ABSTRACT
Usually, if percutaneous absorption tests are conducted in accordance with OECD Guideline 428, in vitro determination is accepted by mainly regulatory agencies. In this paper, we focus on the lack of comparability of the results regarding the permeation parameter/flow rate, although it is widely discussed in the literature. This work sought to evaluate the absorption of caffeine using Franz-type diffusion cell with porcine ear skin samples, varying the storage duration and the way to handle them. Metrological tools were used for caffeine quantification such as certified reference material candidate, calibrated instruments, and validated methodology. Our results corroborate with the recommendation that membranes should be freshly prepared or frozen for short periods. Samples frozen for approximately one year should not be used because they present high cutaneous absorption. The results obtained for the absorption rate (J) are comparable to the results obtained by previous studies using similar experimental conditions. The evidence of the barrier characteristic promoted by the stratum corneum and the effect promoted by the storage time is shown through J = 6.25 ± 0.48 µg/cm2/h. We demonstrated the importance of metrological tools to guarantee reproducibility and comparability of the results between different laboratories.
Subject(s)
Caffeine , Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development , Animals , Epidermis/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results , Skin/metabolism , Skin Absorption , SwineABSTRACT
The progressively increasing use of nanomaterials (NMs) has awakened issues related to nanosafety and its potential toxic effects on human health. Emerging studies suggest that NMs alter cell communication by reshaping and altering the secretion of extracellular vesicles (EVs), leading to dysfunction in recipient cells. However, there is limited understanding of how the physicochemical characteristics of NMs alter the EV content and their consequent physiological functions. Therefore, this review explored the relevance of EVs in the nanotoxicology field. The current state of the art on how EVs are modulated by NM exposure and the possible regulation and modulation of signaling pathways and physiological responses were assessed in detail. This review followed the manual for reviewers produced by The Joanna Brigs Institute for Scoping Reviews and the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. The research question, "Do NMs modulate cellular responses mediated by EVs?" was analyzed following the PECO model (P (Population) = EVs, E (Exposure) = NMs, C (Comparator) = EVs without exposure to NMs, O (Outcome) = Cellular responses/change in EVs) to help methodologically assess the association between exposure and outcome. For each theme in the PECO acronym, keywords were defined, organized, and researched in PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, up to 30 September 2021. In vitro, in vivo, ex vivo, and clinical studies that analyzed the effect of NMs on EV biogenesis, cargo, and cellular responses were included in the analysis. The methodological quality assessment was conducted using the ToxRTool, ARRIVE guideline, Newcastle Ottawa and the EV-TRACK platform. The search in the referred databases identified 2944 articles. After applying the eligibility criteria and two-step screening, 18 articles were included in the final review. We observed that depending on the concentration and physicochemical characteristics, specific NMs promote a significant increase in EV secretion as well as changes in their cargo, especially regarding the expression of proteins and miRNAs, which, in turn, were involved in biological processes that included cell communication, angiogenesis, and activation of the immune response, etc. Although further studies are necessary, this work suggests that molecular investigations on EVs induced by NM exposure may become a potential tool for toxicological studies since they are widely accessible biomarkers that may form a bridge between NM exposure and the cellular response and pathological outcome.