Indirect comparison of capmatinib treatment from GEOMETRY mono-1 trial to SOC in German patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring METex14 skipping mutations.

BACKGROUND: This study provides comparative evidence of the selective MET inhibitor capmatinib versus standard of care (SOC) in first-line (1 L) and second-line (2 L) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with METex14 mutations in German routine care. METHODS: SOC data were collected from German routine care via retrospective chart review. Analyses were conducted as naive and propensity score adjusted (PSA) comparisons to capmatinib-treated patients within the GEOMETRY mono-1 trial. Effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), time to CNS progression (CNSprog), and exploratory safety endpoints. RESULTS: The SOC arm included 119 patients in 1 L and 46 in 2 L versus 60 patients in 1 L and 81 in 2 L treated with capmatinib, with balanced baseline characteristics after PSA. In 1 L, the naive comparison showed a significant benefit of capmatinib versus SOC for OS (median: 25.49 vs 14.59 months; HR 0.58; 95 % CI 0.39-0.87; P = 0.011), PFS (median: 12.45 vs 5.03 months; HR: 0.44; 95 % CI: 0.31-0.63; P < 0.001), and ORR (event rate: 68.3 vs 26.9 %; RR 2.54; 95 % CI 1.80-3.58; P < 0.001). In 2 L, OS, PFS, and ORR showed positive trends favoring capmatinib over SOC. Capmatinib treatment in the 1 L and 2 L led to significant benefit in CNSprog. PSA analyses showed consistent results to naive analysis. Exploratory safety endpoints indicated a manageable safety profile for capmatinib. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the important role of capmatinib in providing robust clinically meaningful benefit to patients with NSCLC harboring METex14 mutations and its significant role in preventing the development of brain metastases.

Clinical management of NUT carcinoma (NC) in Germany: Analysis of survival, therapy response, tumor markers and tumor genome sequencing in 35 adult patients.

NUT carcinomas (NC) are very rare and highly aggressive tumors, molecularly defined by an aberrant gene fusion involving the NUTM1 gene. NCs preferentially arise intrathoracically or in the head and neck region, having a highly adverse prognosis with almost no long-term survivors. Here, we report on a cohort of 35 adult NC patients who were evaluated at University Hospital Tuebingen in an eight year time span, i.e. between 2016 and 2023. Primary objectives were overall survival (OS) and influence of primary tumor locations, fusion gene types and staging on OS. Secondary objectives were patient baseline characteristics, risk factors, tumor markers, treatment decisions and responses to therapy comparing thoracic vs non-thoracic origins. Further, data from tumor genome sequencing were analyzed. In this monocentric German cohort, 54 % of patients had thoracic tumors and 65 % harbored a BRD4-NUTM1 fusion gene. Median OS was 7.5 months, being significantly dependent on primary tumor location and nodal status. Initial misdiagnosis was a problem in 31 % of the cases. Surgery was the first treatment in most patients (46 %) and 80 % were treated with polychemotherapies, showing longer progression free survival (PFS) with ifosfamide-based than with platinum-based regimens. Patients treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in addition to first-line chemotherapy tended to have longer OS. Initial LDH levels could be identified as a prognostic measure for survival prognosis. Sequencing data highlight aberrant NUTM1 fusion genes as unique tumor driver genes. This is the largest adult European cohort of this orphan tumor disease, showing epidemiologic and molecular features as well as relevant clinical data. Awareness to prevent misdiagnosis, fast contact to a specialized nation-wide center and referral to clinical studies are essential as long-term survival is rarely achieved with any of the current therapeutic regimes.