Clinical outcomes after MRI connectivity-guided radiofrequency thalamotomy for tremor.

OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency thalamotomy (RF-T) is an established treatment for refractory tremor. It is unclear whether connectivity-guided targeting strategies could further augment outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRI connectivity-guided RF-T in severe tremor. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with severe tremor (14 with essential tremor [ET], 7 with Parkinson's disease [PD]) underwent unilateral RF-T at a single institution between 2017 and 2020. Connectivity-derived thalamic segmentation was used to guide targeting. Changes in the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Rating Scale (FTMRS) were recorded in treated and nontreated hands as well as procedure-related side effects. RESULTS: Twenty-three thalamotomies were performed (with 2 patients receiving a repeated intervention). The mean postoperative assessment time point was 14.1 months. Treated-hand tremor scores improved by 63.8%, whereas nontreated-hand scores deteriorated by 10.1% (p < 0.01). Total FTMRS scores were significantly better at follow-up compared with baseline (mean 34.7 vs 51.7, p = 0.016). Baseline treated-hand tremor severity (rho = 0.786, p < 0.01) and total FTMRS score (rho = 0.64, p < 0.01) best correlated with tremor improvement. The most reported side effect was mild gait ataxia (n = 11 patients). CONCLUSIONS: RF-T guided by connectivity-derived segmentation is a safe and effective option for severe tremor in both PD and ET.

Neurological update: consult the neurosurgical oracle for a standard operating procedure.

Standard operating procedures (SOPs) contain general instructions and principles to standardize care, to improve effective and safe healthcare. Developing new, or updating current, SOPs is, however, challenging in fields where high-level evidence is limited. Still, SOPs alone have been shown to result in less complications. In this narrative review, we describe the process of creating a consensus-based SOP that is pragmatic for clinical practice since it can be created regardless of the current level of evidence. Through live audience engagement platforms, a group of experts will be able to both anonymously respond to a created questionnaire, and (subsequently) discuss the results within the same meeting. This modified Digital Delphi method as described here can be used as a tool toward consensus-based healthcare.

Outcome After Decompressive Craniectomy for Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: Timing of the Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), clinical guidelines for the treatment of space-occupying hemispheric infarct employ age (≤60 yr) and time elapsed since stroke onset (≤48 h) as decisive criteria whether to perform decompressive craniectomy (DC). However, only few patients in these RCTs underwent DC after 48 h. OBJECTIVE: To study the association between the timing of DC and (un)favorable outcome in patients with space-occupying middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarct undergoing DC. METHODS: We performed a single-center cohort study from 2007 to 2017. Unfavorable outcome at 1 yr was defined as a Glasgow outcome scale 1 to 3. Additionally, we systematically reviewed the literature up to November 2018, including studies reporting on the timing of DC and other predictors of outcome. We performed Firth penalized likelihood and random-effects meta-analysis with odds ratio (OR) on unfavorable outcome. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were enrolled. A total of 26 (39%) patients achieved favorable and 40 (61%) unfavorable outcomes (13 [20%] died). DC after 48 h since stroke diagnosis did not significantly increase the risk of unfavorable outcome (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.3-2.3). Also, in the meta-analysis, DC after 48 h of stroke onset was not associated with a higher risk of unfavorable outcome (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.89-1.38). CONCLUSION: The outcome of DC performed after 48 h in patients with malignant MCA infarct was not worse than the outcome of DC performed within 48 h. Contrary to current guidelines, we, therefore, advocate not to set a restriction of ≤48 h on the time elapsed since stroke onset in the decision whether to perform DC.

Complications in cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: timing of the intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To prevent complications following decompressive craniectomy (DC), such as sinking skin flap syndrome, studies suggested early cranioplasty (CP). However, several groups reported higher complication rates in early CP. We studied the clinical characteristics associated with complications in patients undergoing CP, with special emphasis on timing. METHODS: A single-center observational cohort study was performed, including all patients undergoing CP from 2006 to 2018, to identify predictors of complications. RESULTS: 145 patients underwent CP: complications occurred in 33 (23%): 18 (12%) epi/subdural hemorrhage, 10 (7%) bone flap infection, 4 (3%) hygroma requiring drainage, and 1 (1%) post-CP hydrocephalus. On univariate analysis, acute subdural hematoma as etiology of DC, symptomatic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow disturbance (hydrocephalus) prior to CP, and CP within three months after DC were associated with higher complication rates. On multivariate analysis, only acute subdural hematoma as etiology of DC (OR 7.5; 95% CI 1.9-29.5) and symptomatic CSF flow disturbance prior to CP (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-7.9) were associated with higher complication rates. CP performed within three months after DC was not (OR 1.4; 95% CI 0.5-3.9). Pre-CP symptomatic CSF flow disturbance was the only variable associated with the occurrence of epi/subdural hemorrhage. (OR 3.8; 95% CI 1.6-9.0) CONCLUSION: Cranioplasty has high complication rates, 23% in our cohort. Contrary to recent systematic reviews, early CP was associated with more complications (41%), explained by the higher incidence of pre-CP CSF flow disturbance and acute subdural hematoma as etiology of DC. CP in such patients should therefore be performed with highest caution.

Skin Augmentation as a Last-Resort Operative Technique During Decompressive Craniectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Since 2009, we have performed skin augmentation using a Gore-Tex patch as a last-resort measure to reduce intracranial pressure (ICP) in uncontrollable brain swelling during decompressive craniectomy (DC). Here, we report our experience and outcome in a consecutive series of patients undergoing DC with skin augmentation (DC+S). METHODS: In 2009-2015, a prospective database was created registering all patients who underwent DC+S when ICP increased >25 mm Hg while approximating the skin edges after DC (or when closing the skin was impossible because of uncontrollable brain swelling in patients without an ICP monitoring catheter). Patients' baseline characteristics and 1-year outcome were compared with patients undergoing DC without the need of skin augmentation in the same time frame. Outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was dichotomized into favorable (GOS score 4-5) and unfavorable (GOS 1-3). RESULTS: Of a total of 180 consecutive patients with DC, 20 (11%) underwent DC+S. Four (20%) survived favorably, 2 (10%) unfavorably, and 14 (70%) died (compared with 36%, 22%, and 42%, respectively, in patients with standard DC). Four of 7 patients in whom DC+S was performed ≥24 hours after injury or at second surgery survived favorably, versus none of the 13 patients in whom DC+S was performed <24 hours after injury and at first surgery. Two of 10 patients surviving the first week after DC+S had a skinplasty-related infection. CONCLUSIONS: Decompressive craniectomy with skin augmentation may be used as a last-resort measure in cases of severe brain swelling despite DC.

Decompressive craniectomy in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage for hematoma or oedema versus secondary infarction.

PURPOSE: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been proposed as lifesaving treatment in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) patients with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). However, data is sparse and controversy exists whether the underlying cause of elevated ICP influences neurological outcome. The purpose of this study is to clarify the role of the underlying cause of elevated ICP on outcome after DC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied the one-year neurological outcome in a single-centre cohort to identify predictors of favourable (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 4-5) and unfavourable (GOS 1-3) outcome. Additionally, available individual patient data in the literature was reviewed with a special emphasis on the underlying reason for DC. RESULTS: From 2006-2015, 53 consecutive aSAH patients underwent DC. Nine (17%) achieved favourable, 44 (83%) unfavourable outcome (31 patients died). One fourth of the patients undergoing DC for hematoma or (hematoma-related) oedema survived favourably (increasing to 46% for patients aged <51 years), versus none of the patients undergoing DC for secondary infarction. Analysis of individual data of 105 literature patients showed a similar trend, although overall outcome was much better: half of the patients undergoing DC for hematoma/oedema regained independence, versus less than one-fourth of patients undergoing DC for secondary infarction. CONCLUSIONS: DC in aSAH patients is associated with high rates of unfavourable outcome and mortality, but hematoma or oedema as underlying reason for DC is associated with better outcome profiles compared to secondary infarction. Future observational cohort studies are needed to further explore the different outcome profiles among subpopulations of aSAH patients requiring DC.

Neurologic Outcome After Decompressive Craniectomy: Predictors of Outcome in Different Pathologic Conditions.

OBJECTIVE: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been proposed as a lifesaving treatment in patients with elevated intracranial pressure, but its effectiveness on reaching a favorable neurologic outcome remains unclear. We identified predictors of outcome in a large, single-center cohort of patients undergoing DC for different pathologic conditions. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients undergoing DC from 2006 to 2014. The 1-year outcome, assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), was dichotomized into favorable (GOS 4-5) and unfavorable (GOS 1-3) outcome. Predictors of outcome were identified by analyzing patient characteristics. RESULTS: DC was performed in 204 patients for ischemic stroke (n = 57), traumatic brain injury (n = 50), aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) (n = 44), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (n = 29), cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) (n = 14), or other indications (n = 10). Overall, 69 (34%) patients survived favorably, 39 (19%) survived unfavorably, and 96 (47%) died. Higher age, poor Glasgow Coma Scale score, intubated status before DC, bilateral absence of pupillary light reflexes, DC for aSAH, and additional surgeries after DC (excluding cranioplasty) were significant predictors of unfavorable outcome. When patients were sorted for pathologic conditions and predictors of outcome, favorable outcome rates differed remarkably, ranging from 91% for CVT patients undergoing uncomplicated DC to 0% for aSAH patients undergoing DC for secondary infarction or ICH patients with unilateral or bilateral abnormal pupillary light reflexes upon admission. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term neurologic outcome after DC differed remarkably among subpopulations of patients, with favorable outcome rates ranging from 0% to >90%.