ABSTRACT
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) instruction is required for physician assistant (PA) students. As a follow-up to an initial didactic year survey, this study seeks to understand which attributes of EBM resources clinical PA students find most and least useful, their self-efficacy utilizing medical literature, and their usage of EBM tools in the clinic. Results indicate that students preferred UpToDate and PubMed. PA students valued ease of use, which can inform instructors and librarians. Respondents utilized EBM tools daily or a few days a week, underscoring the importance of EBM tools in real-world scenarios. After their clinical year, students felt moderately confident utilizing the medical literature, emphasizing EBM training.
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Physician Assistants , Physician Assistants/education , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Evidence-Based Medicine/education , Female , Male , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Students, Health Occupations/psychology , Young Adult , Self EfficacyABSTRACT
Stroke incidence is higher and stroke outcomes are poorer in Black patients compared to White patients. Poststroke pain, however, is not a well understood stroke outcome. Using the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program database, we hypothesized that the dataset would demonstrate proportionately higher relative risk of poststroke pain in the Black poststroke patient population compared to the White poststroke patient population. However, our analysis showed that Black stroke patients were diagnosed with poststroke pain at a similar rate as White stroke patients. As our results are not consistent with other poststroke outcomes in the literature, this study identifies a potentially underdiagnosed patient population, highlighting the need for further research.
Subject(s)
Population Health , Stroke , Humans , Black or African American , Pain , Stroke/complications , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/epidemiology , United States , WhiteABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Latinx children face psychosocial, linguistic, and economic challenges that put them at an increased risk of developing mental health conditions. Primary care providers should be equipped to recognize the complex mental health needs of this growing population. This article explores some of the barriers to mental health screenings in Latinx children and presents culturally sensitive, validated screening tools for primary care providers.
Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Child , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/psychologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Current physician assistant (PA) learners have a clear preference for interactive learning that is vibrantly present in new media technologies. At present, there is a paucity of research regarding use or acceptability of gamification in PA education. The purpose of this study was to examine PA students' experience with, attitudes toward, and outcomes of a gamified cardiac auscultation curriculum. METHODS: Faculty at one institution designed an interactive Mobile App Cardiac Auscultation Curriculum (MACAC). The MACAC incorporates independent and group learning using the Littmann Learning mobile app. Author-created surveys as well as knowledge and auscultation assessment tools were delivered to all students. RESULTS: Most of the students recommended the use of the app for future cohorts and reported confidence to accurately identify normal and abnormal heart sounds. Knowledge and auscultation assessment scores demonstrated proficiency in identification of normal and abnormal heart sounds. DISCUSSION: Gamification research is important because blended learning that incorporates new media technologies with traditional approaches can help overcome the limitations of passive learning environments. This study provides evidence that the use of a mobile app can be an effective and innovative method to teach cardiac auscultation to the 21st century PA learners.
Subject(s)
Heart Auscultation , Physician Assistants , Humans , Gamification , Clinical Competence , Physician Assistants/education , StudentsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study highlights trends in available physician assistant (PA) applicant and matriculant data over the first 15 years of the Central Application Service for Physician Assistants (CASPA) service (2002-2016). This study expands knowledge identified in the CASPA 10-year data report. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of CASPA data from all CASPA-participating PA programs between 2002 and 2016. Central Application Service for Physician Assistants staff verified all applicant academic information. In addition, beginning in 2007, the online CASPA admissions portal linked matriculant data with applicant data. RESULTS: During the first 15 years of the CASPA service, there was a 194% increase in the number of CASPA-participating programs (from 68 to 200) and a 409% increase in the number of total applicants. Several trends identified in the CASPA 10-year report persisted, including increasing grade point averages among applicants and matriculants and lower matriculation rates among underrepresented minority applicants and applicants who reported economic disadvantage. CONCLUSION: This 15-year comprehensive analysis of the CASPA data will benefit the profession by providing historical information that faculty and policymakers can use as a basis for developing and evaluating future admissions policies and practices.
Subject(s)
Physician Assistants , School Admission Criteria , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Physician Assistants/education , Minority Groups , FacultyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: (1) To describe how often physician assistant (PA) students correctly identify prescribing errors and (2) examine between-cohort differences on ability to correctly identify prescribing errors. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 2 cohorts of PA students at one institution. Students were presented with 3 hypothetical prescriptions, 2 of which contained a prescribing error. For each prescription, students were asked to (1) identify whether an error occurred and (2) indicate the type of error. A simple Poisson regression model analyzed the data. RESULTS: We received responses from 130 students (72.6% response rate). Approximately 12% (12.3%, n = 16) correctly identified whether all 3 prescriptions were correct. The median number of correctly identified prescriptions was 1 (interquartile range = 1). There was not a statistically significant between-cohort difference identifying the correct number of prescriptions (ß = 0.27, P = .10). CONCLUSION: Physician assistant students' prescribing error identification was similar to previous research in medical and nursing students. Efforts to improve prescribing training are critical to ensure patient safety.
Subject(s)
Physician Assistants , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Physician Assistants/education , Prescriptions , StudentsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: With the expanding treatment landscape for asthma, the process of identifying best-fit, individualized management options is becoming increasingly complicated. Understanding patients' preferences can inform shared decision-making between clinicians and patients. OBJECTIVES: To examine preferences of adults with asthma for therapeutic and management attributes and determine how these preferences vary among patients. METHODS: We conducted an online discrete choice experiment survey in US adults with asthma. Patient preferences were analyzed using logit models. Factors affecting patients' preferences were identified by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,184 patients completed the survey (60% female; mean [SD] age, 49.2 [15.0] years). Patients most valued fewer asthma attacks requiring urgent health care professional visits, fewer exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids, and a reduced risk for oral thrush. Higher value was placed on reducing the risk of short-term (oral thrush) versus long-term side effects (diabetes). Patients were willing to increase rescue medication use in exchange for decreasing exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids and attacks requiring urgent health care professional visits. Patients preferred a single inhaler for rescue and maintenance and least valued asthma action plans. Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors affected patient preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Patients sought convenient management options that focused mainly on decreasing the short-term morbidity associated with asthma exacerbations and therapies. Preferences varied by demographics, clinical factors, and socioeconomics. It is important for shared decision-making discussions to include conversations about morbidity and how available therapeutic options align with individual patient preferences.
Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents , Asthma , Adult , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Patient Preference , Asthma/drug therapy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Disease Management , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
PURPOSE: (1) Identify the proportion of primary care visits in which American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) men receive a prostate-specific antigen test (PSAT)and/or a digital rectal exam (DRE), (2) describe characteristics of primary care visits in which AI/AN receive PSA and/or DRE, and (3) identify whether AI/AN receive PSA and/or DRE less often than non-Hispanic White (nHW) men. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) during 2013-2016 and 2018 and the NAMCS Community Health Center (CHC) datasets from 2012-2015. Weighted bivariate and multivariable tests analyzed the data to account for the complex survey design. RESULTS: For AI/AN men, 1.67 per 100 visits (95% CI = 0-4.24) included a PSATs (or PSAT) and 0 visits included a DRE between 2013-2016 and 2018. The rate of PSA for non-AI/AN men was 9.35 per 100 visits (95% CI = 7.78-10.91) and 2.52 per 100 visits (95% CI = 1.61-3.42) for DRE. AI/AN men were significantly less likely to receive a PSA than nHW men (aOR = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.01-0.83). In CHCs, AI/AN men experienced 4.26 PSAT per 100 visits (95% CI = 0.96-7.57) compared to 5.00 PSAT per 100 visits (95% CI = 4.40-5.68) for non-AI/AN men. DRE rates for AI/AN men was 0.63 per 100 visits (95% CI = 0-1.61) compared to 1.05 per 100 (95% CI = 0.74-1.37) for non-AI/AN men. There was not a statistically significant disparity in the CHC data regarding PSA (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.42-1.98) or DRE (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.15-3.74), compared to nHW men. CONCLUSION: Efforts are needed to better understand why providers may not use PSA and DRE with AI/AN men compared to nHW men.
Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Physical Examination , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , American Indian or Alaska Native , Physical Examination/methods , Primary Health Care , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/ethnology , Rectum , WhiteABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The physician assistant (PA) literature has focused on the implications of creating an entry-level doctoral degree; however, there is scant primary literature on postprofessional doctorates, which are becoming more popular as the number of institutions offering them increases. The purposes of this project were to: (1) describe interest and motivation of currently practicing PAs to enroll in a postprofessional doctorate program and (2) identify the most- and least-preferred attributes of a postprofessional doctorate program. METHODS: This was a quantitative cross-sectional survey of recent alumni from one institution. Measures included interest in obtaining a postprofessional doctorate, a nonrandomized Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) exercise, and motivators for enrolling in a postprofessional doctorate. The main outcome of interest was the BWS standardized score for each attribute. RESULTS: The research team received 172 eligible responses (n = 172, response rate = 25.83%). Results indicate that 47.67% of respondents (n = 82) expressed interest in a postprofessional doctorate. The most preferred doctorate program attribute was a clinically based program, ending with a residency, conferring a Doctor of Medical Science (DMSc) degree, with a hybrid course delivery. DISCUSSION: This sample included various interests, motivations, and preferred program attributes. Understanding these factors may help inform the design and redesign of doctoral programs.
Subject(s)
Medicine , Physician Assistants , Physicians , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Attitude of Health Personnel , Physician Assistants/educationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this article is to (1) describe how professional identity intersects with physician assistants' (PAs') and PA students' racial and ethnic identities and cultural backgrounds; (2) examine how sociohistorical contexts shape professional identity in racial/ethnic minoritized PAs and PA students; and (3) identify the role of PA program administrators and faculty to address the needs of racial/ethnic minoritized PAs and PA students. METHODS: This study draws on elements of constructivist grounded theory to investigate the professional identity formation (PIF) experiences of 45 PA students and alumni from 3 institutions. Participants were recruited using a snowball method and identified as 23 Black/African American, 12 Hispanic/Latino, 6 mixed race, and 4 Native American/Indigenous. Interview data were analyzed using sociocultural theory as an analytic framework. RESULTS: The results suggest that participants felt that their racial/ethnic identity was an important part of their identity, yet many indicated they experienced frequent micro- and macroaggressions from fellow students, faculty, lecturers, administrators, preceptors, patients, and supervisors. Additionally, they indicated that they need more support from their programs than what is currently provided. DISCUSSION: The results of this study suggest that social experiences before, during, and after PA training strongly influence PIF development in racial/ethnic minoritized PAs. Administrators and professional PA organizations should evaluate methods to support those individuals who identify as a racial/ethnic minority throughout their careers.
Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Physician Assistants , Humans , Social Identification , Minority Groups , Physician Assistants/education , Racial GroupsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There has been an increasing focus on improving value in health care and deimplementing the use of low-value services, such as prostate cancer (PC) screening for men aged >70 years. The objectives of this study are to (1) identify the proportion of primary care visits at which low-value PC screening is ordered, and (2) identify predisposing, enabling, and health care need characteristics associated with low-value PC screening in the United States. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the National Ambulatory Medicare Care Survey datasets from 2013 to 2016 and 2018. Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use guided independent variable selection. Weighted multivariable logit models were used to analyze data. RESULTS: There were 6.71 low-value prostate-specific antigens (PSAs) per 100 visits and 1.65 low-value digital rectal exams (DREs) per 100 visits. For each additional service ordered by primary care providers, the odds of ordering a low-value PSA increased by 49%, and the odds of performing a low-value DRE increased by 37%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of low-value PSAs and DREs was sizable during the observed time period. Organizations who want to reduce low-value PSAs and DREs may want to focus interventions on providers who order a high number of tests.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: (1) Present the factor structure of two psychometric instruments for self-efficacy and one for outcome expectations of medication prescribing; (2) evaluate the reliability of the scales, and (3) present preliminary evidence of validity. METHODS: Physician assistants (PA) and PA students completed a survey evaluating three psychometric instruments: (1) Self-Efficacy in Prescribing (SEP), (2) Self-Efficacy in Prescribing-Geriatric (SEPG), and (3) Outcomes Expectations of Prescribing Errors (OEP). Students also evaluated 3 hypothetical prescriptions, two of which contained a prescribing error. Students were instructed to identify (1) if an error occurred and (2) what type of error. The data were analyzed using parallel analysis with a varimax rotation, Cronbach's α, Pearson and Spearman correlations. RESULTS: One hundred eighty five (n = 185) respondents completed the survey (response rate = 63.8%). The parallel analysis found that the SEP had one 7-item factor with α = 0.94 (M = 5.7 (SD = 1.9) out of 10). The SEPG also had one 7-item factor with α = 0.95 (M = 5.5 (1.9). The OEP had one 6-item factor with α = 0.89 (M = 3.5 (SD = 0.8) out of 5). The SEP and SEPG, were correlated to the OEP each other (both p < 0.01). Actively practicing PAs had the highest composite mean SEP and SEPG scores. First-year PA students had the highest mean scores for the OEP. There was a weak association between the mean SEPG score and the number of correctly identified prescriptions (rs = 0.18, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The SEP, SEPG, and OEP show preliminary evidence of reliability and structural, construct, and known-group validities using simulated prescriptions. These tools may be able to be used by educators and implementation scientists as one method to show the effectiveness of future interventions to reduce incidence of prescribing errors.
Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions , Physician Assistants , Humans , Aged , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: (1) To evaluate the effectiveness of a curriculum on physician assistant (PA) students' knowledge about opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and management and (2) present student satisfaction with the curriculum. METHODS: Three cohorts of PA students completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires about their knowledge of motivational interviewing (MI) for OUD. One cohort of students completed the 11-item questionnaire without exposure to the intervention (control group). Students' satisfaction with the curriculum was assessed as was their pre- and post-intervention knowledge about using MI for OUD. Bivariate statistical tests were used to analyze the quantitative data. RESULTS: Three hundred complete and usable responses were obtained from the four cohorts of PA students (n = 300, 87.7 percent response rate). The intervention groups answered a higher number of items correctly (median = 7) than the control group (median = 6, Wilcoxon sign test M = 31, p < 0.0001). Among the intervention group, there was not a statistically significant between cohort difference on: (1) the number of identical pre- and post-intervention questionnaire items answered correctly (Chi-square = 3.77, DF = 2, p = 0.15), and (2) the total number of items answered correctly on the post-intervention questionnaire (Chi-square = 0.32, DF = 2, p = 0.85). Student comments suggest students were supportive of the curriculum, with improvements noted on how to deliver the material. CONCLUSIONS: An educational intervention using MI for PA students was found to be valuable, and students who completed the intervention had greater knowledge about using MI with OUD patients than those who did not complete the training. The size of the effect was small, and more research on the curriculum is necessary prior to widespread adoption.
Subject(s)
Epidemics , Motivational Interviewing , Opioid-Related Disorders , Physician Assistants , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid , Opioid-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/therapyABSTRACT
Little is known about the relative importance of factors that contribute to job choices among health care providers. A convenience sample of 173 health care providers (N=134) and physician assistant students (N=39) completed a cross-sectional survey. Participants rated the importance of sixteen job- (e.g., work environment), community- (e.g., recreational opportunities), and personal-related factors (e.g., children) and one open-ended item. The highest rated item, on average, was an opportunity to make a difference in patient quality of life (mean (M)=4.57, standard deviation (SD)=0.63) while the lowest rated item was wealth/prestige of living in a certain area (M=2.43, SD=1.05). The average importance rating was similar across types of providers and between providers and students. While personal interest to positively affect patients' quality of life was rated as the most important factor, almost all the studied items were rated as important or very important by the majority of participants.
Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Students , Child , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Workplace , Data Collection , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) instruction is required for physician Assistant (PA) students. This pilot study surveyed didactic PA students at three geographically diverse PA programs at the end of their didactic EBM course to understand which attributes of EBM resources they find most and least useful, and their self-efficacy in searching and appraising medical literature. Thematic analysis identified the most important student-reported attributes of a resource. PA students in this sample preferred UpToDate and PubMed as their top EBM tools based on attribute ratings. However, each database included in this pilot study received positive feedback, despite a low usage rate across institutions. The most important attributes were ease of use/search, information presentation, and conclusion/critical appraisal skill. After one EBM course, on average, students rated their self-efficacy searching the literature and appraising the literature as "moderately confident." This suggests that instructors and librarians have an opportunity to expose students to more tools as well as encourage "the right tool for the right job."
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Physician Assistants , Humans , Pilot Projects , Evidence-Based Medicine/education , Surveys and Questionnaires , Physician Assistants/education , StudentsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Aminoglycosides are frequently used for empiric and definitive treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations. Various methods have been described for aminoglycoside therapeutic drug monitoring. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of patient-specific pharmacokinetic calculations for aminoglycosides used to treat CF pulmonary exacerbations. METHODS: Ambidirectional cohort study of patients admitted to a children's hospital from June 1, 2018, through February 28, 2019, and June 1, 2019, through February 8, 2021. The primary outcome was the occurrence of dosing changes after analysis of initial serum concentrations in either group. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of nephrotoxicity, duration of antibiotics, and length of stay. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (75%) in the intervention group versus zero in the control group required dosing adjustments after initial analysis of serum concentrations were completed (p < 0.001). There was not a statistically significant between-group difference for duration of antibiotics in days (median, 14 vs 13.5; Z, 1.07; p = 0.29) or length of stay (median, 11 vs 11; Z, -0.31; p = 0.76). There was also not a statistically significant between-group difference in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) change from admission to discharge (11.4% vs 13.9%; t, 0.61; Degrees of Freedom, 39; p = 0.55). Two patients (6.25%) in the intervention group experienced nephrotoxicity compared with zero patients in the control group (risk difference, 6.25%; 95% CI, -2.14 to 14.64; number needed to harm, 16). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific pharmacokinetic monitoring led to significantly more dosing changes and was associated with similar patient outcomes as trough-only monitoring. Further studies are needed to identify methods to optimize aminoglycoside dosing and monitoring for these patients with the goal of reducing toxicities while maximizing efficacy.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The US National Asthma Education and Prevention Program updates and Global Initiative for Asthma report encourage considering the patient perspective to improve asthma control. The objective of the present study was to collect data about the perceptions, experiences, and concerns of adult patients and caregivers of children with asthma regarding rescue, maintenance, and oral corticosteroid treatments. Patients and Methods: In-person focus groups were conducted in three cities across the US. Participants also completed patient-reported outcome measures assessing asthma control and experiences. Results: Focus groups were conducted in demographically and clinically diverse adults with asthma (five groups, n=34), caregivers of children with asthma (five groups, n=35), and adults with a dual diagnosis of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (one group, n=5). Only 28% of patients were well-controlled by Asthma Control Test/Asthma Control Test-Caregiver Report and 18% by Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire. Forty-four percent of participants reported not following their prescribed medical plan. Four key themes emerged from the focus groups: (1) asthma symptom control and monitoring are often inadequate; (2) treatments are often used incorrectly; (3) communication between health care professionals and patients or caregivers is often ineffective; and (4) concerns related to treatment and desires to improve treatment. Conclusion: Control of asthma symptoms is suboptimal in the vast majority of patients and both patients and caregivers do not feel sufficiently informed about asthma. Health care providers should be encouraged to engage patients and caregivers in shared decision making for managing asthma and selecting treatments that integrate patient values, preferences, and lifestyles.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, public health measures, including stay-at-home orders, were widely instituted in the United States by March 2020. However, few studies have evaluated the impact of these measures on continuity of care among older adults living with chronic diseases. METHODS: Beginning in June 2020, participants of the national Women's Health Initiative (WHI) (N = 64 061) were surveyed on the impact of the pandemic on various aspects of their health and well-being since March 2020, including access to care appointments, medications, and caregivers. Responses received by November 2020 (response rate = 77.6%) were tabulated and stratified by prevalent chronic diseases, including hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (CVD). RESULTS: Among 49 695 respondents (mean age = 83.6 years), 70.2% had a history of hypertension, 21.8% had diabetes, and 18.9% had CVD. Half of the respondents reported being very concerned about the pandemic, and 24.5% decided against seeking medical care to avoid COVID-19 exposure. A quarter reported difficulties with getting routine care, and 45.5% had in-person appointments converted to telemedicine formats; many reported canceled (27.8%) or rescheduled (37.7%) appointments. Among those taking prescribed medication (88.0%), 9.7% reported changing their method of obtaining medications. Those living with and without chronic diseases generally reported similar changes in care and medication access. CONCLUSIONS: Early in the pandemic, many older women avoided medical care or adapted to new ways of receiving care and medications. Therefore, optimizing alternative services, like telemedicine, should be prioritized to ensure that older women continue to receive quality care during public health emergencies.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Hypertension , United States/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Pandemics , Postmenopause , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Women's Health , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Continuity of Patient CareABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe attitudes of health professional trainees for conducting routine screening for suicidal ideation with adolescents; (2) identify the relationship between intention to conduct suicide risk assessments and behavioral attitudes, norm referents, and behavioral control; and (3) investigate the relationship between intention to conduct these assessments and self-reported clinic behavior. METHODS: Second-year physician assistant (PA) students and pediatric residents (MD) at 3 universities voluntarily completed an anonymous cross-sectional questionnaire. The questionnaire was guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior and included items about previous experience with suicide. Pearson correlation and multivariable linear regression were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: There were usable and complete data for 105 respondents (n = 105). The sample included PA students (89.52%, n = 94) and pediatric residents (10.48%, n = 11). Trainees were significantly more likely to have higher intention to conduct suicide risk assessments when they reported greater behavioral control (Std. ß = 0.34, p <0.001) and reported suicide being discussed during previous clinic visits as a student/resident (Std. ß = 0.21, p = 0.03), controlling for profession, race, behavioral attitudes, and norm referents. Trainees were significantly more likely to report conducting suicide risk assessments when they had greater behavioral control (Std. ß = 0.27, p = 0.01) and greater intention to conduct these assessments (Std. ß = 0.21, p = 0.03), controlling for profession, race, behavioral attitudes, and norm referents. DISCUSSION: Second-year PA students and pediatric residents support screening adolescents for suicide risk. Training on methods to increase behavioral control may increase rates of screenings.