Systematic Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Processes for the Assessment of Radiation Target Volumes in Head and Neck Cancer.

PURPOSE: Significant heterogeneity exists in clinical quality assurance (QA) practices within radiation oncology departments, with most chart rounds lacking prospective peer-reviewed contour evaluation. This has the potential to significantly affect patient outcomes, particularly for head and neck cancers (HNC) given the large variance in target volume delineation. With this understanding, we incorporated a prospective systematic peer contour-review process into our workflow for all patients with HNC. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of implementing prospective peer review into practice for our National Cancer Institute Designated Cancer Center and to report factors associated with contour modifications. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Starting in November 2020, our department adopted a systematic QA process with real-time metrics, in which contours for all patients with HNC treated with radiation therapy were prospectively peer reviewed and graded. Contours were graded with green (unnecessary), yellow (minor), or red (major) colors based on the degree of peer-recommended modifications. Contours from November 2020 through September 2021 were included for analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty contours were included. Contour grades were made up of 89.7% green, 8.9% yellow, and 1.4% red grades. Physicians with >12 months of clinical experience were less likely to have contour changes requested than those with <12 months (8.3% vs 40.9%; P < .001). Contour grades were significantly associated with physician case load, with physicians presenting more than the median number of 50 cases having significantly less modifications requested than those presenting <50 (6.7% vs 13.3%; P = .013). Physicians working with a resident or fellow were less likely to have contour changes requested than those without a trainee (5.2% vs 12.6%; P = .039). Frequency of major modification requests significantly decreased over time after adoption of prospective peer contour review, with no red grades occurring >6 months after adoption. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of prospective peer contour-review implementation into systematic clinical QA processes for HNC. Physician experience proved to be the highest predictor of approved contours. A growth curve was demonstrated, with major modifications declining after prospective contour review implementation. Even within a high-volume academic practice with subspecialist attendings, >10% of patients had contour changes made as a direct result of prospective peer review.

A phase 1 trial of Vorinostat in combination with concurrent chemoradiation therapy in the treatment of advanced staged head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Purpose Vorinostat is a potent HDAC inhibitor that sensitizes head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to cytotoxic therapy while sparing normal epithelium. The primary objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of Vorinostat in combination with standard chemoradiation therapy treatment in HNSCC. Patients and Methods Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed Stage III, IVa, IVb HNSCC, that was unresectable or borderline resectable involving the larynx, hypopharynx, nasopharynx, and oropharynx. Vorinostat was administered at the assigned dosage level (100-400 mg, three times weekly) in a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Vorinostat therapy began 1 week prior to initiation of standard, concurrent chemoradiation therapy and continued during the entire course of therapy. Results Twenty six patients met eligibility criteria and completed the entire protocol. The primary tumor sites included tonsil (12), base of tongue (9), posterior pharyngeal wall (1), larynx (4) and hypopharynx (3). Of the 26 patients, 17 were HPV-positive and 9 were HPV-negative. The MTD of Vorinostat was 300 mg administered every other day. Anemia (n = 23/26) and leukopenia (n = 20/26) were the most commonly identified toxicities. The most common Grade3/4 events included leukopenia (n = 11) and lymphopenia (n = 17). No patient had Grade IV mucositis, dermatitis or xerostomia. The median follow time was 33.8 months (range 1.6-82.9 months). Twenty four of 26 (96.2%) patients had a complete response to therapy. Conclusion Vorinostat in combination with concurrent chemoradiation therapy is a safe and highly effective treatment regimen in HNSCC. There was a high rate of complete response to therapy with toxicity rates comparable, if not favorable to existing therapies. Further investigation in Phase II and III trials is strongly recommended.

Long-term follow-up on an intensified treatment regimen for advanced resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

From February 1993 through July 1994, 37 patients with stage III-IV squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or hypopharynx (stage II-IV) were registered to a treatment regimen consisting of preoperative continuous infusion cisplatin (80 mg/m2/80 hours) with hyperfractionated external beam radiotherapy (9.1 Gy/7 fractions of 1.3 Gy BID), surgical resection, intraoperative radiotherapy (7.5 Gy), and postoperative radiotherapy (40 Gy) with concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 x 2 courses). The objectives of the regimen were to improve patient compliance while also increasing treatment intensity. The purpose of this article is to report the local, regional (nodal), and distant disease control of these patients after an extended time at risk (median 40 months). Overall compliance (73%), local control at primary site (97%), and regional nodal control (95%) were excellent. The rate of distant metastasis was 19%. Absolute survival at 48 months was 45.9%.

Induction paclitaxel in previously untreated, resectable, advanced squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Previous Phase II trials evaluating paclitaxel as a single agent have produced objective response rates of 38-40%. However, in these studies patients had recurrent disease and had received previous treatment with chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or some combination of the same. To the authors' knowledge, the study reported here is the first to examine the role of paclitaxel in affecting objective antitumor response, as a single agent, in a previously untreated patient population. METHODS: Patients with untreated, resectable, advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were eligible for this Phase II trial. The treatment plan included paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2) administered by 24-hour intravenous infusion every 21 days for a total of 3 courses and primary prophylaxis with colony stimulating factor during each course of chemotherapy. Surgical resection was performed after recovery from the final course of chemotherapy. After adequate wound healing, patients received external beam radiotherapy (median dose to primary site, 55.8 Gray [Gy]; median dose to neck sites, 50.4 Gy). RESULTS: Forty-five patients were registered. Thirty-eight patients completed the planned chemotherapy, 41 patients underwent surgical resection, and 37 patients completed the intended radiotherapy. The objective response rate was 50% (10% complete response; 40% partial response). Severe or life-threatening (Grade 3 or higher) granulocytopenia or thrombocytopenia occurred in 78% and 27% of patients, respectively. Two patients died of sepsis. Seventy-one percent, 67%, and 91% of patients were free of local, lymph node, and distant recurrence, respectively, with a median follow-up of 37 months. The 4-year overall survival and disease-related survival rates were 44.4% and 52.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that paclitaxel is an active agent in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma. However, the overall disease control, achieved by using paclitaxel as induction therapy, did not appear to be better than that achieved with standard treatment methods. Combined modality regimens with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy have demonstrated more promise.

Intensification regimen 2 for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility, toxicity, and compliance of an intense treatment regimen for patients with advanced, previously untreated, resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, controlled (phase 1 or 2) clinical trial; median time at risk, 25 months (range, 7 days to 36 months). SETTING: Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus. PATIENTS: Forty-three patients (median age, 59 years; range, 32-76 years) with resectable, previously untreated stage III or IV squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or hypopharynx or stage II squamous cell carcinomas of the hypopharynx (referred sample of patients). INTERVENTIONS: Days 1 to 4, perioperative, slightly accelerated, hyperfractionated radiotherapy (9.1 Gy) to off cord fields; days 1 to 3, cisplatin, 30 mg/m2 per day; day 4, surgical resection and intraoperative radiotherapy boost (7.5 Gy); days 45 to 52, postoperative radiotherapy (40 Gy to the primary site and upper neck and 45 Gy to the supraclavicular areas); days 24, 45, and 66, paclitaxel, 135 mg/m2 per 24 hours, with routine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support; and days 25 and 46, cisplatin, 100 mg/m2. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Toxicity, compliance, local control, and distant metastatic rates. RESULTS: Patient compliance was 91% (39 of 43 patients), but protocol compliance was only 58% (25 of 43 patients), reflecting increased toxicity of the systemic regimen (2 [5%] of the 43 patients experienced grade 5 hematologic toxicity due to the regimen; 16 [37%], grade 4; and 10 [23%], grade 3). Local-regional control was 92% (23 of 25 patients), and the distant metastatic rate was 8% (2 of 25) in patients completing treatment per protocol. One patient had surgical salvage of a second primary tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Local control and patient compliance were encouraging, but systemic toxicity was unacceptable. Thus, the paclitaxel was changed to a weekly regimen.

Intraoperative high dose rate brachytherapy can be used to salvage patients with previously irradiated head and neck recurrences.

PURPOSE: To develop a novel technique, intraoperative high-dose rate brachytherapy (IOHDR), in the treatment of previously irradiated head and neck cancers located at anatomical sites inaccessible to intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT). METHODS: Between October 1992 and June 1997, seven patients (median age = 65 yrs; range = 52 to 71 years) with previously irradiated head and neck recurrences at anatomical sites inaccessible to IOERT in the base of skull were treated with IOHDR after maximal resection for microscopic residual disease. Treatment volume ranged from 6 cc to 24 cc. Six patients received 15 Gy of IOHDR at 0.5 cm; one received 10 Gy using custom-made surface foam applicators. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 59 months (range 33 to 67 months). It was technically feasible to deliver IOHDR in all seven patients at sites that were inaccessible to IOERT. The morbidity (observed in two patients) was acceptable and generally surgically related. Four of seven patients (57%) were locally controlled at IOHDR site. Two failed regionally, outside the IOHDR treated sites. The disease-free survival ranged from 3 to 30 months (median 9 months) with two patients still alive, disease-free at 28 and 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: IOHDR can be used, with limited toxicity, to treat previously irradiated head and neck cancers at sites inaccessible to IOERT. We are currently evaluating the addition of limited EBRT dose to improve the local control of these poor prognosis recurrent tumors.

Intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy for previously irradiated advanced head and neck malignancies.

PURPOSE: This is a retrospective review to evaluate the role of surgery and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT) in the treatment of patients with previously irradiated advanced head and neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1992 and March 1997, 38 patients (31 males, 7 females; median age of 62 years) with recurrent head and neck cancer were treated with maximal resection and IOERT at the Ohio State University (OSU). All had been previously treated with full-course radiotherapy (median 65.1 Gy, range 50-74.4 Gy). Twenty-nine patients (76%) had previously undergone one or more surgical procedures. After maximal surgery the tumor bed was treated with IOERT (single field in 36 patients and 2 fields in 2 patients), most commonly with 6 MeV electrons (87%). The dose administered (at 90% isodose line) was 15 Gy for close or microscopically positive margins in 34 patients and 20 Gy for gross disease in 1 patient. Further external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) was not given. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 30 months (range 8-39 months), 24 of the 38 patients (66%) recurred within the IOERT field. Median time to IOERT failure was 6 months (95% CI: 4.3-7.7). The 6-month, 1-, and 2-year control rates within the IOERT volume were 41%, 19%, and 13%, respectively. Thirty of the 38 patients (79%) recurred in locoregional areas. Median time to locoregional failure was 4 months (95% CI: 3.3-4.7). The 6-month, 1-, and 2-year locoregional control rates were 33%, 11%, and 4%, respectively. Distant metastases occurred in 7 patients, 5 in association with IOERT failure and 2 with locoregional failure. Median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI: 4.7-9.3). The 6-month, 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 51%, 21%, 21%, and 8%, respectively. Major treatment-related complications occurred in 6 patients (16%). CONCLUSION: IOERT alone, at the dose used, is not sufficient for control of recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancers. Since higher IOERT doses are associated with high morbidity, we are currently evaluating the addition of limited EBRT dose and/or brachytherapy to improve the local control of these poor prognostic recurrent tumors, with acceptable morbidity.

Boron neutron capture therapy: principles and potential.

This book on the therapeutic applications of neutrons and high-LET radiations in cancer therapy would not have been complete without a review of the present situation of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) and a discussion of its future perspectives. BNCT is a special type of high-LET radiation therapy that attempts to achieve a selectivity at the cellular level. The rationale is to incorporate boron atoms selectively in the cancer cells and then bombard those atoms with thermal neutrons to produce a neutron capture reaction and subsequent decay that emits alpha and lithium particles. The efficiency of the technique depends upon achieving selective incorporation of the boron atoms in the cancer cells and not (or to a lesser extent) in the normal cells. The present status and future directions are described, with emphasis on boron carriers (drugs) and their delivery, as well as physical and treatment planning aspects.

Intraoperative high dose rate brachytherapy in recurrent or metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The survival of patients with recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer usually is less than 12 months. In an attempt to improve this dismal prognosis, we investigated the role of intraoperative high dose rate brachytherapy (IOHDR) in the management of these patients. METHODS: From April 1992 to December 1996, 26 patients with locally recurrent or metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated with maximal surgical resection and IOHDR. Intraoperative radiation dose ranged from 10 to 20 Gy, prescribed at 0.5 cm depth. The residual tumor irradiated was microscopic in 16 patients (62%) and gross residual in 10 patients (38%). Six patients received postoperative external beam radiation therapy. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 28 months (range 6 to 54 months), seven of 15 evaluable patients (47%) failed in the area treated with IOHDR. The median time to local failure was 21 months (range 4 to 52 months). The median survival was 23 months (microscopic 24 months; gross 17 months), with a 4-year actuarial survival rate of 36%. Major morbidity was observed in 7 patients (47%) and usually was surgery-related. CONCLUSION: The use of IOHDR in association with radical resection increases local control in patients with recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients with microscopic residual disease achieved a better result than do those with gross residual disease. Future strategies include the addition of limited EBRT dose to IOHDR, even for previously irradiated patients.

Intensified regimen for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: To devise an intensified treatment regimen for patients with advanced, resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. DESIGN: Phase I/II clinical trial consisting of perioperative cisplatin chemoradiotherapy, surgical resection, intraoperative radiotherapy, and postoperative cisplatin chemoradiotherapy. SETTING: The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus. PATIENTS: Thirty-seven patients (median age, 63 years) with advanced oral cavity, oropharyngeal, or hypopharyngeal carcinomas. RESULTS: The range of time at risk was 1 to 30 months (median, 21 months). Thirty of the 37 registered patients were analyzable; 11 have died (5 with distant metastases; 1 of lung carcinoma; and 5 were cancer-free); 2 experienced second primary tumors in the oral cavity (out of or adjacent to the previous radiotherapy portals). Treatment compliance was excellent (92%), morbidity was low, and excellent locoregional control was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: The initial results are encouraging; the future strategy will intensify the systemic component of therapy based on results from concurrent laboratory studies.

Pilot study of intraoperative high dose rate brachytherapy for head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To develop a new technique, intraoperative high dose rate brachytherapy (IOHDR), to deliver localized radiation therapy intraoperatively to head and neck tumors at sites inaccessible to intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOEBRT) in the skull base region. METHODS: After maximal surgical resection, afterloading catheters spaced 1 cm apart embedded in custom surface applicators made of foam or silicone were placed on resected tumor beds. IOHDR was delivered in a shielded operating room using preplanned dosimetry with a nominal 10 Ci iridium-192 source in an HDR micro-Selectron afterloader. Twenty-nine patients (20 males, 9 females) ranging in age from 9 to 80 years (median = 61) were irradiated intraoperatively for advanced head and neck tumors at sites inaccessible to IOEBRT. Six patients who had previously received external beam radiation (EBRT) ranging from 50 to 75 Gy, were given 15 Gy of IOHDR only. Twenty-three patients who had no prior radiation received 7.5 to 12.5 Gy IOHDR, and 45 to 50 Gy EBRT was planned post-operatively; however, six of these patients did not complete the planned EBRT. Doses to normal tissues were reduced whenever possible by shielding with lead or by displacement with gauze or retractors. Treatment time ranged from 3.8 to 23 min (median = 6.5 min). Five patients received concurrent cis-platinum based chemotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients treated to 30 sites had local tumor control of 67% and crade survival of 72%, with the follow-up ranging from 3 to 33 months (median = 21 months). In the group of 17 previously unirradiated patients who had completed full treatment (IOHDR and EBRT) to 18 sites, the local tumor control was 89%, and all of these patients survived. Tumor control in the six previously unirradiated patients who did not complete EBRT was 50% with a crude survival of 50%. In the group of six previously irradiated patients treated by IOHDR only, the local tumor control was 17% with a crude survival of 17%. No intraoperative complications were noted. The delayed morbidity included cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak with bone exposure (1), chronic subdural hematoma (1), septicemia (1), otitis media (1), and severe xerostomia (1). We cannot comment on long-term morbidity due to the relatively short follow-up period of 21 months. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to deliver IOHDR, with acceptable toxicity, to skull base tumors at sites inaccessible to IOEBRT. The use of IOHDR as a pre-radiotherapy boost produced excellent local control and survival in the selected group of patients who had no previous radiation therapy. The use of exclusive IOHDR in the previously irradiated group resulted in poor outcome, possibly due to the limitations on re-irradiation doses and/or volumes determined by normal tissue tolerance or because these patients have inherently radioresistant tumors. Higher IOHDR doses, additional EBRT, and/or chemotherapy should be considered for this group. The use of IOHDR as a pre-EBRT boost to maximize local control has a promising future in the treatment of carefully selected patients with advanced skull base tumor.

Aggressive chemotherapy, organ-preserving surgery, and high-dose-rate remote brachytherapy in the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma in infants and young children.

BACKGROUND: External beam radiation therapy often is avoided in the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in young children because of the long-term sequelae. Conventional brachytherapy can reduce these problems, but its use is limited in young children because of radiation exposure to parents and care-givers. This is the first reported use of high-dose-rate remote brachytherapy (HDR) to treat RMS in young children. METHODS: Seven young children with RMS were treated from January 1990 through September 1991 with multiagent chemotherapy, organ preserving surgery, and HDR. The primary tumor sites included the tongue, buccal mucosa, chest wall, vagina, and clitoris. A minimum peripheral dose of 36 Gy HDR was administered in 12 fractions (twice a day) at 3 Gy per fraction for a period of 3 days. The treatment was given on an outpatient basis without requiring prolonged patient sedation or immobilization. Each treatment lasted 2-5 minutes. RESULTS: All seven children are alive and without evidence of tumor with a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 18-35 months) from diagnosis. The treatments have been reasonably well tolerated with some acute skin toxicity. There has been relatively good organ growth and function during this short follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The use of HDR radiation in these patients eliminated radiation exposure to care-givers and permitted constant nursing care and interaction among the parents, nursing personnel, and child. Treatments can be given on an outpatient basis, without requiring prolonged patient sedation or immobilization. Local control of tumor with preservation of organ function was achieved. HDR in young children should be restricted to controlled clinical trials until long-term morbidity and efficacy results are obtained from pilot studies.