaling.

Allometric scaling is an empirical examination of the relationships between the pharmacokinetic parameters and size (usually body weight), but it can also involve brain weight for metabolized drug. Through all species, the protein binding of sumatriptan is similar (14-16%), and its metabolic pathway undergoes extensive oxidative deamination involving the monoamine oxidase A isoenzyme. These similarities across species suggested the possible relevance of an allometric analysis. Toxicokinetic data were collected from rats, pregnant rabbits, and dogs in animal pharmacokinetic studies where sumatriptan was administered intravenously to the animals at doses of 5 mg/kg. 0.25 mg/kg, and 1 mg/kg, respectively. Animal data were pooled and analyzed in one step using a mixed effect modeling (population) approach. The kinetic parameters predicted in any species were close to the observed values by species: 77 L/hr vs. 80 L/hr in man for total clearance, 137 L vs. 119 L for distribution volume at steady state. The value of the mixed effect modeling approach compared to the two-step method was demonstrated especially with the possibility of including covariates to describe the status of animal (e.g., pregnancy) in the model. Knowledge of the animal kinetics, dynamics, and metabolism of a drug contributes to optimal and expeditious development. Valuable information for the design of the first-dose-in-man study may emerge from more creative data analysis based on all the information collected during the preclinical and ongoing nonclinical evaluation of a new drug.

Plasma and skin suction-blister-fluid pharmacokinetics and time course of the effects of oral mizolastine.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate plasma and skin suction-blister-fluid pharmacokinetics of oral mizolastine in order to determine whether the drug concentration in the fluid of suction-induced skin blisters could better predict the antihistamine activity than the plasma concentration. SETTING: Department of Internal Medicine, Université Paris 6. SUBJECTS: Ten healthy male volunteers. METHODS: The volunteers (mean age 26.8 years, mean weight 75.8 kg) received a single 10-mg oral dose of mizolastine at 1000 hours. The pharmacokinetic study included 11 plasma and 9 blister fluid samples and blister epidermal-roof specimens. Mizolastine was assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Each volunteer also received nine intradermal injections of 5 micrograms histamine. Antihistamine activity was assessed as the post-treatment percentages of changes in the histamine-induced relative wheal and flare areas versus baseline. RESULTS: Mizolastine mean Cmax (SD) and median tmax were, respectively, 380 ng.ml-1 and 0.8 h in plasma, and 21.8 ng.ml-1 and 10 h in blister fluid. Mizolastine could not be quantified in the epidermis. The maximal histamine-induced relative flare inhibition was 72.5% and was attained at the median time of 3 h post-dosing and therefore was delayed by 2.2 h with respect to the plasma tmax. Mean relative wheal inhibition, although lower, showed the same time profile. A direct relationship could not be found between drug concentrations in blister fluid and antihistamine activity. Simulated concentrations in the peripheral compartment better explain the maximum inhibition effect on flare, observed 3 h post-dosing, with a flatter hysteresis loop obtained when plotting relative flare inhibition versus plasma or blister-fluid drug concentrations. CONCLUSION: The mizolastine concentrations in the skin suction-blister fluid were not predictive of the antihistamine activity.

Reduction of hyperglycemia after oral glucose load by the new alpha 2-adrenergic receptor antagonist SL 84.0418 in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the antihyperglycemic activity of a new peripherally acting alpha 2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, SL 84.0418 in healthy volunteers METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind crossover study. The effects of 10, 50, and 100 mg SL 84.0418 on blood glucose, plasma insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were investigated in comparison with placebo and 5 mg glipizide before and after an oral glucose challenge (75 gm). RESULTS: Peak blood glucose and area under the blood-glucose curve were dose-dependently reduced by SL 84.0418; the extent of this reduction was similar with 100 mg SL 84.0418 and glipizide. Glipizide but not SL 84.0418 decreased nadir blood glucose. Plasma insulin and C-peptide were increased by glipizide but not by SL 84.0418. Treatments did not modify plasma glucagon. Plasma epinephrine increased during glipizide treatment and plasma norepinephrine increased during treatment with 50 and 100 mg SL 84.0418. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were moderately enhanced by 50 and 100 mg SL 84.0418. Adverse effects reflecting alpha 2-adrenergic receptor blockade occurred more frequently with 100 mg SL 84.0418. The adverse effect profile of 50 mg SL 84.0418 was not different from that observed with glipizide. CONCLUSION: The alpha 2-adrenergic receptor antagonist SL 84.0418 dose dependently reduced the increase in blood glucose after glucose load without modification of plasma insulin. It may represent an alternative to sulfonylureas in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Further studies are needed to assess its efficacy and tolerability in non-insulin-dependent patients.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of mizolastine (SL 85.0324), a new nonsedative H1 antihistamine.

The antihistaminic activity, clinical safety, and pharmacokinetics of mizolastine (SL 85.0324) were studied in a 5-way, double-blind crossover study of ten healthy volunteers with doses of 1 to 75 mg. Inhibition of the histamine-induced wheal and flare showed clear dose-dependent antihistaminic activity beginning from the 2-mg dose with a maximum attained between 10 and 20 mg. The onset of action was rapid (one hour) and the effect persisted for more than 24 hours after a 10-mg dose or more. Mizolastine was well tolerated at doses up to 75 mg; subjective and objective signs of transient sedative activity were not observed at doses below 30 mg. The pharmacokinetic profile (rapid absorption with Tmax congruent to 1 h and elimination T1/2 of about eight hours) parallels the pharmacodynamic activity. Within the considered dose range, the pharmacokinetics was linear with no saturation phenomena.

Effects of zolpidem versus diazepam and placebo on breathing control parameters in healthy human subjects.

The following study explores the possibility that zolpidem, a new hypnotic agent derived from imidopyridine, may induce changes in ventilatory function in normal subjects. The study, conducted double-blind on 16 subjects (eight men and eight women, aged 21 to 33 years) was undertaken in two successive phases: phase A with a cross-over, intended to compare the ventilatory effects of 10 mg oral dose of diazepam with a placebo, and then phase B, with a Latin square design, intended to compare the effects of 10 and 20 mg oral doses of zolpidem with 10 mg oral doses of diazepam and a placebo. Central inspiratory drive was assessed by occlusion pressure (P0.1) and breathing pattern in air and during carbon dioxide rebreathing. Measurements were performed one and three hours after each drug or placebo administration. Zolpidem did not affect tidal volume (Vt), slopes S1, S2 or P0.1, but decreased the duration of the phases of the respiratory cycle ti by 14% (p less than 0.01) and ttot by 15% (p = 0.03) after three hours post dosing without any change in ventilation, Vt/ti or ti/ttot. Nevertheless, these timing changes, although statistically significant, seem to have no clinical relevance to overall ventilation regulation in normal subjects. On the other hand, diazepam slightly changed S2 at three hours post dosing (0.14 +/- 0.07 versus 0.17 +/- 0.10 after the placebo; p = 0.06) without modifying the other parameters.

Nocturnal profile of growth hormone secretion during sleep induced by zolpidem: a double-blind study in young adults and children.

Overnight blood sampling for repeated growth hormone (GH) assays, regarded as the most physiological assessment of GH status, may induce some disturbances in patients' sleep and then in the evaluation of GH secretion. We studied the influence of a hypnotic drug, zolpidem (10 mg), on nocturnal GH profiles (GH peak, time to first and maximum GH peak, area under the curve, mean integrated concentration) over two nights at a 7-day interval, in a double-blind cross-over design in a group of 12 young adult volunteers (27.9 +/- 4.3 years), and in a group of 12 children (10.8 +/- 2.3 years) with short stature, in a parallel double-blind study. Mean GH profiles showed no difference between zolpidem-treated subjects and placebo-treated controls, either in adults or in children. Although in these experimental conditions, sleep onset latency was significantly reduced with zolpidem in the adult volunteers, the mean time to first GH peak remained unchanged. Furthermore, GH profile did not relate with sleep duration, sleep onset latency or number of awakenings. A hypnotic drug, such as zolpidem, given at bedtime, is therefore devoided of effect on nocturnal GH profile and may be used in young children for overnight blood sampling when needed.