ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No treatment has surpassed platinum-based chemotherapy in improving overall survival in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, global, open-label, randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab with the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3-week cycles of enfortumab vedotin (at a dose of 1.25 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously on days 1 and 8) and pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg intravenously on day 1) (enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group) or gemcitabine and either cisplatin or carboplatin (determined on the basis of eligibility to receive cisplatin) (chemotherapy group). The primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 886 patients underwent randomization: 442 to the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and 444 to the chemotherapy group. As of August 8, 2023, the median duration of follow-up for survival was 17.2 months. Progression-free survival was longer in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group (median, 12.5 months vs. 6.3 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.54; P<0.001), as was overall survival (median, 31.5 months vs. 16.1 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.58; P<0.001). The median number of cycles was 12 (range, 1 to 46) in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and 6 (range, 1 to 6) in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 55.9% of the patients in the enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab group and in 69.5% of those in the chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab resulted in significantly better outcomes than chemotherapy in patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, with a safety profile consistent with that in previous reports. (Funded by Astellas Pharma US and others; EV-302 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04223856.).
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antineoplastic Agents , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Urologic Neoplasms , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/secondary , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Gemcitabine/administration & dosage , Gemcitabine/adverse effects , Gemcitabine/therapeutic use , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carboplatin/adverse effects , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Survival Analysis , Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urologic Neoplasms/pathology , Urologic Neoplasms/secondaryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Linsitinib, an oral, dual inhibitor of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and insulin receptor, in combination with weekly paclitaxel, may improve clinical outcomes compared with paclitaxel alone in patients with refractory or platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label phase 1/2 clinical trial (NCT00889382) randomized patients with refractory or platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (1:1:1) to receive either oral intermittent linsitinib (600mg once daily on Days 1-3 per week) combined with paclitaxel (80mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15; Arm A) or continuous linsitinib (150mg twice daily) in combination with paclitaxel (Arm B), or paclitaxel alone (Arm C). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety/tolerability. RESULTS: A total of 152 women were randomized to treatment (n=51 Arm A; n=51 Arm B, n=50 Arm C). In combination with paclitaxel, neither intermittent linsitinib (median PFS 2.8months; 95% confidence interval [CI]:2.5-4.4) nor continuous linsitinib (median PFS 4.2months; 95% CI:2.8-5.1) improved PFS over weekly paclitaxel alone (median PFS 5.6months; 95% CI:3.2-6.9). No improvement in ORR, DCR, or OS in either linsitinib dosing schedule was observed compared with paclitaxel alone. Adverse event (AE) rates, including all-grade and grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs, and treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation, were higher among patients receiving intermittent linsitinib compared with the other treatment arms. CONCLUSION: Addition of intermittent or continuous linsitinib with paclitaxel did not improve outcomes in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer compared with paclitaxel alone.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Humans , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Organoplatinum Compounds/pharmacology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Pyrazines/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Among women presenting with de novo stage IV breast cancer, 35% to 60% undergo local therapy, presumably to avoid uncontrolled chest wall disease. Several studies suggest that resection of the primary tumor may prolong survival, but chest wall outcome data are notably lacking. The authors reviewed chest wall status, time to first progression (TTFP), and overall survival (OS) in this group of women. METHODS: Women presenting at the Lynn Sage Breast Center (1995-2005) with an intact primary tumor and stage IV breast cancer or postoperative diagnosis of distant metastases were identified. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for relevant covariates, were used to examine associations between surgical treatment and chest wall status, TTFP, and OS. RESULTS: Of 111 eligible women, 47 (42%) underwent early resection of the primary tumor. Chest wall status was available for 103 women. Local control was maintained in 36 of 44 (82%) patients in the surgical group versus 20 of 59 (34%) patients without surgery (P = .001). TTFP was prolonged in the surgical group (adjusted hazards ratio [HR], 0.493; P = .015). The adjusted HR for OS in the surgical group was 0.798 (P = .520). Chest wall control was associated with improved OS regardless of whether surgical resection of the tumor was performed (HR, 0.415; P < .0002). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the notion that improved local control may play a role in improving outcomes in women with stage IV breast cancer, and resection of in-breast tumors can help to achieve this. A randomized trial is needed to rule out selection bias as an explanation for these findings.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Thoracic Wall/pathology , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Effective therapies to reduce the risk of hormone-sensitive breast cancers (ER or PR positive) exist. Available models predict the risk of breast cancer without addressing hormone receptor status. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors predictive of the development of hormone-sensitive cancers. METHODS: A total of 1285 invasive breast cancers in 1263 women were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Risk factors were compared for ER+ and ER- cancers by using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Models were developed for premenopausal and postmenopausal women. In premenopausal women, white race, age at menarche < 12 years, and nulliparity or age at first birth > 20 years were used. The risk of ER+ cancer increased from 67.7% with 0 variables to 83.8% with all three (P = .013). In postmenopausal women, white race and a history of estrogen therapy were used. With none of the variables present, the incidence of ER+ cancer was 70.0%; it was 77.6% with one variable and 85.4% with both variables (P = .002). In postmenopausal women, variables predicted significant differences in hormone sensitivity only for those aged < or = 60 years. In the subset of women with information on alcohol use, adding this variable to the model improved the prediction of hormonal status. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings, if prospectively validated, may help identify those who would obtain the greatest benefit from hormonal chemoprevention strategies for breast cancer risk reduction.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Models, Theoretical , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Chemoprevention , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Menarche , Middle Aged , Parity , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Racial Groups , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
The CTLA-4-mediated signal is a critical step in the down-modulation of immune responses. The therapeutic potential of this signal to induce tissue-specific tolerance was investigated by using an anti-CTLA-4 antibody that was coupled to an antibody specific for the thyrotropin receptor. After in vivo administration, this bispecific antibody (BiAb) accumulated in the thyroid and prevented development of experimental autoimmune thyroiditis (EAT) in mice immunized with mouse thyroglobulin (mTg). Lymphocytes from BiAb-treated mice showed a significant reduction in their ability to proliferate, and to produce IL-2, IFN-gamma and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, in response to mTg re-stimulation compared to lymphocytes from untreated mice. Moreover, BiAb-treated mice showed suppressed anti-mTg antibody response, lymphocytic infiltration of the thyroid and follicular destruction. The BiAb targeted to the thyroid most likely facilitated engagement of CTLA-4, resulting in an increase in the number of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells. These regulatory T cells suppressed in vitro mTg-specific T cell responses, which were associated with an enhanced transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 production. Neutralization of TGF-beta1 increased mTg-specific in vitro proliferation of, and IL-2 production by, T cells from BiAb-treated mice. Our data suggest that engagement of CTLA-4 expressed on activated autoreactive T cells in close proximity to the thyroid can increase the number of regulatory T cells and their ability to produce TGF-beta1, with a concomitant reduction in IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha, resulting in suppression of EAT.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Differentiation/immunology , Signal Transduction/immunology , Thyroiditis, Autoimmune/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Bispecific/blood , Antibodies, Bispecific/immunology , Antigens, CD , CTLA-4 Antigen , Female , Interleukin-10/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred CBA , Serum/immunology , Thymus Gland/immunology , Thyroid Gland/immunology , Thyroiditis, Autoimmune/metabolism , Thyroiditis, Autoimmune/prevention & control , Transforming Growth Factor beta/metabolismABSTRACT
CD80 and CD86 expressed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells interact with cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 [CTLA-4 (CD152)] expressed on activated T cells and mediate critical T cell inhibitory signals. CD80 and CD86 are type I glycoproteins, and are made up of two extracellular (EC) Ig-like domains-a transmembrane region and a cytoplasmic tail. The N-terminal (V domain) and membrane-proximal (C) domains share homology with the variable region (V) and the constant region (C) of Ig respectively. Co-crystallographic structures of both CD80 and CD86 bound to CTLA-4 indicate that there is no direct interaction of the C domain of either CD80 or CD86 with the CTLA-4. In contrast, previous mutagenesis studies have identified specific amino acids within the C domain of CD80 that are critical for CTLA-4 binding. To further understand the importance of C domains in the functioning of CD80 and CD86, we constructed chimeric human CD80 and CD86 molecules by swapping their respective C domains, and tested their ability to stimulate T cells. A Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line expressing CD86 activated murine T cells. In contrast, CHO cells expressing either CD80 or a chimeric construct of the CD86 V domain and the CD80 C domain showed a significantly reduced activation. Our studies further demonstrated that the decreased activation by cells expressing the CD80 or a chimera containing CD80 C domain is most likely due to enhanced CTLA-4 binding. From these results we conclude that C domains play a critical, albeit indirect, role in determining CTLA-4 binding affinities and co-stimulatory properties.