Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Surg Technol Int ; 34: 156-162, 2019 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30500977

ABSTRACT

AIM: The presence of enterocele may interfere with the surgical approach for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) as it may represent a contraindication to stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR), and tactics to overcome this problem have been debated. A change in the patient's position during surgery may be a means to overcome an enterocele. We sought to determine whether an enterocele could be completely reduced when the patient is placed in the prone position during fluoroscopic defecography (FD). METHODS: Patients of a Colon and Rectal Surgery Residency Program undergoing FD for any condition from August 2012 to May 2016 were enrolled. For participants with an enterocele documented during FD, projections in the prone position were also obtained. Data regarding sex, age, pelvic floor laxity, rectocele, intussusception, sigmoidocele, enterocele and its reduction in the prone position were recorded for all participants. Enterocele reduction was analyzed by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were enrolled and an enterocele was found in 63 (62.3%). Among the patients with an enterocele, in 48 (76.2%) it was completely reduced when the patient was placed in the prone position (p-value = 0.000195; 95% CI 63.79 - 86.02). CONCLUSION: Complete enterocele reduction in the prone position during FD was highly statistically significant. This finding may safely eliminate enterocele as a contraindication to STARR. These results suggest that a projection in the prone position should be added to the standard sequence obtained during FD for patients who may be eligible for a transanal surgical approach. Validation studies are needed to assess whether this change can lead to lower enterocele-related complications in STARR.


Subject(s)
Defecography/methods , Prone Position , Rectocele/diagnostic imaging , Rectum/surgery , Surgical Stapling/methods , Female , Humans , Optical Imaging , Rectum/diagnostic imaging
3.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 49(11): 1781-90, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17041748

ABSTRACT

Adrenal masses are commonly discovered incidentally in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, and adrenal malignancies have been rarely reported. Individuals with familial adenomatous polyposis frequently undergo abdominal CT-scan examinations for surveillance or symptoms. Adrenal lesions often are detected unexpectedly and are thus becoming a common clinical problem in this population. Adrenal lesions encompass a heterogeneous spectrum of pathologic entities, including primary adrenocortical and medullary tumors, benign or malignant lesions, hormonally active or inactive lesions, metastases, and infections. When an adrenal mass is detected, the clinician needs to address two crucial questions: 1) is the mass malignant? and 2) is it hormonally active? This article presents three new cases of incidental adrenal lesions in familial adenomatous polyposis, reviews the medical literature for this setting, and provides an overview of the diagnostic clinical approach and management of the adrenal findings in familial adenomatous polyposis patients.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/complications , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli/complications , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/complications , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adenoma/diagnosis , Adenoma/therapy , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Back Pain/etiology , Female , Humans , Incidental Findings , Male , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...