Reliability of study endpoint adjudication in a pragmatic trial on brain arteriovenous malformations.

BACKGROUND: The results of a clinical trial are given in terms of primary and secondary outcomes that are obtained for each patient. Just as an instrument should provide the same result when the same object is measured repeatedly, the agreement of the adjudication of a clinical outcome between various raters is fundamental to interpret study results. The reliability of the adjudication of study endpoints determined by examination of the electronic case report forms of a pragmatic trial has not previously been tested. METHODS: The electronic case report forms of 62/434 (14%) patients selected to be observed in a study on brain AVMs were independently examined twice (4 weeks apart) by 8 raters who judged whether each patient had reached the following study endpoints: (1) new intracranial hemorrhage related to AVM or to treatment; (2) new non-hemorrhagic neurological event; (3) increase in mRS ≥1; (4) serious adverse events (SAE). Inter and intra-rater reliability were assessed using Gwet's AC1 (κG) statistics, and correlations with mRS score using Cramer's V test. RESULTS: There was almost perfect agreement for intracranial hemorrhage (92% agreement; κG = 0.84 (95%CI: 0.76-0.93), and substantial agreement for SAEs (88% agreement; κG = 0.77 (95%CI: 0.67-0.86) and new non-hemorrhagic neurological event (80% agreement; κG = 0.61 (95%CI: 0.50-0.72). Most endpoints correlated (V = 0.21-0.57) with an increase in mRS of ≥1, an endpoint which was itself moderately reliable (76% agreement; κG = 0.54 (95%CI: 0.43-0.64). CONCLUSION: Study endpoints of a pragmatic trial were shown to be reliable. More studies on the reliability of pragmatic trial endpoints are needed.

Endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: clinical outcomes of patients included in the registry of a pragmatic randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: The role of endovascular treatment in the management of patients with brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains uncertain. AVM embolization can be offered as stand-alone curative therapy or prior to surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (pre-embolization). The Treatment of Brain AVMs Study (TOBAS) is an all-inclusive pragmatic study that comprises two randomized trials and multiple registries. METHODS: Results from the TOBAS curative and pre-embolization registries are reported. The primary outcome for this report is death or dependency (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score > 2) at last follow-up. Secondary outcomes include angiographic results, perioperative serious adverse events (SAEs), and permanent treatment-related complications leading to an mRS score > 2. RESULTS: From June 2014 to May 2021, 1010 patients were recruited in TOBAS. Embolization was chosen as the primary curative treatment for 116 patients and pre-embolization prior to surgery or SRS for 92 patients. Clinical and angiographic outcomes were available in 106 (91%) of 116 and 77 (84%) of 92 patients, respectively. In the curative embolization registry, 70% of AVMs were ruptured, and 62% were low-grade AVMs (Spetzler-Martin grade I or II), while the pre-embolization registry had 70% ruptured AVMs and 58% low-grade AVMs. The primary outcome of death or disability (mRS score > 2) occurred in 15 (14%, 95% CI 8%-22%) of the 106 patients in the curative embolization registry (4 [12%, 95% CI 5%-28%] of 32 unruptured AVMs and 11 [15%, 95% CI 8%-25%] of 74 ruptured AVMs) and 9 (12%, 95% CI 6%-21%) of the 77 patients in the pre-embolization registry (4 [17%, 95% CI 7%-37%] of 23 unruptured AVMs and 5 [9%, 95% CI 4%-20%] of 54 ruptured AVMs) at 2 years. Embolization alone was confirmed to occlude the AVM in 32 (30%, 95% CI 21%-40%) of the 106 curative attempts and in 9 (12%, 95% CI 6%-21%) of 77 patients in the pre-embolization registry. SAEs occurred in 28 of the 106 attempted curative patients (26%, 95% CI 18%-35%, including 21 new symptomatic hemorrhages [20%, 95% CI 13%-29%]). Five of the new hemorrhages were in previously unruptured AVMs (n = 32; 16%, 95% CI 5%-33%). Of the 77 pre-embolization patients, 18 had SAEs (23%, 95% CI 15%-34%), including 12 new symptomatic hemorrhages [16%, 95% CI 9%-26%]). Three of the hemorrhages were in previously unruptured AVMs (3/23; 13%, 95% CI 3%-34%). CONCLUSIONS: Embolization as a curative treatment for brain AVMs was often incomplete. Hemorrhagic complications were frequent, even when the specified intent was pre-embolization before surgery or SRS. Because the role of endovascular treatment remains uncertain, it should preferably, when possible, be offered in the context of a randomized trial.

Patient Selection in a Pragmatic Study on the Management of Patients with Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

BACKGROUND: The Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Study (TOBAS) is an all-inclusive pragmatic study comprising 2 randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Patients excluded from the RCTs are followed in parallel treatment and observation registries, allowing a comparison between RCT and registry patients. METHODS: The first randomized clinical trial (RCT-1) offers 1:1 randomized allocation of intervention versus conservative management for patients with arteriovenous malformation (AVM). The second randomized clinical trial (RCT-2) allocates 1:1 pre-embolization or no pre-embolization to surgery or radiosurgery patients judged treatable with or without embolization. Characteristics of RCT patients are reported and compared to registry patients. RESULTS: From June 2014 to May 2021, 1010 patients with AVM were recruited; 498 patients were observed and 373 were included in the treatment registries. Randomized allocation in RCT-1 was applied to 139 (26%) of the 512 patients (including 127 of 222 [57%] with unruptured AVMs) considered for curative treatment. RCT-1 AVM patients differed (in rupture status, Spetzler-Martin grade and baseline modified Rankin Score) from those in the observation or treatment registries (P < 0.001). Most patients had small (<3 cm; 71%) low-grade (Spetzler-Martin I-II; 64%) unruptured (91%) AVMs. The allocated management was conservative (n = 71) or curative (n = 68), using surgery (n = 39), embolization (n = 16), or stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 13). Pre-embolization was considered for 179/309 (58%) patients allocated/assigned to surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery; 87/179 (49%) were included in RCT-2. RCT-2 patient AVMs differed in size, eloquence and grade from patients of the pre-embolization registry (P < 0.01). Most had small (<3 cm in 82%) low-grade (83%) AVMs in non-eloquent brain (64%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients included in the RCTs differ significantly from registry patients. Meaningful results can be obtained if multiple centers actively participate in the TOBAS RCTs.

Surgical treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: clinical outcomes of patients included in the registry of a pragmatic randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: The Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Study (TOBAS) is a pragmatic study that includes 2 randomized trials and registries of treated or conservatively managed patients. The authors report the results of the surgical registry. METHODS: TOBAS patients are managed according to an algorithm that combines clinical judgment and randomized allocation. For patients considered for curative treatment, clinicians selected from surgery, endovascular therapy, or radiation therapy as the primary curative method, and whether observation was a reasonable alternative. When surgery was selected and observation was deemed unreasonable, the patient was not included in the randomized controlled trial but placed in the surgical registry. The primary outcome of the trial was mRS score > 2 at 10 years (at last follow-up for the current report). Secondary outcomes include angiographic results, perioperative serious adverse events, and permanent treatment-related complications leading to mRS score > 2. RESULTS: From June 2014 to May 2021, 1010 patients were recruited at 30 TOBAS centers. Surgery was selected for 229/512 patients (44%) considered for curative treatment; 77 (34%) were included in the surgery versus observation randomized trial and 152 (66%) were placed in the surgical registry. Surgical registry patients had 124/152 (82%) ruptured and 28/152 (18%) unruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), with the majority categorized as low-grade Spetzler-Martin grade I-II AVM (118/152 [78%]). Thirteen patients were excluded, leaving 139 patients for analysis. Embolization was performed prior to surgery in 78/139 (56%) patients. Surgical angiographic cure was obtained in 123/139 all-grade (89%, 95% CI 82%-93%) and 105/110 low-grade (95%, 95% CI 90%-98%) AVM patients. At the mean follow-up of 18.1 months, 16 patients (12%, 95% CI 7%-18%) had reached the primary safety outcome of mRS score > 2, including 11/16 who had a baseline mRS score ≥ 3 due to previous AVM rupture. Serious adverse events occurred in 29 patients (21%, 95% CI 15%-28%). Permanent treatment-related complications leading to mRS score > 2 occurred in 6/139 patients (4%, 95% CI 2%-9%), 5 (83%) of whom had complications due to preoperative embolization. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical treatment of brain AVMs in the TOBAS registry was curative in 88% of patients. The participation of more patients, surgeons, and centers in randomized trials is needed to definitively establish the role of surgery in the treatment of unruptured brain AVMs. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02098252 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm Trial (MCAAT): A Randomized Care Trial Comparing Surgical and Endovascular Management of MCA Aneurysm Patients.

BACKGROUND: Whether the best management of middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm patients is surgical or endovascular remains uncertain, with little evidence to guide decision-making. A randomized care trial offering MCA aneurysm patients a 50% chance of surgical and a 50% chance of endovascular management may optimize outcomes in the presence of uncertainty. METHODS: The Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm Trial (MCAAT) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, parallel group, prospective, 1:1 randomized controlled clinical trial. All adult patients with MCA aneurysms, ruptured or unruptured, amenable to surgical and endovascular treatment can be included. The composite primary outcome is "Treatment Success": (i) occlusion or exclusion of the aneurysm using the allocated treatment modality; (ii) no intracranial hemorrhage during follow-up; (iii) no retreatment of the target aneurysm during follow-up, (iv) no residual aneurysm on angiographic follow-up; and (v) independence (mRS <3) at 1 year. The trial tests 2 versions of the same hypothesis (one for ruptured and one for unruptured MCA aneurysm patients): Surgical management will lead to a 15% absolute increase in the proportion of patients reaching Treatment Success from 55% to 70% (ruptured) or from 75% to 90% (unruptured aneurysm patients) compared with endovascular treatment (any method). In this pragmatic trial, outcome evaluations are by treating physicians, except for 1-year angiographic results which will be core lab assessed. The trial will be monitored by an independent data safety monitoring committee to assure safety of participants. MCAAT is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05161377. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MCA aneurysms can be optimally managed within a care trial protocol.

Clinical Uncertainty and Equipoise in the Management of Recurrent Glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of glioblastoma (GBM) patients are considered for repeat resection, but evidence regarding best management remains elusive. Our aim was to measure the degree of clinical uncertainty regarding reoperation for patients with recurrent GBM. METHODS: We first performed a systematic review of agreement studies examining the question of repeat resection for recurrent GBM. An electronic portfolio of 37 pathologically confirmed recurrent GBM patients including pertinent magnetic resonance images and clinical information was assembled. To measure clinical uncertainty, 26 neurosurgeons from various countries, training backgrounds, and years' experience were asked to select best management (repeat surgery, other nonsurgical management, or conservative), confidence in recommended management, and whether they would include the patient in a randomized trial comparing surgery with nonsurgical options. Agreement was evaluated using κ statistics. RESULTS: The literature review did not reveal previous agreement studies examining the question. In our study, agreement regarding best management of recurrent GBM was slight, even when management options were dichotomized (repeat surgery vs. other options; κ=0.198 [95% confidence interval: 0.133-0.276]). Country of practice, years' experience, and training background did not change results. Disagreement and clinical uncertainty were more pronounced within clinicians with (κ=0.167 [0.055-0.314]) than clinicians without neuro-oncology fellowship training (κ=0.601 [0.556-0.646]). A majority (51%) of responders were willing to include the patient in a randomized trial comparing repeat surgery with nonsurgical alternatives in 26/37 (69%) of cases. CONCLUSION: There is sufficient uncertainty and equipoise regarding the question of reoperation for patients with recurrent glioblastoma to support the need for a randomized controlled trial.

Angiographic results of surgical or endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and inter-observer reliability study.

PURPOSE: Results of surgical or endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms are often assessed using angiography. A reliable method to report results irrespective of treatment modality is needed to enable comparisons. Our goals were to systematically review existing classification systems, and to propose a 3-point classification applicable to both treatments and assess its reliability. METHODS: We conducted two systematic reviews on classification systems of angiographic results after clipping or coiling to select a simple 3-category scale that could apply to both treatments. We then circulated an electronic portfolio of angiograms of clipped (n=30) or coiled (n=30) aneurysms, and asked raters to evaluate the degree of occlusion using this scale. Raters were also asked to choose an appropriate follow-up management for each patient based on the degree of occlusion. Agreement was assessed using Krippendorff's α statistics (αK), and relationship between occlusion grade and clinical management was analyzed using Fisher's exact and Cramer's V tests. RESULTS: The systematic reviews found 70 different grading scales with heterogeneous reliability (kappa values from 0.12 to 1.00). The 60-patient portfolio was independently evaluated by 19 raters of diverse backgrounds (neurosurgery, radiology, and neurology) and experience. There was substantial agreement (αK=0.76, 95%CI, 0.67-0.83) between raters, regardless of background, experience, or treatment used. Intra-rater agreement ranged from moderate to almost perfect. A strong relationship was found between angiographic grades and management decisions (Cramer's V: 0.80±0.12). CONCLUSION: A simple 3-point scale demonstrated sufficient reliability to be used in reporting aneurysm treatments or in evaluating treatment results in comparative randomized trials.

Surgical or Endovascular Management of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: A Randomized Comparison.

OBJECTIVE: There are few randomized data comparing clipping and coiling for middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms. We analyzed results from patients with MCA aneurysms enrolled in the CURES (Collaborative UnRuptured Endovascular vs. Surgery) and ISAT-2 (International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial II) randomized trials. METHODS: Both trials are investigator-led parallel-group 1:1 randomized studies. CURES includes patients with 3-mm to 25-mm unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), and ISAT-2 includes patients with ruptured aneurysms (RA) for whom uncertainty remains after ISAT. The primary outcome measure of CURES is treatment failure: 1) failure to treat the aneurysm, 2) intracranial hemorrhage during follow-up, or 3) residual aneurysm at 1 year. The primary outcome of ISAT-2 is death or dependency (modified Rankin Scale score >2) at 1 year. One-year angiographic outcomes are systematically recorded. RESULTS: There were 100 unruptured and 71 ruptured MCA aneurysms. In CURES, 90 patients with UIA have been treated and 10 await treatment. Surgical and endovascular management of unruptured MCA aneurysms led to treatment failure in 3/42 (7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.19) for clipping and 13/48 (27%; 95% CI, 0.17-0.41) for coiling (P = 0.025). All 71 patients with RA have been treated. In ISAT-2, patients with ruptured MCA aneurysms managed surgically had died or were dependent (modified Rankin Scale score >2) in 7/38 (18%; 95% CI, 0.09-0.33) cases, and 8/33 (24%; 95% CI, 0.13-0.41) for endovascular. One-year imaging results were available in 80 patients with UIA and 62 with RA. Complete aneurysm occlusion was found in 30/40 (75%; 95% CI, 0.60-0.86) patients with UIA allocated clipping, and 14/40 (35%; 95% CI, 0.22-0.50) patients with UIA allocated coiling. Complete aneurysm occlusion was found in 24/34 (71%; 95% CI, 0.54-0.83) patients with RA allocated clipping, and 15/28 (54%; 95% CI, 0.36-0.70) patients with RA allocated coiling. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized data from 2 trials show that better efficacy may be obtained with surgical management of patients with MCA aneurysms.

Comparing N-hexyl cyanoacrylate (Magic Glue) and N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) for neurovascular embolization using the pressure cooker technique: An experimental study in swine.

BACKGROUND: The pressure cooker (PC) technique uses a second microcatheter to produce a proximal occlusion to prevent the reflux of liquid embolic agent (LEA) injected through a more distal microcatheter, and can be used to treat arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulae. The liquid embolic Magic Glue (MG) (N-hexyl cyanoacrylate (NHCA)) has been introduced as an alternative to N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA). Our goals were to compare the extent of embolization of rete mirabile with or without the PC technique using NBCA or MG, and to compare the proximal occlusions obtained with MG or NBCA while using the PC technique in a renal arterial model. METHODS: Rete mirabile were embolized with (n = 4) and without (n = 4) the PC technique, using MG (n = 4) or NBCA (n = 4). A renal arterial model was then used to study the characteristics of the MG plug (n = 10) used for the PC technique, and resistance to catheter withdrawal as compared to NBCA (n = 4). Specimens were analyzed macro- and microscopically and compared to angiographic results. RESULTS: Extent of rete embolization with CYA agents was not significantly greater when using the PC technique. Results were similar with both types of cyanoacrylate (p = 0.657). The force necessary to withdraw the microcatheter was less with MG than with NBCA (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: MG was similar to NBCA in extent of rete embolization. Less traction force was necessary to withdraw trapped non-detachable microcatheters using MG compared to NBCA.

Comprehensive Aneurysm Management (CAM): An All-Inclusive Care Trial for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of randomized evidence, the optimal management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) remains uncertain. METHODS: Comprehensive Aneurysm Management (CAM) is an all-inclusive care trial combined with a registry. Any patient with a UIA (no history of intracranial hemorrhage within the previous 30 days) can be recruited, and treatment allocation will follow an algorithm combining clinical judgment and randomization. Patients eligible for at least 2 management options will be randomly allocated 1:1 to conservative or curative treatment. Minimization will be used to balance risk factors, using aneurysm size (≥7 mm), location (anterior or posterior circulation), and age <60 years. RESULTS: The CAM primary outcome is survival without neurologic dependency (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score <3) at 10 years. Secondary outcome measures include the incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage during follow-up and related morbidity and mortality; morbidity and mortality related to endovascular treatment or surgical treatment of the UIA at 1 year; overall morbidity and mortality at 1, 5, and 10 years; when relevant, duration of hospitalization; and, when relevant, discharge to a location other than home. The primary hypothesis for patients randomly allocated to at least 2 options, 1 of which is conservative management, is that active UIA treatment will reduce the 10-year combined neurologic morbidity and mortality (mRS score >2) from 24% to 16%. At least 961 patients recruited from at least 20 centers over 4 years will be needed for the randomized portion of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms can be comprehensively managed within the context of an all-inclusive care trial.

Transvenous Approach for the Treatment of cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations (TATAM): Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Transvenous embolisation is a promising technique but the benefits remain uncertain. We hypothesised that transvenous embolisation leads to a higher rate of arteriovenous malformation angiographic occlusion than transarterial embolisation. METHODS: The Transvenous Approach for the Treatment of cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations (TATAM) is an investigator initiated, multicentre, prospective, phase 2, randomised controlled clinical trial. To test the hypothesis that transvenous embolisation is superior to transarterial embolisation for arteriovenous malformation obliteration, 76 patients with arteriovenous malformations considered curable by up to two sessions of endovascular therapy will be randomly allocated 1:1 to treatment with either transvenous embolisation (with or without transarterial embolisation) (experimental arm) or transarterial embolisation alone (control arm). The primary endpoint of the trial is complete arteriovenous malformation occlusion, assessed by catheter cerebral angiography. Complete occlusions will be confirmed at 3 months, while incompletely occluded arteriovenous malformations, considered treatment failures, will then be eligible for complementary treatments by surgery, radiation therapy, or even transvenous embolisation. Standard procedural safety outcomes will also be assessed. Patient selection will be validated by a case selection committee, and participating centres with limited experience in transvenous embolisation will be proctored. DISCUSSION: The TATAM trial is a transparent research framework designed to offer a promising but still unvalidated treatment to selected arteriovenous malformation patients. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03691870.

Testing the Medina embolization device in experimental aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The Medina embolization device (MED) is a novel, braided self-expanding endovascular device designed to occlude aneurysms by constructing an in situ intrasaccular flow diverter. Although a single device can be positioned at the neck of simple spherical in vitro aneurysms, the best way to occlude more complex in vivo aneurysms (using multiple MEDs or a combination of MEDs and platinum coils) is currently unknown. METHODS: Fifty-two aneurysms of 3 different types were created in 31 canines, yielding 48 patent aneurysms. Treatments were randomly allocated by drawing lots: group 1, MEDs alone (n = 16); group 2, MEDs plus standard platinum coils (n = 16); and group 3, control aneurysms treated with coils alone (n = 16). Angiographic results were scored and compared immediately following treatment completion and at 3 months. Specimens were photographed and the extent of neointimal closure of the aneurysmal neck scored, followed by histopathological analyses. RESULTS: Angiographic scores of 0 or 1 (occlusion or near occlusion) were initially obtained in 2 of 16 (12.5%, 95% CI 1.6%-38.3%) group 1 (MEDs alone), 3 of 16 (18.7%, 95% CI 4%-45.6%) group 2 (MEDs plus coils), and 10 of 16 (62.5%, 95% CI 35.4%-84.8%) group 3 (coils alone) aneurysms (p = 0.005). At 3 months, scores of 0 or 1 were found in 11 of 16 (68.7%, 95% CI 41.3%-89.0%) group 1, 9 of 16 (56.2%, 95% CI 29.9%-80.2%) group 2, and 8 of 16 (50%, 95% CI 24.7%-75.3%) group 3 aneurysms (p = 0.82). Neointimal scores were similar for the 3 treated groups (p = 0.66). CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of experimental aneurysms with MEDs or MEDs and coils showed angiographic occlusion and neointimal scores at 3 months that were similar to those achieved with standard platinum coiling.

Surgical or endovascular management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: an agreement study.

OBJECTIVE: Ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) can be managed surgically or endovascularly. In this study, the authors aimed to measure the interobserver agreement in selecting the best management option for various patients with an RIA. METHODS: The authors constructed an electronic portfolio of 42 cases of RIA in which an angiographic image along with a brief clinical vignette for each patient were displayed. Undisclosed to the responders was that the RIAs had been categorized as International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) (small, anterior-circulation, non-middle cerebral artery location, n = 18) and non-ISAT (n = 22) aneurysms; the non-ISAT group also included 2 basilar apex aneurysms for which a high number of endovascular choices was expected. The portfolio was sent to 132 clinicians who manage patients with RIAs and circulated to members of an American surgical association. Judges were asked to choose between surgical and endovascular management, to indicate their level of confidence in the choice of treatment on a quantitative 0-10 scale, and to determine whether they would include the patient in a randomized trial in which both treatments are compared. Eleven clinicians were asked to respond twice at least 1 month apart. Responses were analyzed using kappa statistics. RESULTS: Eighty-five clinicians (58 cerebrovascular surgeons, 21 interventional neuroradiologists, and 6 interventional neurologists) answered the questionnaire. Overall, endovascular management was chosen more frequently (n = 2136 [59.8%] of 3570 answers). The proportions of decisions to clip were significantly higher for non-ISAT (50.8%) than for ISAT (26.2%) aneurysms (p = 0.0003). Interjudge agreement was only fair (kappa 0.210, 95% CI 0.158-0.276) for all cases and judges, despite high confidence levels (mean score > 8 for all cases). Agreement was no better within subgroups of clinicians with the same specialty, years of experience, or location of practice or across capability groups (ability to clip or coil, or both). When agreement was defined as > 80% of responders choosing the same option, agreement occurred for only 7 of 40 cases, all of which were ISAT aneurysms, for which coiling was preferred. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between clinicians regarding the best management option was infrequent but centered around coiling for some ISAT aneurysms. Surgical clipping was chosen more frequently for non-ISAT aneurysms than for ISAT aneurysms. Patients with such an aneurysm might be candidates for inclusion in randomized trials.

Surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a pragmatic randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are increasingly diagnosed and are commonly treated using endovascular treatment or microsurgical clipping. The safety and efficacy of treatments have not been compared in a randomised trial. How to treat patients with UIAs suitable for both options remains unknown. METHODS: We randomly allocated clipping or coiling to patients with one or more 3-25 mm UIAs judged treatable both ways. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as: initial failure of aneurysm treatment, intracranial haemorrhage or residual aneurysm on 1-year imaging. Secondary outcomes included neurological deficits following treatment, hospitalisation >5 days, overall morbidity and mortality and angiographic results at 1 year. RESULTS: The trial was designed to include 260 patients. An analysis was performed for slow accrual: 136 patients were enrolled from 2010 through 2016 and 134 patients were treated. The 1-year primary outcome, available for 104 patients, was reached in 5/48 (10.4% (4.5%-22.2%)) patients allocated surgical clipping, and 10/56 (17.9% (10.0%-29.8%)) patients allocated endovascular coiling (OR: 0.54 (0.13-1.90), p=0.40). Morbidity and mortality (modified Rankin Scale>2) at 1 year occurred in 2/48 (4.2% (1.2%-14.0%)) and 2/56 (3.6% (1.0%-12.1%)) patients allocated clipping and coiling, respectively. New neurological deficits (15/65 vs 6/69; OR: 3.12 (1.05-10.57), p=0.031), and hospitalisations beyond 5 days (30/65 vs 6/69; OR: 8.85 (3.22-28.59), p=0.0001) were more frequent after clipping. CONCLUSION: Surgical clipping or endovascular coiling of UIAs did not show differences in morbidity at 1 year. Trial continuation and additional randomised evidence will be necessary to establish the supposed superior efficacy of clipping.

Flow diversion: what can clinicians learn from animal models?

INTRODUCTION: Flow diversion is increasingly used for treating intracranial aneurysms. This article aims to review the evidence obtained from animal models and summarizes the findings that might be of clinical interest. METHODS: From a systematic review of studies published between 2000 and 2016, we extracted the data on the following questions: What roles do aneurysm dimension, morphology, and vascular geometry have on success of flow diversion? What characteristics of a flow diverter can influence aneurysm occlusion? What are the risk factors for jailed branch occlusion? RESULTS: Flow diversion has been shown to be less effective in occluding large aneurysms with wide or undefined necks, as compared to smaller aneurysms with narrower necks. Straight sidewall aneurysms were more likely to occlude after flow diversion than curved sidewall aneurysms or bifurcation aneurysms with branches originating from the neck or the fundus. The main characteristics of devices that may impact on the success of flow diversion are porosity and pore-density, but challenging aneurysm models were not better occluded with devices of lower porosity. Porosity is not uniform when devices deform to adapt to local in vivo anatomy when deployed. Neointima formation on devices correlates with low porosity. Branches are rarely occluded when they are jailed, but persistent branch flow may prevent aneurysm occlusion. CONCLUSION: Experimental models may help anticipate clinical results of flow diversion.

Testing flow diversion in animal models: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Flow diversion (FD) is increasingly used to treat intracranial aneurysms. We sought to systematically review published studies to assess the quality of reporting and summarize the results of FD in various animal models. METHODS: Databases were searched to retrieve all animal studies on FD from 2000 to 2015. Extracted data included species and aneurysm models, aneurysm and neck dimensions, type of flow diverter, occlusion rates, and complications. Articles were evaluated using a checklist derived from the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines. RESULTS: Forty-two articles reporting the results of FD in nine different aneurysm models were included. The rabbit elastase-induced aneurysm model was the most commonly used, with 3-month occlusion rates of 73.5%, (95%CI [61.9-82.6%]). FD of surgical sidewall aneurysms, constructed in rabbits or canines, resulted in high occlusion rates (100% [65.5-100%]). FD resulted in modest occlusion rates (15.4% [8.9-25.1%]) when tested in six complex canine aneurysm models designed to reproduce more difficult clinical contexts (large necks, bifurcation, or fusiform aneurysms). Adverse events, including branch occlusion, were rarely reported. There were no hemorrhagic complications. Articles complied with 20.8 ± 3.9 of 41 ARRIVE items; only a small number used randomization (3/42 articles [7.1%]) or a control group (13/42 articles [30.9%]). CONCLUSION: Preclinical studies on FD have shown various results. Occlusion of elastase-induced aneurysms was common after FD. The model is not challenging but standardized in many laboratories. Failures of FD can be reproduced in less standardized but more challenging surgical canine constructions. The quality of reporting could be improved.

Temporary surgical clipping of flow-diverted arteries in an experimental aneurysm model.

OBJECTIVE Surgical management of recurrent aneurysms following failed flow diversion may pose difficulties in securing vascular control with temporary clips. The authors tested the efficacy and impact of different types of aneurysm clips on flow-diverted arteries. METHODS Six wide-necked experimental aneurysms were created in canines and treated with Pipeline flow diverters. In 4 aneurysms, occlusion of the artery at the level of the proximal and distal landing zones (n = 2 per aneurysm) was attempted, using temporary, fenestrated, single, and double permanent aneurysm clips. Two aneurysms served as unclipped controls. Serial angiography was performed to investigate the efficacy of clip occlusion, flow diverter deformation, and thrombus formation. After the animals were killed, the flow-diverted aneurysm constructs were opened and photographed to determine neointimal or device damage as a result of clip placement. RESULTS Angiography-confirmed clip occlusion was only possible for 4 of 8 of the tested flow-diverted arterial segments. Clip application attempts led to filling defects consistent with thrombus formation in 2 of 4 flow-diverted constructs, and to minor damage of the flow diverter with neointimal fracture in 1 of 4 cases. CONCLUSIONS Aneurysm clips placed on canine parent arteries bearing a Pipeline flow diverter were unable to reliably stop blood flow. Application of aneurysm clips can cause mild damage to the device and neointima, which might translate into thromboembolic risks. If possible, vascular control should be sought beyond the terminal ends of the implanted device.

Compaction of flow diverters improves occlusion of experimental wide-necked aneurysms.

INTRODUCTION: Flow diverters (FDs) are increasingly used in the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms. OBJECTIVE: To examine the hypothesis that intentional FD compaction might improve aneurysm occlusion rates. METHODS: Bilateral wide-necked carotid aneurysms were created in 12 dogs. Endovascular treatment was performed 1 month later, using Pipeline embolization devices deployed with compaction across the aneurysm neck (n=12). Group 1a consisted of aneurysms treated with a single compacted FD (n=8), while group 1b aneurysms required two compacted FDs (n=4). Control aneurysms were treated with a single non-compacted FD (group 3; n=6), or not treated (group 4; n=4). Angiographic results were compared at 3 months. Pathology specimens were photographed and the neointimal coverage of devices scored using an ordinal grading system. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 24 aneurysms were patent at 1 month. Deployment with compaction was successful in eight cases (group 1a aneurysms). The compaction maneuver led to immediate FD prolapse into the aneurysm in four cases, rescued by deploying a second, telescoping FD (forming group 1b aneurysms). One compacted device later migrated distally, leaving the aneurysm untreated. Angiographic results differed significantly between groups (p=0.0002). At 3 months, aneurysms successfully treated with a single compacted FD were more often occluded at 3 months (7/7) than aneurysms flow-diverted without compaction (2/6; p=0.021). All aneurysms treated with two compacted FDs were occluded, while all untreated aneurysms remained patent. There were no parent vessel stenoses. CONCLUSIONS: Compaction of FDs can improve angiographic occlusion of experimental wide-necked aneurysms.

Fatal avulsion of choroidal or perforating arteries by guidewires. Case reports, ex vivo experiments, potential mechanisms and prevention.

Innovations in endovascular tools have permitted an increasingly broad range of neurovascular lesions to be treated via minimally invasive methods. However, some device modifications may carry additional risks, not immediately apparent to operators. A patient with a symptomatic, partially thrombosed basilar apex aneurysm was allocated balloon-assisted coiling. Attempts were made to place a microwire across the basilar apex through the posterior communicating artery. Overlapping courses of the posterior cerebral and posterior choroidal arteries on the roadmap images were not recognized and a flanged-tip microwire was inadvertently advanced deep into the choroidal artery. Following the wire with a microcatheter led to binding of arterial tissue within the microcatheter. Removing the wire led to an avulsion of the choroidal artery and a severe hemorrhagic complication which proved fatal. Tissue was identified on the tip of the guidewire. Pathology showed layers of vascular tissue within the laser-cut flanges of the distal wire tip. A similar complication, also fatal, occurred during balloon angioplasty of a distal vertebral artery, when an exchange wire was accidently introduced into a perforator from a posterior cerebral artery. Ex vivo catheterization of distal mesenteric arterial branches showed that the wall of small arteries can be entrapped by laser-cut, flanged, but not by smooth guidewire tips. Microwires with a flanged instead of smooth distal tip, when placed into small caliber vessels, may cause hemorrhagic complications from avulsions*.

Flow diversion of giant curved sidewall and bifurcation experimental aneurysms with very-low-porosity devices.

OBJECTIVE: Flow diverters (FDs) are increasingly used to treat difficult intracranial aneurysms. The objective of this study was to test whether treatment challenges posed by giant curved sidewall (cSW) and endwall bifurcation (EwB) aneurysms can be overcome with the use of very-low-porosity devices. METHODS: Large and giant EwB (n = 12) and cSW aneurysms (n = 5) were constructed in 17 dogs. EwB aneurysms were treated with 48 (n = 4), 64 (n = 4), or two overlapping 64-wire low-porosity devices (n = 4), whereas all cSW aneurysms were treated with single 64-wire devices. Angiographic results were recorded immediately and at 12 weeks before euthanasia. Pathologic specimens were photographed and neointimal coverage of devices measured and scored. RESULTS: By 12 weeks, 1 of 12 EwB and 1 of 5 cSW aneurysms were occluded. All other aneurysms were patent. Device-related arterial stenoses occurred in 13 of 17 animals, hemodynamically significant in two. All branches jailed by the FDs remained patent. There was a significant correlation between angiographic scores and the degree of neointima formation on the device (Rho = 0.527; P = 0.04). Failures of aneurysm occlusion could be explained by holes, sometimes barely visible, in the neointima that formed over FDs. CONCLUSION: Low-porosity FDs fail to reliably occlude experimental giant EwB and cSW aneurysms.