ABSTRACT
Trisomy 20 has been shown to be one of the most frequent rare autosomal trisomies in patients that undergo genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing. Here, we describe the clinical outcomes of cases that screened positive for trisomy 20 following prenatal genome-wide cell-free (cf.) DNA screening. These cases are part of a larger cohort of previously published cases. Members of the Global Expanded NIPT Consortium were invited to submit details on their cases with a single rare autosomal aneuploidy following genome-wide cfDNA screening for retrospective analysis. Clinical details including patient demographics, test indications, diagnostic testing, and obstetric pregnancy outcomes were collected. Genome-wide cfDNA screening was conducted following site-specific laboratory procedures. Cases which screened positive for trisomy 20 (n = 10) were reviewed. Clinical outcome information was available for 90% (9/10) of our screen-positive trisomy 20 cases; the case without diagnostic testing ended in a fetal demise. Of the nine cases with outcome information, one was found to have a mosaic partial duplication (duplication at 20p13), rather than a full trisomy 20. Only one case in the study cohort had placental testing; therefore, confined placental mosaicism could not be ruled out in most cases. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were seen in half of the cases, which could suggest the presence of underlying confined placental mosaicism or mosaic/full fetal trisomy 20. Based on our limited series, the likelihood of true fetal aneuploidy is low but pregnancies may be at increased risk for adverse obstetric outcomes and may benefit from additional surveillance.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Preeclampsia (PE) is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity worldwide. However, current methods of screening are complicated and require special skill sets. In this observational study of prospectively collected samples, we wanted to evaluate if cell-free (cf) DNA could be an efficient biomarker for identification of at-risk patients. Methods: One hundred patients attending a private prenatal clinic in Canada were enrolled in their first trimester of pregnancy and a blood draw was carried out at 11 + 0 to 14 + 2 weeks' (timepoint A) and 17 + 6 to 25 + 5 weeks of gestation (timepoint B). CfDNA signals, namely concentration, fetal fraction, and fragment size distribution, were correlated with clinical outcomes in the test population to develop the logistic regression model. Results: Twelve patients developed PE-four early-stage and eight late-stage PE. Significant differences were observed between PE patients and control cases for all three cfDNA signals at timepoint A, while both fetal fraction and concentration were significantly different between PE patients and control cases at timepoint B. Overall, the model had a sensitivity of up to 100% and specificity of up to 87.5% at Timepoint A. Conclusion: This proof-of-principle study showed that use of this logistic regression model could identify patients at risk of preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is typically carried out to screen for common fetal chromosomal anomalies, with the option to screen for a wider range of chromosomal changes (expanded NIPT) becoming increasingly available. However, little is known about pregnant patients' attitudes and preferences regarding expanded NIPT. Methods: To address this gap, we surveyed general-risk patients having first-tier cfDNA screening at a private prenatal clinic on their expectations for expanded NIPT. Patients were asked questions regarding their current pregnancy and previous pregnancy history, their opinions on fetal DNA screenings during pregnancy and incidental findings, information and opinions on financial resources for NIPT, as well as socio-cultural questions to determine patient demographics. Results: Of the 200 survey participants, the majority were educated, self-reported as white, had a higher than average income, and reported no aneuploidy risk factors. When asked what information they would like to receive from cfDNA screening, the vast majority of participants wanted all information available that could have an immediate impact on fetal health (88%) or an immediate impact on infant health from birth (82%). Many participants also wanted information that could have a future impact on the child's health or an immediate or future impact on the pregnant woman's own health. Most participants wanted information about the sex of fetus (86%) and common trisomies (71%), with almost half of participants desiring information about rare autosomal aneuploidies and/or all genetic information that may affect the baby. In addition, participants were found to be comfortable screening for conditions that are well-known, influence care during pregnancy, and are treatable. Finally, while most respondents either had insurance coverage for NIPT or were able to afford NIPT out of pocket, the majority of our participants felt that expanded NIPT should be either free for everyone or for those considered high risk. Discussion: Our findings suggest that with appropriate pre-test counseling, pregnant patients may choose NIPT for an expanding list of conditions.
ABSTRACT
Cell-free (cf) DNA screening is a noninvasive prenatal screening approach that is typically used to screen for common fetal trisomies, with optional screening for sex chromosomal aneuploidies and fetal sex. Genome-wide cfDNA screening can screen for a wide variety of additional anomalies, including rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) and copy number variants. Here, we describe a multi-cohort, global retrospective study that looked at the clinical outcomes of cases with a high-risk cfDNA screening result for a RAA. Our study cohort included a total of 109 cases from five different sites, with diagnostic outcome information available for 68% (74/109) of patients. Based on confirmatory diagnostic testing, we found a concordance rate of 20.3% for presence of a RAA (15/74) in our study population. Pregnancy outcome was also available for 77% (84/109) of cases in our cohort. Many of the patients experienced adverse pregnancy outcomes, including intrauterine fetal demise, fetal growth restriction, and preterm birth. These adverse outcomes were observed both in patients with fetal or placental confirmation of the presence of a RAA, as well as patients that did not undergo fetal and/or placental diagnostic testing. In addition, we have proposed some suggestions for pregnancy management and counseling considerations for situations where a RAA is noted on a cfDNA screen. In conclusion, our study has shown that genome-wide cfDNA screening for the presence of rare autosomal aneuploidies can be beneficial for both patients and their healthcare practitioners. This can provide a possible explanation for an adverse pregnancy outcome or result in a change in pregnancy management, such as increased monitoring for adverse outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Medical genetic services are facing an unprecedented demand for counseling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in a context of limited resources. To help resolve this issue, a collaborative oncogenetic model was recently developed and implemented at the CHU de Québec-Université Laval; Quebec; Canada. Here, we present the protocol of the C-MOnGene (Collaborative Model in OncoGenetics) study, funded to examine the context in which the model was implemented and document the lessons that can be learned to optimize the delivery of oncogenetic services. Within three years of implementation, the model allowed researchers to double the annual number of patients seen in genetic counseling. The average number of days between genetic counseling and disclosure of test results significantly decreased. Group counseling sessions improved participants' understanding of breast cancer risk and increased knowledge of breast cancer and genetics and a large majority of them reported to be overwhelmingly satisfied with the process. These quality and performance indicators suggest this oncogenetic model offers a flexible, patient-centered and efficient genetic counseling and testing for HBOC. By identifying the critical facilitating factors and barriers, our study will provide an evidence base for organizations interested in transitioning to an oncogenetic model integrated into oncology care; including teams that are not specialized but are trained in genetics.
ABSTRACT
We compared clinical validity of two non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) methods for fetal trisomies 13, 18, 21, and monosomy X. We recruited prospectively 2203 women at high risk of fetal aneuploidy and 1807 at baseline risk. Three-hundred and twenty-nine euploid samples were randomly removed. The remaining 1933 high risk and 1660 baseline-risk plasma aliquots were assigned randomly between four laboratories and tested with two index NIPS tests, blind to maternal variables and pregnancy outcomes. The two index tests used massively parallel shotgun sequencing (semiconductor-based and optical-based). The reference standard for all fetuses was invasive cytogenetic analysis or clinical examination at birth and postnatal follow-up. For each chromosome of interest, chromosomal ratios were calculated (number of reads for chromosome/total number of reads). Euploid samples' mean chromosomal ratio coefficients of variation were 0.48 (T21), 0.34 (T18), and 0.31 (T13). According to the reference standard, there were 155 cases of T21, 49 T18, 8 T13 and 22 45,X. Using a fetal fraction ≥4% to call results and a chromosomal ratio z-score of ≥3 to report a positive result, detection rates (DR), and false positive rates (FPR) were not statistically different between platforms: mean DR 99% (T21), 100%(T18, T13); 79%(45,X); FPR < 0.3% for T21, T18, T13, and <0.6% for 45,X. Both methods' negative predictive values in high-risk pregnancies were >99.8%, except for 45,X(>99.6%). Threshold analysis in high-risk pregnancies with different fetal fractions and z-score cut-offs suggested that a z-score cutoff to 3.5 for positive results improved test accuracy. Both sequencing platforms showed equivalent and excellent clinical validity.
Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids , Fetus , High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods , Ikaros Transcription Factor/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Down Syndrome , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Pregnancy , Trisomy 13 Syndrome , Trisomy 18 Syndrome , Turner Syndrome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Yearly, 450 000 pregnant Canadians are eligible for voluntary prenatal screening for trisomy 21. Different screening strategies select approximately 4% of women for invasive fetal chromosome testing. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using maternal blood cell-free DNA could reduce those invasive procedures but is expensive. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of NIPT strategies compared with conventional strategies. METHODS: This study used a decision analytic model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of 13 prenatal screening strategies for fetal aneuploidies: six frequently used strategies, universal NIPT, and six strategies incorporating NIPT as a second-tier test. The study considered a virtual cohort of pregnant women of similar size and age as women in Quebec. Model data were obtained from published sources and government databases. The study predicted the number of chromosomal anomalies detected (trisomies 21, 13, and 18), invasive procedures and euploid fetal losses, direct costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: Of the 13 strategies compared, eight identified fewer cases at a higher cost than at least one of the remaining five strategies. Integrated serum screening with conditional NIPT had the lowest cost, and the cost per case detected was $63 139, with a 90% reduction of invasive procedures. The number of cases identified was improved with four other screening strategies, but with increasing of incremental costs per case (from $61 623 to $1 553 615). Results remained robust, except when NIPT costs and risk cut-offs varied. CONCLUSION: NIPT as a second-tier test for high-risk women is likely to be cost-effective as compared with screening algorithms not involving NIPT.
Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/analysis , Maternal Serum Screening Tests/economics , Models, Economic , Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , PregnancyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the impact of offering cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening as a first-tier test for trisomies 21 and 18. METHODS: This is a prospective study of pregnant women undergoing conventional prenatal screening who were offered cfDNA screening in the first trimester with clinical outcomes obtained on all pregnancies. RESULTS: A total of 1198 pregnant women were recruited. The detection rate of trisomy 21 with standard screening was 83% with a false positive rate (FPR) of 5.5% compared with 100% detection and 0% FPR for cfDNA screening. The FPR of cfDNA screening for trisomies 18 and 13 was 0.09% for each. Two percent of women underwent an invasive diagnostic procedure based on screening or ultrasound findings; without the cfDNA screening, it could have been as high as 6.8%. Amongst the 640 women with negative cfDNA results and a nuchal translucency (NT) ultrasound, only 3 had an NT greater or equal to 3.5 mm: one had a normal outcome and two lost their pregnancy before 20 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: cfDNA screening has the potential to be a highly effective first-tier screening approach leading to a significant reduction of invasive diagnostic procedures. For women with a negative cfDNA screening result, NT measurement has limited clinical utility.
Subject(s)
Mass Screening , Maternal Serum Screening Tests , Adult , Canada , Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Nuchal Translucency Measurement , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
Gain-of-function variants in some RAS-MAPK pathway genes, including PTPN11 and NRAS, are associated with RASopathies and/or acquired hematological malignancies, most notably juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML). With rare exceptions, the spectrum of germline variants causing RASopathies does not overlap with the somatic variants identified in isolated JMML. Studies comparing these variants suggest a stronger gain-of-function activity in the JMML variants. As JMML variants have not been identified as germline defects and have a greater impact on protein function, it has been speculated that they would be embryonic lethal. Here we identified three variants, which have previously only been identified in isolated somatic JMML and other sporadic cancers, in four cases with a severe pre- or neo-natal lethal presentation of Noonan syndrome. These cases support the hypothesis that these stronger gain-of-function variants are rarely compatible with life.
Subject(s)
GTP Phosphohydrolases/genetics , Germ-Line Mutation , Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Juvenile/genetics , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Noonan Syndrome/genetics , Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11/genetics , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Noonan Syndrome/diagnosis , PregnancyABSTRACT
Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA (cfDNA screening) was proposed to reduce the number of invasive procedures in current prenatal diagnosis for fetal aneuploidies. We review here the clinical and ethical issues of cfDNA screening. To date, it is not clear how cfDNA screening is going to impact the performances of clinical prenatal diagnosis and how it could be incorporated in real life. The direct marketing to users may have facilitated the early introduction of cfDNA screening into clinical practice despite limited evidence-based independent research data supporting this rapid shift. There is a need to address the most important ethical, legal, and social issues before its implementation in a mass setting. Its introduction might worsen current tendencies to neglect the reproductive autonomy of pregnant women.
ABSTRACT
Partial monosomy of the long arm of chromosome 7 has been characterized by wide phenotypic manifestations, but holoprosencephaly (HPE) and sacral agenesis have frequently been associated with this chromosomal deletion. A clear relationship between genotype and phenotype remains to be defined in the 7q deletion syndrome. Three patients (1, 2, and 3) were investigated with 7q terminal deletion and compared with similar deletion cases in the literature in order to stratify the phenotypes associated with 7q35 and 7q36 terminal deletion patients. Patients 1, 2, and 3 were carrying a de novo terminal deletion at bands 7q36.2, 7q35, and 7q36.1, respectively. In patient 3, a small Xq28 duplication was also identified by array-CGH. Our patients presented with heterogeneous phenotypic manifestations, which could imply the possible role of environmental factors (multifactorial inheritance), structural variations in the non-coding regions, penetrance, and/or polymorphism. The varying length of deletion was also taken into account. Growth retardation was the most frequent symptom found in both 7q35 and 7q36 patients we reviewed. The occurrence of HPE and sacral malformation together was seen in less than 10% of the reviewed cases in both kinds of deletion. HPE was associated mainly in cases with an unbalanced translocation.
Subject(s)
Chromosome Deletion , Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis , Chromosome Disorders/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7 , Genetic Association Studies , Phenotype , Adolescent , Child , Comparative Genomic Hybridization , Female , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Karyotyping , Male , Microsatellite RepeatsABSTRACT
Current prenatal diagnosis for fetal aneuploidies (including trisomy 21 [T21]) generally relies on an initial biochemical serum-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) after which women who are deemed to be at high risk are offered an invasive confirmatory test (amniocentesis or chorionic villi sampling for a fetal karyotype), which is associated with a risk of fetal miscarriage. Recently, genomics-based NIPT (gNIPT) was proposed for the analysis of fetal genomic DNA circulating in maternal blood. The diffusion of this technology in routine prenatal care could be a major breakthrough in prenatal diagnosis, since initial research studies suggest that this novel approach could be very effective and could reduce substantially the number of invasive procedures. However, the limitations of gNIPT may be underappreciated. In this review, we examine currently published literature on gNIPT to highlight advantages and limitations. At this time, the performance of gNIPT is relatively well-documented only in high-risk pregnancies for T21 and trisomy 18. This additional screening test may be an option for women classified as high-risk of aneuploidy who wish to avoid invasive diagnostic tests, but it is crucial that providers carefully counsel patients about the test's advantages and limitations. The gNIPT is currently not recommended as a first-tier prenatal screening test for T21. Since gNIPT is not considered as a diagnostic test, a positive gNIPT result should always be confirmed by an invasive test, such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. Validation studies are needed to optimally introduce this technology into the existing routine workflow of prenatal care.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the most cost-effective option to prevent alloimmunization against the Rh factor. METHODS: A virtual population of Rh-negative pregnant women in Quebec was built to simulate the cost-effectiveness of preventing alloimmunization. The model considered four options: (1) systematic use of anti-D immunoglobulin; (2) fetal Rh(D) genotyping; (3) immunological determination of the father's Rh type; (4) mixed screening: immunological determination of the father's Rh type, followed if positive by fetal Rh(D) genotyping. Two outcomes were considered, in addition to the estimated costs: (1) the number of babies without hemolytic disease, and (2) the number of surviving infants. RESULTS: In a first pregnancy, two options emerged as the most cost-effective options: systematic prophylaxis and immunological Rh typing of the father, with overlapping confidence intervals between them. In a second pregnancy, the results were similar. In all cases (first or second pregnancy or a combination of the two) fetal genotyping was not found to be a cost-effective option. CONCLUSION: Routine prophylaxis and immunological Rh typing of the father are the most cost-effective options for the prevention of Rh alloimmunization. Considering that immunological typing of the father would probably not be carried out by the majority of clinicians, routine prophylaxis remains the preferred option. However, this could change if the cost of Rh(D) fetal genotyping fell below $140 per sample.
Objectif : Cette étude avait pour objectif d'identifier l'option la plus rentable pour la prévention de l'allo-immunisation contre le facteur Rh. Méthodes : Une population virtuelle québécoise de femmes enceintes séronégatives pour le facteur Rh a été créée pour simuler la rentabilité de la prévention de l'allo-immunisation. Ce modèle a pris en considération quatre options : (1) l'utilisation systématique d'immunoglobuline anti-D; (2) le génotypage Rh(D) fÅtal; (3) la détermination immunologique du type Rh du père; (4) le dépistage mixte : détermination immunologique du type Rh du père, suivie (en présence de résultats positifs) du génotypage Rh(D) fÅtal. Deux critères d'évaluation ont été pris en considération, en plus des coûts estimés : (1) le nombre d'enfants nés sans maladie hémolytique et (2) le nombre de nouveau-nés survivants. Résultats : Dans le cas d'une première grossesse, deux options se sont avérées les plus rentables : la prophylaxie systématique et la détermination immunologique du type Rh du père; leurs intervalles de confiance se chevauchaient. Dans le cas d'une deuxième grossesse, les résultats ont été semblables. Dans tous les cas (première ou deuxième grossesse, ou une combinaison des deux), nous avons constaté que le génotypage fÅtal ne constituait pas une option rentable. Conclusion : La mise en Åuvre systématique d'une prophylaxie et la détermination immunologique du type Rh du père constituent les options les plus rentables pour la prévention de l'allo-immunisation contre le facteur Rh. Puisqu'il est peu probable que la détermination immunologique du type Rh du père soit mise en Åuvre par la majorité des cliniciens, la prophylaxie systématique demeure l'option à privilégier. Cependant, cela pourrait changer si le coût du génotypage Rh(D) fÅtal chutait en deçà de 140 $ par prélèvement.
Subject(s)
Genetic Testing/methods , Mass Screening , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Rh Isoimmunization/prevention & control , Rho(D) Immune Globulin/therapeutic use , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Fathers , Female , Fetus/immunology , Humans , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Maternal-Fetal Exchange/drug effects , Maternal-Fetal Exchange/genetics , Maternal-Fetal Exchange/immunology , Models, Organizational , Pregnancy , Preventive Health Services/economics , Preventive Health Services/methods , Quebec , Rh Isoimmunization/genetics , Rh-Hr Blood-Group SystemABSTRACT
We report a new and rare case of recurrent anencephaly in a family with no other apparent abnormalities. The karyotypes of the family and all affected subjects were normal. Thorough mutational analyses of VANGL1 of chromosome 1p13.1 and FOXN1 of chromosome 17q11-q12, genes that are associated with phenotypes of the anencephaly spectrum, unfortunately did not disclose any DNA variations in an affected fetus of this family. The etiology of recurrent anencephaly in this family is therefore due to mutations in genes yet to be discovered, perhaps of the planar cell polarity pathway, or to possible environmental gestational factors during development.
Subject(s)
Anencephaly/genetics , Carrier Proteins/genetics , Forkhead Transcription Factors/genetics , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Adult , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Humans , Pedigree , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: holoprosencephaly is the most common forebrain malformation syndrome with a multifactorial etiology. Currently, mutations are identified in 5-10% of non syndromic, non-chromosomal cases in at least 12 genes. We report the molecular prenatal diagnosis of a fetus with alobar holoprosencephaly. METHODS: CTG band karyotyping and array CGH genome-wide cytogenetic screenings were done, in conjunction with DNA sequence analyses of the SHH, ZIC2, SIX3 and TGIF genes in search of a molecular etiology and with comparison of findings to prior cases. RESULTS: standard CTG band karyotyping and array CGH genome-wide screening failed to identify plausible chromosome imbalances or structural anomalies. However, extensive sequencing of the genomic DNA from the fetus and both parents on all exon and exon-intron boundaries of the four most commonly mutated genes: SHH, ZIC2, SIX3 and TGIF, identified codon 100 of the sonic hedgehog (SHH) gene having a hotspot for loss-of-function mutations in our case and others. CONCLUSION: mutations in codon 100 of SHH were discovered in both sporadic and autosomal dominant inherited cases with evidence of variable expressivity and penetrance. Collectively, this study reinforces the complexity of genotype-phenotype correlations in the prenatal diagnosis of holoprosencephalic fetuses.
ABSTRACT
Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have an endless self-renewal capacity and can theoretically differentiate into all types of lineages. They thus represent an unlimited source of cells for therapies of regenerative diseases, such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), and for tissue repair in specific medical fields. However, at the moment, the low number of efficient specific lineage differentiation protocols compromises their use in regenerative medicine. We developed a two-step procedure to differentiate hESCs and dystrophic hiPSCs in myogenic cells. The first step was a culture in a myogenic medium and the second step an infection with an adenovirus expressing the myogenic master gene MyoD. Following infection, the cells expressed several myogenic markers and formed abundant multinucleated myotubes in vitro. When transplanted in the muscle of Rag/mdx mice, these cells participated in muscle regeneration by fusing very well with existing muscle fibers. Our findings provide an effective method that will permit to use hESCs or hiPSCs for preclinical studies in muscle repair.
Subject(s)
Embryonic Stem Cells/physiology , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/therapy , Myoblasts, Skeletal/transplantation , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Cell Fusion , Cell Shape , Cells, Cultured , Culture Media , Dystrophin/metabolism , Embryonic Stem Cells/transplantation , Humans , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/transplantation , Lamin Type A/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred mdx , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/pathology , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/physiopathology , MyoD Protein/genetics , MyoD Protein/metabolism , Myoblasts, Skeletal/metabolism , Myoblasts, Skeletal/pathology , Regeneration , Spectrin/metabolism , TransfectionABSTRACT
We report a new case of a fetus with holoprosencephaly-polydactyly syndrome, also known as pseudo-trisomy 13 syndrome, and no other apparent abnormalities except for septal agenesis of the left lung. The fetal karyotype was normal. Mutational analysis of five genes (SHH, SIX3, TGIF, ZIC2, and GLI3), which are major genes associated with holoprosencephaly, did not disclose any mutational findings. We therefore propose that the abnormalities of our fetus support the demarcation of this syndrome as an autonomous phenotype. Specific diagnostic criteria for holoprosencephaly-polydactyly syndrome need to be complemented by the absence of mutations in the major holoprosencephaly genes.
Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple/pathology , Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis , Fetal Macrosomia/diagnosis , Hand Deformities, Congenital/diagnosis , Holoprosencephaly/diagnosis , Polydactyly/diagnosis , Trisomy/diagnosis , Abnormalities, Multiple/genetics , Abortion, Eugenic , Adult , Chromosome Banding , Chromosome Disorders/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 13/genetics , DNA Mutational Analysis , Diagnosis, Differential , Fatal Outcome , Female , Fetal Macrosomia/genetics , Hand Deformities, Congenital/genetics , Holoprosencephaly/genetics , Humans , Male , Mutation , Polydactyly/genetics , Trisomy/genetics , Trisomy 13 Syndrome , Ultrasonography, PrenatalABSTRACT
We examined the association between midtrimester intra-amniotic sludge and spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) in asymptomatic women undergoing amniocentesis. We performed a prospective cohort study of women having an amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping between 14 and 24 weeks' gestation. Cervical length and the presence of amniotic sludge were assessed by transvaginal ultrasound. Amniotic fluid concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase-8, glucose and lactate were measured. Early (<32 weeks) and late (32 to 36 weeks) preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) and spontaneous PTB constituted primary outcomes. Nonparametric analyses were conducted. Three hundred ten women, including 94 (30%) with free-floating echogenic particles and 16 (5%) with dense amniotic sludge, were recruited. Dense amniotic sludge was linked with early (13%) but not with late (0%) primary outcome ( P < 0.01). Two women with combined dense amniotic sludge and short cervix delivered 4 and 10 weeks later (at 20 and 25 weeks, respectively) and had a higher median amniotic lactate concentration than controls ( P < 0.05). A third woman with dense amniotic sludge at 15 weeks was diagnosed with a short cervix and an intra-amniotic infection at 22 weeks that was eradicated with intravenous antibiotics. Midtrimester dense amniotic sludge is associated with early PPROM and spontaneous PTB.
Subject(s)
Amniotic Fluid/chemistry , Amniotic Fluid/diagnostic imaging , Cervix Uteri/abnormalities , Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture/etiology , Premature Birth/etiology , Amniocentesis , Amniotic Fluid/microbiology , Birth Weight , Endosonography , Female , Gestational Age , Glucose/analysis , Humans , Lactic Acid/analysis , Matrix Metalloproteinase 8/analysis , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) represents a major advance in the ability to detect chromosomal imbalances (CI). A recent meta-analysis recommended aCGH for replacing karyotyping for patients with unexplained disabilities. However, favouring aCGH over karyotyping must be based on solid evidence due to the major implications of selecting a preferential diagnostic tool. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective study of 376 samples was conducted to assess the relevance of karyotyping after a first-tier aCGH in patients with unexplained disabilities. aCGH detected CI in 28.7% of the cases. Out of 376 patients, 288 had undergone parallel karyotyping testing: 69.8% (201/288) showed similar results for both aCGH and karyotyping. For patients with a CI detected by aCGH, 7.9% (7/89) showed similar results for both aCGH and karyotyping. Among 20 patients with abnormal karyotyping, 13 showed dissimilar results compared to aCGH analysis: 4 patients (1.4%) had balanced rearrangements and 9 patients (3.1%) had additional chromosomal anomalies unseen using aCGH. This rate of unseen chromosomal anomalies is far superior to the previously estimated 0.5-0.78% prevalence and affects 10.1% (9/89) of patients with CI detected by aCGH in the tested population. CONCLUSIONS: Since the clinical significance of CI identified by aCGH might be influenced by such discrepancies between the two methods, these may in turn have an impact on clinical diagnosis and patient counselling. It is proposed that each genetic laboratory should evaluate the relevance of karyotyping for all first-tier abnormal aCGH results in order to include the genomic (chromosomal) aspects of the aCGH findings in the diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Comparative Genomic Hybridization/methods , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis , Genetic Testing/standards , Karyotyping/standards , Developmental Disabilities/diagnosis , Developmental Disabilities/genetics , Female , Genetic Diseases, Inborn/genetics , Genetic Testing/methods , Humans , Karyotyping/methods , Male , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
This is an 11-year survey of molecular analysis of APC germline mutations for the province of Quebec done at the Molecular Pathology Unit of the Jewish General Hospital which offers genetic testing for hereditary forms of colorectal cancer for the whole of Quebec province. We report on 47 unique mutations seen in 66 families affected with familial adenomatous polyposis. Of these unique mutations, 60% are short indels, 28% are point mutations, and 6% are whole exon deletions. The absence of founder mutations and the variety of mutations encountered reinforce the value of RNA-based testing and the need for gene dosage techniques such as multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.