ABSTRACT
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most common nosocomial pathogens and part of the top emergent species associated with antimicrobial resistance that has become one of the greatest threat to public health in the twenty-first century. This bacterium is provided with a wide set of virulence factors that contribute to pathogenesis in acute and chronic infections. This review aims to summarize the impact of multidrug resistance on the virulence and fitness of P. aeruginosa. Although it is generally assumed that acquisition of resistant determinants is associated with a fitness cost, several studies support that resistance mutations may not be associated with a decrease in virulence and/or that certain compensatory mutations may allow multidrug resistance strains to recover their initial fitness. We discuss the interplay between resistance profiles and virulence from a microbiological perspective but also the clinical consequences in outcomes and the economic impact.
Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Pseudomonas Infections , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genetics , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/pathogenicity , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Virulence , Humans , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Virulence Factors/geneticsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim was to analyse the clinical and economic impact of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) infections. METHODS: Case-control study. Adult patients with CPE infections were considered cases, while those with non-CPE infections were controls. Matching criteria were age (± 5 years), sex, source of infection and microorganism (ratio 1:2). Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality, clinical failure, hospitalisation costs and resource consumption. RESULTS: 246 patients (82 cases and 164 controls) were included. Klebsiella pneumoniae OXA-48 was the most common microorganism causing CPE infections. CPE cases had more prior comorbidities (p = 0.007), septic shock (p = 0.003), and were more likely to receive inappropriate empirical and definitive antibiotic treatment (both p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified septic shock and inappropriate empirical treatment as independent predictors for 7-day and end-of-treatment clinical failure, whereas Charlson Index and septic shock were associated with 30- and 90-day mortality. CPE infection was independently associated with early clinical failure (OR 2.18, 95% CI, 1.03-4.59), but not with end-of-treatment clinical failure or 30- or 90-day mortality. In terms of resource consumption, hospitalisation costs for CPE were double those of the non-CPE group. CPE cases had longer hospital stay (p < 0.001), required more long-term care facilities (p < 0.001) and outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The CPE group was associated with worse clinical outcomes, but this was mainly due to a higher comorbidity burden, more severe illness, and more frequent inappropriate antibiotic treatment rather than resistance patterns as such. However, the CPE group consumed more healthcare resources and incurred higher costs.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To design a randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of favipiravir in patients with COVID-19 disease with pneumonia. METHODS: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of favipiravir in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was conducted in three Spanish sites. Randomization 1:1 to favipiravir or placebo (in both groups added to the Standard of Care) was performed to treat the patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The primary endpoint was "time to clinical improvement," measured as an improvement for ≥ two categories on a 7-point WHO ordinal scale in an up to 28 days' time frame. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were randomized (23 in the favipiravir group and 21 in the placebo group). The median time to clinical improvement was not different between the favipiravir and the placebo arms (10 days for both groups) and none of the secondary endpoints showed significant differences between arms. The proportion of adverse events (both serious and non-serious) was statistically different between the favipiravir group (68.29%) and the placebo group (31.7%) (p = 0.019), but there was insufficient statistical evidence to correlate the degree of severity of the events with the treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Favipiravir administered for ten days to patients with COVID-19 and pneumonia did not improve outcomes compared with placebo. Although this is an underpowered negative study, efficacy results align with other randomized trials. However, in the present study, the non-serious adverse events were more frequent in the favipiravir group.
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: In some cases, colistin is the only treatment option for infections caused by the very drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, in the past decade, there have been questions concerning its pharmacokinetics and concentration at the site of infection. In this scenario, its use in a difficult-to-treat infection like pneumonia is currently debatable. This is a clinical pharmacokinetic study of colistin in patients with multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa pneumonia. Our findings demonstrate that colistin exposure is associated with worse clinical outcomes rather than better clinical outcomes, implying that other therapeutic options should be explored in this clinical setting.
Subject(s)
Pneumonia , Pseudomonas Infections , Humans , Colistin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Microbial Sensitivity TestsABSTRACT
Introduction: Penicillin allergy labels (PAL) are common in the hospital setting and are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Desensitization can be a useful strategy for allergic patients when alternative options are suboptimal or not available. The aim was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with PAL managed with antibiotic desensitization vs. those who received alternative non-beta-lactam antibiotic treatments. Methods: A retrospective 3:1 case-control study was performed between 2015-2022. Cases were adult PAL patients with infection who required antibiotic desensitization; controls were PAL patients with infection managed with an alternative antibiotic treatment. Cases and controls were adjusted for age, sex, infection source, and critical or non-critical medical services. Results: Fifty-six patients were included: 14 in the desensitization group, 42 in the control group. Compared to the control group, desensitized PAL patients had more comorbidities, with a higher Charlson index (7.4 vs. 5; p = 0.00) and more infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens (57.1% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.05). Thirty-day mortality was 14.3% in the desensitized group, 28.6% in the control group (p = 0.24). Clinical cure occurred in 71.4% cases and 54.8% controls (p = 0.22). Four control patients selected for MDR strains after alternative treatment; selection of MDR strains did not occur in desensitized patients. Five controls had antibiotic-related adverse events, including Clostridioides difficile or nephrotoxicity. No antibiotic-related adverse events were found in the study group. In multivariate analysis, no differences between groups were observed for main variables. Conclusion: Desensitization was not associated with worse clinical outcomes, despite more severe patients in this group. Our study suggests that antibiotic desensitization may be a useful Antimicrobial Stewardship tool for the management of selected PAL patients.
ABSTRACT
Treatment failure occurs in about 25% of patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. We assessed whether cloxacillin plus fosfomycin achieves better treatment success than cloxacillin alone in hospitalized adults with MSSA bacteremia. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase III-IV superiority randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive 2 g of intravenous cloxacillin alone every 4 h or with 3 g of intravenous fosfomycin every 6 h for the initial 7 days. The primary endpoint was treatment success at day 7, a composite endpoint with the following criteria: patient alive, stable or with improved quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, afebrile and with negative blood cultures for MSSA, adjudicated by an independent committee blinded to treatment allocation. We randomized 215 patients, of whom 105 received cloxacillin plus fosfomycin and 110 received cloxacillin alone. We analyzed the primary endpoint with the intention-to-treat approach in 214 patients who received at least 1 day of treatment. Treatment success at day 7 after randomization was achieved in 83 (79.8%) of 104 patients receiving combination treatment versus 82 (74.5%) of 110 patients receiving monotherapy (risk difference 5.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -5.95-16.48). Secondary endpoints, including mortality and adverse events, were similar in the two groups except for persistent bacteremia at day 3, which was less common in the combination arm. In a prespecified interim analysis, the independent committee recommended stopping recruitment for futility prior to meeting the planned randomization of 366 patients. Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin did not achieve better treatment success at day 7 of therapy than cloxacillin alone in MSSA bacteremia. Further trials should consider the intrinsic heterogeneity of the infection by using a more personalized approach. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03959345 .
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Fosfomycin , Staphylococcal Infections , Adult , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Cloxacillin/adverse effects , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Methicillin/therapeutic use , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus , Treatment Outcome , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effectsABSTRACT
The interplay between antibiotic resistance and bacterial fitness/virulence has attracted the interest of researchers for decades because of its therapeutic implications, since it is classically assumed that resistance usually entails certain biological costs. Reviews on this topic revise the published data from a general point of view, including studies based on clinical strains or in vitro-evolved mutants in which the resistance phenotype is seen as a final outcome, i.e., a combination of mechanisms. However, a review analyzing the resistance/fitness balance from the basic research perspective, compiling studies in which the different resistance pathways and respective biological costs are individually approached, was missing. Here we cover this gap, specifically focusing on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a pathogen that stands out because of its extraordinary capacity for resistance development and for which a considerable number of recent and particular data on the interplay with fitness/virulence have been released. The revised information, split into horizontally-acquired vs. mutation-driven resistance, suggests a great complexity and even controversy in the resistance-fitness/virulence balance in the acute infection context, with results ranging from high costs linked to certain pathways to others that are seemingly cost-free or even cases of resistance mechanisms contributing to increased pathogenic capacities. The elusive mechanistic basis for some enigmatic data, knowledge gaps, and possibilities for therapeutic exploitation are discussed. The information gathered suggests that resistance-fitness/virulence interplay may be a source of potential antipseudomonal targets and thus, this review poses the elementary first step for the future development of these strategies harnessing certain resistance-associated biological burdens.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess the microbiological characteristics of Escherichia coli causing healthcare-associated bacteraemia of urinary origin (HCA-BUO) in Spain (ITUBRAS-2 project), with particular focus on ESBL producers and isolates belonging to ST131 high-risk clone (HiRC). Clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with ST131 infection were investigated. METHODS: A total of 222 E. coli blood isolates were prospectively collected from patients with HCA-BUO from 12 tertiary-care hospitals in Spain (2017-19). Antimicrobial susceptibility and ESBL/carbapenemase production were determined. ST131 subtyping was performed. A subset of 115 isolates were selected for WGS to determine population structure, resistome and virulome. Clinical charts were reviewed. RESULTS: ESBL-producing E. coli prevalence was 30.6% (68/222). ST131 represented 29.7% (66/222) of E. coli isolates and accounted for the majority of ESBL producers (46/68, 67.6%). The C2/H30-Rx subclone accounted for most ST131 isolates (44/66) and was associated with CTX-M-15 (37/44) and OXA-1 enzymes (27/44). Cluster C1-M27 was identified in 4/10 isolates belonging to subclade C1/H30-R1 and associated with CTX-M-27. Additionally, ST131 isolates showed a high content of other acquired resistance genes, and clade C/ST131 isolates carried characteristic QRDR mutations. They were categorized as uropathogenic E. coli and had higher aggregate virulence scores. ST131 infection was associated with more complex patients, prior use of cephalosporins and inadequate empirical treatment but was not associated with worse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: ST131 HiRC is the main driver of ESBL-producing E. coli causing HCA-BUO in Spain, mainly associated with the expansion of subclade CTX-M-15-C2/H30-Rx and the emergence of CTX-M-27-C1/H30-R1 (Cluster C1-M27).
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Escherichia coli Infections , Humans , Escherichia coli , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Spain/epidemiology , Molecular Epidemiology , Genotype , Bacteremia/epidemiology , beta-Lactamases/genetics , Delivery of Health CareABSTRACT
AIM: To analyze trends in the prescription of COVID-19 treatments for hospitalized patients during the pandemic. METHODS: Multicenter, ecological, time-series study of aggregate data for all adult patients with COVID-19 treated in five acute-care hospitals in Barcelona, Spain, between March 2020 and May 2021. Trends in the monthly prevalence of drugs used against COVID-19 were analyzed by the Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS: The participating hospitals admitted 22,277 patients with COVID-19 during the study period, reporting an overall mortality of 10.8%. In the first months of the pandemic, lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine were the most frequently used antivirals, but these fell into disuse and were replaced by remdesivir in July 2020. By contrast, the trend in tocilizumab use varied, first peaking in April and May 2020, declining until January 2021, and showing a discrete upward trend thereafter. Regarding corticosteroid use, we observed a notable upward trend in the use of dexamethasone 6 mg per day from July 2020. Finally, there was a high prevalence of antibiotics use, especially azithromycin, in the first three months, but this decreased thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 evolved with the changing scientific evidence during the pandemic. Initially, multiple drugs were empirically used that subsequently could not demonstrate clinical benefit. In future pandemics, stakeholders should strive to promote the early implementation of adaptive randomized clinical trials.
ABSTRACT
According to clinical guidelines, the management of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) due to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) includes catheter removal and antibiotic treatment for 5 to 7 days. However, in low-risk episodes, it remains uncertain whether antibiotic therapy is necessary. This randomized clinical trial aims to determine whether the non-administration of antibiotic therapy is as safe and effective as the recommended strategy in low-risk episodes of CRBSI caused by CoNS. With this purpose, a randomized, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted in 14 Spanish hospitals from 1 July 2019 to 31 January 2022. Patients with low-risk CRBSI caused by CoNS were randomized 1:1 after catheter withdrawal to receive/not receive parenteral antibiotics with activity against the isolated strain. The primary endpoint was the presence of any complication related to bacteremia or to antibiotic therapy within 90 days of follow-up. The secondary endpoints were persistent bacteremia, septic embolism, time until microbiological cure, and time until the disappearance of a fever. EudraCT: 2017-003612-39 INF-BACT-2017. A total of 741 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 27 were included in the study; 15 (55.6%) were randomized to the intervention arm (non-antibiotic administration) and 12 (44.4%) to the control arm (antibiotic therapy as per standard practice). The primary endpoint occurred in one of the 15 patients in the intervention group (septic thrombophlebitis) and in no patients in the control group. The median time until microbiological cure was 3 days (IQR 1-3) in the intervention arm and 1.25 days (IQR 0.5-2.62) in the control arm, while the median time until fever resolution was zero days in both arms. The study was stopped due to the insufficient number of recruited patients. These results seem to indicate that low-risk CRBSI caused by CoNS can be managed without antibiotic therapy after catheter removal; efficacy and safety are not affected.
ABSTRACT
Tools for the evaluation of COVID-19 severity would help clinicians with triage decisions, especially the decision whether to admit to ICU. The aim of this study was to evaluate SeptiCyte RAPID, a host immune response assay (Immunexpress, Seattle USA) as a triaging tool for COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization and potentially ICU care. SeptiCyte RAPID employs a host gene expression signature consisting of the ratio of expression levels of two immune related mRNAs, PLA2G7 and PLAC8, measured from whole blood samples. Blood samples from 146 adult SARS-CoV-2 (+) patients were collected within 48 h of hospital admission in PAXgene blood RNA tubes at Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain, between July 28th and December 1st, 2020. Data on demographics, vital signs, clinical chemistry parameters, radiology, interventions, and SeptiCyte RAPID were collected and analyzed with bioinformatics methods. The performance of SeptiCyte RAPID for COVID-19 severity assessment and ICU admission was evaluated, relative to the comparator of retrospective clinical assessment by the Hospital del Mar clinical care team. In conclusion, SeptiCyte RAPID was able to stratify COVID-19 cases according to clinical severity: critical vs. mild (AUC = 0.93, p < 0.0001), critical vs. moderate (AUC = 0.77, p = 0.002), severe vs. mild (AUC = 0.85, p = 0.0003), severe vs. moderate (AUC = 0.63, p = 0.05). This discrimination was significantly better (by AUC or p-value) than could be achieved by CRP, lactate, creatine, IL-6, or D-dimer. Some of the critical or severe cases had "early" blood draws (before ICU admission; n = 33). For these cases, when compared to moderate and mild cases not in ICU (n = 37), SeptiCyte RAPID had AUC = 0.78 (p = 0.00012). In conclusion, SeptiCyte RAPID was able to stratify COVID-19 cases according to clinical severity as defined by the WHO COVID-19 Clinical Management Living Guidance of January 25th, 2021. Measurements taken early (before a patient is considered for ICU admission) suggest that high SeptiScores could aid in predicting the need for later ICU admission.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Triage , Spain , Intensive Care Units , ProteinsABSTRACT
The objective was to compare clinical characteristics, outcomes, and economic differences in complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) caused by extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDR P. aeruginosa) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-K. pneumoniae). A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. Patients with XDR P. aeruginosa and ESBL-K. pneumoniae cUTIs were compared. The primary outcome was clinical failure at day 7 and at the end of treatment (EOT). Secondary outcomes: 30- and 90-day mortality, microbiological eradication, and economic cost. Two-hundred and one episodes were included, of which 24.8% were bloodstream infections. Patients with XDR P. aeruginosa cUTI more frequently received inappropriate empirical therapy (p < 0.001). Nephrotoxicity due to antibiotics was only observed in the XDR P. aeruginosa group (26.7%). ESBL-K. pneumoniae cUTI was associated with worse eradication rates, higher recurrence, and higher infection-related readmission. In multivariate analysis, XDR P. aeruginosa was independently associated with clinical failure on day 7 of treatment (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.71−11.04) but not at EOT, or with mortality. Regarding hospital resource consumption, no significant differences were observed between groups. XDR P. aeruginosa cUTI was associated with worse early clinical cures and more antibiotic side effects than ESBL-K. pneumoniae infections. However, no differences in mortality or in hospitalization costs were observed.
ABSTRACT
El aumento progresivo de las resistencias antibióticas apremia el tener estrategias para disminuir la presión sobre la microbiota. La duración del tratamiento antibiótico empírico es variable, a pesar de las recomendaciones de las guías. Se ha realizado una revisión bibliográfica de la evidencia científica publicada sobre la duración del tratamiento antibiótico empírico en las infecciones intraabdominales quirúrgicas con control de foco efectivo. Se analizan las guías americanas realizadas por Mazuski et al. de 2017 como eje central en las recomendaciones de la duración de tratamiento antibiótico empírico en infecciones intraabdominales con control del foco y se añade una búsqueda bibliográfica de todos los artículos que contuviesen las palabras claves en Pubmed y Google Scholar. Se recopilan 21 artículos referentes en la duración del tratamiento antibiótico empírico en la infección intraabdominal con control del foco. Con las guías americanas y estos artículos se ha elaborado una propuesta de duración del tratamiento antibiótico empírico en pacientes sin factores de riesgo entre 24 y 72 h. Y en los que presentan factores de riesgo se habría de individualizar el mismo con monitorización activa cada 24 h de fiebre, íleo paralítico y leucocitosis, ante una detección precoz de complicaciones o de necesidad de cambios en el espectro antibiótico. Los tratamientos cortos son igual de eficaces que los de duraciones más prolongadas y se asocian a menos tasa de efectos adversos, por tanto, ajustar y revaluar diariamente la duración del tratamiento antibiótico empírico es fundamental para una mejor praxis (AU)
A non-systematic review of the published scientific evidence has been carried out on the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment in surgical intra-abdominal infections with effective focus control. Given the progressive increase in antibiotic resistance, it is urgent to have strategies to reduce the pressure on the microbiota. The American guidelines made by Mazuski et al. of 2017, as the central axis in the recommendations of the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment in intra-abdominal infections with control of the focus and a bibliographic search of all the articles that contained the keywords in Pubmed and Google Scholar is added. 21 articles referring to the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment in intra-abdominal infection with control of the focus are collected. With the American guidelines and these articles, a proposal is prepared for the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment in patients without risk factors between 24 and 72h. And in those who present risk factors, it should be individualized with active monitoring every 24h of fever, paralytic ileus and leukocytosis, before an early detection of complications or the need for changes in antibiotic treatment. Short treatments are just as effective as those of longer durations and are associated with fewer adverse effects, therefore, daily adjusting and reassessing the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment is essential for better practice (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Digestive System Diseases/surgery , Digestive System Diseases/classification , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosageABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic allergy labels (AAL) are related to worse therapeutic results. Strategies to improve the management of these patients, such as the implementation of antibiotic desensitization, are essential for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP). The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibiotic desensitization procedures for the management of patients with AAL. METHODS: A retrospective study from 2015 to 2022 was performed to describe all antibiotic desensitization conducted in our institution, within the framework of ASP. A systematic literature review using electronic databases, such as PubMed, was also done to identify studies describing antibiotic desensitization between 2000 and 2022. RESULTS: Sixteen antibiotic desensitization protocols were carried out in our institution. In fourteen cases, the desensitization was successfully completed, and the antibiotic could be used to treat the infection. In the systematic review, twenty-two studies were included, with a total of 202 desensitization episodes . In 97% of them, the desensitization was completed successfully. No desensitization-related mortality was observed neither in our cohort nor in literature review. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic desensitization strategies should be considered a safe and effective tool that can be included in ASP for patients with a high risk of or confirmed allergy to penicillin.
Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Drug Hypersensitivity , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Data Analysis , Penicillins/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) is the most common infectious cause of hospital admission in adults, and poses a significant clinical and economic burden. At the same time, antimicrobial resistance is increasing worldwide with only a few new antibiotics developed in recent years. Delafloxacin is an anionic fluoroquinolone available in intravenous and oral formulations and with a broad spectrum of activity targeting Gram-positives, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), gram-negative organisms, and atypical and anaerobic organisms. It also has a better adverse event profile compared to other fluoroquinolones. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the current epidemiology of CABP, etiologic agents and current resistance rates, current treatment guidelines, characteristics of delafloxacin (chemistry, microbiology, PK/PD), clinical efficacy and safety in pneumonia and other indications, and regulatory affairs. EXPERT OPINION: Delafloxacin's susceptibility profile against respiratory pathogens, bioequivalent intravenous and oral formulations and favorable safety profile, support its use for the treatment of CABP. It could be useful as empirical treatment in countries with high rates of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae and in patients with suspected or documented pneumonia due to MRSA. In post-influenza staphylococcal bacterial pneumonia, MRSA could be also considered an important pathogen.
Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Pneumonia, Bacterial , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Fluoroquinolones/adverse effects , Humans , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapyABSTRACT
Background: CD4/CD8 ratio has been used as a quantitative prognostic risk factor in patients with viral infections. This study aims to assess the association between in-hospital mortality and at admission CD4/CD8 ratio among individuals with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This is a longitudinal cohort study with data of all consecutive patients admitted to the COVID-19 unit at Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain for ≥48 h between March to May 2020. The CD4+ CD8+ T-cell subset differentiation was assessed by flow cytometry at admission as well as a complete blood test. Patients were classified according to CD4/CD8 ratio tertiles. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was acute respiratory distress (ARDS). Results: A total of 338 patients were included in the cohort. A high CD4/CD8 ratio (third tertile) was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality [adjusted Cox model hazard ratio (HR) 4.68 (95%CI 1.56-14.04, p = 0.006), reference: second tertile HR 1]. Similarly, a high CD4/CD8 ratio (third tertile) was associated with a higher incidence of ARDS [adjusted logistic regression model OR 1.97 (95%CI 1.11-3.55, p = 0.022) reference: second tertile HR 1]. There was a trend of higher in-hospital mortality and incidence of ARDS in patients within the first tertile of CD4/CD8 ratio compared with the second one, but the difference was not significant. No associations were found with total lymphocyte count or inflammatory parameters, including D-dimer. Conclusion: CD4/CD8 ratio is a prognostic factor for the severity of COVID-19, reflecting the negative impact on prognosis of those individuals whose immune response has abnormal CD8+ T-cell expansion during the early response to the infection.
ABSTRACT
A non-systematic review of the published scientific evidence has been carried out on the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment in surgical intra-abdominal infections (IIA) with effective focus control. Given the progressive increase in antibiotic resistance, it is urgent to have strategies to reduce the pressure on the microbiota. The American guidelines made by Mazuski et al. of 20171, as the central axis in the recommendations of the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment in intra-abdominal infections with control of the focus and a bibliographic search of all the articles that contained the keywords in Pubmed and Google Scholar is added. 21 articles referring to the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment in intra-abdominal infection with control of the focus are collected. With the American guidelines and these articles, a proposal is prepared for the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment in patients without risk factors between 24 and 72 h. And in those who present risk factors, it should be individualized with active monitoring every 24 h of fever, paralytic ileus and leukocytosis (FIL), before an early detection of complications or the need for changes in antibiotic treatment. Short treatments are just as effective as those of longer durations and are associated with fewer adverse effects, therefore, daily adjusting and reassessing the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment is essential for better practice.
Subject(s)
Intraabdominal Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Intraabdominal Infections/drug therapy , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To compare clinical characteristics, outcomes, and resource consumption of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and seasonal influenza requiring supplemental oxygen. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary-care hospital. Patients admitted because of seasonal influenza between 2017 and 2019, or with COVID-19 between March and May 2020 requiring supplemental oxygen were compared. Primary outcome: 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes: 90-day mortality and hospitalization costs. Attempted sample size to detect an 11% difference in mortality was 187 patients per group. RESULTS: COVID-19 cases were younger (median years of age, 67; interquartile range [IQR] 54-78 vs 76 [IQR 64-83]; P < .001) and more frequently overweight, whereas influenza cases had more hypertension, immunosuppression, and chronic heart, respiratory, and renal disease. Compared with influenza, COVID-19 cases had more pneumonia (98% vs 60%, <.001), higher Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and CURB-65 (confusion, blood urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, and age >65 years) scores and were more likely to show worse progression on the World Health Organization ordinal scale (33% vs 4%; P < .001). The 30-day mortality rate was higher for COVID-19 than for influenza: 15% vs 5% (P = .001). The median age of nonsurviving cases was 81 (IQR 74-88) and 77.5 (IQR 65-84) (P = .385), respectively. COVID-19 was independently associated with 30-day (hazard ratio [HR], 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2-10.4) and 90-day (HR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.4-11.4) mortality. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses, including a subgroup considering only patients with pneumonia, did not show different trends. Regarding resource consumption, COVID-19 patients had longer hospital stays and higher critical care, pharmacy, and complementary test costs. CONCLUSIONS: Although influenza patients were older and had more comorbidities, COVID-19 cases requiring supplemental oxygen on admission had worse clinical and economic outcomes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza, Human , Humans , Aged , Cohort Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Hospitalization , Oxygen , Hospital MortalityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Successful clinical trials are subject to recruitment. Recently, the REJUVENATE trial, a prospective phase 2a open-label, single-arm interventional clinical trial conducted within the Innovative Medicines Initiative-supported Combatting Bacterial Resistance in Europe-Carbapenem Resistance project, was published, with 85% of the recruitment performed in Spain. We analysed the recruitment success in this trial by establishing a model of recruitment practice. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study was performed from May 2016 to October 2017 at 10 participating Spanish centres. Data were extracted from: (1) feasibility questionnaires to assess the centre's potential for patient enrolment; (2) delegation of responsibility records; (3) pre-screening records including an anonymised list of potentially eligible and (4) screening and enrolment records. A descriptive analysis of the features was performed by the participating centre. Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to determine factors of recruitment success. RESULTS: The highest recruitment rate was observed in Hospitals 3 and 6 (58.8 and 47.0 patients per month, respectively). All the study teams were multidisciplinary with a median of 15 members (range: 7-22). Only Hospitals 3, 5 and 6 had dedicated nursing staff appointed exclusively to this study. Moreover, in those three hospitals and in Hospital 9, the study coordinator performed exclusive functions as a research planner, and did not assume these functions for the other hospitals. The univariate analysis showed a significant association between recruitment success and months of recruitment (p=0.024), number of staff (p<0.001), higher number of pharmacists (p=0.005), infectious disease specialists (p<0.001), the presence of microbiologist in the research team (p=0.018) and specifically dedicated nursing staff (p=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The existence of broad multidisciplinary teams with staff dedicated exclusively to the study as well as the implementation of a well-designed local patient assessment strategy were the essential optimisation factors for recruitment success in Spain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02655419; EudraCT 2015-002726-39; analysis of pre-screened patients.
Subject(s)
Aztreonam , Azabicyclo Compounds , Humans , Prospective Studies , Spain , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infections are difficult to treat. We aimed to compare aminoglycosides or polymyxin monotherapy versus other antibiotic regimens (carbapenems, aztreonam, ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane-tazobactam, or ceftazidime-avibactam) in complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) caused by XDR-PA. METHODS: Study performed at a tertiary-care hospital from 2010 to 2019. All consecutive adult patients with XDR-PA urine cultures and diagnosed with cUTI were retrospectively reviewed. XDR phenotype was defined according to Magiorakos et al. A propensity score was used as a covariate in multivariate analyses and for matching. Primary outcome was early clinical failure and at end of treatment (EOT). Main secondary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality, microbiological clearance, and antibiotic-related side effects. RESULTS: Of the 465 episodes screened, 101 were included, 48% were treated with aminoglycoside or colistin monotherapy. Most XDR-PA were susceptible to colistin (100%) and amikacin (43%). Patients treated with antibiotic regimens other than aminoglycosides or polymyxin monotherapy were more likely to have hematologic malignancy (p < 0.001), higher SOFA score (p = 0.048), and bacteremia (p = 0.003). In multivariate models adjusted by propensity score, aminoglycoside or colistin monotherapy was not associated with worse outcomes. After propensity score matching, 28 episodes in each treatment group were matched. Adjusted ORs (95% CI) for early clinical failure and at EOT with aminoglycosides or polymyxin monotherapy were 0.53 (0.18-1.58) and 1.29 (0.34-4.83), respectively. Aminoglycoside or colistin monotherapy was not associated with higher 30-day (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.17-5.08) or 90-day mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.20-2.31), nor with absence of microbiological clearance (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.33-1.58). No statistically significant differences were found in terms of nephrotoxicity. Clostridioides difficile infection was observed only in the "other antibiotic regimens" group (n = 6, 11.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Aminoglycosides or polymyxin monotherapy showed good efficacy and safety profile in treating cUTI caused by XDR-PA. These results may be useful for antibiotic stewardship activities.