Risk of New-Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation After Transient Ischemic Attack.

Background: Transient ischemic attack (TIA) provides a unique opportunity to optimize secondary preventive treatments to avoid subsequent ischemic stroke (SIS). Although atrial fibrillation (AF) is the leading cause of cardioembolism in IS and anticoagulation prevents stroke recurrence (SR), limited data exists about the risk of new-diagnosed AF (NDAF) after TIA and the consequences of the diagnostic delay. The aim of our study was to determine this risk in a cohort of TIA patients with long-term follow-up. Methods: We carried out a prospective cohort study of 723 consecutive TIA patients from January 2006 to June 2010. Median follow-up was 6.5 (5.0-9.6) years. In a subgroup of 204 (28.2%) consecutive patients, a panel of biomarkers was assessed during the first 24 h of the onset of symptoms. Multivariate analyses were performed to find out the associated factors of NDAF. Kaplan-Meier analysis was also performed to analyzed risk of SIS. Results: NDAF was indentified in 116 (16.0%) patients: 42 (36.2%) during admission, 18 (15.5%) within first year, 29 (25%) between one and five years and 27 (23.3%) beyond 5 years. NDAF was associated with sex (female) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.61 (95% CI, 1.07- 2.41)], age [[HR 1.05 (95% CI, 1.03-1.07)], previous ischemic heart disease (IHD) [HR 1.84, (95% CI 1.15-2.97)] and cortical DWI pattern [HR 2.81 (95% CI, 1.87-4.21)]. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, NT-proBNP ≥ 218.2 pg/ml (log-rank test P < 0.001) was associated with significant risk of NDAF during the first 5 years of follow-up. Patients with NDAF after admission and before 5 years of follow-up had the highest risk of SIS (P = 0.002). Conclusion: The risk of NDAF after TIA is clinically relevant. We identified clinical and neuroimaging factors of NDAF. In addition, NT-proBNP was related to NDAF. Our results can be used to evaluate the benefit of long-term cardiac monitoring in selected patients.

Sex-Related Differences in Clinical Features, Neuroimaging, and Long-Term Prognosis After Transient Ischemic Attack.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Differences in sex in the incidence, presentation, and outcome of events after ischemic stroke have been studied in depth. In contrast, only limited data are available after transient ischemic attack (TIA). We aim to assess sex-related differences in the presentation, cause, neuroimaging features, and predictors of long-term prognosis in patients with TIA. METHODS: We carried out a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with TIA from January 2006 to June 2010. Nondefinitive TIA events were defined by the presence of isolated atypical symptoms. The risk of stroke recurrence (SR) and composite of major vascular events were stratified by sex after a median follow-up time of 6.5 (interquartile range, 5.0-9.6) years. RESULTS: Among the 723 patients studied, 302 (41.8%) were female and 79 (10.9%) suffered a nondefinitive TIA event. Vascular territory diffusion-weighted imaging patterns (odds ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 0.94-2.77]), and nondefinitive TIA events (odds ratio, 2.66 [95% CI, 1.55-4.59]) were associated with women, whereas active smoking (odds ratio, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.15-0.58]) and large artery atherosclerosis causes (odds ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.29-0.83]) were related to men. The risk of SR was similar in both sexes (12.6% [95% CI, 8.9-16.3] for women versus 14.3% [95% CI, 11.0-17.6] for men). In contrast, the risk of major vascular events was significantly lower in women than in men (17.5% [95% CI, 13.2-21.8] versus 23.8% [95% CI, 19.7-27.9]). In both sexes, after adjusting for age, large artery atherosclerosis was associated with SR (hazard ratio, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.42-7.24] and hazard ratio, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.14-3.51]). In a Kaplan-Meier analysis, females with positive diffusion-weighted imaging (P=0.014) and definitive TIA (log-rank test P=0.022) had a significantly higher risk of SR. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar risks of SR, there were sex-related differences in baseline characteristics, presenting symptoms, patterns of acute ischemic lesions, cause, and outcomes. These findings encourage further research into optimal preventive strategies that take into account these differences.

Risk-benefit assessment of treatment of epileptic women of childbearing age with valproic acid.

AIM: Valproic acid (VPA) is a widely used anti-epileptic drug (AED) of demonstrated efficacy. However, its teratogenic effects have resulted in many regulatory agencies recommending that it should not be administered to women of childbearing age unless they are taking contraceptives. The aim of this study was to determine the willingness of candidate patients to change their treatment and to monitor the evolution of their attitude. METHODS: We identified patients aged between 15 and 45 years old who had been diagnosed with epilepsy and were being treated with VPA. A shared decision-making visit was arranged, during which variables related to their epilepsy were recorded. The patients were informed about the teratogenic effects of VPA and the risks/benefits of a change in treatment. The patient, or legal guardian, then freely chose the course of treatment that they wished to follow. On a follow-up visit, six months later, seizure control and tolerance to the chosen treatment were recorded. The variables related to each patient's willingness to their change treatment were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients, with a median age of 32.7 years, were included in the study. Of these, 25 (41.7%) suffered some form of intellectual disability. Only one (1.7%) had poor seizure control. After the initial visit, 41 patients (68%) opted to continue with the VPA treatment, six opted to stop receiving VPA, and 13 decided to switch to another AED. The median age of the patients who opted to change treatment was significantly lower than that of those who opted to continue with the VPA treatment (29.1 vs. 34.4, p = 0.024). The absence of intellectual disability (p = 0.047) and a length of treatment of less than five years (0.016) were both significantly associated with the decision to change treatment. Of the 19 patients who changed treatment, nine (47%) returned to the initial treatment with VPA. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being informed of the teratogenic risk associated with VPA, a significant number of patients and legal guardians opted to continue with this treatment; the reasons given for this were the low possibility of pregnancy and the risk of breakthrough seizures. In almost half the cases studied, the pharmacological alternatives to VPA were poorly tolerated and did not provide a good level of seizure control.