ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The rise of antimicrobial resistance represents a critical threat to global health, exacerbated by the excessive and inappropriate dispensing and use of antimicrobial drugs, notably antibiotics, which specifically target bacterial infections. The surge in antibiotic consumption globally is particularly concerning in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), where informal healthcare providers (IPs) play a vital role in the healthcare landscape. Often the initial point of contact for healthcare-seeking individuals, IPs play a crucial role in delivering primary care services in these regions. Despite the prevalent dispensing of antibiotics by IPs in many LMICs, as highlighted by existing research, there remains a gap in the comprehensive synthesis of antibiotic dispensing practices and the influencing factors among IPs. Hence, this scoping review seeks to map and consolidate the literature regarding antibiotic dispensing and its drivers among IPs in LMICs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guideline for scoping review. A comprehensive search across nine electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Global Health, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS, AJOL and IMSEAR) will be performed, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists of eligible publications. The search strategy will impose no constraints on study design, methodology, publication date or language. The study selection process will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. The findings on antibiotic dispensing and its patterns will be synthesised and reported descriptively using tables, visuals and a narrative summary. Additionally, factors influencing antibiotic dispensing will be elucidated through both inductive and deductive content analysis methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for scoping reviews. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at relevant conferences.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Developing Countries , Health Personnel , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Research Design , Review Literature as TopicABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The diagnostic yield and clinical impact of image-guided core needle biopsy (ICNB) of suspected vertebral osteomyelitis in adults is heterogenous in published studies owing to small sample sizes, indicating the need for large cohort studies. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ICNBs was performed from 2010 to 2021 for patients with imaging findings consistent with vertebral osteomyelitis. For each biopsy, a series of factors were analyzed, as well as if histopathology was diagnostic of osteomyelitis and if microbiological cultures were positive. In addition, it was recorded in what way biopsy influenced clinical management regarding antimicrobial treatment. A multivariate statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the factors associated with yield. RESULTS: A total of 570 biopsies performed on 527 patients were included. A histopathologic diagnosis of osteomyelitis was made in 68.4% (359 of 525) of biopsies, and microbiological cultures were positive in 29.6% (169 of 570). Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate was positively associated with a histopathologic diagnosis of osteomyelitis (odds ratio [OR] =1.96, P = 0.007) and positive cultures from bone cores (OR = 1.02, P ≤0.001) and aspirate (OR = 1.02, P ≤0.001). Increased total core length was positively associated with a histopathologic diagnosis of osteomyelitis (OR = 1.81, P = 0.013) and positive cultures from bone cores (OR = 1.65, P = 0.049). Clinical management was affected by ICNB in 37.5% (214 of 570) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort, ICNB yielded approximately 30% positive cultures and changed clinical management in over one-third of the patients.
Subject(s)
Image-Guided Biopsy , Osteomyelitis , Humans , Osteomyelitis/diagnosis , Osteomyelitis/microbiology , Osteomyelitis/pathology , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Male , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Female , Middle Aged , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/methods , Aged , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Spine/pathology , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Spine/microbiology , Spinal Diseases/diagnosis , Spinal Diseases/microbiology , Spinal Diseases/pathology , Spinal Diseases/drug therapyABSTRACT
The WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (EML) prioritizes medicines that have significant global public health value. The EML can also deliver important messages on appropriate medicine use. Since 2017, in response to the growing challenge of antimicrobial resistance, antibiotics on the EML have been reviewed and categorized into three groups: Access, Watch, and Reserve, leading to a new categorization called AWaRe. These categories were developed taking into account the impact of different antibiotics and classes on antimicrobial resistance and the implications for their appropriate use. The 2023 AWaRe classification provides empirical guidance on 41 essential antibiotics for over 30 clinical infections targeting both the primary health care and hospital facility setting. A further 257 antibiotics not included on the EML have been allocated an AWaRe group for stewardship and monitoring purposes. This article describes the development of AWaRe, focussing on the clinical evidence base that guided the selection of Access, Watch, or Reserve antibiotics as first and second choices for each infection. The overarching objective was to offer a tool for optimizing the quality of global antibiotic prescribing and reduce inappropriate use by encouraging the use of Access antibiotics (or no antibiotics) where appropriate. This clinical evidence evaluation and subsequent EML recommendations are the basis for the AWaRe antibiotic book and related smartphone applications. By providing guidance on antibiotic prioritization, AWaRe aims to facilitate the revision of national lists of essential medicines, update national prescribing guidelines, and supervise antibiotic use. Adherence to AWaRe would extend the effectiveness of current antibiotics while helping countries expand access to these life-saving medicines for the benefit of current and future patients, health professionals, and the environment.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Drugs, Essential , World Health Organization , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drugs, Essential/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Practice Guidelines as TopicSubject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cross Infection , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Hospitals , Health Services Research , India/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is a growing public health concern. There is a global need to estimate the population-level value of developing new antimicrobials and to ensure the effective use of existing antimicrobials as strategies to counteract antimicrobial resistance. To this aim, population-level value criteria need to be considered alongside conventional value measures. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a novel modelling approach to estimate the value of new antimicrobials, considering the transmission, diversity and enablement elements of STEDI value. METHODS: We developed a population-based mathematical model for the assessment of antimicrobial value considering both prophylactic use of antimicrobials and the treatment of selected serious hospital-acquired infections in hospitals in the USA at a population level. Large-scale clinical and population healthcare data were used to inform a modelling-based analysis assessing the impact of introducing a new antimicrobial compared with continuing with no new antimicrobial, accounting for the transmission, diversity and enablement value of antimicrobial agents. RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, the addition of a new antimicrobial as part of an antimicrobial stewardship strategy in the USA was estimated to result in a proportional reduction of 9.03% in projected antimicrobial resistance levels. This yielded an estimated reduction of $64.3 million in hospitalization costs and a gain of over 153,000 quality-adjusted life-years at an economic value of over $15.4 billion over 10 years. Considering input uncertainty, the estimate of monetary benefit ranged from $11.1 to $21.4 billion. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a new antimicrobial for treatment and prophylactic indications yields considerable clinical and economic benefits including transmission diversity and enablement value. These findings may provide decision makers with important evidence to support investment in new antimicrobials and antimicrobial stewardship policy that address the patient, population and system burden associated with antimicrobial resistance.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Cross Infection , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, MicrobialABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Studies evaluating the incidence, source, and preventability of hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia (HOB), defined as any positive blood culture obtained after 3 calendar days of hospital admission, are lacking in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All consecutive blood cultures performed for 6 months during 2020-2021 in 2 hospitals in India were reviewed to assess HOB and National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) reportable central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) events. Medical records of a convenience sample of 300 consecutive HOB events were retrospectively reviewed to determine source and preventability. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with HOB preventability. RESULTS: Among 6,733 blood cultures obtained from 3,558 hospitalized patients, there were 409 and 59 unique HOB and NHSN-reportable CLABSI events, respectively. CLABSIs accounted for 59 (14%) of 409 HOB events. There was a moderate but non-significant correlation (r = 0.51; P = .070) between HOB and CLABSI rates. Among 300 reviewed HOB cases, CLABSIs were identified as source in only 38 (13%). Although 157 (52%) of all 300 HOB cases were potentially preventable, CLABSIs accounted for only 22 (14%) of these 157 preventable HOB events. In multivariable analysis, neutropenia, and sepsis as an indication for blood culture were associated with decreased odds of HOB preventability, whereas hospital stay ≥7 days and presence of a urinary catheter were associated with increased likelihood of preventability. CONCLUSIONS: HOB may have utility as a healthcare-associated infection metric in LMIC settings because it captures preventable bloodstream infections beyond NHSN-reportable CLABSIs.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Cross Infection , Fungemia , Sepsis , Humans , Fungemia/epidemiology , Fungemia/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospitals , Sepsis/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Rapid and accurate quantification of low-abundance protein biomarkers in biofluids can transform the diagnosis of a range of pathologies, including infectious diseases. Here, we harness ultrabright plasmonic fluors as "digital nanolabels" and demonstrate the detection and quantification of subfemtomolar concentrations of human IL-6 and SARS-CoV-2 alpha and variant proteins in clinical nasopharyngeal swab and saliva samples from COVID-19 patients. The resulting digital plasmonic fluor-linked immunosorbent assay (digital p-FLISA) enables detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein, both in solution and in live virions. Digital p-FLISA outperforms the "gold standard" enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), having a nearly 7000-fold lower limit-of-detection, and outperforms a commercial antigen test, having over 5000-fold improvement in analytical sensitivity. Detection and quantification of very low concentrations of target proteins holds potential for early detection of pathological conditions, treatment monitoring, and personalized medicine.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , COVID-19/diagnosis , Fluoroimmunoassay , SARS-CoV-2 , Biomarkers , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic overuse is a pressing global health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where there is limited access to quality healthcare and insufficient regulation of antibiotic dispensation. This perspective piece highlights the challenges of antibiotic overuse in LMICs and provides insights into potential solutions to address this issue. AREAS COVERED: This perspective explores key factors contributing to antibiotic overuse in LMICs, encompassing weak healthcare infrastructure, limited access to quality services, and deficiencies in diagnostic capabilities. It discusses regulatory frameworks to curb non-prescription sales, the role of accessible point-of-care diagnostic tools, challenges in implementing effective stewardship programs, the expanded use of vaccines, and the importance of health systems, hygiene, and sanitation. EXPERT OPINION: In this article, we emphasize the need for a comprehensive approach involving collaboration among healthcare professionals, policymakers, researchers, and educators. We underscore the importance of improving healthcare infrastructure, enhancing access to quality services, and strengthening diagnostic capabilities. The article also highlights the significance of education and awareness in promoting responsible antibiotic use, the role of regulatory measures, the expanded utilization of vaccines, and the need for international collaboration to address the challenges of antibiotic overuse in LMICs.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Vaccines , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Developing Countries , Health Personnel , Quality of Health CareABSTRACT
In this retrospective cohort from 3 Missouri hospitals from January 2017 to August 2020, hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infections were more common during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic at the tertiary care hospital. Risk factors associated with hospital-onset C difficile infection included the year of hospitalization, age, high-risk antibiotic use, acid-reducing medications, chronic comorbidities, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a looming pandemic, demanding prompt actions to avert catastrophic consequences. Effluents from pharmaceutical industries containing antimicrobial residues could serve as one of the entry points of these drugs to the environment. This qualitative study explores the treatment and disposal practices of pharmaceutical effluent (PE) containing potential antibiotic residues (ARs) by interviewing major stakeholders. In addition, we assessed their knowledge and perception on contribution of PE to AMR. METHODS: The study was conducted in the two Indian states, Haryana and Telangana and at the federal level. Data was collected by semi-structured in-depth interviews of 29 participants from 17 stakeholders/organizations viz. Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) of Telangana and Haryana, civic body, pharmaceutical manufacturers, pharmaceutical associations and civil society. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The effluent treatment and disposal practices varied with the multinational companies (MNCs) having advanced technologies whereas the small and medium-scale pharmaceutical companies (SMPCs) having effluent treatment plants as per the regulations but often under-utilized. The presence of ARs in the PE was considered inconsequential by SPCBs and SMPCs and majority of stakeholders imputed other causes as major contributors to AMR. However, the MNCs were well aware of the contribution of PE to AMR and CPCB also considered ARs as direct source of AMR. The central regulators as well as MNCs expressed concerns regarding the current regulations lacking maximum ARs in the PE. CONCLUSION: Setting up regulatory standards for maximum ARs in PE, their implementation and monitoring is an urgent need to curb environmental contribution of ARs to AMR. The findings of our study will help in systematic approach in policy making, awareness programs and capacity-building in dealing with the ARs in PE to combat AMR.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Examining the existing federal and state policies in place that could strengthen antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities in district and sub-district hospitals in India. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with national and state level policy makers and various stakeholders at a district hospital. For national level, officials from the National Health Systems Resource Centre (NHSRC) were approached. The state of Haryana was selected and officials from Haryana State Health Systems Resource Centre (HSHRC), a state-level counterpart of the NHSRC, along with officials from the Health Department and relevant stakeholders from one of the district hospitals of the Haryana state were selected as participants. The recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was done. RESULTS: Several measurable elements within the existing policies such as National Quality Assurance Program (NQAP) and Kayakalp program, could be leveraged to strengthen AMS activities in district and sub-district hospitals, were identified. These cover aspects such as infection control, standard treatment guidelines (STGs), prescription auditing, essential medicine list (EML), availability of antimicrobials and incentives for meeting quality standards. Revising the EML based on WHO AWaRe classification, incorporating the STGs for common clinical infections from the WHO AWaRe antibiotic book and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), program mandated requirements for dedicated staff/standards for AMS activities and antimicrobial-specific prescription audits as per WHO AMS tool-kit and ICMR AMS guidelines are identified as opportunities for strengthening AMS activities. Further, hindrances in executing existing policies were also identified such as shortage of human resources, reluctance to follow STGs, and limited availability of diagnostic microbiology laboratory services. CONCLUSION: Implementing NQAS and Kayakalp program in public healthcare facilities are identified as existing well working key programs that aid in improving AMS activities with incorporation of WHO and ICMR recommended practices.
Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Biomedical Research , Humans , India , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Delivery of Health CareABSTRACT
Studies comparing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnostic microbiology culture yields and antimicrobial resistance proportions in low-to-middle-income and high-income countries are lacking. A retrospective study using blood, respiratory, and urine microbiology data from a community hospital in India and two community hospitals (Hospitals A and B) in St. Louis, MO, USA was performed. We compared the proportion of cultures positive for selected multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) listed on the WHO's priority pathogen list both before the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2017-December 2019) and early in the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020-October 2020). The proportion of blood cultures contaminated with coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CONS) was significantly higher during the pandemic in all three hospitals. In the Indian hospital, the proportion of carbapenem-resistant (CR) Klebsiella pneumoniae in respiratory cultures was significantly higher during the pandemic period, as was the proportion of CR Escherichia coli in urine cultures. In the US hospitals, the proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in blood cultures was significantly higher during the pandemic period in Hospital A, while no significant increase in the proportion of Gram-negative MDROs was observed. Continuity of antimicrobial stewardship activities and better infection prevention measures are critical to optimize outcomes and minimize the burden of antimicrobial resistance among COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
Lateral-flow assays (LFAs) are rapid and inexpensive, yet they are nearly 1,000-fold less sensitive than laboratory-based tests. Here we show that plasmonically active antibody-conjugated fluorescent gold nanorods can make conventional LFAs ultrasensitive. With sample-to-answer times within 20 min, plasmonically enhanced LFAs read out via a standard benchtop fluorescence scanner attained about 30-fold improvements in dynamic range and in detection limits over 4-h-long gold-standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and achieved 95% clinical sensitivity and 100% specificity for antibodies in plasma and for antigens in nasopharyngeal swabs from individuals with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Comparable improvements in the assay's performance can also be achieved via an inexpensive portable scanner, as we show for the detection of interleukin-6 in human serum samples and of the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal samples. Plasmonically enhanced LFAs outperform standard laboratory tests in sensitivity, speed, dynamic range, ease of use and cost, and may provide advantages in point-of-care diagnostics.
Subject(s)
Immunoconjugates , Nanoparticles , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Antibodies , Point-of-Care TestingABSTRACT
Objective: To use interrupted time-series analyses to investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). We hypothesized that the pandemic would be associated with higher rates of HAIs after adjustment for confounders. Design: We conducted a cross-sectional study of HAIs in 3 hospitals in Missouri from January 1, 2017, through August 31, 2020, using interrupted time-series analysis with 2 counterfactual scenarios. Setting: The study was conducted at 1 large quaternary-care referral hospital and 2 community hospitals. Participants: All adults ≥18 years of age hospitalized at a study hospital for ≥48 hours were included in the study. Results: In total, 254,792 admissions for ≥48 hours occurred during the study period. The average age of these patients was 57.6 (±19.0) years, and 141,107 (55.6%) were female. At hospital 1, 78 CLABSIs, 33 CAUTIs, and 88 VAEs were documented during the pandemic period. Hospital 2 had 13 CLABSIs, 6 CAUTIs, and 17 VAEs. Hospital 3 recorded 11 CLABSIs, 8 CAUTIs, and 11 VAEs. Point estimates for hypothetical excess HAIs suggested an increase in all infection types across facilities, except for CLABSIs and CAUTIs at hospital 1 under the "no pandemic" scenario. Conclusions: The COVID-19 era was associated with increases in CLABSIs, CAUTIs, and VAEs at 3 hospitals in Missouri, with variations in significance by hospital and infection type. Continued vigilance in maintaining optimal infection prevention practices to minimize HAIs is warranted.
ABSTRACT
Background: Antimicrobial resistance is an urgent global healthcare concern. Beyond carbapenems as broad-spectrum, often 'last resort' antibiotics, oral penem antibiotics currently are approved only in Japan and India, used for the treatment of indications including urinary tract infections (UTIs). Exploring oral penem use to better understand the impact of antibiotic resistance on public health would help inform the management of infectious diseases, including UTIs. Scoping Review Methodology: This scoping review investigated the impact of faropenem and other oral penems on Enterobacterales infection treatment and evaluated evidence for faropenem resistance and cross-resistance to carbapenems. PubMed, Embase, J-STAGE and CiNii were searched for relevant English- or Japanese-language articles published between 1 January 1996 and 6 August 2021. Key Findings: From 705 unique publications, 29 eligible articles were included (16 in vitro studies; 10 clinical trials; 2 in vitro and in vivo studies; and 1 retrospective medical chart review). Limited evidence described faropenem to treat infectious disease; only four randomized clinical trials were identified. Faropenem dosing regimens varied broadly within and between indications. One study indicated potential dependence of penem efficacy on underlying antibiotic resistance mechanisms, while several studies reported UTI persistence or recurrence after faropenem treatment. In vitro MIC data suggested some potential bacterial resistance to faropenem, while limited clinical data showed resistance emergence after faropenem treatment. Preliminary in vitro evidence suggested faropenem resistance might foster cross-resistance to carbapenems. Overall, very limited clinical evidence describes faropenem for treating infectious diseases. Preclinical and clinical research investment and dedicated community surveillance monitoring is crucial for understanding faropenem treatment patterns, resistance and potential cross-resistance to carbapenems.
ABSTRACT
In this prospective, longitudinal study, we examined the risk factors for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among a cohort of chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients and healthcare personnel (HCPs) over a 6-month period. The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HD patients and HCPs was consistently associated with a household member having SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Policy , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , World Health Organization , Books , AwarenessABSTRACT
Objective: Patients on dialysis are at high risk for severe COVID-19 and associated morbidity and mortality. We examined the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in a maintenance dialysis population. Design: Single-center cohort study. Setting and participants: Adult maintenance dialysis patients at 3 outpatient dialysis units of a large academic center. Methods: Participants were vaccinated with 2 doses of BNT162b2, 3 weeks apart. We assessed anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (anti-S) â¼4-7 weeks after the second dose and evaluated risk factors associated with insufficient response. Definitions of antibody response are as follows: nonresponse (anti-S level, <50 AU/mL), low response (anti-S level, 50-839 AU/mL), and sufficient response (anti-S level, ≥840 AU/mL). Results: Among the 173 participants who received 2 vaccine doses, the median age was 60 years (range, 28-88), 53.2% were men, 85% were of Black race, 86% were on in-center hemodialysis and 14% were on peritoneal dialysis. Also, 7 participants (4%) had no response, 27 (15.6%) had a low response, and 139 (80.3%) had a sufficient antibody response. In multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with insufficient antibody response included end-stage renal disease comorbidity index score ≥5 and absence of prior hepatitis B vaccination response. Conclusions: Although most of our study participants seroconverted after 2 doses of BNT162b2, 20% of our cohort did not achieve sufficient humoral response. Our findings demonstrate the urgent need for a more effective vaccine strategy in this high-risk patient population and highlight the importance of ongoing preventative measures until protective immunity is achieved.